Open Access

Anti-plasmodial and insecticidal activities of the essential oils of aromatic plants growing in the Mediterranean area

  • Mario Dell’Agli1Email author,
  • Cinzia Sanna2,
  • Patrizia Rubiolo3,
  • Nicoletta Basilico4,
  • Elisa Colombo1,
  • Maria M Scaltrito4,
  • Mamadou Ousmane Ndiath5,
  • Luca Maccarone3,
  • Donatella Taramelli1,
  • Carlo Bicchi3,
  • Mauro Ballero2 and
  • Enrica Bosisio1
Malaria Journal201211:219

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-219

Received: 25 April 2012

Accepted: 19 June 2012

Published: 2 July 2012

Abstract

Background

Sardinia is a Mediterranean area endemic for malaria up to the last century. During a screening study to evaluate the anti-plasmodial activity of some aromatic plants traditionally used in Sardinia, Myrtus communis (myrtle, Myrtaceae), Satureja thymbra (savory, Lamiaceae), and Thymus herba-barona (caraway thyme, Lamiaceae) were collected in three vegetative periods: before, during and after flowering.

Methods

The essential oils were obtained by steam distillation, fractionated by silica gel column chromatography and analysed by GC-FID-MS. Total oil and three main fractions were tested on D10 and W2 strains of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Larvicidal and adulticidal activities were tested on Anopheles gambiae susceptible strains.

Results

The essential oil of savory, rich in thymol, was the most effective against P. falciparum with an inhibitory activity independent from the time of collection (IC50 17–26 μg/ml on D10 and 9–11 μg/ml on W2). Upon fractionation, fraction 1 was enriched in mono-sesquiterpenoid hydrocarbons; fraction 2 in thymol (73-83%); and fraction 3 contained thymol, carvacrol and terpinen-4-ol, with a different composition depending on the time of collection. Thymol-enriched fractions were the most active on both strains (IC50 20–22 μg/ml on D10 and 8–10 μg/ml on W2) and thymol was confirmed as mainly responsible for this activity (IC50 19.7± 3.0 and 10.6 ± 2.0 μg/ml on D10 and W2, respectively). The essential oil of S. thymbra L. showed also larvicidal and adulticidal activities. The larvicidal activity, expressed as LC50, was 0.15 ± 0.002; 0.21 ± 0.13; and 0.15 ± 0.09 μg/ml (mean ± sd) depending on the time of collection: before, during and after flowering, respectively.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence for the use of essential oils for treating malaria and fighting the vector at both the larval and adult stages. These findings open the possibility for further investigation aimed at the isolation of natural products with anti-parasitic properties.

Keywords

Essential oil Insecticidal activity Plasmodium falciparum Satureja thymbra Myrtus communis Thymus herba-barona Thymol Anopheles gambiae

Background

Malaria, with AIDS and tuberculosis, is one of the three major communicable diseases linked to poverty. The unavailability of a vaccine and the spread and intensification of drug resistance over the past 15–20 years have led to a dramatic decline in the efficacy of the most affordable anti-malarial drugs. Because of their importance to humans since ancient times, plants have been the object of relevant scientific investigations to identify bioactive anti-plasmodial compounds [1], a view supported by the fact that natural products have become effective drugs against malaria.

In addition to anti-malarial drugs, plant constituents are of interest for application as insecticides and repellents. Among plant-derived compounds, essential oils (EOs) received great attention due to the variety of their biological activities including anti-bacterial, fungicidal, pesticidal, and anti-malarial [2]. Most of plant-based insecticides and repellents are derived from plants containing EOs. Receptors responding to DEET (N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), also respond to thujone, eucalyptol and linalool [3].

Sardinia is a region of Italy endemic for malaria until the first half of the past century. The infection was counteracted through the use of autochthonous plants as febrifuge or mosquito control agents. This Mediterranean island is rich in aromatic plants used for their content in EOs. Plants in the Sardinian flora include Myrtus communis (myrtle, Myrtaceae), Satureja thymbra (savory, Lamiaceae), and Thymus herba-barona (caraway thyme, Lamiaceae) [4].

A decoction of myrtle was in use for the treatment of malarial fevers. The EOs of several plants including myrtle showed anti-plasmodial activity towards various strains of Plasmodium falciparum[1, 5].

Myrtle is a potent anti-bacterial and may work as an immune-stimulant in fighting cold, influenza or infectious diseases. Recent reports have described the anti-oxidant [6] and anti-inflammatory [7] activities of myrtle extracts. Oligomeric acylphloroglucinols were isolated from myrtle leaves and showed potent multi-drug resistant anti-bacterial effects [8, 9]. Myrtucommulone, one of the acylphloroglucinols, inhibited Plasmodium growth in a nanomolar range [8], and caused a striking reduction of parasitaemia in mice infected with Plasmodium berghei[10].

Savory is a perennial aromatic shrub growing in the East Mediterranean basin from Turkey to Greece and Libya. In Italy, it grows only in Southern Sardinia. Previous studies reported a larvicidal activity by the EO of S. thymbra against the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster, and Culex pipiens, the vector responsible for the transmission of West-Nile virus, filariasis and Japanese encephalitis [11]. The EO obtained from this plant also showed an acaricidal activity [12]. The EO of myrtle and savory showed insecticidal activity against adults of the Mediterranean flour moth Ephesta kuehniella, the Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella and the bean weevil Acanthoscelides obtectus[13].

