Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: a comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods
- Chris Bass†1Email author,
- Dimitra Nikou†2,
- Martin J Donnelly2,
- Martin S Williamson1,
- Hilary Ranson3,
- Amanda Ball2,
- John Vontas4 and
- Linda M Field1
© Bass et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 16 April 2007
Accepted: 13 August 2007
Published: 13 August 2007
Knockdown resistance (kdr) is a well-characterized mechanism of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in many insect species and is caused by point mutations of the pyrethroid target site the para-type sodium channel. The presence of kdr mutations in Anopheles gambiae, the most important malaria vector in Africa, has been monitored using a variety of molecular techniques. However, there are few reports comparing the performance of these different assays. In this study, two new high-throughput assays were developed and compared with four established techniques.
Fluorescence-based assays based on 1) TaqMan probes and 2) high resolution melt (HRM) analysis were developed to detect kdr alleles in An. gambiae. Four previously reported techniques for kdr detection, Allele Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (AS-PCR), Heated Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (HOLA), Sequence Specific Oligonucleotide Probe – Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (SSOP-ELISA) and PCR-Dot Blot were also optimized. The sensitivity and specificity of all six assays was then compared in a blind genotyping trial of 96 single insect samples that included a variety of kdr genotypes and African Anopheline species. The relative merits of each assay was assessed based on the performance in the genotyping trial, the length/difficulty of each protocol, cost (both capital outlay and consumable cost), and safety (requirement for hazardous chemicals).
The real-time TaqMan assay was both the most sensitive (with the lowest number of failed reactions) and the most specific (with the lowest number of incorrect scores). Adapting the TaqMan assay to use a PCR machine and endpoint measurement with a fluorimeter showed a slight reduction in sensitivity and specificity. HRM initially gave promising results but was more sensitive to both DNA quality and quantity and consequently showed a higher rate of failure and incorrect scores. The sensitivity and specificity of AS-PCR, SSOP-ELISA, PCR Dot Blot and HOLA was fairly similar with a small number of failures and incorrect scores.
The results of blind genotyping trials of each assay indicate that where maximum sensitivity and specificity are required the TaqMan real-time assay is the preferred method. However, the cost of this assay, particularly in terms of initial capital outlay, is higher than that of some of the other methods. TaqMan assays using a PCR machine and fluorimeter are nearly as sensitive as real-time assays and provide a cost saving in capital expenditure. If price is a primary factor in assay choice then the AS-PCR, SSOP-ELISA, and HOLA are all reasonable alternatives with the SSOP-ELISA approach having the highest throughput.
Members of the Anopheles gambiae complex are the major vectors of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. One of the most effective vector-directed malaria control strategies involves the use of insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) [1–4]. The only class of insecticides presently licensed for this purpose are the pyrethroids which show low mammalian toxicity and fast knockdown activity. Unfortunately, the intensive use of pyrethroids, including their indirect use in agriculture, has led to reports of reduced efficacy [5, 6].
Pyrethroids act on the insect nervous system by altering the normal function of the para-type sodium channel, resulting in prolonged channel opening that causes increased nerve impulse transmission, leading to paralysis and death [7, 8]. Resistance to pyrethroids is often associated with alterations (point mutations) in the para-type sodium channel gene, that cause reduced neuronal sensitivity. This resistance mechanism was first identified in the house fly Musca domestica and was termed knockdown resistance or kdr . Subsequent analyses demonstrated that kdr was caused by a leucine to phenylalanine (L1014F) replacement in transmembrane segment 6 of domain II of the sodium channel . Two amino acid substitutions at the same position (L1014F and L1014S) have been reported in pyrethroid resistant An. gambiae initially in An. gambiae s.s. [11, 12] and more recently in Anopheles arabiensis [13, 14]. In several West African countries the predominant kdr mutation in An. gambiae populations is the leucine to phenyalanine substitution (L1014F) termed kdr west (kdr- w), whilst in East African populations the leucine to serine (L1014S) termed kdr east (kdr-e) is more common [14–19]. Recently, individuals heterozygous for both the kdr-w and kdr-e alleles have been reported [20, 21].
Sensitive detection of the mutations associated with resistance is a prerequisite for resistance management strategies aimed at prolonging insecticide life while maintaining sufficient insect control. This type of monitoring requires rapid high-throughput assays and there are currently several different methods available for detecting the DNA changes responsible for kdr in An. gambiae. The most widely used method is based on Allele Specific PCR (AS-PCR) [11, 12], but more recently a number of other assays have been described including Heated Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (HOLA) , Sequence Specific Oligonucleotide Probe Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (SSOP-ELISA) , PCR-Dot Blot , Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)/Melt Curve analysis  and PCR elongation with fluorescence . However, to date there are few reports comparing the performance and relative advantages and disadvantages (safety, cost, speed, simplicity etc.) of these assays under comparable conditions. Here a single blind comparison of the performance of four of these assays with two newly developed fluorescence-based high-throughput assays (TaqMan and High Resolution Melt – HRM) was carried out using a 96 sample reference plate containing DNAs from a variety of field-collected Anopheles individuals representing all the known kdr genotypes.
Mosquito collections and preparation of 96 sample reference plate
For the initial optimisation of each assay mosquitoes were either obtained from two laboratory colonies, Kisumu (susceptible line from Kenya) and RSP (homozygous for the East African kdr mutation), or were field-caught samples from Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya and Cameroon. Genotypes of individuals were confirmed by sequencing of the relevant region of the para-type sodium channel gene as described previously .
All detection assays were performed on a standard 96 well test plate. The 96 sample test plate was comprised of genomic DNA of representative mosquito individuals of all the known kdr genotypes including three individuals heterozygous for both the east and west kdr alleles. The plate included DNA from An. gambiae s.s (both S and M forms) An. arabiensis, Anopheles quadriannulatus, Anopheles melas, Anopheles merus and Anopheles funestus. The amount of DNA was variable between samples to test the sensitivity of each assay. DNA concentration was determined by absorption at 260 nm using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies). The plate also included a number of Plasmodium falciparum DNA samples and water blanks as negative controls. The details of each of the 96 samples (including species, molecular form, collection location, DNA concentration and kdr genotype) is given in Additional file 1. This information was withheld from the persons who carried out the testing of each assay to ensure no bias occurred in the scoring of results. For all samples DNA was extracted from single mosquitoes using either the Livak or Ballinger Crabtree methods [26, 27] or DNAzol reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc) at one-fifth the recommended reagent volume for each extraction. The DNAs were resuspended in either TE buffer or sterile water at volumes between 100 and 200 μl. Species identification was carried out using an established PCR assay  and specimens had been assigned a putative kdr genotype by AS-PCR [11, 12], HOLA  or DNA sequencing. After the blind genotyping trials any samples of ambiguous kdr genotype were sequenced.
AS-PCR was carried out following the methods in the original descriptions of AS-PCR for kdr detection in Anopheles [11, 12]. Two reported methods of modifications to these assays were also investigated [20, 29]. All four protocols were performed using three different DNA polymerases/master mixes, Dynazyme II (Finzymes), PCR master mix (Promega) HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen) and three different PCR machines a GeneAmp™ PCR System 2700 a Techne Genius and a Techne Progene. In all cases amplifications were performed in 25 μl reactions using 1 μl template. After comparison of all protocols/polymerase kits the protocol of Verhaeghen et al  using the 2 × PCR master mix (Promega) was selected to genotype the 96 sample reference plate.
Previous work characterizing the para gene region encoding domain II S4–S6 of the sodium channel from a range of insect species has shown that this region contains an intron very close to the kdr mutation site. In many insect species this intron shows a degree of variation (nucleotide substitutions or insertions/deletions) between different stains/isolates which would affect the performance of any assay that uses primer binding sites within this region. Therefore, nucleotide alignments of all the An. gambiae and An. arabiensis domain II sodium channel gene sequences available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database were compared and a region around the kdr site which was conserved in all isolates/species was selected for primer/probe design.
Forward and reverse primers and three minor groove binding (MGB) probes (Applied Biosystems) were designed using the Primer Express™ Software Version 2.0. Primers kdr-Forward (5'-CATTTTTCTTGGCCACTGTAGTGAT-3'), and kdr-Reverse (5'-CGATCTTGGTCCATGTTAATTTGCA-3') were standard oligonucleotides with no modification. The probe WT (5'-CTTACGACTAAATTTC-3') was labelled with VIC at the 5' end for the detection of the wildtype allele, the probes kdr W (5'-ACGACAAAATTTC-3') and kdr E (5'-ACGACTGAATTTC-3') were labelled with 6-FAM for detection of the kdr-w and kdr-e alleles respectively. Each probe also carried a 3' non-fluorescent quencher and a minor groove binder at the 3' end. The minor groove binder provides more accurate allelic discrimination by increasing the TM between matched and mis-matched probes . The primers kdr-Forward and kdr-Reverse and the WT probe were used in one assay with probe kdr W for kdr-w detection and in a second assay with probe kdr E for kdr-e detection.
PCR reactions (25 μl) contained 1 μl of genomic DNA, 12.5 μl of SensiMix DNA kit (Quantace), 900 nM of each primer and 200 nM of each probe. Samples were run on a Rotor-Gene 6000™ (Corbett Research) using the temperature cycling conditions of: 10 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds and 60°C for 45 seconds. The increase in VIC and FAM fluorescence was monitored in real time by acquiring each cycle on the yellow (530 nm excitation and 555 nm emission) and green channel (470 nm excitation and 510 emission) of the Rotor-Gene respectively.
The TaqMan assays were also performed using a standard PCR machine followed by endpoint measurements using a fluorimeter. For this the PCR reactions were set up as described above and run on a GeneAmp™ PCR System 2700 (Applied Biosystems) using temperature cycling conditions of: 10 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 92°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. Reactions were then transferred to black half-area microtitre plates (Costar) and read in a FLx800 fluorimeter (Biotek) using 485/20 excitation and 528/20 emission filters for FAM detection and 530/25 excitation and 560/10 emission filters for VIC detection. The sensitivity of the FLx800 was adjusted for FAM and VIC fluorescence to achieve the maximum dynamic range without exceeding the maximum threshold. To determine the background level of fluorescence of the assay three or more no template controls were included in each run and the fluorescence values of these reactions averaged and subtracted from all values. To aid in genotype scoring a cut-off threshold was established by subtracting a further percentage of the averaged negative control value to create only positive or negative values. Percentages varied for the different probe fluorophore measurements. For the east and west assay susceptible probes labelled with VIC, an additional 15% was subtracted. For the kdr-w allele specific probe (VIC), an additional 20% was subtracted and for the kdr-e specific probe, an additional 60% was subtracted. The cut-off values given here were found to work well with the master mix and conditions described above. However, when using different master mixes or fluorimeters the cut-off thresholds were found to vary, so if alternative conditions are to be used optimization with templates of known genotype may be required.
The design of a HRM assay for kdr detection followed the recommendations in previous reports of this technique [31–33]. The same forward and reverse primers (kdr-Forward and kdr-Reverse) that were used in the TaqMan assay were also used for HRM as they efficiently amplified a small product of 71 bp. PCR reactions contained 1 μl of genomic DNA, 12.5 μl of SensiMix DNA kit (Quantace), 300 nM of each primer and 1.5 μM of SYTO 9 (Invitrogen) made up to 25 μl with filter sterilized water. Samples were run on a Rotor-Gene 6000 (HRM)™ (Corbett Research) using temperature cycling conditions of: 10 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 10 seconds. This was followed by a melt step of 65–75°C in 0.1°C increments pausing for 2 seconds per step. The increase in SYTO 9 fluorescence was monitored in real time during the PCR and the subsequent decrease during the melt phase by acquiring each cycle/step to the green channel (470 nm excitation and 510 nm emission) of the Rotor-Gene. Genotypes were scored by examining normalized and difference melt plots using the Rotor-Gene Software.
HOLA was carried out following the protocol of Lynd et al  with no modification.
SSOP-ELISA followed the protocol of Kulkarni et al  with slight modifications. Primers AgD1 and AgD2 primers  were used to PCR amplify a 293 bp fragment from domain II of the sodium channel gene. The primer AgD2 carries a biotin modification at the 5' end. PCR was carried out in a 25 μl volume with a final concentration of 1 × Buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.1 μM each primer, 0.034 U/μl Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). Reaction conditions were 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 48°C for 40 sec, 72°C for 40 sec and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were diluted 1:1 in water, denatured at 95°C for five minutes and cooled to 4°C. The 3' end digoxigenin-conjugated SSOPs (104F, 104S, 104L)  were added together with the diluted PCR products to the streptavidin-coated ELISA plates (Sigma) as described previously . Washes were performed  and 100 μl of TMB substrate (Roche, 11 484 281 001) was added. After five minutes, the reaction was stopped with the addition of 0.5 M H2SO4 and the optical density at 450 nm was measured in an ELISA reader.
PCR was carried out as for the SSOP-ELISA method (although in this case the AgD2 primer is unmodified). Amplified DNA products were denatured for 2 min at 94°C and then cooled to 4°C. One and a half μl of PCR products were spotted onto nylon membranes (Roche) and fixed to them by cross-linking with ultraviolet radiation. Membranes were probed with the 104L, 104F and 104S probes  at 42°C for 1.5 hours and then washed twice with 2 × SSC 0.1% SDS for 5 min at room temperature, followed by two washings with 0.2 × SSC 0.1% SDS at 42°C for the three kdr alleles (15 minutes per wash). Membranes were then placed in blocking buffer (Roche) for 30 minutes. Probes were detected using a non-radioactive CSPD substrate (Roche) based approach. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin Fab fragments and CSPD substrate were added to the membranes following manufacturer's instructions. Membranes were finally exposed to Hyperfilm ECL for approximately 6 hours.
In allele-specific PCR oligonucleotide primers that are designed to be allele specific (by incorporating sequence specific differences between alleles into the 3' end of the primers) are used in PCR in combination with allele non-specific primers to amplify allele-specific and allele non-specific 'control' fragments of different sizes. Agarose gel electrophoresis is carried out post-PCR to separate the DNA fragments and score genotypes .
Performance of seven assays in the blind kdr genotyping trial. Table shows the number of samples scored correctly, failed to score, or incorrectly scored out of a total of 96 samples.
PCR Dot Blot
The TaqMan assay is a PCR method employing oligonucleotide probes that are dual-labelled with a fluorescent reporter dye and a quencher molecule. Amplification of the probe-specific product causes cleavage of the probe, generating an increase in reporter fluorescence as the reporter dye is released away from the quencher. By using different reporter dyes, cleavage of allele-specific probes can be detected in a single PCR .
In HRM analyses a small region of DNA containing the mutation of interest is amplified by PCR in the presence of a third generation fluorescent dsDNA dye. The new generation of dyes for this purpose such as SYTO 9 (Invitrogen), LC Green (Idaho Technologies) and Eva Green (Biotium Inc) are less inhibitory to PCR than traditional dyes which allow them to be used at higher concentration to achieve maximum saturation of the resulting dsDNA amplicon. A high resolution melt step is then performed, centered around the TM of the amplicon, using machines with high optical and thermal precision. As the dsDNA dissociates into single strands the dye is released and the fluorescence diminishes giving a melt curve profile characteristic of the sequence of the amplicon .
The SSOP ELISA technique combines a PCR step with subsequent visualization of products using sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes in an ELISA format. Biotinylated PCR products are captured on streptavidin-coated microtiter plates and digoxigenin-labelled sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes (SSOPs) hybridized to the PCR products. A stringent washing procedure precedes the detection of the bound SSOPs using peroxidase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies. Results can be scored by eye or quantified by spectrophotometry .
The results of genotyping the 96 samples in the reference plate using the SSOP-ELISA method are shown in Table 1/Additional file 1. Overall there were 13 failed reactions, four of which were DNA from An. funestus (which is either very degraded or contains strong inhibitors as described in the TaqMan results section) and 4 from An. merus individuals. The remaining five failed reactions were from An. gambiae DNA. One of these samples also failed in all assays apart from the TaqMan endpoint assay where it was scored as a false positive, another failed in almost all assays except for the TaqMan and the third also failed in the HOLA and HRM methods. There was some between-experiment variation in the cut-off OD values of positive and negative controls which may explain the five incorrect results that might have been caused by trivial differences in the strength of probe binding and the washing force during high stringency washes. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of this method was similar to that displayed by the AS-PCR, PCR-dot blot and HOLA assays.
In the PCR-Dot Blot technique an initial PCR step, in which the DNA region of interest is amplified, is followed with dot-blotting of the products onto nylon membranes which are then probed with allele specific digoxigenin-labelled oligonucleotides. A stringent washing procedure precedes the detection of bound oligos using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies. Membranes are exposed to chemiluminescent sensitive films and scored visually .
In the HOLA technique an initial PCR step to amplify the region of interest is followed by a hot ligation step during which ligation occurs between biotinylated "allele-specific detector" oligonucleotides and fluorescein-labelled "reporter" oligonucleotides when the 3' detector nucleotide is complementary to a nucleotide at the SNP locus. Ligated products are then captured in 96-well streptavidin plates, and successful ligation is detected using peroxidase-labelled anti-fluorescein antibodies. Results can be scored by eye or using a 96-well microplate spectrophotometer .
The results of the blind genotyping of the 96 samples in the reference plate using the HOLA method are shown in Table 1/Additional file 1. The results were scored either visually or analysed on an ELISA plate reader. Overall the HOLA method genotyped a similar number of samples correctly as the AS-PCR, SSOP-ELISA and Dot Blot methods. Compared to these other assays there was a lower number of failed reactions (three of which were from An. funestus DNA the remainder An. gambiae) but a higher rate of incorrect scores (11 out of 96).
Comparison of seven assays for kdr genotyping based on specialist equipment required, cost, safety, simplicity of protocol and speed of method. Capital cost was calculated for all assays and is correct at the time of submission. Consumable/running cost was calculated for all assays except for the HOLA and SSOP-ELISA where the running cost listed was obtained from the original report of the method.
PCR Dot Blot
Specialist equipment required
Real-time PCR machine
High-spec real time PCR machine
Gel electrophoresis and imaging equipment
*optional ELISA plate reader
*optional ELISA plate reader
Capital outlay cost (for equipment above given in US$)
96 well $25 000
48 well $19 000
*optional ELISA plate reader add $5000
*optional ELISA plate reader add $5000
TMAC, H2SO4, SDS
Protocol run time
1 hr 45 mins
1 hr 35 mins
~4 hrs 30 mins
~5 hrs 30 mins
~6 hrs 30 mins
Number of steps
Primers/Probes required (for detection of 3 kdr alleles)
2 PCR primers
3 fluorescently labelled probes
2 PCR primers
3 fluorescently labelled probes
2 PCR primers
5 PCR primers
2 PCR primers (one biotin labelled)
3 SSOPs (digoxigenin labelled)
2 PCR primers
3 SSOPs (digoxigenin labelled)
2 PCR primers
2 reporter primers (5'phosphorylation and 3'fluorescein labelled)
4 detector primers (biotin labelled)
Number of tubes/wells/membranes required per sample
Running cost (per sample for three alleles)
Other methods with a low initial set-up cost that were investigated in this study were SSOP-ELISA, PCR DOT-BLOT and HOLA with all three giving comparable results in the blind genotyping trial. As shown in Table 2 all three assays require only basic equipment (a PCR machine, shaking incubator (ELISA) and, for the ELISA and HOLA methods, an optional ELISA reader). In addition, all dispense with the need for gel electrophoresis making them safer than AS-PCR. On the basis of cost and throughput the SSOP-ELISA method is the front-runner of the three assays. It requires approximately five and a half hours to run (17 steps) and more than 150 samples can be screened for the three kdr alleles in one day. The HOLA method takes approximately six and a half hours (16 steps) and 96 samples can be screened per day if four PCR machines/blocks are used. The PCR dot-blot assay can be completed in approximately 16 hours (16 steps) and more than 150 samples can be screened per day. Analysis of one sample (for the three kdr alleles) costs approximately US $1 using the SSOP-ELISA method, US$ 1.74 using the HOLA method and US$ 1.6 using the PCR dot-blot assay. Overall, the SSOP-ELISA, HOLA and PCR dot-blot assays require the use of basic equipment, are relatively cheap and provide acceptable sensitivity/specificity. They are thus amenable to researchers on a limited budget or without access to expensive equipment and are good options for laboratories in developing countries. The limitation of these assays lies in the requirement for a high number of post-PCR steps making them lengthier and of limited throughput capacity compared to the TaqMan and HRM assays. This is also an important consideration where operator time is included as part of the assay cost.
In this study, the performance of the four lower throughput assays was compared with two newly developed assays, TaqMan and HRM. The two high-throughput platforms both represent true closed-tube approaches requiring a single step to achieve results. This is in contrast to two recently developed high-throughput assays for kdr detection, FRET/MCA which requires two rounds of PCR  and PCR elongation with fluorescence which requires PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis . HRM is a relatively new technique that has been used very successfully in a number of previous genotyping studies [32, 33]. Because this method uses standard oligonucleotide primers and has no requirement for fluorescently-labelled oligonucleotides, the running costs are very low (Table 2). In addition HRM has the potential to identify novel mutations in the region of DNA encompassed by the PCR primers as any alternative base change will alter the melt profile of the amplicon. The HRM method showed initial promise during optimization with templates of known genotype (where DNA concentration was adjusted to be consistent for all samples) but subsequently performed less well in the blind genotyping trial. This is likely explained by variable DNA quality and quantity in the 96 samples in the reference plate, leading to many samples amplifying after ~35 cycles or failing to reach full plateau phase. For HRM it is recommended that the amount of DNA template used in PCR be consistent between samples as large differences in starting template will affect the observed Tm. It is, therefore, possible that this assay could be improved if DNA concentration was adjusted. However this constitutes an additional step in the protocol and would require DNA quantification using a spectrophotometer or gel electrophoresis. A comparison of HRM with the other methods (Table 2) highlights the greatest disadvantage which is the capital outlay required. Although HRM has low consumable costs it requires real-time PCR machines of high thermal and optical precision that are significantly more expensive than those that lack this specification. This high initial cost may give this assay limited application for use in resource poor malaria endemic countries.
In contrast to HRM, the TaqMan approach performed very well in the genotyping trial showing the highest level of specificity and sensitivity (as determined by the low number of failed reactions and incorrect scores) of all the assays trialled. This is likely due to both a higher degree of sensitivity and a higher tolerance to variation in DNA quality and quantity than the other assays. The TaqMan method was quick to optimise and along with HRM shows the highest throughput of the assays being simple and quick to setup (Table 2). Results can be scored easily, both manually or autoscored. The running cost of the TaqMan assay is slightly higher than the AS-PCR and HRM assays but comparable to the other methods (Table 2). Currently this method uses two separate assays to detect the kdr-w and kdr-e mutations, in future consumable costs could be further reduced by multiplexing the assay so that the wildtype, kdr-e and kdr-w alleles are detected in a single tube using probes with three fluorophores with distinct emission and excitation spectra. The other significant disadvantage of this assay is the capital outlay required, for a 96 well real-time PCR machine which costs in the region of US$ 25,000–50,000. One way to bring this cost down is through the purchase of a 48 well machine (these can be purchased for US$ 19,000–21,000) although this entails a reduction in possible throughput. An alternative cost-saving option is to carry out the TaqMan assays using a standard thermocycler for PCR and then measure endpoint fluorescence with a fluorimeter. The results described here show this is a viable approach and although a slight increase in failed reactions and incorrect scores was seen in the blind genotyping trial compared to the real-time assay, this method was still more sensitive and more specific than the AS-PCR, SSOP-ELISA, HOLA, and PCR Dot-Blots assays. A disadvantage of the endpoint method is the requirement for a small degree of data analysis before scoring (subtraction of blank and cut-off values).
Monitoring of resistance alleles such as kdr often involves the processing of thousands of individual insects per site. In this study the performance of these methods was examined on individual mosquitoes, future work could investigate the feasibility of using these assays on pooled insects to further increase throughput. A potential caveat of this approach is that it may not efficiently identify resistance alleles at low levels in mosquito populations particularly if they are present in the heterozygous state.
There are a number of options available for kdr genotyping. In this comparison of two new high-throughput methods with four previously reported assays the TaqMan method delivered the greatest specificity and sensitivity. However, where cost is the overwhelming factor in assay choice the SSOP-ELISA method is recommended based on cost, ease of use and throughput.
We thank Keith Steen for help with the preparation of the reference plate of samples. This study was supported by the Innovative Vector Control Consortium. Rothamsted Research receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK.
- Phillips-Howard PA, Nahlen BL, Kolczak MS, Hightower AW, ter Kuile FO, Alaii JA, Gimnig JE, Arudo J, Vulule JM, Odhacha A, Kachur SP, Schoute E, Rosen DH, Sexton JD, Oloo AJ, Hawley WA: Efficacy of permethrin-treated bed nets in the prevention of mortality in young children in an area of high perennial malaria transmission in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 23-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binka FN, Kubaje A, Adjuik M, Williams LA, Lengeler C, Maude GH, Armah GE, Kajihara B, Adiamah JH, Smith PG: Impact of permethrin impregnated bednets on child mortality in Kassena-Nankana district, Ghana: A randomized controlled trial. Trop Med Int Health. 1996, 1: 147-154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi HW, Breman JG, Teutsch SM, Liu SM, Hightower AW, Sexton JD: The effectiveness of insecticide-impregnated bed nets in reducing cases of malaria infection: A meta-analysis of published results. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995, 52: 377-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- D'Alessandro U, Olaleye BO, McGuire W, Langerock P, Bennett S, Aikins MK, Thomson MC, Cham MK, Cham BA, Greenwood BM: Mortality and morbidity from malaria in Gambian children after introduction of an impregnated bednet program. Lancet. 1995, 345: 479-483. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90582-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vulule JM, Beach RF, Atieli FK, Roberts JM, Mount DL, Mwangi RW: Reduced susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to permethrin associated with the use of permethrin-impregnated bednets and curtains in Kenya. Med Vet Entomol. 1994, 8: 71-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- N'Guessan R, Corbel V, Akogbeto M, Rowland M: Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin. Emerg Inf Dis. 2007, 13 (2): 199-206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Narahashi T: Nerve membrane Na+ channels as targets of insecticides. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992, 13: 236-241. 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90075-H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soderlund DM, Bloomquist JR: Neurotoxic actions of pyrethroid insecticides. Annu Rev Entomol. 1989, 34: 77-96. 10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.000453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Busvine JR: Mechanisms of resistance to insecticides in house-flies. Nature. 1951, 168: 193-195. 10.1038/168193a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williamson MS, Martinez-Torres D, Hick CA, Devonshire AL: Identification of mutations in the housefly para-type sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Mol Gen Genet. 1996, 252: 51-60. 10.1007/BF02173204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000, 9: 491-497. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D: Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998, 7: 179-184. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre E, Dabire KR, Simard F, Ouedraogo JB, Guillet P, Hougard JM: First report of a kdr mutation in Anopheles arabiensis from Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2004, 20: 195-196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stump AD, Atieli FK, Vulule JM, Besansky NJ: Dynamics of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele in western Kenyan populations of Anopheles gambiae in response to insecticide-treated bed net trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 591-596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awolola TS, Oyewole IO, Amajoh CN, Idowu ET, Ajayi MB, Oduola A, Manafa OU, Ibrahim K, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M: Distribution of the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae and pyrethroid knock down resistance gene in Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2005, 95: 204-209. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yawson AE, McCall PJ, Wilson MD, Donnelly MJ: Species abundance and insecticide resistance of Anopheles gambiae in selected areas of Ghana and Burkina Faso. Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18: 372-377. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00519.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fanello C, Petrarca V, della Torre A, Santolamazza F, Dolo G, Coulibaly M, Alloueche A, Curtis CF, Toure YT, Coluzzi M: The pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali and further indication of incipient speciation within An. gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2003, 12: 241-245. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00407.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- della Torre A, Fanello C, Akogbeto M, Dossou-yovo J, Favia G, Petrarca V, Coluzzi M: Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa. Insect Mol Biol. 2001, 10: 9-18. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diabate A, Brengues C, Baldet T, Dabire KR, Hougard JM, Akogbeto M, Kengne P, Simard F, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Chandre F: The spread of the Leu-Phe kdr mutation through Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkina Faso: genetic introgression and de novo phenomena. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 1267-1273. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01336.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Backeljau T, Coosemans M: Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/Melt Curve analysis. Malar J. 2006, 5: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-5-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etang J, Fondjo E, Chandre F, Morlais I, Brengues C, Nwane P, Chouaibou M, Ndjemai H, Simard F: Short report: First report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 795-797.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynd A, Ranson H, McCall PJ, Randle NP, Black WC, Walker ED, Donnelly MJ: A simplified high-throughput method for pyrethroid knock-down resistance (kdr) detection in Anopheles gambiae. Malar J. 2005, 4: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-4-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kulkarni MA, Rowland M, Alifrangis M, Mosha FW, Matowo J, Malima R, Peter J, Kweka E, Lyimo I, Magesa S, Salanti A, Rau ME, Drakeley C: Occurrence of the leucine-to-phenylalanine knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation in Anopheles arabiensis populations in Tanzania, detected by a simplified high-throughput SSOP-ELISA method. Malar J. 2006, 5: 56-10.1186/1475-2875-5-56.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolaczinski JH, Fanello C, Herve JP, Conway DJ, Carnevale P, Curtis CF: Experimental and molecular genetic analysis of the impact of pyrethroid and non-pyrethroid insecticide impregnated bednets for mosquito control in an area of pyrethroid resistance. Bull Entomol Res. 2000, 90: 125-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tripet F, Wright J, Lanzaro G: A new high-performance PCR diagnostic for the detection of pyrethroid knockdown resistance kdr in Anopheles gambiae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 658-662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ: Organization and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila melanogaster X-chromosome and Y-chromosome that is transcribed during spermatogenesis. Genetics. 1984, 107: 611-634.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ballinger-Crabtree ME, Black WC, Miller BR: Use of genetic polymorphisms detected by the Random-Amplified Polymorphic DNA-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RAPD-PCR) for differentiation and identification of Aedes aegypti subspecies and populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992, 47: 893-901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinto J, Lynd A, Elissa N, Donnelly MJ, Costa C, Gentile G, Caccone A, Do Rosario VE: Co-occurrence of East and West African kdr mutations suggests high levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles gambiae from Libreville, Gabon. Med Vet Entomol. 2006, 20: 27-32. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00611.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Afonina I, Zivarts M, Kutyavin I, Lukhtanov E, Gamper H, Meyer RB: Efficient priming of PCR with short oligonucleotides conjugated to a minor groove binder. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 2657-2660. 10.1093/nar/25.13.2657.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- High Resolution Melt Assay Design and Analysis. CorProtocol. 6000, [http://www.corbettlifescience.net/public/Rotor-Gene%206000/hrm_corprotocol.pdf] -1-July06
- Krypuy M, Newnham GM, Thomas DM, Conron M, Dobrovic A: High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 295-10.1186/1471-2407-6-295.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liew M, Pryor R, Palais R, Meadows C, Erali M, Lyon E, Wittwer C: Genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms by high-resolution melting of small amplicons. Clin Chem. 2004, 50: 1156-1164. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.032136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu Q, Thorland EC, Heit JA, Sommer SS: Overlapping PCR for bidirectional PCR amplification of specific alleles: A rapid one-tube method for simultaneously differentiating homozygotes and heterozygotes. Genome Res. 1997, 7: 389-398.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ: Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5' nuclease assay. Genetic Anal. 1999, 14: 143-149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alifrangis M, Enosse S, Pearce R, Drakeley C, Roper C, Khalil IF, Nkya W, Ronn AM, Theander TG, Bygjerg IBC: A simple, high-throughput method to detect Plasmodium falciparum single nucleotide polymorphisms in the dihydrofolate reductase, dihydropteroate synthase, and P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter genes using polymerase chain reaction- and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based technology. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 72: 155-162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdel-Muhsin AMA, Ranford-Cartwright LC, Medani AR, Ahmed S, Suleiman S, Khan B, Hunt P, Walliker D, Babiker HA: Detection of mutations in the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) gene by dot-blot hybridization. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 24-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Black WC, Gorrochotegui-Escalante N, Duteau NM: Heated oligonucleotide ligation assay (HOLA): An affordable single nucleotide polymorphism assay. J Med Entomol. 2006, 43: 238-247. 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0238:HOLAHA]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.