Use of a colorimetric (DELI) test for the evaluation of chemoresistance of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax to commonly used anti-plasmodial drugs in the Brazilian Amazon

  • Lilian R Pratt-Riccio1, 2,

    Affiliated with

    • Yonne F Chehuan3,

      Affiliated with

      • Maria José Siqueira3,

        Affiliated with

        • Maria das Graças Alecrim3,

          Affiliated with

          • Cesare Bianco-Junior1, 2,

            Affiliated with

            • Pierre Druilhe4,

              Affiliated with

              • Philippe Brasseur5,

                Affiliated with

                • Maria de Fátima Ferreira-da-Cruz1, 2,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Leonardo JM Carvalho1, 2 and

                    Affiliated with

                    • Cláudio T Daniel-Ribeiro1, 2Email author

                      Affiliated with

                      Malaria Journal201312:281

                      DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-281

                      Received: 23 May 2013

                      Accepted: 31 July 2013

                      Published: 12 August 2013



                      The emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax resistance to available anti-malarial drugs represents a major drawback in the control of malaria and its associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemoresistance profile of P. falciparum and P. vivax to commonly used anti-plasmodial drugs in a malaria-endemic area in the Brazilian Amazon.


                      The study was carried out in Manaus (Amazonas state), in the Brazilian Amazon. A total of 88 P. falciparum and 178 P. vivax isolates was collected from 2004 to 2007. The sensitivity of P. falciparum isolates was determined to chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine and artesunate and the sensitivity of P. vivax isolates was determined to chloroquine and mefloquine, by using the colorimetric DELI test.


                      As expected, a high prevalence of P. falciparum isolates resistant to chloroquine (78.1%) was observed. The prevalence of isolates with profile of resistance or decreased sensitivity for quinine, mefloquine and artesunate was 12.7, 21.2 and 11.7%, respectively. In the case of P. vivax, the prevalence of isolates with profile of resistance for chloroquine and mefloquine was 9.8 and 28%, respectively. No differences in the frequencies of isolates with profile of resistance or geometric mean IC50s were seen when comparing the data obtained in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, for all tested anti-malarials.


                      The great majority of P. falciparum isolates in the Brazilian malaria-endemic area remain resistant to chloroquine, and the decreased sensitivity to quinine, mefloquine and artesunate observed in 10–20% of the isolates must be taken with concern, especially for artesunate. Plasmodium vivax isolates also showed a significant proportion of isolates with decreased sensitivity to chloroquine (first-line drug) and mainly to mefloquine. The data presented here also confirm the usefulness of the DELI test to generate results able to impact on public health policies.


                      Malaria Plasmodium falciparum Plasmodium vivax Resistance Anti-malarials DELI test


                      Malaria is one of the most serious public health problems worldwide. It is a leading cause of disease and death in many developing countries, where young children and pregnant women are the most affected groups. Malaria is endemic in 99 countries and, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were about 219 million cases of malaria and an estimated 660,000 malaria deaths in 2010 [1].

                      In Brazil, malaria is hypo- to meso-endemic, present throughout the year with clear seasonal fluctuations and is frequently associated with migration movements of non-immune individuals to areas where malaria is endemic [2]. In 2011, approximately 263,000 malaria cases were reported in Brazil, 99.8% of them in the Amazon Region [3].

                      In the absence of an effective vaccine, malaria control is almost entirely dependent on the availability of effective chemotherapy and the efficacy of anti-vectorial measures. The emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to anti-malarial drugs thus represent a major drawback in the control of malaria and its associated morbidity and mortality. Resistance to current available anti-malarial drugs has been reported in many places in the world, including Brazil. The case of chloroquine is representative. Chloroquine appeared in the 1940s as an extraordinary anti-malarial drug: effective, cheap and easy to produce. However, since the first reports of P. falciparum parasites with reduced sensitivity to chloroquine [47], the resistance to this drug spread rapidly throughout the world. In many places, it became no longer effective and had to be substituted by other drugs, more expensive and in many cases presenting considerable side effects. The same was true in Brazil, where the first report of P. falciparum resistance to chloroquine was in the 1960s [4] and, by 1990, more than 95% of P. falciparum isolates circulating in malaria endemic areas were resistant to chloroquine [8].

                      Given the strong impact of chemoresistance to anti-malarial drugs in the control of malaria, monitoring the development of resistant phenotypes is a priority wherever malaria is endemic. The in vitro methods for evaluating anti-malarial drug sensitivity can provide a profile of plasmodial sensitivity to a variety of drugs, since several drugs can be assayed simultaneously. A lower sensitivity in vitro of an isolate does not necessarily mean that it will be resistant in vivo, because the in vivo outcome depends on a number of factors that cannot be evaluated in vitro. However, it can provide an outline of resistant phenotypes circulating for each drug tested when using samples from an adequate number of patients in a given area, thus providing crucial information for policy-makers to determine the best drug to be employed in the area. Ideally, monitoring of antimalarial chemoresistance must be continuous, since development and spread of resistance are dynamic events, changing with time and according to human interventions and other factors, such as population migration.

                      A good alternative for microscopic and isotopic in vitro methods appeared with the development of immuno-enzymatic methods to evaluate plasmodial growth. The double-site enzyme-linked immunodetection (DELI) test [9, 10] is based on the detection of the parasite lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), produced during the plasmodial growth, by means of monoclonal antibodies, in a sandwich ELISA. Deli-test assay proved to be reproducible, very sensitive to detect low parasitaemia (0.005%) and easy to perform even in field conditions, and without the need of well training microscopists or manipulation of [3] hypoxanthine [1013]. As an ELISA procedure, it allows the fast evaluation of many samples at once. In addition, DELI-test is easier to perform, faster to implement, and cheaper than in vitro isotopic assays [10]. With the development of an efficient short-term culture protocol for in vitro Plasmodium vivax culture [14], and the availability of monoclonal antibodies specific for P.vivax LDH, DELI test also allows the study of the sensitivity of this parasite to anti-malarial drugs.

                      The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemoresistance profile of P. falciparum and P. vivax to commonly used anti-plasmodial drugs in a Brazilian malaria-endemic area in the Amazon Region using the DELI-test.


                      Studied area and isolates

                      This study was carried out in the city of Manaus (Amazonas state), located at the Brazilian Amazon. A total of 88 P. falciparum and 178 P. vivax isolates were collected from patients who sought health care at Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado Tropical Medicine Foundation (FMT-HVD) from 2004 to 2007.

                      Written informed consent was obtained from all donors and venous blood samples were drawn in Vacutainer® (Becton Dickinson, Oxnard, CA) EDTA tubes. Thin and thick blood smears were examined for identification of malaria parasite and determination of parasitaemia by two expert malaria microscopists from FMT-HVD and from the Laboratory of Malaria Research (Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) which is a reference centre in malaria diagnosis for the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Thick blood smears from all subjects were stained with Giemsa and examined under 1,000-fold magnification. Parasitaemia was determined by counting parasites in reference to 200 white blood cells in thick blood films, and the number of the blood parasites per millilitre was calculated.

                      All malaria patients enrolled in this study complied with the following criteria: 1) they presented symptoms; 2) they had P. falciparum or P. vivax infection; 3) they neither used chemoprophylaxis nor took anti-malarial drugs as self-treatment; 4) they were 12 years old or older; 5) females were not pregnant or breast feeding; and, 6) blood collection was performed at the day of diagnosis before malaria treatment. After malaria diagnosis and blood sample collection, the patients were immediately treated according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health standards for malaria therapy.

                      The study was reviewed and approved by the Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Ethical Committee (number 221/03).

                      Drug sensitivity assay

                      The sensitivity of P. falciparum isolates was determined to chloroquine sulphate, quinine hydrochloride, mefloquine hydrochloride, and artesunate and the sensitivity of P. vivax isolates was determined to chloroquine sulphate and mefloquine hydrochloride (all drugs obtained from Sigma-Aldrich).

                      Anti-malarial drugs aliquoted in predosed tubes (15 mg/tube) were dissolved by the addition of 3 mL of 100% ethanol and 7 mL of RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Invitrogen Life Technologies) (chloroquine and quinine) or 10 mL of 100% methanol (mefloquine and artesunate). From the stock solution, another solution was prepared for each drug at final concentrations of 2,400 ng/mL for chloroquine, 1,200 ng/mL for quinine and 150 ng/mL for mefloquine and artesunate in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 0.5% albumax (Gibco) (complete culture medium), for P. falciparum; and 600 ng/mL for chloroquine and 300 ng/mL for mefloquine in a 3:1 mix (vol/vol) of RPMI 1640 medium and Waymouth medium (Sigma-Aldrich), for P. vivax. One hundred mL of each dilution were added to wells of the column 1 of 96-well tissue culture plates (Falcon) and nine subsequent two-fold dilutions were prepared in wells 2–9. Wells 10–12 were filled with 50 μL of complete culture medium (culture control wells). Each concentration of anti-malarial was tested in duplicate (P. falciparum) or quadruplicate (P. vivax).

                      Isolates with at least 0.1% parasitaemia were included in the study and were maintained at 4°C (for up to 8 hr after collection) before the in vitro culture was started. Blood samples were washed twice with a solution of RPMI-1640 medium and then resuspended in the complete culture medium (P. falciparum) or RPMI-Waymouth (P. vivax). If necessary, a dilution was performed by adding uninfected O-positive-group erythrocytes to obtain a 0.5–1% parasite density. Finally, 200 μL of this suspension were distributed to each well in the anti-malarial predosed plates in 1.2% final haematocrit. The plates were incubated for 48 hr at 37°C in a CO2 incubator (5% CO2 in air) and were then frozen and kept at −20°C. Before ELISA, the plates were frozen and thawed three times to lyse the red blood cells.


                      The success of the drug sensitivity assay and the appropriate volume of haemolysed culture were previously determined for each clinical isolate by using a preliminary LDH ELISA as a pretest. To determine which dilution of haemolysed culture had to be used in the DELI-test, four serial dilutions (1:50, 1:25, 1:12.5, 1:6.25) of culture control wells (no drug) of each isolate were tested in a preliminary LDH ELISA. The dilutions used were those providing optical density (OD) readings between 1.0–2.0.

                      ELISA plate (Nunc, Maxisorb, Denmark) wells were coated with 100 μL of monoclonal antibody (MAb) against P. falciparum (17EA) or P. vivax (11D) LDH (kind gifts of Dr Michael Makler, Flow Inc, Portland, USA) at 1 μg/mL, in PBS pH 7.4. The plates were incubated overnight at 4°C, washed with PBS with 1% BSA (fraction V, Boehringer-Mannheim) (PBS-BSA) and then incubated with 300 μL of PBS-BSA for 4 hr, at room temperature. The plates were maintained at 4°C until used.

                      Subsequently, the appropriated volume of the haemolysed culture was transferred to the ELISA plate wells with PBS-BSA to the final volume of 100 μL, incubated for 1 hr at 37°C and then washed with PBS-BSA. After the addition of 100 μL per well of a biotinylated MAb against pan-Plasmodium LDH (19G7), the plates were incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. After washing, a third incubation for 30 min at room temperature with 100 μL of a streptavidin horseradish peroxidase solution was followed by a last washing step. Enzyme activity was revealed by incubation for 5 min at room temperature with 100 μL of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB). The reaction was stopped with 1 M of phosphoric acid, and the absorbance was read at 450 nm in a spectrophotometer (Spectramax 250, Molecular Devices).

                      Concentration-response data were analysed by a non-linear regression function to determine the 50% inhibition of parasite growth (IC50), defined as the concentration of the drug which inhibited 50% of the production of LDH as determined by OD values from sample test wells compared to those obtained from drug-free control wells. The IC50 threshold values for resistance to chloroquine, mefloquine, quinine and artesunate were 100 nM, 30 nM, 500 nM and 10 nM, respectively; these values were similar to those already described elsewhere [10, 11, 15, 16].

                      Statistical analysis

                      The data were stored in the Fox-plus® (Borland International Inc, Perrysburg, OH, USA) data bank software. GraphPad Instat and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc, CA, USA) statistical software programs were used for data analysis. The Student’s t-test was used to analyse the differences in IC50 mean values and the Chi-square test was applied to compare the prevalence of isolates with profile of resistance observed from 2004 to 2007.


                      A total of 88 P. falciparum and 178 P. vivax samples was collected from malaria patients from 2004 to 2007. Males were predominant in both P. falciparum (71%) and P. vivax (81%) groups. The average age was also similar between P. falciparum (36 ± 15 years old) and P. vivax (34 ± 13 years old) groups.

                      Overall, the IC50 values could be determined in most of P. falciparum (70/88, 80%) and P. vivax (132/178, 74%) samples (Table 1). Successful in vitro culture allowing IC50 determination for fresh isolates was low in the first year (2004) for both P. falciparum and P. vivax cultures, but substantially increased in the subsequent years, suggesting better handling and optimization of culture procedures (Table 1). The feasibility of the procedure using chloroquine-sensitive (Dd2) and chloroquine-resistant (3D7) strains adapted for in vitro culture was determined and showed that it worked well (Figure 1).
                      Table 1

                      Frequencies of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax field isolates from Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil, with IC50 of commonly used anti-malarial drugs determined in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007


                      2004 nd/n (%)

                      2005 nd/n (%)

                      2006 nd/n (%)

                      2007 nd/n (%)

                      Total nd/n (%)

                      P. falciparum

                      16/30 (53)

                      18/19 (94)

                      20/22 (91)

                      16/17 (94)

                      70/88 (80)

                      P. vivax

                      11/23 (48)

                      24/44 (55)



                      132/178 (74)

                      nd: number of samples with IC50 determined; n: number of total samples (percentage).

                      Figure 1

                      Example of curves for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. P. falciparum chloroquine-resistant Dd2 strain (A), P. falciparum chloroquine-sensitive 3D7 strain (B), isolate from one patient with P. falciparum infection (C) and isolate from one patient with P. vivax infection (D) cultures in presence of chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine and artesunate (P. falciparum) or chloroquine and mefloquine (P. vivax).

                      As expected, a high prevalence of P. falciparum isolates resistant or with decreased susceptibility to chloroquine was observed (Figure 2A). Indeed, 78.1% (50/64) of the samples showed IC50 higher than 100 nM. The geometric mean IC50s for chloroquine was 361.8 nM (95% confidence interval 266–492 nM) (Table 2). For quinine, the prevalence of clearly resistant isolates (IC50 > 500 nM) was 12.7% (8/63). The geometric mean IC50s for quinine was 128.5 nM (95% confidence interval 93–175). For mefloquine, the prevalence of isolates with profile of resistance or decreased susceptibility (IC50 > 30nM) was 21.2% (14/66). The geometric mean IC50s for mefloquine was 14.2 nM (95% confidence interval 10–20). Finally, for artesunate, the prevalence of isolates with IC50 above the threshold of 10 nM was 11.7% (6/51). The geometric mean of IC50s was 3.4 nM (95% confidence interval 3–4). No difference in frequencies of isolates with profile of resistance or geometric mean IC50s were seen comparing the data obtained in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 for chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine and artesunate.
                      Figure 2

                      Distribution of IC50 values in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax isolates using DELI test. Plasmodium falciparum isolates (A), Plasmodium vivax isolates (B). Values are individual IC50 (nM). Lines represent geometric mean with 95% confidence interval.

                      Table 2

                      IC50 values of commonly used anti-malarial drugs in in vitro culture of Plasmodium falciparum and in Plasmodium vivax from Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil


                      P. falciparum

                      P. vivax


                      IC50 (nM)


                      IC50 (nM)


                      No. of isolates

                      Geometric mean

                      95% CI2


                      No of isolates

                      Geometric mean

                      95% CI2






































                      1Performed only in P. falciparum cultures; 2CI, confidence interval.

                      Among P. falciparum isolates, different chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine, and artesunate sensitivity levels were observed, however, the temporal analysis indicate that the profile of sensitivity to these drugs remained relatively stable.

                      In the case of P. vivax isolates, the prevalence of isolates with IC50 above threshold of 100 nM for chloroquine was 9.8% (13/132) (Figure 2B) and the geometric mean IC50 was 24.1 nM (95% confidence interval 20–29). For mefloquine, the prevalence of IC50 above threshold of 30 nM was 28% (22/78) and the geometric mean IC50 was 18.1 nM (95% confidence interval 14–23) (Table 2). No difference in frequencies of isolates with profile of resistance or geometric mean IC50s were seen comparing the data obtained in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 for chloroquine and mefloquine.


                      In the present study, the DELI-test was used to determine the profile of in vitro sensitivity of P. falciparum and P. vivax field isolates in Manaus, in the Brazilian Amazon. Despite some initial technical difficulties in the beginning of the study (2004), the performance of the test in 2005–2007 was similar to that observed in previous studies in Africa, which reported test success rates of 81% for P. falciparum[13].

                      Overall, a high prevalence (78.1%) of P. falciparum isolates resistant or with decreased sensitivity to chloroquine was observed. This was expected since earlier studies conducted in Amazonia suggested that 100% of the P. falciparum isolates circulating in the area were chloroquine-resistant [17]. In addition, most of the “sensitive” isolates had IC50s close to the threshold for sensitivity (100 nM) and therefore represent rather borderline isolates. Only 2/64 (3.1%) of isolates showed clearly low IC50 to chloroquine. Any evidence of the re-emergence of chloroquine-sensitive parasites in Brazil through the documentation of a wild pfcrt P. falciparum haplotype (CVMNK) in Amazonian region was already reported [18].

                      In Brazil, reduced in vitro and in vivo sensitivity to mefloquine has been reported since 1981 [1923] and this might explain the 21.2% resistant phenotypes in the present study. In fact, even before the official introduction of mefloquine in Brazilian endemic areas in 1987, P. falciparum isolates with profile of resistance to mefloquine had already been reported [24].

                      In relation to quinine, the prevalence of resistant isolates (IC50 above 500 nM) was 12.7%. Some isolates showed IC50s very close to the threshold. In any case, this scenario is worrisome because a continuous decreasing in parasite sensitivity has been noted in the Brazilian Amazon [17, 21, 2427] and quinine plus doxycycline is actually recommended as P. falciparum second-line treatment by the Brazilian Malaria Control Programme.

                      Since 2007 the Brazilian Malaria Control Programme defined artemisinin-based combined therapy (ACT) as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria. In this study, 11.7% of the isolates showed IC50 above the threshold of 10 nM (11.7%) for artesunate. This is surprising as these samples were collected in a period before the introduction of ACT in the area; therefore, no selection pressure is to be accounted for. A study performed in another area in the Amazonian region in the same period, showed no evidence of decreased sensitivity of local isolates to artesunate or artemether [28]. However, a recent study showed that 23.9% of the studied isolates from Gabon had a reduced susceptibility to dihydroartemisinin [16]. Decreased sensitivity of P. falciparum parasites to artemether in vitro in French Guiana and Senegal [29] as well as in vivo in Cambodia [30] has also been described. Given the immense value of artemisinin derivatives as alternative drugs for multidrug-resistant parasites, authorities must be alert to these data indicating a trend for emergence of isolates with decreased sensitivity to this drug.

                      The sensitivity of P. vivax parasites to anti-malarial drugs has not been widely monitored in vitro due the difficulties in cultivating P. vivax. Here, the in vitro resistance of P. vivax fresh isolates to chloroquine and mefloquine was evaluated for the first time in Brazil. Although the threshold of IC50 to define a sample as resistant to chloroquine is not well established for P. vivax, it has been proposed that the same threshold used for P. falciparum should be used for P. vivax[15]. In this case, a considerable frequency (9.8%) of P. vivax isolates was above the adopted 100 nM threshold of chloroquine. This frequency was not surprising, because P. vivax resistance to chloroquine has been reported in Brazil [31, 32], as well as increasing numbers of severe P. vivax malaria cases [33, 34]. Consequently, the use of DELI test can be an important tool for backing decisions of the Brazilian health authorities in relation to the treatment policy of P. vivax.

                      Mefloquine is usually an alternative treatment for P. vivax infections. Interestingly, the prevalence of P. vivax isolates with resistant profile to mefloquine was greater (28%) than to P. falciparum parasites (21.2%), corroborating a study performed in Thailand where P. vivax isolates were more resistant to mefloquine when compared with P. falciparum isolates from the same area [35].

                      It should be highlighted that the in vivo outcome depends on a number of factors that cannot be evaluated in vitro, including the level of innate and acquired immunity. However, in vitro assays act as a preliminary warning system indicating a trend, since in vitro resistance may be indicative of clinical resistance.


                      The data here presented using DELI test provide important and useful information regarding the sensitivity profile of Brazilian plasmodial isolates to common anti-malarial drugs. For updating and evaluating potential shifts in the profiles of drug sensitivity, periodic such studies associated with the screening using potential molecular markers should be performed.



                      We are grateful to all patients that agreed to participate in this study for their cooperation and generous donation of blood, which made this study possible. We are deeply grateful to the late Dr Michael Makler for kindly providing the 17EA and 11D monoclonal antibodies. This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Brazil), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ, Brazil), Petróleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobrás) and the Sanofi-Aventis Access to Medicines Impact Malaria Program. CTDR and MFFC are recipients of a Research Productivity Fellowship from CNPq and receive a grant from FAPERJ as “Cientistas do Nosso Estado”.

                      Authors’ Affiliations

                      Laboratório de Pesquisas em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz
                      Centro de Pesquisa, Diagnóstico e Treinamento em Malária (CPD-Mal), Fiocruz, Reference Center for Malaria in the Extra-Amazonian Region for the Secretary for Health Surveillance from the Ministry of Health
                      Laboratório de Malária, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado
                      Institut Pasteur
                      UMR 198, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement


                      1. WHO: World malaria report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. http://​www.​who.​int/​malaria/​publications/​world_​malaria_​report_​2012/​en/​
                      2. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lacerda MV, Brasil P, Ladislau JL, Tauil PL, Daniel-Ribeiro CT: Malaria in Brazil: an overview. Malar J 2010, 9:115.PubMedView Article
                      3. SVS: Boletim Epidemiológico da Malária. 2012. http://​portal.​saude.​gov.​br/​portal/​arquivos/​pdf/​boletim_​malaria_​2010_​2011.​pdf
                      4. Silva J: Terçã maligna cloroquino-resistente–uma série ameaça ao Hinterland brasileiro. Trib Medica 1961, 160:2–6.
                      5. Moore D, Lanier J: Observations on two Plasmodium falciparum infections with an abnormal response to chloroquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1961, 10:5–9.PubMed
                      6. Young M, Moore D: Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum . Am J Trop Med Hyg 1961, 10:317–320.PubMed
                      7. Walker AJ, Lopez-Antunano FJ: Response to drugs of South American strains of Plasmodium falciparum . Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1968, 62:654–667.PubMedView Article
                      8. Gama BE, Lacerda MV, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Ferreira-da-Cruz Mde F: Chemoresistance of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasites in Brazil: consequences on disease morbidity and control. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2011,106(Suppl 1):159–166.PubMedView Article
                      9. Brasseur P, Agnamey P, Moreno A, Druilhe P: Evaluation of in vitro drug sensitivity of antimalarials for Plasmodium falciparum using a colorimetric assay (DELI-microtest). Med Trop (Mars) 2001, 61:545–547.
                      10. Druilhe P, Moreno A, Blanc C, Brasseur P, Jacquier P: A colorimetric in vitro drug sensitivity assay for Plasmodium falciparum based on a highly sensitive double-site lactate dehydrogenase antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001, 64:233–241.PubMed
                      11. Moreno A, Brasseur P, Cuzin-Ouattara N, Blanc C, Druilhe P: Evaluation under field conditions of the colorimetric DELI-microtest for the assessment of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001, 95:100–103.PubMedView Article
                      12. Brockman A, Singlam S, Phiaphun L, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F: Field evaluation of a novel colorimetric method double-site enzyme-linked lactate dehydrogenase immunodetection assay to determine drug susceptibilities of Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates from northwestern Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004, 48:1426–1429.PubMedView Article
                      13. Kaddouri H, Nakache S, Houzé S, Mentré F, Le Bras J: Assessment of the drug susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates from africa by using a Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase immunodetection assay and an inhibitory maximum effect model for precise measurement of the 50-percent inhibitory concentration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006, 50:3343–3349.PubMedView Article
                      14. Chotivanich K, Silamut K, Udomsangpetch R, Stepnewski K, Pukrittayakamee S, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Ex-vivo short-term culture and developmental assessment of Plasmodium vivax . Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001, 95:677–680.PubMedView Article
                      15. Druilhe P, Brasseur P, Blanc C, Makler M: Improved assessment of Plasmodium vivax response to antimalarial drugs by a colorimetric double-site plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007, 51:2112–2116.PubMedView Article
                      16. Zatra R, Lekana-douki JB, Lekoulou F, Bisvigou U, Ngoungou EB, Ndouo FS: In vitro antimalarial susceptibility and molecular markers of drug resistance in Franceville, Gabon. BMC Infect Dis 2012, 12:307.PubMedView Article
                      17. Menezes CM, Kirchgatter K, Di Santi SM, Paula GA, Ferreira EI: In vitro evaluation of quinidine sensitivity in Brazilian Plasmodium falciparum isolates: comparative analysis to quinine and chloroquine. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2001, 43:221–226.PubMedView Article
                      18. Gama BE, De Oliveira NK, Zalis MG, De Souza JM, Santos F, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Ferreira-da-Cruz M, De F: Chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum parasites in a Brazilian endemic area. Malar J 2009, 8:156.PubMedView Article
                      19. Alecrim MGC: Estudo da resistência do P. falciparum às drogas antimaláricas in vivo e in vitro na Amazônia. Brasilia: Universidade de Brasília; 1981. [MSc thesis]
                      20. Couto AA, Calvosa VS, Santos MA, de Souza JM: The evolution over time of the in-vitro resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs in 2 areas of the Brazilian Amazonia with distinct socioeconomic and geographic characteristics. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1995, 28:357–365.PubMedView Article
                      21. Cerutti Junior C, Marques C, Alencar FE, Durlacher RR, Alween A, Segurado AA, Pang LW, Zalis MG: Antimalarial drug susceptibility testing of Plasmodium falciparum in Brazil using a radioisotope method. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1999, 94:803–809.PubMedView Article
                      22. Noronha E, Alecrim MG, Romero GA, Macêdo V: RIII mefloquine resistance in children with falciparum malaria in Manaus, AM, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2000, 33:201–205.PubMed
                      23. Calvosa VS, Adagu IS, Póvoa MM: Plasmodium falciparum : emerging mefloquine resistance in vitro in Para State, North Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001, 95:330–331.PubMedView Article
                      24. Boulos M, Di Santi SM, Barata LCB, Segurado AAC, Dutra AP, Neves VLF: Some aspects of treatment, prophylaxis and chemoresistance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1986,81(Suppl. II):255–257.View Article
                      25. Souza JM, Sheth UK, de Oliveira RM, Roulet H, de Souza SD: An open, randomized, phase III clinical trial of mefloquine and of quinine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the treatment of symptomatic falciparum malaria in Brazil. Bull World Health Organ 1985, 63:603–609.PubMed
                      26. Souza JM: Mefloquine clinical trials-therapeutical experience with mefloquine alone and combination (MSP) in Brazilian male subjects with falciparum malaria. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1986,81(Suppl. II):259–268.View Article
                      27. Zalis MG, Pang L, Silveira MS, Milhous WK, Wirth DF: Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum isolated from the Amazon region of Brazil: evidence for quinine resistance. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998, 58:630–663.PubMed
                      28. Ferreira ID, Martinelli A, Rodrigues LA, Do Carmo EL, Do Rosário VE, Póvoa MM, Cravo P: Plasmodium falciparum from Pará state (Brazil) shows satisfactory in vitro response to artemisinin derivatives and absence of the S769N mutation in the SERCA-type PfATPase6. Trop Med Int Health 2008, 3:199–207.View Article
                      29. Jambou R, Legrand E, Niang M, Khim N, Lim P, Volney B, Ekala MT, Bouchier C, Esterre P, Fandeur T, Mercereau-Puijalon O: Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates to in-vitro artemether and point mutations of the SERCA-type PfATPase6. Lancet 2005, 366:1960–1963.PubMedView Article
                      30. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Lwin KM, Ariey F, Hanpithakpong W, Lee SJ, Ringwald P, Silamut K, Imwong M, Chotivanich K, Lim P, Herdman T, An SS, Yeung S, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, Lindegardh N, Socheat D, White NJ: Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:455–467.PubMedView Article
                      31. Alecrim M, Alecrim W, Macedo V: Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine (R2) and mefloquine (R3) in Brazilian Amazon region. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1999, 32:67–68.PubMed
                      32. Santana Filho FS, Arcanjo AR, Chehuan YM, Costa MR, Martinez-Espinosa FE, Vieira JL, Barbosa MG, Alecrim WD, Alecrim MG: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax , Brazilian Amazon. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13:1125–1126.PubMedView Article
                      33. Cabral PHO AS, Alecrim WD, Alecrim MGC, Lacerda MVG: Malaria and sickle cell anemia: report of complications and clinical management of three patients in a highly endemic area for Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Brazilian Amazon. Case Rep Clin Pract Rev 2006, 7:220–223.
                      34. Lacerda MV: Clinical manifestations and pathogenesis of the thrombocytopenia in malaria. Brasilia: Universidade de Brasilia; 2007. [PhD thesis]
                      35. Chotivanich K, Udomsangpetch R, Chierakul W, Newton PN, Ruangveerayuth R, Pukrittayakamee A, Looareesuwan S, White N: In vitro efficacy of antimalarial drugs against Plasmodium viva x on the western border of Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004, 70:395–397.PubMed


                      © Pratt-Riccio et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.