Caraway thyme is a perennial plant endemic in Majorca, Corsica and Sardinia [14]. The EO of caraway thyme showed larvicidal effects on Limantria dispar, one of the most serious pests of cork oak forests [15]. The EOs of Thymus spp (T. transpicatus, and T. vulgaris) and Myrtus communis showed larvicidal activity against Anopheles[1619]. Thymus spp (vulgaris and serpyllus) and Myrtus communis were shown to be repellent against Aedes, Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes [20, 21]. Thyme EO is patented for anophelifuge activity [22].

In view of the increasing interest in developing new anti-malarials or insecticides of natural origin as an alternative to chemical insecticides, this study selected plant species from the Sardinia flora traditionally used to combat malaria. The EOs of S. thymbra, M. communis, and T. herba-barona were obtained and tested for anti-plasmodial activity against P. falciparum. The EO of S. thymbra was also tested for adulticidal/larvicidal activity against Anopheles gambiae.

Methods

Chemicals

Pure standard of α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, limonene, terpinen-4-ol, sabinene hydrate, thymol, germacrene D, caryophyllene oxide, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milan, Italy). They were selected as representative of the different chemical classes of the essential oil components for the calculation of response factors towards an internal standard (n-decane) to correct the potential shift of flame ionization detector (FID) response towards the different classes of compounds [23]. Standard solutions at different concentrations of each of them containing 5 μg/μl of n-decane as internal standard were dissolved in cycloexane. Solvents were all HPLC grade from Riedel de Haen (Seelze, Germany).

Plant material and essential oil preparation

Aerial parts of M. communis, S. thymbra and T. herba-barona were collected in Jerzu, Cagliari and Osini (Sardinia, Italy), respectively, in three different periods, before (sample A), during (sample B) and after flowering (sample C) to investigate how the variability of the EO could affect the biological activity.

They were botanically identified and registered with the specimen numbers 514 (Myrtus), 1,079 (Satureja) and 1,065 (Thymus) at the General Herbarium of Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente, Macrosezione Botanica e Orto botanico, University of Cagliari (CAG). EOs from fresh plant materials were obtained in agreement with the European Pharmacopoeia VII ed.: fresh crushed aerial parts were submitted to steam distillation for five hours. The resulting EOs were left to stabilize for one hour.

Successively, each sample (A, B, C) of the essential oil of S. thymbra was fractionated on silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether (PE) with increasing amount of ethyl acetate (EtOAc), giving seven fractions, three of them in significant amounts (fractions A1-A3, B1-B3, C1-C3, see Results).

Essential oil analyses

GC analyses were carried out with a Thermo Electron TRACE GC Ultra (Rodano, Italy) provided with a FID detector. GC/MS analysis was carried out with a Thermo Electron TRACE GC Ultra coupled to a Trace DSQ mass spectrometer operating in Electron Impact mode.

GC-FID-MS analyses were carried out on a Mega5 column (5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane) 25 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 mm film thickness, from MEGA (Milan – Italy). GC and GC-MS conditions: injection mode: split; split ratio: 1: 20. Temperatures: injector: 220°C, transfer line: 230°C; ion source: 230°C; carrier gas: He, flow-rate: 1.0 ml/min in constant flow-mode. MS detector operated in electron impact ionization mode (EI) at 70 eV, scan rate was 1,111 amu/s and mass range of 35–350 m/z. Temperature program: from 50°C (1 min) to 220°C (5 min) at 3°C/min.

The components were identified by comparison of both their linear retention indices (IsT), calculated versus a C8-C25 hydrocarbon mixture, and their mass spectra to those of authentic samples or with data from the literature [24]. The FID response factors were used for the semi-quantitative determination of the volatile components.

Anti-plasmodial activity

The chloroquine (CQ) -sensitive (D10) and the CQ-resistant (W2) strains of P. falciparum were sustained in vitro as described by Trager and Jensen [25]. Parasites were maintained at 5% haematocrit (human type A-positive red blood cells) in RPMI 1640 (EuroClone, Pero, Milan, Italy) medium with the addition of 1% AlbuMaxII (Invitrogen, Monza, Italy), 0.01% hypoxantine 20 mM Hepes (EuroClone, Pero, Milan, Italy), 2 mM glutamine (EuroClone, Pero, Milan, Italy). The viability and parasitaemia of cultured parasites was evaluated by light microscopy analysis of Giemsa-stained blood smears. The parasitaemia was maintained within 1% and 4% diluting the cultures with uninfected erythrocytes in complete medium at 5% haematocrit. All cultures were maintained at 37°C in a standard gas mixture consisting of 1% O2, 5% CO2, 94% N2.

The EOs and fractions were dissolved in DMSO and then diluted with a medium to achieve the required concentrations (final DMSO concentration <1%, which is non-toxic to the parasite). Asynchronous cultures with parasitaemia of 1–1.5% and 1% final haematocrit were aliquoted into the plates and incubated for 72 hrs at 37°C. Parasite growth was determined spectrophotometrically (OD: 650 nm) by measuring the activity of the parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), according to a modified version of Makler’s method in control and drug-treated cultures [26]. EOs and fractions were tested at 1–100 μg/ml. Anti-plasmodial activity is expressed as the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50), each IC50 value is the mean ± standard deviation (sd) of at least three separate experiments performed in duplicate. Chloroquine was used as positive reference compound at 0.8-100 ng/ml and 8–1000 ng/ml on D10 and W2 strains, respectively.

Plasmepsin II inhibition assay

Pro-plasmepsin (Pro-PLM) II was prepared according to the procedure previously described [27], with slight modifications [28]. Protein was diluted to the final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml in 50% glycerol and stored at −20°C. Pro-PLM II was activated by addition of one tenth volume of 100 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 4.7 following by incubation at 37°C for 90 min. The enzyme activity of PLM II was evaluated spectrophotometrically at 300 nm by following the cleavage of the chromogenic substrate Lys-Glu-Phe-Val-Phe-NPhe-Ala-Leu-Lys (where NPhe is para-nitro-phenylalanine), as described [28].

Satureja thymbra EO was tested at 1–50 μg/ml dissolved in DMSO (final concentration <1% of the sample volume). IC50 values (mean ± sd of three experiments in triplicate) were obtained using Graph Pad Prism 4.

Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxicity was evaluated in human neonatal dermal fibroblasts (Cell applications, inc. San Diego, CA, USA, cat number 106-05n). Cell proliferation was followed by the MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) test. Fibroblasts (2 × 104/ml) were grown in DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium) containing 10% foetal calf serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% L- glutamine. The compounds to be tested were added to culture medium dissolved in DMSO 48 hrs after plating. The final concentration of the vehicle in control and test medium was 0.1% of the incubation volume. The effect of compounds (10–100 μg/ml) on cell proliferation was assayed at 24–48 hrs after treatment. Each concentration was tested in triplicate in three separate experiments.

Adulticidal activity

Anopheles gambiae, molecular form M, originated from Yaoundé, Cameroon and maintained since more than one decade under the conditions of the insectary in IRD Dakar Senegal (at temperature 28 ± 2°C and relative humidity 80% + −5%) were used [29]. All mosquitoes were 100% susceptible to pyrethroids, DDT, bendiocarb and fenitrothion. To measure the ability of the EO to kill adult mosquitoes, bottle test bioassays were conducted according to the method of Brogdon and McAllister [30], with acetone as solvent. Twenty-five mosquitoes, aged three days from the susceptible Dakar strain, were used. For each EO, solutions were prepared at concentrations of 8.3 μg/ml, 16.6 μg/ml, 24.91 μg/ml, 32.22 μg/ml, 41.52 μg/ml, 49.88 μg/ml, 58.13 μg/ml and 66.44 μg/ml. Four replicates were set up for each concentration, using 1 ml of solution/bottle. Deltamethrin 12.5 μg/ml was used for positive control while the negative control was acetone. Mortality was assessed every 15 min. With practice, the mortality of mosquitoes in the control bottle at two hours should be zero. In most cases, mortality of up to 3% in the control bottles may be ignored. The data were corrected using the Abbot’s formula [31] for mortalities in the control ranging 3-10%. A dose-mortality line depending on the exposure time was developed.

Larvicidal activity

The larvicidal activity was performed according to the guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides published by WHO (who/cds/whopes/gcdpp/2005.13), with minor modifications.

A laboratory colony of An. gambiae larvae (susceptible strain) was used for the larvicidal activity of EO collected at the three stages (samples A, B and C). Twenty-five third instars larvae were kept in 500 ml glass beaker containing aqueous suspension of EO at dilution from 14 to 75%. Four replicates were set up for each dilution. The negative control was exposed to water. Larval mortality was assessed after 24 hrs of exposure by probing the larvae with needle and moribund larvae were counted as dead. A dose-mortality line was recorded and the lethal concentration of EO needed to kill 50% (LC50) of larvae was determined.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with Graph Pad Prism 4 software, using t test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The significance was set at p <0.05.

Results

Essential oil yield and composition

The yield of the EOs from S. thymbra M. communis and T. herba-barona collected before (A), during (B) and after (C) flowering are reported in Table 1. Maximum amount of the oil was present during flowering, with the exception of T. herba-barona. Tables 23, and 4 list the components identified in the EOs, together with the Linear Retention Indices (IsT) on Mega 5 column compared to the corresponding value from the literature [24], and the quantitative data (g/100 g) obtained by using the response factors (RFs) calculated for all the chemical groups present in the EO (see Methods). The EO of M. communis was rich in α-pinene, limonene and 1,8-cineole (Table 2), the EO of T. herba-barona was rich in linalool and carvacrol (Table 3), the EO of S. thymbra was rich in thymol and γ-terpinene (Table 4). Since the EO of S. thymbra was the most active against P. falciparum, it was submitted to fractionation. Three main fractions (1–3) were obtained from each S. thymbra EO (Table 5): fraction A1, B1 and C1 are characterized by a mixture of monoterpene and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons accounting respectively for the 47%, 48% and 20% of the total oil; in fractions A2, B2, C2 thymol and carvacrol are the main components accounting for about 80% of the composition of these fractions representing 8%, 24% and 33% of the total oil, respectively; in fractions A3, B3, and C3 which represent only 7% of the total oil, thymol content is lower with respect to the corresponding fraction 2.
Table 1

Collection date and site, and EO recovery

Plant

Sample*

Collection date

Site

Drug weight (Kg)

Oil weight (g)

Oil volume (ml)

 

A

April 2009

 

3.4

2.0

3.0

M. communis aerial parts

B

June 2009

Jerzu (Ogliastra)

1.5

6.8

8.5

 

C

July 2009

 

2.6

5.5

6.5

 

A

April 2009

 

2.0

5.4

6.0

S. thymbra aerial parts

B

June 2009

Cagliari

2.3

15.7

17.0

 

C

July 2009

 

1.1

8.0

9.3

 

A

May 2009

 

1.0

3.0

3.5

T. herba-barona aerial parts

B

June 2009

Osini (Ogliastra)

0.8

1.7

2.2

 

C

July 2009

 

1.4

4.9

6.0

* sample A: before flowering; sample B: during flowering; sample C: after flowering.

Table 2

Composition of Myrtus communis essential oil before (A), during (B) and after (C) flowering

   

Sample A

Sample B

Sample C

Compound

ITS.EXPa

ITS. LITb

g/100g

g/100g

g/100g

α-Thujene

929

930

0.56

0.75

0.69

α-Pinene

938

936

78.00

56.6

54.77

Sabinene

975

975

n.r.

0.12

0.07

β-Pinene

977

979

0.45

0.60

0.58

β-Myrcene

992

991

0.12

0.31

0.20

α-Phellandrene

1003

1003

0.35

1.34

0.64

δ-2-Carene

1009

1002

0.84

0.98

0.94

α-Terpinene

1017

1017

0.07

0.35

0.19

p-Cimene

1025

1025

1.32

0.51

1.27

Limonene

1030

1029

5.54

5.68

6.53

E-β-Ocimene

1051

1050

0.37

1.06

0.78

γ-Terpinene

1060

1060

0.53

1.47

1.03

α-Terpinolene

1088

1089

0.50

1.86

1.20

Linalool

1099

1097

0.66

1.55

1.85

Terpinen-4-ol

1177

1177

0.07

0.27

0.34

α-Terpineol

1189

n.r.-

0.32

3.00

3.40

Geraniol

1257

1253

0.11

0.57

0.32

Terpinyl acetate

1350

1349

0.12

0.57

n.r.

Eugenol

1357

1359

n.r.

0.15

n.r.

Geranyl acetate

1385

1381

1.16

2.38

2.23

β-Elemene

1390

1391

0.12

0.08

0.41

Methyl eugenol

1404

1404

0.25

0.41

0.33

β-Caryophyllene

1416

1419

1.58

1.41

1.23

γ-Elemene

1432

1437

0.10

0.39

0.19

α-Humulene

1451

1455

0.54

0.47

0.44

β-Selinene

1483

1490

n.r.

n.r.

0.17

α-Selinene

1491

1498

n.r.

n.r.

0.21

δ-Cadinene

1521

1523

0.10

0.10

0.11

Germacrene B

1554

1561

0.28

0.97

0.40

Caryophyllene oxide

1579

1583

1.11

0.10

0.25

TOTAL

  

99.32

99.64

99.70

GC-FID-MS analyses were carried out on a Mega5 column (5%phenyl methyl polysiloxane) 25 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness.

aExperimental Linear Retention Index on Mega5 Column.

b Linear Retention Index on Mega5 Column from Literature (Ref Adams 2007).

Table 3

Composition of Thymus herba-barona essential oil before (A) during(B) and after (C) flowering

   

Sample A

Sample B

Sample C

Compound

ITS.EXPa

ITS.LITb

g/100g

g/100g

g/100g

Heptanone

-

892

1.30

1.61

1.81

α-Thujene

929

930

0.17

0.18

0.16

α-Pinene

935

936

0.17

0.25

0.19

Camphene

950

954

0.25

0.43

0.33

Octanone

987

984

2.03

2.38

2.32

β-Myrcene

992

991

0.24

0.23

0.20

Octanol

996

995

0.20

0.98

1.07

α-Terpinene

1017

1017

0.20

0.19

0.19

p-Cymene

1025

1025

1.00

0.87

0.94

Limonene

1030

1029

0.11

0.10

0.11

γ-Terpinene

1060

1060

1.83

1.45

1.24

Z-Sabinene hydrate

1068

1070

0.23

0.25

0.09

Nonanone

1088

1090

0.41

0.46

0.59

Linalool

1104

1097

38.86

47.26

55.15

Borneol

1166

1169

2.89

3.63

3.05

Terpinen-4-ol

1177

1177

0.44

0.44

0.45

Carvacrol methyl ether

1245

1245

0.27

1.38

0.55

Thymol

1293

1290

0.81

0.70

0.22

Carvacrol

1307

1299

45.00

34.60

28.59

Carvacrol acetate

1374

1373

0.31

n.r.

n.r.

β-Caryophyllene

1417

1419

2.20

2.06

1.67

trans-α-Bergamotene

1435

1435

0.06

0.06

0.06

α-Humulene

1451

1455

0.08

0.08

0.06

Caryophyllene oxide

1579

1583

0.63

0.32

0.38

TOTAL

  

99.69

99.91

99.42

a Experimental Linear Retention Index on Mega5 Column.

b Linear Retention Index on Mega5 Column from Literature (Adams 2007).

Table 4

Composition of Satureja thymbra essential oil before (A) during (B) and after (C) flowering

   

Sample A

Sample B

SampleC

Compound

ITSEXPa

ITS. LITb

g/100g

g/100g

g/100g

α-Thujene

929

930

1.1

1.1

0.9

α-Pinene

935

936

1.5

1.4

1.7

Camphene

950

954

0.7

0.6

0.7

Sabinene

974

975

0.2

0.2

0.1

β-Pinene

977

979

0.7

0.7

0.9

β-Myrcene

991

991

1.4

1.2

1.2

α-Phellandrene

1003

1003

0.2

0.2

0.2

α-Terpinene

1017

1017

2.4

2.0

1.6

p-Cymene

1025

1025

6.7

4.3

4.8

Limonene

1029

1029

0.8

0.6

0.7

Cis β-Ocimene

1040

1037

1.0

0.3

0.3

Trans β-Ocimene

1050

1050

1.2

0.4

0.4

γ -Terpinene

1061

1060

27.0

18.2

11.8

cis-Sabinene hydrate

1068

1070

0.1

0.1

0.2

α-Terpinolene

1088

1089

0.1

0.1

0.1

trans-Sabinene hydrate

1097

1098

0.1

0.1

0.1

Linalool

1099

1097

0.1

0.2

0.2

Borneol

1165

1169

1.0

1.0

1.6

Terpinen-4-ol

1177

1177

0.3

0.3

0.4

Thymol methyl ether

1244

1235

1.8

1.3

1.8

Thymol

1293

1290

36.0

52.6

57.1

Carvacrol

1300

1299

1.8

2.8

3.5

Thymol acetate

1354

1352

0.2

0.1

0.3

β-Caryophyillene

1417

1419

5.6

5.0

5.1

α-Humulene

1451

1455

0.2

0.2

0.2

Germacrene D

1479

1485

0.5

0.4

0.1

Caryophyllene oxide

1579

1583

0.9

0.3

0.6

TOTAL

  

93.6

95.7

96.5

a Experimental Linear Retention Index on Mega5 Column.

b Linear Retention Index on Mega5 Column from Literature (Ref Adams 2007).

Table 5

Seasonal composition of S. thymbra EO after fractionation

Compounds

% Composition*

 

A1

A2

A3

B1

B2

B3

C1

C2

C3

γ-terpinene

54

  

50

  

39

  

β-caryophyllene

15

  

15

  

32

  

p-cymene

10

  

11

  

12

  

thymol-methyl-ether

4

  

-

9

 

-

10

 

thymol

 

83

61

 

75

51

 

73

47

carvacrol

 

5

21

 

11

25

 

11

22

thymol acetate

 

3

  

0.5

  

1

 

caryophyllene oxide

 

8

  

3

  

3

 

terpinen-4-ol

  

5

  

7

  

8

Thym./carv. ratio

-

16.6

2.9

-

6.8

2.0

-

6.6

2.1

* sample A: before flowering; sample B: during flowering; sample C: after flowering.

Fraction 1-3 were obtained through fractionation on silicagel column chromatography and analysed by CG-FID-MS on a Mega5 column (5%phenyl methyl polysiloxane) 25 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness.

Anti-plasmodial activity

The anti-plasmodial activity of the EOs of S. thymbra, M. communis and T. herba-barona is reported in Table 6. All EOs inhibited the growth of CQ-resistant and CQ-sensitive strains of P. falciparum in a dose-dependent manner. The EO of S. thymbra was the most active compared to the EOs of the other plants: the anti-plasmodial effect of the EOs collected at the three different flowering stages was in a similar range of IC50s, namely 9–11 μg/ml against D10, and 17.5-26.1 μg/ml against W2.
Table 6

Antiplasmodial activity of the essential oils (EO) of S. thymbra , M. communis and T. herba-barona

EO

D10 IC50(μg/ml)

W2 IC50(μg/ml)

M. communis A

37.3 ± 3.5

28.5 ± 8.9

M. communis B

>50.0

36.5 ± 10.3

M. communis C

21.8 ± 2.2

18.3 ± 12.5

S. thymbra A

26.1 ± 10

11.3 ± 6.5

S. thymbra B

17.5 ± 6.6

9.0 ± 3.3

S. thymbra C

21.3 ± 4.2

9.7 ± 2.8

T. herba-barona A

29.1 ± 6.6

26.2 ± 2.2

T. herba-barona B

29.4 ± 4.9

24.2 ± 7.6

T. herba-barona C

>50.0

28.8 ± 12.2

CQa

0.007 ± 0.0001

0.11 ± 0.04

aCQ: chloroquine; results are the mean ± s.d. of three experiments in duplicate.

A) before flowering; B) during flowering; C) after flowering.

S. thymbra EO at the flowering stage (sample B) was tested for inhibition of plasmepsin II and the IC50 was 29.5 ± 0.09 μg/ml (mean ± sd). The potency for killing Plasmodium and for inhibition of the enzyme was comparable, thus indicating that plasmepsin II may be one of the molecular targets of its pharmacological effect.

The effect of fractions 1–3 obtained from the EO of S. thymbra is reported in Figure 1. The highest inhibition of parasite growth was observed using the fractions A2, B2 and C2 where thymol is the main component. Fractions A1, B1 and C1, where thymol was absent, showed a very low effect. The anti-plasmodial effect of thymol (IC50 19.7 ± 3.0 and 10.6 ± 2.0 μg/ml on D10 and W2, respectively) confirmed that this compound is the active principle. The W2 strain rather than D10 seems to be more susceptible to the effects of the EO sub fractions and thymol.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-11-219/MediaObjects/12936_2012_Article_2170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Anti-plasmodial activity of fractions 1–3 of Satureja thymbra EO. Fractions were dissolved in DMSO and then diluted with a medium to achieve the required concentrations (final DMSO concentration <1%, which is non-toxic to the parasite). Asynchronous cultures with parasitaemia of 1–1.5% and 1% final haematocrit were aliquoted into the plates and incubated for 72 hrs at 37°C. Parasite growth was determined spectrophotometrically (OD650) by measuring the activity of the parasite lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). IC50 is the mean ± standard deviation of three separate experiments performed in duplicate. # statistically different vs A; * statistically different vs B; ° statistically different vs C. CQ was used as reference compound (IC50 7.0 and 110 ng/ml on CQ-S and CQ-R strains, respectively).

Larvicidal and adulticidal activity against anopheles gambiae

The mortality rate of the larvae of An. gambiae increased dose-dependently in the presence of EOs of S. thymbra (Figure 2). The activity of the EO expressed as LC50 was 0.15 ± 0.002; 0.21 ± 0.013; and 0.15 ± 0.087 μg/ml (mean ± sd) for the samples A, B and C, respectively. Samples A and C were significantly different versus sample B (p < 0.002). The larvicidal activity was dependent on the composition of EO being higher for the EO collected before and after flowering, compared to those collected during flowering. The time-course of the adulticidal activity is shown in Figure 3. Following the same trend as the larvicidal effect, the insecticidal activity against the adult stage of the mosquito is greater when the EO was obtained from plant material collected before and after flowering. At the lowest concentration tested (8.3 μg/ml), 100% mosquitoes died within 40 min when exposed to sample A and C. For sample B the time of exposure required to kill 100% of insects was 60 min.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-11-219/MediaObjects/12936_2012_Article_2170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Evolution of the larvicidal activity at different dilutions of Satureja thymbra EO. Twenty-five third instar larvae of a laboratory colony of Anopheles gambiae (susceptible strain) were used. Mortality % was assessed at increasing concentration of EOs collected before, during, and after flowering. Four replicates were set up for each concentration. Water was used as negative control. The activity of the EOs expressed as LC50 was 0.15 ± 0.002; 0.21 ± 0.013; and 0.15 ± 0.087 μg/ml (mean ± sd) for the samples A, B and C, respectively.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-11-219/MediaObjects/12936_2012_Article_2170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Time-course of the adulticidal activity of Satureja thymbra EO. Twenty-five mosquitoes aged three days from the susceptible Dakar strain were used. For each EO, solutions were prepared in acetone at concentrations of 8.3 μg/ml, 16.6 μg/ml, 24.91 μg/ml, 32.22 μg/ml, 41.52 μg/ml, 49.88 μg/ml, 58.13 μg/ml and 66.44 μg/ml. Four replicates were set up for each concentration, using 1 ml of solution/bottle. Deltamethrin 12.5 μg/ml was used for positive control while the negative control was acetone. Mortality was assessed every 15 min. A) before flowering; B) during flowering; C) after flowering.

Cytotoxicity on human dermal fibroblasts

The results are reported in Table 7. The EO of S. thymbra (samples A, B, C) and sub-fractions A1-A2, B1-B2, and C1-C2 in the range of 10–50 μg/ml were not toxic in human fibroblasts at 24 hrs of exposure. By extending the time of exposure to 48 hrs, cell viability was either not different from untreated cells (A1, B, B1, C) or reduced (A, A2, B2, C1, C2). Sub-fractions A3, B3 and C3 caused 100% mortality at 50 μg/ml independently of the time of exposure. These fractions are characterized by higher levels of carvacrol with respect to fraction 1 and 2, indicating that carvacrol may be responsible for cytotoxicity. The exposure of fibroblasts to 100 μg/ml of EO and sub-fractions caused a rise of cell mortality. In general with longer time of exposure, cell viability diminished. Thymol at 50 μg/ml (five-fold higher than the IC50 on P. falciparum) for 24 hrs did not influence cell viability, but became more toxic at 48 hrs (50% reduction of cell viability). It is worthy to underline that the concentration of EO causing toxicity to human cells (100 μg/ml) are far and best higher than those required for the larvicidal or mosquitocidal effects (0.15 and 8 μg/ml, respectively).
Table 7

Cytotoxicity of the EO of Satureja Thymbra L

 

24 hrs

48 hrs

Sample

Concentration (μg/ml)

 

25

50

100

25

50

100

A

NT

NT

15.3

NT

12.3

24.4

A1

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

33.0

A2

NT

NT

NT

NT

9.0

94.7

A3

15

100

100

100

100

100

B

NT

NT

12.2

NT

NT

13.3

B1

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

24.0

B2

NT

NT

24.3

19.7

47.0

94.0

B3

18.0

100

100

100

100

100

C

NT

NT

14.3

NT

NT

22.2

C1

NT

NT

NT

NT

35.3

85.2

C2

NT

NT

24.4

14.0

31.6

95.3

C3

32

100

100

100

100

100

Data are reported as % mortality vs ctrl (0 %). NT: not toxic (viability not statistically different with respect to ctrl). A) before flowering; B) during flowering; C) after flowering.

Discussion

Aromatic plants are frequently investigated as a possible source of antimicrobial/insecticide compounds. In the past, the Sardinian population traditionally employed local aromatic plants against malaria.

Among the plants of the Sardinian flora, myrtle, savory, and caraway thyme have an historical witness of use and thus were chosen for this study. Among the three plants, S. thymbra showed the highest in vitro anti-plasmodial activity, especially against the CQ-resistant strain. Moreover, the time of collection (before, during, and after flowering) did not influence the anti-plasmodial effect, which appeared to be mainly associated with thymol, one of the components of the EO. These results are in agreement with a recent report that the EO of Oreganum compactum, rich in thymol, shows anti-plasmodial activity in vitro[32]. Such a conclusion is corroborated by the data obtained with the EOs of M. communis and T. herba-barona since the latter, which does not contain thymol, possesses lower activity against P. falciparum. Moreover, the activity of thymol was selective against the parasites with low cytotoxicity against human dermal fibroblasts.

The anti-plasmodial activity of the EOs of various aromatic plants has been investigated [5, 3234], however the mechanism of action still remains obscure. When tested on a highly synchronized culture, the EO of Lippia multiflora inhibited the growth mostly at the trophozoite-schizont step, indicating a potential effect on the first nuclear division of the parasite [33]. In the present work savory EO was tested against plasmepsin II and caused enzyme inhibition at a concentration very close to that needed for killing the parasite. Even if preliminary this observation suggests the food vacuole as the site of action and plasmepsins as one of the possible targets. The absence or very low toxicity on human cell lines indicates a selectivity of savory EO for targets specific of P.falciparum. In the present work, the bioassays were performed on the erythrocytic stage of the parasite, then the molecular targets are to be searched within those operating at this point of the life cycle.

Malaria control and elimination will not be achieved without the control of transmission through the use of repellents/insecticides against the mosquito vector. The vector control is among the key strategies promoted by WHO and The Roll Back Malaria Partnership for prevention, control and elimination of malaria [35]. Insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying are effective methods for malaria vector control. Larval control at the breeding sites can be used complementary to other vector control methods [36].

A large number of phytochemicals including volatile oils exhibited larvicidal and mosquitocidal activity [37]. In this regard, it is interesting that the EO of S. thymbra is highly active against both the larvae and the adults of Anopheles mosquitoes. The vegetative period produced EO with different composition, probably not affecting the efficacy of the insecticidal bio-activity. Even if EOs obtained from savory at the different vegetative stages show statistically significant differences, these differences are minimal, and thus not relevant in term of efficacy for pest control.

In consideration of the toxicity tests on human cells, and the dose at which savory EO is active as larvicidal (IC50 0.15–0.2 μg/ml), the use of savory for vector control is rather promising and deserves further investigation in order to test individual prominent components and verify whether the mixture is less or more potent than the compounds alone. Synergistic or antagonistic phenomena have been described at this regard [11, 38].

The mode of action and site of effect for larvicidal/mosquitocidal phytochemicals have received little attention so far. Hypotheses for mechanistic action can be neurotoxicity, growth regulation, endogenous hormone agonist or antagonist [11, 38]. The investigation about the mechanism of action of EO would be helpful for development of natural insecticides with low toxicity and with little impact on the environment.

Conclusions

The use of aromatic plants as a source of insecticides and/or repellents is a traditional practice still in wide use throughout developing countries [3]. The inhalation of plants containing essential oils as febrifuge in malaria remains nowadays a common practice in traditional medicine in West African countries, such as Cameroon, where the population inhales the vapours of a decoction of Cymbogon citratus and Ocimum gratissimum to treat fevers due to malaria [5].

This study provides evidence for the use of EOs for treating malaria and fighting the vectors at both larval and adult stages, thus supporting the Sardinian traditional use of savory against malaria. The research reported herein opens the possibility for further investigation and isolation of natural products with anti-parasitic properties in order to overcome the problem of insecticide resistance.

Abbreviations

EO: 

Essential oil

FID: 

Flame ionization detector

PE: 

Petroleum ether

GC: 

Gas chromatography

EtOAc: 

Ethyl acetate

MS: 

Mass spectrometry

CQ: 

Chloroquine

DMSO: 

Dimetilsulfoxide

LDH: 

Lactate dehydrogenase

EI: 

Ionization mode

PLM: 

Plasmepsin

MTT: 

(3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)

sd: 

Standard deviation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The contribution of Phillippe Brasseur and Piero Olliaro to this work is acknowledged. This study was supported by a grant from Provincia dell’Ogliastra (Sardinia, Italy) and by the AntiMal project, funded under the 6th Framework Program of the European Community (Contract N° IP-018834). The authors are solely responsible for its content, it does not represent the opinion of the European Community and the Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of the information contained therein. The fellowship of Elisa Colombo is partially sponsored by FSE, Regione Lombardia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano
(2)
Co.S.Me.Se, Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente, Macrosezione Botanica e Orto botanico, Università degli Studi di Cagliari
(3)
Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Torino
(4)
Dipartimento di Scienze biomediche, chirurgiche e odontoiatriche, Università degli Studi di Milano
(5)
Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire

References

  1. Saxena S, Pant N, Jain DC, Bhakuni RS: Anti-malarial agents from plant sources. Current Sci. 2003, 85: 1314-1329.
  2. Zygadlo JA, Juliani HR: Bioactivity of essential oil components. Curr Top Phytochem. 2000, 3: 203-214.
  3. Maia MF, Moore SJ: Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing. Malar J. 2011, 10 (Suppl 1): S11-10.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  4. Atzei AD: Le piante nella tradizione popolare della Sardegna. 2009, Carlo Delfino Editore, Sassari
  5. Tchoumbougnang F, Zollo PH, Dagne E, Mekonnen Y: In vivo anti-malarial activity of essential oils from Cymbopogon citratus and Ocimum gratissimum on mice infected with Plasmodium berghei. Planta Med. 2005, 71: 20-23. 10.1055/s-2005-837745.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Rosa A, Deiana M, Casu V, Corona G, Appendino G, Bianchi F, Ballero M, Dessi MA: Antioxidant activity of oligomeric acylphloroglucinols from Myrtus communis L. Free Radic Res. 2003, 37: 1013-1019. 10.1080/10715760310001595739.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Nassar MI, el SA A, Ahmed RF, El-Khrisy ED, Ibrahim KM, Sleem AA: Secondary metabolites and bioactivities of Myrtus communis. Pharmacogn Res. 2010, 2: 325-329. 10.4103/0974-8490.75449.View Article
  8. Verotta L: Are acylphloroglucinols lead structures for the treatment of degenerative diseases?. Phytochem Rev. 2002, 1: 389-407. 10.1023/A:1026069624278.View Article
  9. Appendino G, Maxia L, Bettoni P, Locatelli M, Valdivia C, Ballero M, Stavri M, Gibbons S, Sterner O: Antibacterial galloylated alkylphloroglucinol glucosides from myrtle (Myrtus communis). J Nat Prod. 2006, 69: 251-254. 10.1021/np050462w.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Verotta L, Goddio E, Appendino G, Ballero M, Maxia L, Brun R: Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.): from the Mediterranean tradition a potential antiparasitic lead. Medicine and Health In the Tropics: 11–15 September 2005. 2005, Marseille-France, 85.
  11. Karpouhtsis I, Pardali E, Feggou E, Kokkini S, Scouras ZG, Mavragani-Tsipidou P: Insecticidal and genotoxic activities of oregano essential oils. J Agr Food Chem. 1998, 46: 1111-1115. 10.1021/jf970822o.View Article
  12. Cetin H, Cilek JE, Oz E, Aydin L, Deveci O, Yanikoglu A: Acaricidal activity of Satureja thymbra L. essential oil and its major components, carvacrol and gamma-terpinene against adult Hyalomma marginatum (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet Parasitol. 2010, 170: 287-290. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.02.031.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Ayvaz A, Sagdic O, Karaborklu S, Ozturk I: Insecticidal activity of the essential oils from different plants against three stored-product insects. J Insect Sci. 2010, 10: 21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  14. Camarda I: Le piante endemiche della Sardegna. Boll Soc Sarda Sci Nat. 1978, 17: 227-241.
  15. Moretti MD, Sanna-Passino G, Demontis S, Bazzoni E: Essential oil formulations useful as a new tool for insect pest control. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2002, 3: E13.View Article
  16. Behravan J, Ramezani M, Dargahi L, Abaei MR: Larvicidal activity of Thymus Transcaspicus essential oil against Anopheles stephensi (Celia). Mittwock. 2006
  17. Amer A, Mehlhorn H: Larvicidal effects of various essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex larvae (Diptera, Culicidae). Parasitol res. 2006, 99: 466-472. 10.1007/s00436-006-0182-3.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Massebo F, Tadesse M, Bekele T, Balkew M, Gebre-Michael T: Evaluation on larvicidal effects of essential oils of some local plants against Anopheles arabiensis Patton and Aedes aegypty Linnaeus (Diptera, Culicidae) in Ethiopia. African J Biotechnol. 2009, 8: 4183-4188.
  19. Tchoumbougnang F, Dongmo PMZ, Sameza ML, Mbanjo EGN, Fotso GBT, Zollo PH, Menut C: Larvicidal activity against Anopheles gambiae Giles and chemical composition of essential oils from four plants cultivated in Cameroon. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Societe et Environnement. 2009, 13: 77-84.
  20. Barnard DR: Repellency of essential oils to mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1999, 36: 625-629.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Amer A, Mehlhorn H: Repellency effect of forty-one essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex mosquitoes. Parasitol Res. 2006, 99: 478-490. 10.1007/s00436-006-0184-1.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Guanmin F, Ling Y, Yunhe C: Anophelifuge essence composition with fragrance of herbal medicine, and its preparation method. Faming Zhuanli Shenqing Gongkai Shuomingshu. 2005, , China, 6-vol. CN 1631169
  23. Bicchi C, Liberto E, Matteodo M, Sgorbini B, Mondello L, d’Acamporad Zellner B, Costa R, Rubiolo P: Quantitative analysis of essential oils: a complex task. Flavour Frag J. 2008, 23: 382-391. 10.1002/ffj.1905.View Article
  24. Adams RP: Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Edited by: Press C. 2007, Allured Pub, New York, 4
  25. Trager W, Jensen JB: Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976, 193: 673-675. 10.1126/science.781840.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Makler MT, Ries JM, Williams JA, Bancroft JE, Piper RC, Gibbins BL, Hinrichs DJ: Parasite lactate dehydrogenase as an assay for Plasmodium falciparum drug sensitivity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 48: 739-741.PubMed
  27. Hill J, Tyas L, Phylip LH, Kay J, Dunn BM, Berry C: High level expression and characterisation of Plasmepsin II, an aspartic proteinase from Plasmodium falciparum. FEBS Lett. 1994, 352: 155-158. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00940-6.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Dell’Agli M, Parapini S, Galli G, Vaiana N, Taramelli D, Sparatore A, Liu P, Dunn BM, Bosisio E, Romeo S: High antiplasmodial activity of novel plasmepsins I and II inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2006, 49: 7440-7449. 10.1021/jm061033d.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Ndiath MO, Sougoufara S, Gaye A, Mazenot C, Konate L, Faye O, Sokhna C, Trape JF: Resistance to DDT and pyrethroids and increased kdr mutation frequency in An. gambiae after the implementation of permethrin-treated nets in Senegal. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e31943-10.1371/journal.pone.0031943.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  30. Brogdon WG, McAllister JC: Simplification of adult mosquito bioassays through use of time-mortality determinations in glass bottles. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1998, 14: 159-164.PubMed
  31. Abbott WS: A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925, 18: 265-267.View Article
  32. El Babili F, Bouajila J, Souchard JP, Bertrand C, Bellvert F, Fouraste I, Moulis C, Valentin A: Oregano: chemical analysis and evaluation of its anti-malarial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities. J Food Sci. 2011, 76: C512-518. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02109.x.View ArticlePubMed
  33. Valentin A, Pelissier Y, Benoit F, Marion C, Kone D, Mallie M, Bastide JM, Bessiere JM: Composition and anti-malarial activity in vitro of volatile components of Lippia multiflora. Phytochemistry. 1995, 40: 1439-1442. 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00522-9.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Milhau G, Valentin A, Benoit F, Mallie M, Bastide J-M, Pelissier Y, Bessiere J-M: In vitro anti-malarial activity of eight essential oils. J essent oil res. 1997, 9: 329-333.View Article
  35. WHO: World Malaria report 2011. 2011, Geneva
  36. WHO: The world health report 1995: bridging the gaps. 1995, WHO, Geneva
  37. Shaalan EA, Canyon D, Younes MW, Abdel-Wahab H, Mansour AH: A review of botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential. Environ Int. 2005, 31: 1149-1166. 10.1016/j.envint.2005.03.003.View ArticlePubMed
  38. Youssif RS, Shaalan EA: Mosquitocidal activity of some volatile oils against Aedes caspius mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis. 2011, 48: 113-115.PubMed

Copyright

© Dell'Agli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement