Volume 11 Supplement 1

Challenges in malaria research

Open Access

Understanding the role of climatic and environmental variables on the population dynamics of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and the implications for vector control strategies in different settings

  • Paul E Parham1,
  • Diane Pople2,
  • Céline Christiansen-Jucht2,
  • Steve Lindsay3,
  • Wes Hinsley2 and
  • Edwin Michael4
Malaria Journal201211(Suppl 1):P76

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-S1-P76

Published: 15 October 2012

Background

The impact of weather, climate, and environmental conditions on malaria transmission have attracted increasing attention in recent years, although there remain significant uncertainties and debate regarding its precise role. Global mean temperatures are predicted to increase by several degrees over the coming century, although increases in Africa, accounting for over 90% of the global malaria burden, are expected to be greater than the global mean, with anticipated median increases around 3-4°C (depending on the emissions scenario). Global mean precipitation is also predicted to increase in most emissions scenarios over the coming decades, although there is currently less consensus between climate models on expected changes thereafter, particularly at low latitudes where the majority of cases arise and across many regions of Africa. Mathematical models provide powerful tools for understanding the impact of changes in environmental variables on transmission and intervention strategies, but this first requires realistic modelling of Anopheles population dynamics and its response to environmental variables.

Materials and methods

Experimental and field data are used to develop new parameterisations to model the relationships between key aspects of An. gambiae s.s. ecology and climatic and environmental conditions. These relationships are integrated into a deterministic model of Anopheles gambiae s.s. population dynamics to better understand mosquito response to changes in biotic and abiotic variables. This model is then calibrated against longitudinal vector abundance data from Tanzania, before applying the methods of matrix population modelling to analyse model behaviour (specifically, adult An. gambiae s.s. response to environmental conditions), and, hence, assess the implications for the design and implementation of local vector control strategies.

Results

A valuable modelling framework for assessing the effects of rainfall, cloudiness, wind speed, desiccation, temperature, relative humidity and density-dependence on vector abundance is developed, allowing ease of construction, analysis, and integration into malaria transmission models. Model calibration demonstrates excellent agreement with abundance data over a 40 month period, suggesting that recent malaria reductions in certain areas of Africa could be due to changing environmental conditions. Analysis of the model demonstrates the dependence on climatic conditions of An. gambiae s.s. persistence, resilience, stable stage distribution, and reproductive value of each of its lifecycle stages to fluctuations in local environmental conditions.

Conclusions

Mathematical models provide a valuable means of understanding the role of environmental variables on malaria vectors and hence for better understanding future malaria transmission under different environmental conditions, as well as the potential impacts of climate change. Modelling and analysis here provides an important contribution to this goal, enabling direct assessment of the implications of climatic and environmental conditions on the design of optimal local vector control strategies, as well as evaluating the potential impact of climate change on the likely success of these interventions. The work also highlights research gaps and priorities that should be targeted if we are to more reliably understand future malaria risk in regions predicted to experience significant changes in climatic variables over the coming decades.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College
(2)
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College
(3)
Disease Control and Vector Biology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(4)
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame

Copyright

© Parham et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement