Open Access

Development of a population suppression strain of the human malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi

  • Osvaldo Marinotti1,
  • Nijole Jasinskiene1,
  • Aniko Fazekas1,
  • Sarah Scaife2,
  • Guoliang Fu2,
  • Stefanie T Mattingly1,
  • Karissa Chow1,
  • David M Brown3,
  • Luke Alphey2, 4 and
  • Anthony A James1, 3Email author
Malaria Journal201312:142

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-142

Received: 4 March 2013

Accepted: 19 April 2013

Published: 26 April 2013

Abstract

Background

Transgenic mosquito strains are being developed to contribute to the control of dengue and malaria transmission. One approach uses genetic manipulation to confer conditional, female-specific dominant lethality phenotypes. Engineering of a female-specific flightless phenotype provides a sexing mechanism essential for male-only mosquito, release approaches that result in population suppression of target vector species.

Methods

An approach that uses a female-specific gene promoter and antibiotic-repressible lethal factor to produce a sex-specific flightless phenotype was adapted to the human malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi. Transposon- and site-specific recombination-mediated technologies were used to generate a number of transgenic An. stephensi lines that when combined through mating produced the phenotype of flight-inhibited females and flight-capable males.

Results

The data shown here demonstrate the successful engineering of a female-specific flightless phenotype in a malaria vector. The flightless phenotype was repressible by the addition of tetracycline to the larval diet. This conditional phenotype allows the rearing of the strains under routine laboratory conditions. The minimal level of tetracycline that rescues the flightless phenotype is higher than that found as an environmental contaminant in circumstances where there is intensive use of antibiotics.

Conclusions

These studies support the further development of flightless female technology for applications in malaria control programmes that target the vectors.

Keywords

Anopheles stephensi Transgenic mosquitoes Malaria

Background

Methods are being developed to control transmission of vector-borne diseases based on transgenic mosquitoes carrying a conditional dominant lethal gene (release of insects carrying a dominant lethal [RIDL]) [15]. The principal dengue virus vector, Aedes aegypti, was engineered in one RIDL-based approach to carry a transgene conferring a repressible female-specific flightless phenotype (fsRIDL) [2]. The sex-specificity of the phenotype results from the regulatory DNA of the Ae. aegypti gene, Ae. aegypti Actin-4[2, 6], that encodes a female-specific flight muscle protein. These strains are showing promising results in meeting the goal of new tools for dengue vector population suppression although further refinements are necessary [7, 8]. The technology also was shown to work in a related species, Aedes albopictus[4]. The technological advances achieved with Aedes species are potentially applicable to anophelines that transmit malaria parasites.

Features that contribute to the suitability of an fsRIDL-based, population-suppression tool for controlling malaria transmission include that the vector species is the major one responsible for malaria transmission in a defined geographical region and that controlling transmission will have a meaningful impact on local disease incidence and prevalence. In addition, the efficacy of such tools would be supplemented if the proposed species were endemic to a country that had in place robust malaria control programmes with which to interact and the target areas were of a reasonable scale. Geographic and ecological islands represented by confined urban and semi-urban areas would be ideal for evaluating the impact of the population suppression strain on the target species. Malaria transmission by Anopheles stephensi in urban and peri-urban settings in the Indian subcontinent appears to meet these criteria [911]. Malaria is endemic to the Indian subcontinent where 70–100 million cases per year are reported [12]. Successful application of molecular-genetic approaches to controlling malaria transmission by An. stephensi is expected to have a major effect on the disease burden of one of the most populous places in the world. Anopheles stephensi is recognized as having two forms that may be isolated reproductively and a third intermediate form [13, 14]. The type-form is found principally in urban areas where it is responsible for the majority, if not all, of malaria transmission that occurs in cities. It breeds in peridomestic water containers and is highly anthropophilic. Distribution and feeding habits create functional “genetic islands” defined by breeding sites and hosts. A rural form, ‘mysorensis’, is found in the arid countryside and is not a major vector of malaria. The role of the intermediate form in transmission is unclear. Therefore, the urban mosquitoes are good targets for an fsRIDL-based, population-suppression tool.

The data presented here demonstrate that it is possible to engineer An. stephensi with a repressible female-specific flightless phenotype based on the use of the female-specific flight muscle promoter. These results support the prospect of applying fsRIDL in the fight against malaria on the Indian subcontinent.

Methods

Mosquito rearing

A colony of An. stephensi (gift of M Jacobs-Lorena, Johns Hopkins University) bred at the UCI insectary for longer than five years was used in the experiments. Insects were maintained at 27°C with 77% humidity and 12 hr day/night, 30 min dusk/dawn lighting cycle. Larvae were fed a diet of powdered fish food (Tetramin) mixed with yeast. Adults were provided ad libitum with a 0.3M sucrose solution in water and anesthetized mice were used for blood feeding when required. The blood-feeding protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, Irvine (NIH Animal Welfare Assurance number: A3416.01; approved February 20, 2008), Protocol Number: 1998–1411 (approved May 17, 2012). Transgenic and control non-transgenic (wild-type) mosquitoes were reared using the same standardized insectary procedures, unless otherwise indicated.

Identification of the Aedes aegypti Actin-4 gene orthologue in Anopheles stephensi

Primary nucleotide sequences of the Ae. aegypti Actin-4 (AeAct-4, AY531222) gene were used to search Vectorbase [15] for an orthologue in the genome and transcriptome of An. stephensi. The lowest e-value and highest score were assigned to ASTM009772. The reciprocal best BLAST hit strategy supports the 1:1 orthology of AeAct-4 and ASTM009772. ASTM009772 is designated hereafter as AsAct-4.

Total RNA samples extracted with TRIZOL from larvae (mixed sexes), and separately from males and females, pupae and adults were treated with RNAse-free DNAse and served as templates for Reverse Transcriptase-PCRs, using a gene-specific pair of primers complementary to sequences located in the first and second exons of ASTM009772 (AsActin4 exon1for 5′-CACATAGTTGTTAGCTGGGAGAGC-3′, and AsActin4 5RACE 5′-CAGATCCATACGCAGGATAGCATG-3′).

The transcription start-site and intron location of AsAct-4 was identified by 5′RACE and RT-PCR techniques. 5′RACE was performed using the Ambion FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit using the gene-specific primer AsActin4-5RACE. Comparison of cDNA (5′RACE and RT-PCR products) and An. stephensi genomic DNA, scaffold 01062 [15] sequences revealed one intron in the 5′UTR.

Mosquito transgenesis, embryo microinjection and Southern-blot hybridization analyses

Microinjection of the pBac-IE1-DsRed2-AeAct4-tTA driver construct (OX3545) [2] with the piggyBac helper plasmid [16] in An. stephensi embryos was performed as described previously [17]. OX3545 contains the AeAct-4 promoter and first intron cloned at the 5′ end of tTAV linked to a SV40 3′ UTR, as described previously [2]. This gene cassette was inserted into a piggyBac vector containing the Hr5-IE1 promoter driving a gene encoding the fluorescent protein DsRed, to facilitate identification of transgenic mosquitoes. The helper plasmid phsp-pBac [16] has DNA sequences that drive constitutive expression of functional piggyBac transposase that catalyzes random insertions of the driver construct into the mosquito genome.

Each G0 male was mated with fifteen virgin females and groups of ten G0 females were mated with five males. The G1 progeny and the subsequent generations were screened at the larval stage with fluorescence microscopy for the expression of the DsRed marker gene. Transgenic lines were maintained as hemizygous by out-crossing transgenic individuals at every generation with wild-type mosquitoes. Southern blotting and hybridization techniques were used to detect transgene integration and copy number. Genomic DNA extracted from groups of six transgenic or wild-type control females was fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to Zeta-probe GT Genomic Tested Blotting Membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as described previously [18] and using standard protocols [19]. The probe used to identify transgene integrations consisted of the DsRed2 ORF and was amplified from the OX3545 plasmid using the primers 5′-GCAGCTGATCACGTACGCTC-3′ and 5′-GTGCGCTCGTACTGCTCCAC-3′ and labelled with 32P using the Megaprime DNA labelling system (Amersham).

The AsAct-4 promoter and 5′UTR were used to make the driver construct, pBac-IE1-DsRed2-AsAct4-tTA (AsOX3545). A DNA fragment including 1014 base pairs (bp) of the 5′-end gene sequence, the first exon (96 bp), and the complete intron (271 bp) was amplified with the primers AsPforEcoRV (5′-GATATCCGAGTAGTGGGTGCTACTGTAGCG-3′) and AsPrevSpeI (5′-ACTAGTGCCGAGTGTTATGGATTGTCCTGCAGG-3′). The amplified DNA was digested with Eco RV and Spe I restriction endonucleases and the resulting fragment cloned into OX3545 digested previously with Nru I and Spe I. Microinjection of AsOX3545 in An. stephensi embryos and analyses of the resulting transgenic lines were performed as described above.

The effector construct attB-3×P3-DsRed2-tetO-Nipp1Dm (OX3547) [2] was injected into embryos of the docking-site strain, attP 43 [20] together with in vitro- transcribed φC31 integrase mRNA [21]. The φC31 integrase catalyses recombination between the attB site in the plasmid and the attP site in the genome of the docking site strain, promoting site-specific integration of transgenes in the target genome. OX3547 contains the regulatory sequence of a tetracycline responsive element (tRE), comprising multiple copies of the tetO sequence, to which tTA binds, and a basal promoter driving expression of the effector molecule, Nuclear Inhibitor of PP1 (Nipp1Dm). Nipp1Dm overexpression induces phenotypes that include lethality, abnormal mitotic figures and defects in muscle development [2, 22, 23]. tTA cannot bind to tetO in the presence of tetracycline and expression of Nipp1Dm remains uninduced.

The survivors of OX3547 injections were grouped into female and male pools and out-crossed with wild-type, non-transgenic mosquitoes of the opposite sex. The offspring were screened as larvae with fluorescence microscopy for the expression of the fluorescent DsRed marker. Genomic DNA extracted from groups of six females was fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to Zeta-probe GT Genomic Tested Blotting Membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Southern blots to evidence transgene integration were performed as described above and used the same 32P-labelled DsRed2 ORF probe.

Generation of conditional flightless mosquitoes and tetracycline rescue of the phenotype

Conditional flightless female mosquitoes were generated by crossing males or females hemizygous for the driver constructs with those of the opposite sex hemizygous for the effector construct. Progeny were screened as larvae with fluorescence microscopy for the expression of the marker genes. The DsRed2-encoding marker gene is the same in the driver and effector lines, however the driver lines express red fluorescent protein in a scattered pattern throughout the body under the control of the IE1 promoter while DsRed2 expression in the effector lines is driven by the eye-specific promoter, 3×P3. Progeny of crosses of the driver and effector lines presenting both the IE1 and the 3×P3 driven fluorescence patterns were selected for further analyses. The double-hemizygous individuals were raised to adults and the survival of males and females as well as frequency of adult flightless phenotype scored. Adult females were considered flightless when they could not elevate and remain aloft after the mosquito cages were agitated. Flightless females tend to walk, may be able to hop but do not fly for even short distances. Alternatively, double-hemizygous progeny were raised in the presence of tetracycline added to the water during larval development. Adults were offered a 0.3M sucrose solution supplemented with tetracycline (the same concentration used for rearing larvae) and allowed to feed ad libitum. The survival of tetracycline-treated males and females, and frequencies of marker gene and adult flightless phenotypes were scored.

Results

Transgene constructions

Two existing transgene constructs, previously used for genetic transformation of Ae. aegypti, and a third, novel construct were used in the experiments (Figure 1). Replacement of the AeAct-4 gene 5-end sequence (putative promoter and first intron) with the orthologous DNA from AsAct-4 originated the novel driver construct (AsOX3545). Putative orthology of the Ae. aegypti AeAct-4 and An. stephensi ASTM009772 genes was assigned by sequencing (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and reciprocal Blast analysis. Blastp using the predicted AeAct-4 protein sequence as query identified ASTM009772-PA as the best hit within the An. stephensi proteome (E-value = 0.0, Score = 2010, Identity = 99.2%). The reciprocal blast, using ASTM009772-PA as query identified AeAct-4 as the best hit within the Ae. aegypti proteome (E-value = 0.0, Score = 2010, Identity = 99.2%). The orthology assignment is supported further by gene expression analyses showing that in An. stephensi ASTM009772-RA transcripts are present in fourth instar larvae (mixed sexes) and female pupae, and absent in male pupae and adults, a pattern similar to that of AeAct-4[2, 6].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-12-142/MediaObjects/12936_2013_Article_2752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Schematic representations of the transformation constructs OX3545, AsOX3545 and OX3547, and the mechanism of action of the double transgene-based female-specific RIDL. OX3545 and OX3547 were previously described in detail [2]. AsOX3545 is a similar to OX3545, with the Anopheles stephensi Actin-4 regulatory sequences replacing the Aedes aegypti Actin-4 sequence. Actin 4 promoters (Act4P) drive the expression of the tetracycline-repressible transactivator protein (tTa) in the flight muscles of adult female mosquitoes. tTA binds tetO in the absence of tetracycline, driving expression of the effector molecule, Nuclear Inhibitor of PP1 (Nipp1Dm) [22, 23], leading to disruption of normal cell functions. Tetracycline prevents tTa binding to tetO abolishing expression of Nipp1Dm. The positions of the Spe I recognition and cleavage sites in OX3545, AsOX3545 and OX3547 are indicated by vertically oriented arrows. Horizontally oriented arrows indicate the direction of transcription for each component of the constructs. Abbreviations: pBac R and L, piggyBac right and left inverted repeats, respectively; attB, φC31 recombination site; DsRed2, red fluorescent protein open reading frame; IE1, baculovirus immediate-early gene promoter driving DsRed2 expressed throughout the body; 3×P3, artificial promoter consisting of a multimer of the binding site (P3), driving high levels of expression in the eye.

Generation of transgenic driver lines

A total of 1,423 An. stephensi embryos injected with the OX3545 driver construct and piggyBac helper plasmid resulted in 447 (31%) individuals surviving and developing into adults. These G0 adults were back-crossed with the wild-type, non-transgenic recipient strain and 31 produced DsRed2 fluorescent G1 larvae for an estimated transformation efficiency of ~7%. All DsRed2 fluorescent progeny from 16 of the 31 outcrosses died during their pre-imago stages and hence adults were recovered from only 15 matings. These transgenic lines were designated DAa-xx, indicating that they are driver lines carrying a transgene with the Ae. aegypti Actin-4 regulatory sequence. Eight of the G1 driver lines (DAa-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) produced viable transgenic offspring when crossed with wild-type mosquitoes (Table 1). All driver lines derived from injections with the OX3545 construct exhibited some degree of lethality during metamorphosis of the G2 mosquitoes, with line DAa-1 showing only 8% survival. Survival in line DAa-1 increased to 24% by the fifth generation (G5) post injection (Additional file 2: Table S1). All driver lines produced a higher percentage of adult males in generations G2 through G5 than was observed in control lines. Southern blot analyses of genomic DNA isolated from G5 adult mosquitoes indicate distinct transgene integration events in each of the characterized lines (Figure 2). All lines had hybridization signal consistent with a single insertion of the driver construct in the An. stephensi genome.
Table 1

Sex ratio and survival of driver transgenic lines carrying the Aedes aegypti Act-4 promoter (OX3545 construct)

G0

G1

G2

Lines outcrossed with wild-type

Transgenic adults

Wild type larvae

Transgenic larvae

Transgenic adults*

Females

Males

DAa-1 ♂

1 ♂

325

199

0

17

DAa-2 ♂

4 ♂

680

138

21

22

DAa-3 ♂

1 ♂

200

86

3

29

DAa-4 ♂

17 ♂

1140

659

31

134

DAa-5 ♂

4 ♂

90

45

3

11

DAa-6 ♀

1 ♂

70

44

22

9

DAa-7 ♀

1 ♂

100

45

9

15

DAa-8 ♀

1 ♂

90

30

10

17

DAa-9 ♂

1 ♂, 2 ♀

0

0

0

0

DAa-10 ♂

1 ♂

0

0

0

0

DAa-11 ♂

2 ♂

0

0

0

0

DAa-12 ♂

1 ♂

0

0

0

0

DAa-13 ♂

2 ♂

0

0

0

0

DAa-14 ♂

1 ♂

0

0

0

0

DAa-15 ♂

1 ♀

0

0

0

0

*A flightless phenotype was not observed in males or females. An expanded Table showing results of five generations is provided as Additional file 2: Table S1.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-12-142/MediaObjects/12936_2013_Article_2752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Southern blot detection of transgenes integrated into the genomes of Anopheles stephensi driver and effector transgenic lines. Genomic DNA extracted from a pool of mosquitoes from each line was digested with SpeI, fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to a Zeta-probe GT membrane and hybridized to a 32P-labelled DsRed2 open-reading frame probe. DAa, DAs and E and the numbers on top of the figures indicate the individual transgenic lines originated from injection of the OX3545 and AsOX3534 driver and OX3547 effector constructs, respectively.

The driver construct containing the An. stephensi Actin-4 regulatory DNA, AsOX3545, was injected in 995 embryos, resulting in 408 (41% survival) G0 adults. Twenty-one transgenic lines (~5% transformation efficiency), designated DAs-xx, were generated after out-crossing G0 adults with the wild-type strain (Table 2). For one line, DAs-16, all transgenic females were flightless. This phenotype was not repressed by rearing on tetracycline. Southern blot analyses revealed a variable number of transgene insertions, ranging from one (lines DAs-28 and DAs-30) to at least four in line DAs-20 (Figure 2).
Table 2

Sex ratio, survival, and flightless phenotype of driver transgenic lines carrying the Anopheles stephensi Act-4 promoter (AsOX3545 construct)

G0

G1

G2

Lines outcrossed with wild-type

Transgenic adults

Wild-type larvae

Transgenic larvae

Transgenic adults

Females

Males

    

flightless/flying

flying

DAs-16

1 ♂

120

119

33/0*

33

DAs-17

17 ♂

300

101

4/21

36

DAs-18

33 ♂

300

131

2/19

51

DAs-19

1 ♂

210

129

0/53

48

DAs-20

2 ♂

320

321

0/21

65

DAs-21

4 ♂

510

202

0/37

95

DAs-22

1 ♂

260

176

0/21

48

DAs-23

1 ♂

170

147

0/19

52

DAs-24

1 ♂

410

344

0/19

32

DAs-25

14 ♂

350

168

0/19

35

DAs-26

27 ♂

400

107

0/29

39

DAs-27

4 ♂

70

62

0/4

20

DAs-28

1 ♂

130

163

0/3

35

DAs-29

10 ♂

410

178

0/8

17

DAs-30

1 ♂

120

144

0/9

6

DAs-31

1 ♀

300

46

0/3

3

DAs-32

1 ♀

500

32

0/4

14

DAs-33

1 ♀

450

37

0/4

3

DAs-34

2 ♂

90

54

0/0

3

DAs-35

1 ♀

400

47

0/0

6

DAs-36

3 ♂

40

13

0/0

1

*The flightless female phenotype of line DAs-16 is not rescued by tetracycline.

Generation of transgenic effector lines

The An. stephensi transgenic line attP43 has two φC31 attP docking sites in its genome [20]. Five hundred line attP 43 embryos injected with the attB-3×P3-DsRed2-tetO-Nipp1Dm effector construct (OX3547) produced 178 (36% survival) adult mosquitoes (Table 3). The surviving adults were reared as 11 male and eight female pools and out-crossed with wild-type mosquitoes. The progeny of four pools, designated E-1 to E-4, contained transgenic individuals detected by fluorescence microscopy. The sex ratio of the progeny is consistent with the inserted transgene being integrated into the X chromosome. Genomic DNA extracted from G1 transgenic mosquitoes analyzed with Southern blots revealed that the effector transgene was inserted into the same X-linked φC31 attP docking site in all four integration events (Figure 2). Adults of the four transgenic lines were combined in a single population and named E-1.
Table 3

Sex-ratio and survival of effector transgenic lines carrying the OX3547 construct

G0

G1

G2

Effector lines outcrossed with wild-type

Transgenic adults

Outcross

Transgenic larvae

Transgenic adults

Females

Males

E-1 (♂)

0 ♂, 28 ♀

G1 ♀ x WT* ♂

57

29

26

E-2 (♂)

0 ♂, 42 ♀

G1 ♀ x WT ♂

128

59

62

E-3 (♀)

6 ♂, 2 ♀

G1 ♂ x WT ♀

81

76

0

E-4 (♀)

25 ♂, 26 ♀

G1 ♂ x WT ♀

32

27

0

*WT, wild-type.

Crossings of DAa driver and E-1 effector lines

Seven DAa driver lines (DAa1-7) were crossed with the effector line E-1 and the flight capabilities and sex ratio of their progeny analysed (Table 4). Larvae hemizygous for both driver and effector transgenes were identified by the tissue-specific expression patterns of DsRed2 fluorescence consistent with those produced by the 3×P3 and the IE1 promoters (Additional file 3: Figure S2).
Table 4

Sex-ratio, survival, and flightless phenotypes in the F1 progeny of crosses between the effector line E-1 and driver lines engineered with either OX3545 (DAa-) or AsOX3545 (DAs-)

♂ driver lines outcrossed with the ♀ effector line E-1

Larvae

Transgenic adults

 

Only one transgene

Effector and driver transgenes

Flying females

Flightless females

Flying males

Totals(% survival larvae-adult)

DAa-1

775

144

0

1

62

63 (44%)

DAa-2

1150

307

7

0

34

41 (13%)

DAa-3

4340

880

9

172

345

517 (70%)

DAa-4

600

110

3

23

29

54 (49%)

DAa-5

900

226

47

0

96

143 (63%)

DAa-6

1830

371

140

0

143

283 (76%)

DAa-7

1200

239

41

6

74

121 (51%)

DAs-17

nd

465

80

79

177

336 (72%)

DAs-18

nd

89

11

3

23

37 (41%)

DAs-19

nd

185

58

20

62

140 (75%)

DAs-20

nd

152

11

0

52

63 (41%)

DAs-21*

nd

1545

0

161

483

644 (42%)

DAs-22

nd

1483

3

397

507 (1)**

907 (61%)

DAs-24

nd

93

23

4

28

55 (59%)

DAs-25*

nd

761

0

70

193

263 (35%)

DAs-26

nd

328

15

86

112

213 (65%)

DAs-28

nd

244

19

0

73

92 (37%)

DAs-29

nd

107

33

0

33

66 (61%)

DAs-30

nd

226

15

0

14

29 (12%)

DAs-34

nd

114

8

0

0

8 (0%)

DAs-36

nd

267

21

0

46

67 (25%)

*Lines with design-feature phenotypes.

**Crossing Das-22 and E-1 lines generated one flightless male (indicated in parenthesis).

Larvae carrying both the effector and the driver transgenes are expected to represent 25% of the progeny. 2 analyses of crosses between males from DAa lines and E-1 females resulted in significantly reduced proportions of double-hemizygous larvae relative to this expectation (X 2 from 11.79 to 184.11; df = 1, and p < 0.001 for all crosses). These results support the interpretation that some load is associated with carrying the transgenes. The surviving double-hemizygous individuals were maintained in the absence of tetracycline and allowed to develop into adults. Crosses with driver line DAa-1 produced 97% adult male progeny, reflecting significant lethality in developing females. The single adult female recovered from this cross exhibited a flightless phenotype. In contrast, crosses with driver line DAa-6 males resulted in equal numbers of adults of both sexes and no flightless phenotypes were observed among the surviving females. In addition, the flightless phenotype was not observed in any female of crosses involving males from DAa-5 or DAa-2. Driver lines DAa-3 and DAa-4 crossed with E-1 produced results consistent with the design intent of the transgenes with 95% of the females exhibiting the flightless phenotype and all males capable of flight.

Crossings of DAs driver and E-1 effector lines

Eight of 14 DAs driver lines produced progeny with a flightless-female phenotype following crossing with the effector line E-1 (Table 4). The majority of the female progeny of lines DAs-24 (15% flightless) and DAs-18 (21% flightless) was able to fly. Line DAs-17 produced similar numbers of flying and flightless females. Lines DAs-26 and DAs-22 produced mostly flightless females (85% and 99% flightless, respectively) while DAs-21 and DAs-25 crosses with E-1 resulted in 100% flightless females. The sex-ratios of the adult progeny resulting from DAs-21, DAs-25 and DAs-22 crosses with E-1 are abnormal (X 2 from 13 to 160; df = 1, and p < 0.001 for all crosses) with more males than females indicating some degree of female lethality at the sub adult stages. No sex-associated lethality was observed when crossing lines DAs-24, DAs-26, DAs-17 and DAs-19 (X 2 from 0.0 to 0.9; df = 1, and p > 0.2 for all crosses).

Tetracycline suppression of the flightless phenotype

Tetracycline provided to double-hemizygous transgenic An. stephensi is expected to rescue the flightless-female phenotype by preventing tTA binding to tetO and therefore inhibiting expression of the effector molecule Nipp1Dm. Eggs (estivated embryos) were collected from E-1 females mated with DAa-3, DAs-21 or DAs-22 driver line males and allowed to develop either in the presence or absence of tetracycline (Tables 4 and 5). The presence of tetracycline results in adults of both sexes with the flying, wild-type phenotype. All adult males except one could fly independent of the presence of tetracycline. In contrast, 98% (731/743 combined for DAa-3, DAs-21 and DAs-22; Table 4) of the adult females reared in the absence of tetracycline were flightless. The majority, ≥ 67%, of the females treated with ≥ 1 μg/ml tetracycline were able to fly, while tetracycline concentrations of 100 and 10 ng/ml only rescued partially (48 and 24%, respectively) the flightless phenotype (Table 5).
Table 5

Effects of tetracycline on survival and flightless phenotype of transgenic Anopheles stephensi carrying driver and effector transgenes

♂ driver lines outcrossed with ♀ effector line E-1

Tetracycline concentration

Larvae

Transgenic adults

  

Only one transgene

Effector + driver transgenes

Flying females

Flightless females

Flying males

Totals (% survival larvae-adult)

DAa-3

10 μg/ml

2535

371

108

16

226

350 (94%)

DAa-3

5 μg/ml

930

269

37

3

91

131 (49%)

DAa-3

1 μg/ml

610

143

21

10

69

100 (70%)

DAa-3

100 ng/ml

750

162

15

16

61

92 (57%)

DAa-3

10 ng/ml

600

127

9

28

38

75 (59%)

DAs-21

10 μg/ml

nd

233

25

18

82

125 (54%)

DAs-22

10 μg/ml

nd

628

155

12

285 (1)*

453 (72%)

*One flightless male was observed among the progeny of driver DAs-22 ♂ x effector E-1 ♀ cross (indicated in parenthesis).

Conclusions

The results shown here demonstrate that the genetics and resulting phenotypes of a female-specific RIDL strategy, previously developed for dengue vector mosquitoes [2, 4] can be adapted to a vector of human malaria, An. stephensi. This demonstration supports efforts to optimize the efficacy of the gene constructs and to eventually perform cage and field trials to assess the usefulness of this approach as a malaria vector population suppression tool.

It is clear that further refinements of this system are required. Efficient scale-up would benefit from having to manage only a single line, so linkage of the driver and effector genes would ultimately be required. Furthermore, piggyBac-mediated transposition was used to insert randomly the driver constructs into the mosquito genome. The expectation was that position effects resulting from the activity state of the DNA surrounding each independent insertion site would influence in a variable manner the expression of the driver construct. This was evident in variable penetrance of the intended flightless phenotype and the sex-independent and -dependent lethality in some lines. Remarkably, Southern blot analyses showed that all of the recovered driver lines carrying the AeAct-4 promoter and at least two of those carrying the AsAct-4 promoter had single transgene insertions. This is unusual for piggyBac integration into An. stephensi[20, 24] and supports the conclusion that the driver construct alone can be deleterious if present in high-copy number as well as being integrated at a chromosomal site that enhances its expression. Selection and characterization of favourable chromosomal docking sites, site-specific recombination and DNA fragments with insulator-like activity would assist the development of a strain with the optimized flightless phenotype and diminish or eliminate male fitness impact [20, 24, 25].

Scale-up in testing of novel genetic strains is needed to ensure that the engineered mosquitoes function as designed in the field. The Ae. aegypti fsRIDL line OX3604C had outstanding performance characteristics in small and large laboratory cage trials, but did not meet efficiency expectations derived from modelling when tested in large outdoor field cages [7, 8]. It is important to note that the field-cage trials were limited to only one test of a single, independently-derived fsRIDL strain. Here again, strain optimization using alternative characterized genome insertion sites, DNA insulator sequences [24] and even redesigning the transgenes could produce a strain that can be used with the expectation of an epidemiological impact on pathogen transmission.

The translation of new technologies from the laboratory to the field requires that resulting products function in a safe and efficacious manner. Transgenic mosquito technologies bring with them a number of challenges that can be addressed in the design features of the final products and site-specific community engagement activities [2628]. A specific concern about the conditional, dominant, lethal genes is whether environmental contamination by tetracycline could produce a hazard by rescuing the flightless phenotype in the released transgenic mosquitoes. The most plausible source of rescue would be tetracycline contaminating larval habitats. No reports exist of measurements of tetracycline in the urban breeding sites of An. stephensi. However, there is an extensive literature on the widespread use of antibiotics for therapeutic, prophylactic and growth promotion purposes in livestock production. Antibiotics, including tetracycline and its analogues, are transferred to soils and surface waters when manure from the animals is spread on farmland or held in wastewater ponds. Several studies have been conducted to measure the concentrations of antibiotics in wastewater, animal waste and soil from manure-treated farmland. In studied sites, concentrations of tetracycline, tetracycline analogues or tetracycline degradation products were found to be lower than 1 μg/ml. One of the highest numbers measured was 0.698 ng/ml tetracycline in farmland treated with pig-manure slurry [29]. Other locations, such as waste-water treatment facilities, where persistent tetracycline could come from various sources such as cities and rural areas, had a maximum tetracycline concentration of 0.004 μg/ml [30]. The highest detected concentration of chlortetracycline in the same study was estimated at 0.0012 μg/ml. These concentrations are atypical, though. Bodies of water such as rivers and streams where runoff from farms could potentially be problematic contained minimal amounts of tetracycline, with concentrations below the limit of detection (≤ 0.5 ng/ml) [31]. Reviews examining tetracycline levels measured in waste-water treatment plants in USA and Asia found concentrations in the range <0.00003-0.62 ng/ml [32, 33]. These data indicate that environmental tetracycline (and tetracycline analogue) concentrations detected in the breeding sites in which An. stephensi larvae are most likely to be located are not sufficient to rescue the engineered mosquito flightless phenotype.

Anopheles stephensi is an important malaria vector in the Indian subcontinent. Therefore the management of An. stephensi populations is of prime importance to public health and welfare. Successful population suppression could result in local or regional vector elimination dependent on the scope and size of the effort. It is anticipated that this suppression would result in less parasite transmission and therefore reduced human morbidity and mortality. However, population suppression technologies would have to be sustained to prevent re-colonization of the treated areas following vector migration or natural- or human-aided dispersal. Sustainable transgenic technologies also are being developed and these may represent second-generation genetic tools for controlling parasite transmission [25]. In the interim, the data presented here support the conclusion that fsRIDL should be developed as a tool in integrated pest management practices to control malaria transmission in urban settings were An. stephensi is the major vector.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Karen Chu and Judy Coleman for mosquito care and for the DsRed2 phenotype images, and Neil Morrison for reviewing the manuscript. This research was funded by a grant to the Regents of the University of California from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California
(2)
Oxitec Ltd
(3)
Departments of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics and Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, 3205 McGaugh Hall, University of California
(4)
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford

References

  1. Thomas DD, Donnelly CA, Wood RJ, Alphey LS: Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system. Science. 2010, 287: 2474-2476.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fu G, Lees RS, Nimmo D, Aw D, Jin L, Gray P, Berendonk TU, White-Cooper H, Scaife S, Kim Phuc H, Marinotti O, Jasinskiene N, James AA, Alphey L: Female-specific flightless phenotype for mosquito control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 4550-4554. 10.1073/pnas.1000251107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Black WC, Alphey L, James AA: Why RIDL is not SIT. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27: 362-370. 10.1016/j.pt.2011.04.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Labbé GM, Scaife S, Morgan SA, Curtis ZH, Alphey L: Female-specific flightless (fsRIDL) phenotype for control of Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012, 6: e1724-10.1371/journal.pntd.0001724.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Alphey L, Benedict M, Bellini R, Clark GG, Dame DA, Service MW, Dobson SL: Sterile-insect methods for control of mosquito-borne diseases: an analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10: 295-311. 10.1089/vbz.2009.0014.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Muñoz D, Jimenez A, Marinotti O, James AA: The AeAct-4 gene is expressed in the developing flight muscles of female Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13: 563-568. 10.1111/j.0962-1075.2004.00519.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wise de Valdez MR, Nimmo D, Betz J, Gong HF, James AA, Alphey L, Black WC: Genetic elimination of dengue vector mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 4772-4775. 10.1073/pnas.1019295108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Facchinelli L, Valerio L, Ramsey JM, Gould F, Walsh RK, Bond G, Robert MA, Lloyd AL, James AA, Alphey L, Scott TW: Field cage studies and progressive evaluation of genetically-engineered mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7: e2001-10.1371/journal.pntd.0002001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharma VP: Hidden burden of malaria in Indian women. Malar J. 2009, 8: 281-10.1186/1475-2875-8-281.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay SI, Sinka ME, Okara RM, Kabaria CW, Mbithi PM, Tago CC, Benz D, Gething PW, Howes RE, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Bangs MJ, Chareonviriyaphap T, Elyazar IR, Harbach RE, Hemingway J, Manguin S, Mbogo CM, Rubio-Palis Y, Godfray H: Developing global maps of the dominant anopheles vectors of human malaria. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000209-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000209.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Qi Q, Guerra CA, Moyes CL, Elyazar IR, Gething PW, Hay SI, Tatem AJ: The effects of urbanization on global Plasmodium vivax malaria transmission. Malar J. 2012, 11: 403-10.1186/1475-2875-11-403.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. WHO: World malaria report. 2009, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  13. Oshaghi MA, Yaaghoobi F, Abaie MR: Pattern of mitochondrial DNA variation between and within Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) biological forms suggests extensive gene flow. Acta Trop. 2006, 99: 226-233. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gakhar SK, Sharma R, Sharma A: Population genetic structure of malaria vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Ind J Exp Biol. 2013, 51: 273-279.Google Scholar
  15. Vectorbase: [http://vectorbase.org]
  16. Handler AM, Harrell RA: Germline transformation of Drosophila melanogaster with the piggyBac transposon vector. Insect Mol Biol. 1999, 8: 449-457. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.00139.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Isaacs AT, Li F, Jasinskiene N, Chen X, Nirmala X, Marinotti O, Vinetz JM, James AA: Engineered resistance to Plasmodium falciparum development in transgenic Anopheles stephensi. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002017-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathur G, Sanchez-Vargas I, Alvarez D, Olson KE, Marinotti O, James AA: Transgene-mediated suppression of dengue viruses in the salivary glands of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol. 2010, 19: 753-763. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2010.01032.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. 1989, New York: Plainview: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Amenya DA, Bonizzoni M, Isaacs AT, Jasinskiene N, Chen H, Marinotti O, Yan G, James AA: Comparative fitness assessment of Anopheles stephensi transgenic lines receptive to site-specific integration. Insect Mol Biol. 2010, 19: 263-269. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00986.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nimmo DD, Alphey L, Meredith JM, Eggleston P: High efficiency site-specific genetic engineering of the mosquito genome. Insect Mol Biol. 2006, 15: 129-136. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00615.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bennett D, Szoor B, Gross S, Vereshchagina N, Alphey L: Ectopic expression of inhibitors of Protein Phosphatase type 1 (PP1) can be used to analyse roles of PP1 in Drosophila development. Genetics. 2003, 164: 235-245.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Parker L, Gross S, Beullens M, Bollen M, Bennett D, Alphey L: Functional interaction between NIPP1 and PP1 in Drosophila: lethality of over-expression of NIPP1 in flies and rescue by the over-expression of PP1. Biochem J. 2002, 368: 789-797. 10.1042/BJ20020582.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carballar-Lejarazú R, Jasinskiene N, James AA: Exogenous gypsy insulator sequences modulate transgene expression in the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110: 7176-7181.
  25. Isaacs AT, Jasinskiene N, Tretiakov M, Thiery I, Zettor A, Bourgouin C, James AA: Transgenic Anopheles stephensi coexpressing single-chain antibodies resist Plasmodium falciparum development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109: E1922-E1930. 10.1073/pnas.1207738109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lavery JV, Tinadana PO, Scott TW, Harrington LC, Ramsey JM, Ytuarte-Nuñez C, James AA: Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. Trends Parasitol. 2010, 26: 279-283. 10.1016/j.pt.2010.02.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization: Progress and prospects for the use of genetically-modified mosquitoes to inhibit disease transmission. Report on planning meeting 1: Technical consultation on current status and planning for future development of genetically-modified mosquitoes for malaria and dengue control. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 64-Google Scholar
  28. Alonso PL, Besansky NJ, Burkot TR, Collins FH, Hemingway J, James AA, Lengeler C, Lindsay S, Liu Q, Lobo NF, Mnzava A, Tanner M, Zwiebel L, The malERA Consultative Group on Vector Control: A research agenda for malaria eradication: vector control. PLoS Med. 2011, 8: e1000401-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Beausse J: Selected drugs in solid matrices: a review of environmental determination, occurrence and properties of principal substances. Trends Anal Chem. 2004, 23: 753-761. 10.1016/j.trac.2004.08.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Karthikeyan K, Bleam WF: Occurrence of antibiotics in wastewater effluents and their mobility in soils: a case study for Wisconsin. [http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/EcoNatRes.KarthikeyanOccurr]
  31. Campagnolo ER, Johnson KR, Karpati A, Rubin CS, Kolpin DW, Meyer MT, Esteban JE, Currier RW, Smith K, Thu KM, McGeehin M: Antimicrobial residues in animal waste and water resources proximal to large-scale swine and poultry feeding operations. Sci Total Environ. 2002, 299: 89-95. 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00233-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gulkowska A, He Y, So MK, Yeung LW, Leung HW, Giesy JP, Lam PK, Martin M, Richardson BJ: The occurrence of selected antibiotics in Hong Kong coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007, 54: 1287-1293. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Le-Minh N, Khan SJ, Drewes JE, Stuetz RM: Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes. Water Research. 2010, 44: 4295-4323. 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Marinotti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement