Open Access

In vitro antimalarial drug susceptibility in Thai border areas from 1998–2003

  • Wanna Chaijaroenkul1,
  • Kesara Na Bangchang1,
  • Mathirut Mungthin2 and
  • Stephen A Ward3Email author
Malaria Journal20054:37

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-4-37

Received: 30 June 2005

Accepted: 02 August 2005

Published: 02 August 2005

Abstract

Background

The Thai-Myanmar and Thai-Cambodia borders have been historically linked with the emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum parasites resistant to antimalarial drugs. Indeed, the areas are often described as harbouring multi-drug resistant parasites. These areas of Thailand have experienced significant changes in antimalarial drug exposure patterns over the past decade. This study describes the in vitro antimalarial susceptibility patterns of 95 laboratory-adapted P. falciparum isolates, collected between 1998 and 2003,.

Methods

Ninety five P. falciparum isolates were collected from five sites in Thailand between 1998 and 2003. After laboratory adaptation to in vitro culture, the susceptibility of these parasites to a range of established antimalarial drugs (chloroquine [CQ], mefloquine [MQ], quinine [QN] and dihydroartemisinin [DHA]) was determined by the isotopic microtest.

Results

Mefloquine (MQ) sensitivity remained poorest in areas previously described as MQ-resistant areas. Sensitivity to MQ of parasites from this area was significantly lower than those from areas reported to harbour moderate (p = 0.002) of low level MQ resistance (p = 000001). Importantly for all drugs tested, there was a considerable range in absolute parasite sensitivities. There was a weak, but statistically positive correlation between parasite sensitivity to CQ and sensitivity to both QN and MQ and a positive correlation between MQ and QN. In terms of geographical distribution, parasites from the Thai-Cambodia were tended to be less sensitive to all drugs tested compared to the Thai-Myanmar border. Parasite sensitivity to all drugs was stable over the 6-year collection period with the exception of QN.

Conclusion

This study highlights the high degree of variability in parasite drug sensitivity in Thailand. There were geographical differences in the pattern of resistance which might reflect differences in drug usage in each area. In contrast to many other studies there were weak, but statistically significant positive, correlations between sensitivity to CQ and sensitivity to MQ and QN. Over the six years of sample collection, parasite sensitivity appears to have stabilized to these drugs in these sites.

Background

Malaria is still a major health problem in Thailand, especially along the Thai-Myanmar and Thai-Cambodia borders where multi-drug resistant malaria is highly prevalent [1]. Chloroquine-resistant (CQR) parasites were first reported in the late 1950s from Southeast-Asia and South-America. Since those early reports CQR has spread throughout the malaria endemic countries of the world. The Malaria Control Programme of the Ministry of Public Health of Thailand was established in 1963. The objective of the control programme is to monitor the susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to currently used antimalarial drugs using both in vitro and in vivo tests with the ultimate goal of providing effective malaria control strategies and delaying the emergence of drug resistance [2]. Both approaches to the sensitivity assessment have their strengths and weaknesses [3]. The in vitro sensitivity monitoring system is considered a suitable system for assessing absolute sensitivity without the confounding influences of host-related factors, such as host immunity and drug pharmacokinetics. The results from in vitro tests, therefore, provide a more objective insight into inherent drug sensitivity than do in vivo tests. However, compared to the in vivo test, there are technical requirements which make this type of analysis operationally more difficult.

Several in vitro sensitivity test systems have been developed and applied to sensitivity monitoring of P. falciparum in endemic areas. These include traditional in vitro tests based on the measurement of the effect of drugs on the growth and development of malaria parasites, i.e., schizont maturation or growth inhibition [4, 5], incorporation of radiolabeled precursors [6], enzymatic activity of parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) [7] or histidine-rich protein II (HRP II) [8]. The in vitro sensitivity test based on the standard micro-technique recommended by the World Health Organization [5] using the schizont maturation inhibition test has been applied successfully in certain highly multi-drug resistant areas of Thailand. However, the technique requires immediate laboratory work at the sites, where availability of qualified personnel is not readily available. One approach to solve this problem is to collect patient's blood samples and perform the test at the central laboratories where qualified personnel exist. This approach requires preservation of parasite samples at low temperature (-196°C) in a liquid nitrogen tank and adaptation of the parasite isolates to short-term culture prior to in vitro sensitivity testing. An additional advantage of this approach is that it allows multiple assessment of drug susceptibility, increasing confidence in the data collected, compared to the one-off drug sensitivity analysis afforded by the use of freshly collected isolates. The main purpose of this study was to explore the in vitro susceptibility of recently collected and adapted P. falciparum isolates to chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine and dihydroartemisinin in order to establish the degree of variability in parasite sensitivity, any geographical patterns and the stability of parasite sensitivity over a six-year collection period.

Methods

Parasite isolates

This study was carried out between 1998–2003, P. falciparum isolates were collected from malaria endemic areas of Thailand (Figure 1), including the Thai-Myanmar border regions (Kanchanaburi, Tak, Ratchaburi and Ranong) and the Thai-Cambodia border (Chantaburi). Approval of the study protocol was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Fresh isolates of P. falciparum were collected from patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria who presented at Mae Sot General Hospital and Malaria Clinics located in the various provinces. Inclusion criteria included those who had no previous history of antimalarial treatment within the preceding one month and with an asexual parasitaemia between 1,000 and 80,000/μl. All gave informed consent for study participation. Three to five millilitres of blood were collected into EDTA tubes from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. The fresh blood samples were then centrifuged to remove the buffy coat and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen following the method of Rowe [9] before being transported to the laboratory.
Figure 1

Map of Thailand showing the sampling sites: Tak, Kanchanaburi, Ratchaburi, Ranong and Chantaburi provinces.

Parasites were maintained in in vitro culture using the method of Trager and Jensen [10]. Briefly, infected blood samples were removed from liquid nitrogen tank storage and thawed in a 37°C water bath. An equal volume of sterile 3.5% sodium chloride was added, and the mixture was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was washed three times and re-suspended with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 20% human serum and placed in a 25 ml tissue culture flask in a total volume of 10 ml containing a 5% RBC suspension. The flask was flushed with a gas mixture of 5%CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2 and incubated at 37°C. The culture medium was changed once a day; group O red blood cells were added to maintain the 5% cell suspension. Parasite growth was monitored by Giemsa-stained (2% v/v, pH 6.8, 30 min) thin smear examination.

In vitro sensitivity tests of P. falciparum isolates

Drug testing was performed using the cultured parasites once the parasitaemia of the culture reached an optimum density (0.5%–1% parasitaemia and 1.5% haematocrit). In vitro susceptibility was tested by monitoring [3H] hypoxanthine uptake [6]. Each drug was prepared as 10 mM stock solution and further diluted in RPMI-1640 medium to the desired concentrations. The plates (96-wells microtitre plates) were dosed with antimalarial drugs at a total of eight final concentrations as follows: mefloquine (1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 nM), chloroquine (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 250, 500 nM), quinine (10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 250, 500, 1,000 nM), and dihydroartemisinin (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 nM). Ten microlitres of blood (1% parasitaemia, 20% haematocrit) was dispensed into each well of the sterile plates, followed by 100 μl of drug solution in RPMI-1640 without [3H] hypoxanthine. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a candle jar for 24 hours, pulsed with 5 μl of [3H] hypoxanthine solution (0.1 mCi/ml), and reincubated for an additional 24 hours. The plates were harvested using a Tomtec March III M semi-automatic harvester, using Wallac A Printed Filtermats (Finland), dried, and mixed with 5 ml of scintillation fluid. Each filter mat was then placed in a cassette and the radioactivity were measured using a 1450 MicroBeta Trilux liquid scintillation and luminescence counter (Wallac, Finland). The drug concentration that inhibited 50% parasite growth (IC50) were determined. Reported data represent the mean results from at least three independent drug sensitivity tests.

Statistical analysis

The in vitro activity of antimalarials is presented as the geometric mean of the IC50s for all isolates. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to determine whether the observed differences in the in vitro response of geographically distinct parasites to antimalarial drugs were significantly different. The potential for in vitro cross-resistance was evaluated by standard linear regression analysis. For all statistical tests the significance level (p) was set at 0.05.

Results

In vitro susceptibility of P. falciparum to antimalarials

A total of 95 P. falciparum isolates were collected from five malaria endemic areas of Thailand: Mae-sot District, Tak (27), Ratchaburi (1), Kanchanaburi (37), Ranong (16) and Chantaburi Province (14). The in vitro susceptibility data are shown in Figure 2A to 2C. The geometric mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) and 95%CI were 74.3 (45.2–122.2), 162.9 (91.9–288.8), 22.2 (10.8–45.6) and 1.35 (0.73–2.47) nM for CQ, QN, MQ and DHA respectively. There were no major differences in drug susceptibility over the six years the samples were collected with the exception of quinine sensitivity, which was lower in the isolates collected in 2003 (Table 1).
Figure 2

The scatter plot between the IC50 (nM) and the mefloquine resistance areas and the border regions. A represents the chloroquine data, B the quinine data and C the mefloquine data. (a) is the geometric mean 50% inhibitory concentration in vitro with the 95% CI and (b) is the median.

Table 1

In vitro susceptibility of Thai P. falciparum isolates according the years

Year

GMIC50 CQ (nM)

GMIC50 QN (nM)

GMIC50 MQ (nM)

GMIC50 DHA (nM)

 

Mean

95%CI

Mean

95%CI

Mean

95%CI

Mean

95%CI

1998

72.5

56.7–89.7

178.3

121.1–262.4

20.1

11.7–34.5

1.07

0.82–1.39

2000

65.1

44.8–94.5

243.4

163.7–361.8

28.1

15.8–50.1

1.64

0.92–2.92

2002

67.8

53.2–86.5

184.7

152.1–224.5

30.4

25.5–36.1

1.46

1.16–1.84

2003

79.1

68.8–90.1

136b

115.2–160.4

19.1

15.3–23.7

1.35

1.12–1.63

a Geometric mean 50% inhibitory concentration in vitro

b Significant difference with 2000 (p = 0.012) and 2002 (p = 0.024)

In vitro susceptibility and geographical distribution

The malarious areas of Thailand have been categorized by the clinical level of mefloquine sensitivity i.e. high level MQ resistance (cure rate of MQ 750 mg is less than 50%; Tak and Chantaburi provinces), moderate level MQ resistance (cure rate between 50% and 70%; Kanchanaburi and Ratchaburi provinces) and low level MQ resistance (cure rate more than 70%; Ranong province). These groupings were maintained in the isolates studied here in vitro. Interestingly, parasites from the least MQ resistant area tended to demonstrate highest susceptibility to the other drugs tested.

In vitro cross-resistance

In contrast to previous studies conducted on African and Thai isolates [11, 12], there was a significant positive correlation between the in vitro susceptibility to CQ and susceptibility to MQ (n = 91, Pearson r = 0.075, p = 0.010) and QN (n = 93, Pearson r = 0.134, p < 0.0001) (Figure 3). Similarly there was a significant positive correlations between IC50 values of QN and the IC50 values of MQ (n = 91, Pearson r = 0.230, p < 0.0001). The strong correlation between the activities of MQ and QN was not surprising given the structural similarities between these two drugs and has been noticed by several authors [13, 14]. In contrast, susceptibility to DHA did not correlate with susceptibility to any of the other drugs tested (data not shown).
Figure 3

The scatter diagram and the regression line representing the relationship between IC50 (nM) values of CQ, QN and MQ.

Discussion

In response to concerns about the malaria situation in Thailand, the government established the Malaria Control Programme since 1963. This programme has monitored and modified Thai policy on malaria control which was last revised in 1995. The major aim of the programme is to monitor the evolution of drug resistant malaria parasites [2]. The ability to implement a quick and relatively cheap assay to predict drug susceptibility of P. falciparum infections is vitally important, so that the spread of drug resistant parasites can be monitored and controlled. The first report of CQ resistance came from Thailand's borders in the late 1950s. More recently, MQ resistance was shown to develop rapidly after its introduction into clinical practice. This problem has been remedied by the introduction and deployment of the artemisinins in combination with MQ. Experience with CQ has highlighted the utility of drug sensitivity assays in plotting the emergence and spread of resistance. More recently molecular tools have found utility. For example the use of the K76T mutation in pfcrt gene as a marker for CQ susceptibility is the most useful molecular marker for CQ resistance, however, some parasite isolates that are sensitive to CQ also carried this mutation [11, 15] and the use of this strategy is based on a full knowledge of all potential resistance mutations. Furthermore, the large variability in parasite sensitivity to drugs such as CQ suggests that although one molecular event may be the dominant control of susceptibility, other molecular events must contribute to this variability [16].

There have been many studies looking at parasite chemosensitivity in S.E.Asia. In general, the pattern of sensitivity shows consistency across the region, although parasite responses in parasites from Vietnam tend to show better responses to drugs [17, 18]. Decreased susceptibility to quinine was first reported at the beginning of the 1980s in patients living near the Thai-Cambodia border [19, 20]. The data reported in this current study indicate that the P. falciparum susceptibility to QN is stable or may have slightly improved recently. With respect to the other drugs studied against parasite sensitivity apperas to have stabilized.

Several studies have reported evidence of cross-resistance among certain group of quinoline-containing antimalarial drugs, i.e., QN, MQ and HF, while showing an inverse relationship between this group of drugs and sensitivity to CQ [14, 2124]. Similarly, in other studies, the sensitivity of P. falciparum field isolates to the two structurally related drugs QN and MQ was strongly correlated [13, 14, 25]. This pattern of cross-resistance was also confirmed in this study. In contrast, a weak, but statistically significant, positive correlation was observed between sensitivity to CQ and sensitivity to either MQ or QN. The mechanisms behind this observation remains to be determined, but it does suggest that additional factors must be operational in these parasites compared to those displaying a clear negative correlation in their susceptibility patterns. Although a number of reports showed a positive correlation between in vitro susceptibilities of DHA and quinolines such as mefloquine and quinine, this cross-resistance was not apparent in this study [11, 12, 25]. In terms of distribution within Thailand, parasites from the Thai-Cambodia tended to be more resistant to all drugs evaluated compared to parasites from the Thai-Myanmar border.

The in vitro sensitivity data from adapted parasites showed the clearer view of drug profiles, which allows multiple assessment of drug testing. The drug profile in this study showed that the pattern of MQ resistance was spread to most of endemic areas, especially along the borders. The old drug policy was based on the level of MQ resistance areas, which treated the falciparum malaria with single dose of MQ 750 mg in low MQ resistance area, whereas the moderate and high MQ resistance areas were treated with multiple dose of MQ 750 mg plus 300 mg and 500 mg of artesunate at 6-hour interval, respectively [2]. From the fact of increasing the MQ resistance, the malaria control policy has been revised, which aim to reduce the MQ resistance. Thus, the combination of artemisinin derivatives with MQ has been introduced as first line drug for treating non-severe falciparum malaria throughout the country. However, QN still remains the first line drug for severe malaria treatment [26].

Conclusion

This study indicates a relative stability in parasite susceptibility to four key drugs in the border areas of Thailand. Notably, resistance to CQ and MQ remains at a high level although there is substantial variation. There are indications that QN sensitivity may have increased slightly and, importantly for combination chemotherapy, parasite susceptibility to the artemisinin derivative, DHA remains high. This supports the decision of the Thai malaria control programme to introduce artemisinin containing MQ combinations as first line malaria treatment for the country.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Thailand Research Fund for the scholarship of The Royal Golden Jubilee (RGJ) Ph.D. programme to W.C. M.M. and K.N. were supported by Thailand-Tropical Disease Research Programme (ID 02-2-MAL-24-047). We would like to thank Malaria Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand for parasites isolates.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University
(2)
Department of Parasitology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine
(3)
Division of Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

References

  1. Wongsrichanalai C, Pickard AL, Wernsdorfer WH, Meshnick SR: Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2: 209-218. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00239-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Malaria-Division: Malaria Control Programme in Thailand. 1998, Malaria Division, Department of Communicable Disease Control (CDC) of the Ministry of Public Health, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: Chemotherapy of Malaria and Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: What next?. Trends Parasitol. 2001, 17: 582-588. 10.1016/S1471-4922(01)02085-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rieckmann KH, Campbell GH, Sax LJ, Mrema JE: Drug sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum. An in-vitro microtechnique. Lancet. 1978, i: 22-23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90365-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organization: In vitro microtest (MARK II) for the assessment of the response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine, mefloquine, quinine, sulfadoxine/pyrimentamine and amodiaquine. 1990, World Health Organization: Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Desjardins RE, Canfield CJ, Haynes JD, Chulay JD: Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979, 16: 710-718.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Makler MT, Hinrichs DJ: Measurement of the lactate dehydrogenase activity of Plasmodium falciparum as an assessment of parasitemia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 48: 205-210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Noedl H, Wernsdorfer WH, Miller RS, Wongsrichanalai C: Histidine-rich protein II: a novel approach to malaria drug sensitivity testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 1658-1664. 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1658-1664.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rowe AW, Eyster E, Kellner A: Liquid nitrogen preservation of red blood cells for transfusion; a low glycerol-rapid freeze procedure. Cryobiology. 1968, 5: 119-128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Trager W, Jensen JB: Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976, 193: 673-675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ringwald P, Bickii J, Basco LK: In vitro activity of dihydroartemisinin against clinical isolates of Plasmodium falciparum in Yaounde, Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 61: 187-192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockman A, Price RN, Van Vugt M, Heppner DG, Walsh D, Sookto P, Wimonwattrawatee T, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F: Plasmodium falciparum antimalarial drug susceptibility on the northwestern border of Thailand during five years of extensive use of artesunate-mefloquine. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94: 537-544. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90080-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wongsrichanalai C, Wimonwattratee T, Sookto P, Laoboonchai A, heppner DG, Kyle DE, Wernsdorfer WH: In vitro sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate in Thailand. Bull World Health Organ. 1999, 77: 392-398.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Suebsaeng L, Wernsdorfer WH, Rooney M: Sensitivity to quinine and mefloquine of Plasmodium falciparum in Thailand. Bull World Health Organ. 1986, 64: 759-765.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Labbe AC, Patel S, Crandall I, Kain KC: Molecular surveillance system for global patterns of drug resistance in imported malaria. Emerg Infec Dis. 2003, 9: 33-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mu J, Ferdig MT, Feng X, Joy DA, Duan J, Furuya T, Subramanian G, Aravind L, Cooper RA, Wootton JC, Xiong M, Su XZ: Multiple transporters associated with malaria parasite responses to chloroquine and quinine. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 49: 977-989. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03627.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Singhasivanon P: Mekong Malaria. Malaria, multi-drug resistance and economic development in the greater Mekong subregion of Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999, 30: 1-101.Google Scholar
  18. Huong NM, Hewitt S, Davis TME, Dao Le D, Toan TQ, Kim TB, Hanh NT, Phuong VN, Nahn DH, Cong Le D: Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs in a highly endemic area of southern Viet Nam: a study in vivo and in vitro. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 95: 325-329. 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90254-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giboda M, Desnis MB: Response of Kampucheam strains of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarials: in vivo assessment of quinine and quinine plus tetracycline; multiple drug resistance in vitro. J Trop Med Hyg. 1988, 91: 205-211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Denis MB, Kouznetsov RL, Gibboda M: In vivo response of multi-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections to mefloquine and its combination with sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in Cambodia. Folia Parasitol. 1991, 38: 187-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowman AF, Galatis d, Thompson JK: Selection for mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum is linked to amplification of the pfmdr1 gene and cross-resistance to halofantrine and quinine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91: 1143-1147.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Peel SA, Bright P, Yount B, Handy J, Baric RS: A strong association between mefloquine and halofantrine resistance and amplification, overexpression, and mutation in the P-glycoprotein gene homolog (pfmdr) of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 51: 648-658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Webster HK, Boudreau EF, Payanand K, Yongvanitchit K, Pang LW: Antimalarial drug susceptibility testing of Plasmodium falciparum in Thailand using a microdilution radioisotope method. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985, 34: 228-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson CM, Volkman SK, Thaithong S, Martin SK, Kyle DE, Milhous WK, Wirth DF: Amplification of pfmdr1 associated with mefloquine and halofantrine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Thailand. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993, 57: 151-160. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90252-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lim P, Chim P, Sem R, Nemh S, Poravuth Y, Lim C, Seila S, Tsuyuoka R, Denis MB, Socheat D, Fandeur T: In vitro monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum susceptibility to artesunate, mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine in Cambodia: 2001–2002. Acta Trop. 2005, 93: 31-40. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Malaria Division: Guideline for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. 2004, Malaria Division, Department of Communicable Disease Control (CDC) of the Ministry of Public Health, ThailandGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chaijaroenkul et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement