Prevalence of contraindications to mefloquine use among USA military personnel deployed to Afghanistan
© Nevin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 04 September 2007
Accepted: 11 February 2008
Published: 11 February 2008
Mefloquine has historically been considered safe and well-tolerated for long-term malaria chemoprophylaxis, but its prescribing requires careful attention to rule out contraindications to its use, including a history of certain psychiatric and neurological disorders. The prevalence of these disorders has not been defined in cohorts of U.S. military personnel deployed to areas where long-term malaria chemoprophylaxis is indicated.
Military medical surveillance and pharmacosurveillance databases were utilized to identify contraindications to mefloquine use among a cohort of 11,725 active duty U.S. military personnel recently deployed to Afghanistan.
A total of 9.6% of the cohort had evidence of a contraindication. Females were more than twice as likely as males to have a contraindication (OR = 2.48, P < 0.001).
These findings underscore the importance of proper systematic screening prior to prescribing and dispensing mefloquine, and the need to provide alternatives to mefloquine suitable for long-term administration among deployed U.S. military personnel.
Malaria poses a continued threat to U.S. military personnel. At least 423 blood-smear confirmed cases of malaria were diagnosed among members of the U.S. military between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2005; of which at least 64 represent cases attributable to service in Afghanistan . Outbreaks of malaria among U.S. military personnel attributable to service in Afghanistan are well described [1, 2], of which infection due to Plasmodium vivax is the principal cause. To protect against the threat of malaria, U.S. military personnel deploying to Afghanistan may be prescribed mefloquine, which must be taken continuously throughout deployments lasting as long as 15 months. Although the long-term use of mefloquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis has historically been considered safe and well-tolerated among civilian travelers [3, 4] and deployed military personnel , careful prescribing is needed to minimize the potential for severe neuropsychiatric adverse events, which may include acute psychoses, anxiety, depression, paranoia, myoclonus, and seizures . Although the underlying mechanism of these adverse events is unknown, individuals with certain psychiatric and neurological histories appear to be at highest risk [4, 5]. The U.S. package insert cautions that mefloquine "should not be prescribed for prophylaxis in patients with active depression, a recent history of depression, generalized anxiety disorder, psychosis, or schizophrenia or other major psychiatric disorders, or with a history of convulsions" .
To quantify the prevalence of, and identify demographic characteristics associated with contraindications to mefloquine use among deployed U.S. military personnel, a retrospective cohort study was performed using information available in military personnel, medical surveillance [1, 4, 7], and pharmacosurveillance databases [4, 8].
To identify the study cohort, a roster was obtained comprising all active duty U.S. military personnel assigned in support of combat and reconstruction operations in Afghanistan and deployed within six months of a reference date in early 2007. Demographic covariate data on each was obtained from the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS) , to include age category (as of the reference date), race (categorized as black, white, and other), gender, number of prior deployments, and military specialty (categorized as combat, and non-combat according to methods previously described) .
Medical diagnoses consistent with contraindication to mefloquine use.
Major depressive disorder
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood
Prolonged depressive reaction
Generalized anxiety disorder
Bipolar and manic disorders
296.0, 296.1, 296.3–296.8
Panic disorder (with and without agorophobia)
Attention-deficit disorders (with or without hyperactivity)
Dissociative, conversion and factitious disorders
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Extrapyramidal diseases and movement disorders
Prescription drugs consistent with a contraindication to mefloquine use
Amphetamines, atomoxetine, methyphenidate, modafinil
Carbamazepine, clonazepam, divalproex sodium, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepim, phenytoin, pregabalin, topiramate
Citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, flurazepam, mirtazapine, nefazodone, nortriptyline, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafexine
Aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, olanzapine/fluoxetine, quetiapine, risperidone
Sedatives – anxiolytics
Alprazolam, buspirone, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, lorazepam, oxazepam, temazepam, trazodone, triazolam
Analyses included producing summary and descriptive statistics. The prevalence and the statistical significance of associations between demographic characteristics and a contraindication to mefloquine use were determined. All statistical analyses, including producing Pearson's χ2 statistics, P-values, calculation of crude odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using SAS software (Version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) .
