Adding artesunate to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine greatly improves the treatment efficacy in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria on the coast of Benin, West Africa
© Nahum et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 31 August 2007
Accepted: 21 December 2007
Published: 21 December 2007
Benin has recently shifted its national antimalarial drug policy from monotherapies to combinations containing artemisinin derivatives. When this decision was taken, the available information on alternatives to chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, the first- and second-line treatment, was sparse.
In 2003 – 2005, before the drug policy change, a randomized, open-label, clinical trial was carried out on the efficacy of chloroquine, and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine alone or combined with artesunate, with the aim of providing policy makers with the information needed to formulate a new antimalarial drug policy. Children between six and 59 months of age, with uncomplicated malaria and living in the lagoon costal area in southern Benin, were randomly allocated to one of the three study arms and followed up for 28 days.
Treatment failure (PCR corrected) was significantly lower in the artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine group (4/77, 5.3%) than in chloroquine group(51/71, 71.8%) or the sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine alone group (30/70, 44.1%) (p < 0.001). Despite high sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine failure, its combination with artesunate greatly improved treatment efficacy.
In Benin, artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine is efficacious and could be used when the recommended artemisinin-based combinations (artemether-lumefantrine and amodiaquine-artesunate) are not available. However, because sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine is also used in pregnant women as intermittent preventive treatment, its combination with artesunate should not be widely employed in malaria patients as this may compromise the efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment.
In Benin, early malaria case management, both at health facility and community level, is the backbone of the national malaria control strategy . High chloroquine (CQ) resistance, the first-line treatment for many years, has lead to a review of the national antimalarial policy in 2004 [1–3]. Two artemisinin-based combination treatments (ACTs) were recommended for uncomplicated falciparum malaria, namely artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and amodiaquine-artesunate (AQ-AS). Unfortunately, the implementation of the new national antimalarial drug policy currently meets several obstacles. Despite their availability in the pharmacies of the economic capital, Cotonou, and of other major cities, these ACTs are still not available in the public health facilities, and even less at community level. Thus, the large majority of the population does not have access to this newly recommended treatment, mainly because of its cost. Consequently, malaria patients continue to be treated with CQ, despite its low efficacy.
In Benin, CQ resistance was first reported in 1986 [4–6] and, in 1998, it was estimated at 23.8% in the south and 21.4% in the north, at day 14 after treatment (A. Massougbodji, personal communication) according to the 1996 WHO guidelines . CQ resistance was higher (35.2%) when the follow-up was extended to 28 days after treatment [3, 8].
Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) efficacy was assessed in 2002 in five different sites with varying intensity of malaria transmission . It had a patchy distribution with an overall treatment failure at day 28 of 22.8%, but ranging from 3.3% to 45.9%. However, it should be noted that none of these estimates was corrected by genotyping and the true treatment failure, excluding new infections, is probably lower. SP is currently used for intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) in pregnant women and there are plans to use it as IPT in infants [1, 9]. No data on alternative treatments to CQ and SP were available in Benin at the time when the national drug policy was revised. A randomized clinical trial was carried out on the efficacy of the first- and second-line treatment, CQ and SP-alone, and SP associated with artesunate (SP-AS), in children with uncomplicated malaria living in the lagoon costal area in southern Benin.
Study site and population
This is a randomized trial conducted at three adjacent peri-urban sites: Ladji, Awansori and Toweta, situated in the coastal lagoon area of Cotonou. Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles melas are the main malaria vectors , and the annual entomologic inoculation rate (AEIR) has been estimated at 58 infective bites per person [10, 11]. Prevalence of malaria infection in children between two and nine years of age is high and defines this area as hyper-endemic .
The local authorities and the population were informed about the study and its objectives in 2001. A census was carried out in 2002–2003. Houses were numbered and information on the household's residents (name, sex, age, relationship with the household head) collected. A list of six to 59 months old children without any obvious chronic illness, with parents willing to participate to the study, and unlikely to emigrate outside the study area was produced. Five hundred and fifty three children (34% of all children of this age group) were randomly chosen from this list to be part of the cohort under surveillance. Parents or legal guardians were asked before inclusion to sign an informed consent form. Refusal to participate did not affect access to basic health services. Parents/guardians were instructed to attend the nearby health facility, where a physician was always available, whenever their child was sick. They were also asked to administer to the child only drugs given or prescribed by the research physician.
Starting from July 2003 up to January 2005, each child was visited twice a week by the research team. Body temperature was measured routinely during home visits and, if the child was febrile (body temperature ≥ 37.5°C), a blood sample for parasitaemia (thick and thin blood film) and for genotyping at a later stage (filter paper Whatman grade 3) was collected. A similar approach was applied to children attending health facilities within the study area. An additional blood sample for PCV was collected in children with a Plasmodium falciparum mono-infection with a density between 1,000–200,000/μL. Children were allocated to one of the study treatment groups, i.e. CQ, SP or SP-AS if they met no exclusion criteria: PCV < 25%, severe malaria , danger signs (prostration, inability to drink, recent convulsion, persistent vomiting) or other concomitant illness or underlying disease. Allocation to treatment groups was done according to a predefined randomization list and was concealed (sealed opaque envelopes) until final recruitment of the patient. Treatment was administered according to the body weight at the following doses: CQ: 10 mg/kg/day on days 0 and 1, and 5 mg/kg on day 2; SP: 25 mg/kg of sulphadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine as a single dose on day 0; SP as before plus artesunate: 4 mg/kg/day for three days. Treatment was administered directly by the study team and patients were observed for one hour. Treatment was repeated if vomiting occurred: a full dose if within 30 minutes and half dose if between 30 minutes and one hour. If vomiting persisted, the patient was referred to the health facility and rescue treatment was given (full course of quinine, according to Benin National Treatment Guidelines ). A case-record form was completed for each patient documenting all symptoms prior to treatment, concomitant illness and drug history. Besides the first three days of treatment (days 0, 1 and 2), children were seen at scheduled visits at days three, seven, 14, 21 and 28. In addition, parents/guardians were encouraged to attend the health facilities whenever the child was sick. At each visit, the clinical history, signs and symptoms, body temperature were recorded and a blood sample was collected for parasitaemia and genotyping at a later stage.
Thick blood films were stained with Giemsa (10% for 10 minutes). Parasite density was determined on a thick blood film according to the number of parasites per 200 white blood cells (WBC), and assuming a total WBC count of 8,000/μl. If gametocytes were seen, the gametocyte count was extended at 1,000 WBC. Microscopy examination was totally blinded to the patient's identity and treatment group. PCV, measured by micro-haematocrit centrifugation, was assessed on days 0, 14 and 28. Genotyping, to distinguish between a new infection and a recrudescence, was done on blood samples collected before treatment and at the time of any recurrent parasitaemia and was performed at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. DNA was extracted as described elsewhere. Parasite genotyping was done by nested PCR for variable blocks within the merozoite surface protein 1 and 2 (msp1 and msp2) as described previously [14, 15]. A recrudescence was defined by observing at least one common band for both markers between the infections before treatment at day 0 and at the time of recurrent parasitaemia. New infection was defined by completely different bands between the two infections in at least one of the two markers.
Outcomes were defined according to the standard WHO classification . Early treatment failure (ETF) was defined as one of the following: i) danger signs/severe malaria at day 1, 2 or 3 with parasitaemia; ii) parasite density at day 2 greater than at day 0; iii) parasitaemia at day 3 with fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C); iv) parasite density at day 3 equal or greater than 25% of that at day 0. Late clinical failure (LCF) was defined as danger signs/severe malaria or parasitaemia with fever occurring between day 4 and day 28, without having been previously classified as ETF. Late parasitological failure (LPF) was defined as parasitaemia without fever between day 4 and day 28 and without previously meeting any of the criteria for ETF or LCF. An adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) was defined as the absence of parasitaemia by day 28 without previously meeting any of the criteria for ETF, LCF and LPF. The primary outcomes were day-28 failure rates (uncorrected and PCR corrected). Total treatment failure (TTF) was computed as ETF+LCF+LPF. After day 14 only infections confirmed by PCR as recrudescence were considered as treatment failures. Secondary outcomes included fever, parasite and gametocyte clearance.
Data were analysed in STATA version 8.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, US). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline values and demography data.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for normally distributed continuous data. Data not normally distributed were compared by Wilcoxon Rank sum or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Categorical data were compared by calculating the chi-square value or by Fisher's exact test. Data were analysed by Intention-to-Treat (ITT), Per-Protocol (PP) and Kaplan Meier survival analysis to determine the cure rate (PCR corrected) at day 28 in each treatment group. In the ITT analysis, patients lost to follow up were considered as treatment failures (worst case scenario) and the denominator was the number of patients initially randomized to each group. In the PP analysis, patients lost to follow-up and those excluded after enrolment were excluded from the analysis; only patients with a complete follow-up were included in the denominator. Cure rates, fever and parasite clearance were compared using logistic regression models. Odds ratio and 95% CI were estimated from these models. In the Kaplan Meier survival analysis, each patient contributed to the analysis for the time s/he was followed up. Data were censored for patients who did not complete follow up and for new P. falciparum infection when estimating outcomes corrected by PCR. In the survival analysis, cure rates were described by Kaplan Meier estimates and compared between groups with a log-rank test. Pair-wise comparisons of treatment efficacy at day 28 were made with a Cox proportional hazards model. Gametocyte carriage rates were estimated as proportion of patients with gametocytaemia and person-gametocyte-weeks (PGW) were calculated to measure gametocyte carriage and transmission potential. The PGW were calculated as the number of weeks in which blood slides were positive for gametocytes during the two first weeks of follow-up after treatment divided by the number of all follow-up weeks and expressed per 1,000 person-weeks. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
The study was approved by the Minister of Health of Benin, the Ethical Committee of the Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Cotonou, Benin and the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp. Informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians.
Baseline characteristics by treatment group
CQ (n = 79)
SP (n = 77)
SP-AS (n = 81)
Sex ratio, Males:Females
Mean age in months [SD]
Mean weight in kg [SD]
Days with fever before diagnosis, median [IQR]*
Mean body temperature, °C [SD]
Bed net use, n (%)
Parasite density (/μl)at Day 0, (geometric mean [range])
16,323 [1,119; 198,107]
20,100 [1,192; 192,398]
20,286 [1,114; 198,609]
Gametocytaemia at day 0, n (%)
Packed cell volume, mean [range]
Fever clearance was significantly more rapid in the SP-AS than in the CQ or SP groups; by day 3 the prevalence of fever was the following: SP-AS: 0/79 (0.0%), SP alone: 4/67 (6.0%), CQ: 6/62 (9.7%) (p = 0.02). Parasite clearance was also faster in the SP-AS than in the other two treatment groups. By day 3, the percentage of children without infection was 94.9% (75/79) in the SP-AS, 56.7% (38/67) in the SP and 56.5% (35/62) in the CQ group (p < 0.001).
Clinical and parasitological failure by day 14 and day 28
SP – AS
DAY 14, n
ETF, n (%)
LCF, n (%)
LPF, n (%)
Per protocol, n (%)
Intention to Treat, n (%)
DAY 28 (PCR uncorrected), n
ETF, n (%)
LCF, n (%)
LPF, n (%)
Per protocol, n (%)
Intention to Treat, n (%)
DAY 28 (PCR corrected)
ETF, n (%)
LCF, n (%)
LPF, n (%)
New infections, n (%)
Per protocol, n (%)
Intention to Treat, n (%)
Kaplan Meier survival analysis (%)
By day 28, seven additional recurrent parasitaemia occurred in the SP-AS group (one LCF and six LPF), seven in the SP group (two LCF and five LPF), and 14 in the CQ group (two LCF and 12 LPF). Thus, the failure rate (PCR uncorrected) was 10.5% (8/76) for the SP-AS, 45.6% (31/68) for the SP alone and 74.6% (53/71) for the CQ group. After PCR correction, these rates were 5.3% (4/76), 44.1% (30/68) and 71.8% (51/71), respectively (Table 2). The odds of failure was significantly higher in the CQ than in the SP alone group (OR = 3.2; 95% CI 1.5; 7.0) (p = 0.002); and for the latter it was significantly higher than in the SP-AS group (OR = 14.2; 95% CI: 4.3; 58.5) (p < 0.001). Compared to SP-AS, the odds of failure for CQ was 46 times higher (OR = 45.9; 95% CI: 14.0; 188.9) (p < 0.0001).
Gametocyte carriage by treatment group
Gametocyte prevalence, n (%)
Gametocyte incidence, n (%)
Person-gametocyte-weeks (/1000 person-weeks)
Serious adverse events by treatment group
CQ (N = 79)
SP (N = 77)
SP – AS (N = 81)
Patients with any SAE, n (%)
- Severe anaemia
- Acute respiration infection
The combination SP-AS was safe, well-tolerated and significantly more efficacious than the two other treatments. Children treated with SP-AS had also a faster fever and parasite clearance. At day 28, the PCR-corrected TTF for the SP-AS group was only 5.3%, an extremely low figure compared to the other two treatments. These findings are comparable to the 28-day PCR-corrected cure rates recently reported from Ghana, (94.5%)  and eastern Sudan (97.5%) . The high treatment failure observed in our study for both CQ and SP monotherapies suggests a high prevalence of mutations linked to drug resistance [19, 21]. This may compromise the efficacy of ACT in which the partner drug to the artemisinin-derivative shares common resistance markers with either CQ or SP. For example, when considering that there may be cross-resistance between CQ and amodiaquine (AQ) [22–24], the recently available fixed-dose combination AQ-artesunate, one of the treatment included in the national antimalarial drug policy, may be less efficacious than expected. It is often stated that in an ACT the partner drug to the artemisinin derivative should have a good efficacy and this because a 3-day treatment with artesunate is insufficient to clear an infection. If the partner drug is not effective, it is likely that a large number of infections, incompletely treated, could re-appear during the patient follow up. It is, therefore, surprising that in this study, despite the high risk of treatment failure in the children treated with SP alone, SP-AS had such a good efficacy. Even the PCR-uncorrected results are extremely good as only about 10% of the children in the SP-AS group experienced a failure or a recurrent infection, despite the high transmission intensity, as compared to almost half of children treated with SP alone. In Thailand, combining artesunate with mefloquine considerably improved the efficacy of treatment, despite the high resistance to mefloquine itself . However, the intensity of malaria transmission in Benin is much higher than in Thailand and new infections are more likely to occur shortly after treatment. However, a longer follow up may have detected more cases of recurrent parasitaemia or even recrudescence . It is also possible that the high bed net use among the study children may have limited their risk of new infections.
As expected, gametocyte carriage in children treated with SP-AS was much lower than in the other treatment groups. A decrease in malaria transmission after the introduction of ACT has already been reported in Thailand and it has been suggested that this was linked to the lower gametocyte production in patients treated with ACT . However, considering that malaria transmission in Africa, more specifically in the coastal lagoon area of Cotonou, is much higher than in south-east Asia, it is unclear whether the introduction of ACT will have a major impact on transmission. Nevertheless, anecdotic reports of a lower-than-expected number of malaria patients at health facilities in several African countries have been produced . It is unclear whether this is a true phenomenon and, if yes, this is due to the introduction of ACT or also to other interventions such as insecticide-treated bed nets.
Benin recently chose artemether-lumefantrine and amodiaquine-artesunate as recommended treatments for uncomplicated malaria. This decision was taken in 2004 but it is unfortunate to notice that these ACT are not available yet at peripheral health facilities. Other African countries such as Burkina Faso are in a similar situation, i.e. the national drug policy has been changed but not implemented yet (Tinto Halidou., personal communication). In Benin, considering that SP and AS are easily available and their combination has an acceptable efficacy, SP-AS may be used whenever the recommended standard treatments are hopefully temporarily unavailable. However, because SP is also used in pregnant women as intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp), its combination with AS should not be widely employed in malaria patients as this may compromise the efficacy of IPTp.
We are very grateful to the children and parents who participated in the study. The authors thank the staff of Population Health Project, particularly its coordinator, Dr. Olivier Capo-Chichi. We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the members of the study team including Bocovo Charles, Tohon Honesty, Chabi do Aboudou, Djidonou Gilbert, Ahounou Daniel, Bonou Désiré for their commitment, technical support and high quality work related to the data entered. We would also like to thank Dr. Albertine Traoré of the Aïdjedo district health centre, Dr. Théophile Hounhouédo and the staff of health centre NGO Vie Nouvelle.
This study was funded by the Benin Ministry of Health through the Population Health Project. Finally, we would like to thank all the members of the "epidemiology and control of parasitic diseases" unit at the Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme: Politique nationale de lutte contre le paludisme et cadre stratégique de mise en æuvre. Cotonou. 2005Google Scholar
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme: Atelier de consensus sur le changement de la politique de traitement antipaludique. Cotonou. 2004Google Scholar
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme: Reprise du dépouillement des fiches de suivi et individuelles des enfants retenus pour le test de chimiosensibilité réalisé en 2002 au Bénin. Cotonou. 2003Google Scholar
- Le Bras J, Hatin I, Bourée P, Coco-Cianci O, Garin J-P, Rey M, Charmot G, Roue R: Chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in Benin. Lancet. 1986, 2: 1043-1044. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92657-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenheim M, Prazuck T, Brandicourt O, Diquet B, Datry A, Danis M, Gentilini M: Five cases of chloroquine-resistant malaria in Benin, Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987, 81: 498-10.1016/0035-9203(87)90174-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux J-P, Massougbodji A, Akogbeto M, Josse R, Zohoun T, Sadeler B-C: Evolution de la chimio-sensibilité de Plasmodium falciparum à la chloroquine et à la méfloquine au Bénin entre 1980 et 1989. Bull Soc Path Ex. 1990, 83: 320-329.Google Scholar
- Assessment of therapeutic efficacy of antimalarial drugs for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in areas with intense transmission: [WHO/MAL/96.1077]. Geneva. 1996
- Report of a WHO consultation: Monitoring anti-malarial drugs resistance. Geneva. 2002Google Scholar
- Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme: Information essentielles sur le Traitement Préventif Intermittent Infantile du paludisme (TPIi). Cotonou. 2006Google Scholar
- Akogbeto M: Etude des aspects épidémiologiques du paludisme côtier lagunaire au Bénin. Thèse de Doctorat ès-Science. 1992, Université de Paris XIGoogle Scholar
- Akogbeto M, Chippaux J-P, Coluzzi M: Le paludisme urbain côtier à Cotonou (République du Bénin). Etude entomologique. Rev Epidemiol Santé Publique. 1992, 40: 233-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akogbeto M, Modiano D, Bosman A: Malaria transmission in the lagoon area of Cotonou, Benin. Parassitologia. 1992, 34: 147-154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Severe falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94: 1-90. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90300-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plowe CV, Djimde A, Bouare M, Doumbo O, Wellems TE: Pyrimethamine and proguanil resistance-conferring mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase: polymerase chain reaction methods for surveillance in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995, 52: 565-568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranford-Cartwright LC, Balfe P, Carter R, Walliker D: Frequency of cross-fertilization in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitology. 1993, 107: 11-18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Assessment and monitoring of antimalarial drug efficay for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Geneva. 2003Google Scholar
- Mockenhaupt FP, Ehrhardt S, Dzisi SY, Teun Bousema J, Wassilew N, Schreiber J, Anemana SD, Cramer JP, Otchwemah RN, Sauerwein RW, Eggelte TA, Bienzle U: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial on sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone or combined with artesunate or amodiaquine in uncomplicated malaria. Trop Med Int Health. 2005, 10: 512-520. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01427.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahium AM, Kheir MM, Osman ME, Khalil IF, Alifrangis M, Elmardi KA, Malik EM, Adam I: Efficacies of artesunate plus, either sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or amodiaquine, for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Eastern Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2007, 101: 15-21. 10.1179/136485907X156924.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma YD: Genetic alteration in drug resistance markers of Plasmodium falciparum. Indian J Med Res. 2005, 121: 13-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fidock DA, Nomura T, Talley AT, Cooper RA, Dzekunov S, Ferdig MT, Ursos LM, Sidhu AS, Naude B, Deitsch K, Su XZ, Wootton JC, Roepe PD, Wellems TE: Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein Pfcrt and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol Cell. 2000, 6: 861-871. 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00077-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djimde A, Doumbo OK, Cortese JF, Kayentao K, Doumbo S, Diourte Y, Dicko A, Su XZ, Nomura T, Fidock DA, Wellems TE, Plowe CV, Coulibaly D: A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 257-263. 10.1056/NEJM200101253440403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duraisingh MT, Drakeley CJ, Muller O, Bailey R, Snounou G, Targett GAT, Greenwood BM, Warhurst DC: Evidence for selection for the tyrosine-86 allele of the Pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum by chloroquine and amodiaquine. Parasitology. 1997, 114: 205-211. 10.1017/S0031182096008487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Happi CT, Gbotosho GO, Folarin OA, Bolaji OM, Sowunmi A, Kyle DE, Milhous W, Wirth DF, Oduola AMJ: Association between mutations in Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter and P. falciparum multidrug resistance1 genes and in vivo amodiaquine resistance in P. falciparum malaria-infected children in Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 155-161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dokomajilar C, Lankoande ZM, Dorsey G, Zongo I, Ouedraogo J-B, Rosenthal PJ: Roles specific Plasmodium falciparum mutations in resistance to amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 162-165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price R, Luxemburger C, Thaway KL, Brockman A, McGready R, ter Kuile F, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet. 2000, 356: 297-302. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02505-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stepniewska K, White NJ: Some considerations in the design and interpretation of antimalarial drug trials in uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Malar J. 2006, 22: 127-10.1186/1475-2875-5-127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chanda P, Masiye F, Chitah BM, Sipilanyambe N, Hawela M, Banda P, Okorosobo T: A cost-effectiveness analysis of artemether lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Zambia. Malar J. 2007, 6: 21-10.1186/1475-2875-6-21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.