Demographics of the study cohort and those with a medical or pharmacologic contraindication to mefloquine use, U.S. military personnel deployed to Afghanistan, 2007.
Contraindication(s) to mefloquine
Either or Both
Of the 558 total with one or more diagnoses, 27 (4.8%) had neurological diagnoses and 531 (95.2%) had psychiatric diagnoses. The groups were mutually exclusive. Among those with neurological diagnoses (0.2% of the study cohort), all 27 had outpatient diagnoses, and none had inpatient diagnoses. Of the 27, 13 (48%) had primary diagnoses. Among those with psychiatric diagnoses (4.5% of the study cohort), three had inpatient diagnoses, and the remainder had one or more outpatient diagnoses, of which 411 (78%) had primary diagnoses.
Of the 837 with one or more prescriptions, 78 (9.4%) had a prescription for an ADHD treatment; 93 (11.1%) for an anticonvulsant; 315 (37.6%) for an antidepressant; two (0.2%) for an antiparkinsonian; 24 (2.9%) for an antipsychotic; and 446 (53.3%) for a sedative-anxiolytic. A total of 100 (11.9%) had prescriptions for two or more classes of drug.
There were significant differences between the study cohort and those with diagnoses by gender (χ2 = 38.9, P < 0.001) and military specialty (χ2 = 3.44, P = 0.025), and between the study cohort and those with prescriptions by gender (χ2 = 115, P < 0.001), military specialty (χ2 = 16.3, P ≤ 0.001), and age category (χ2 > 1000, P < 0.001). Between the study cohort and those with either diagnosis or prescription, there were significant differences by gender (χ2 = 124, P < 0.001), military specialty (χ2 = 17.4, P < 0.001), and age category (χ2 = 14.3, P < 0.001). Women had over twice the odds of having either diagnosis or prescription (OR = 2.48, 95% CI 2.11–2.93). Among those with any deployment history, the odds of either diagnosis or prescription was higher, but this difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.975–1.25).
This is the first study to assess the prevalence of contraindications to mefloquine use among U.S. service members deployed to a malarious area and for whom long-term chemoprophylaxis against Plasmodium vivax is indicated. This study found a high prevalence of contraindications to the safe use of this drug in this population overall, and a statistically significant elevation in the prevalence of contraindications among females.
This study was performed to determine the prevalence of contraindications to mefloquine use in a deployed U.S. military cohort, and as such has a number of limitations that preclude its generalizability to the non-military U.S. population. This study examined a highly biased sample of young adults (93.8% who were under the age of 40), self-selected for military service from the U.S. general population and subject to considerable selection pressures from commissioning, enlistment, or periodic health screenings. These pressures would ordinarily result in this population being generally more healthy than members of the U.S. civilian population, and would ordinarily be expected to reduce the prevalence of health conditions incompatible with continued military service and deployment.
Interestingly, this bias, which is commonly referred to as the "healthy-warrior effect"  may not be applicable in this study population for those health conditions consistent with a contraindication to mefloquine use. The prevalences of both acute and chronic mental health diagnoses are high among cohorts of previously deployed service members [12, 13], although in this study population a statistically significant difference was not found in the prevalence of contraindications among those with and without such deployment history.
Despite the substantial differences in health histories and demographics between studies, this study finds a similar overall rate of contraindication to mefloquine use as a prior prospective study in the general population, in which 9% of 2,389 civilian travelers with available medical histories presenting to a travel medicine clinic were evaluated . Similar to the present study, this prior study found a history of psychiatric contraindication in 3.5% of the group. Unlike the present study, in which neurological contraindications were rare, these were present in 5.7% of the prior study group. This difference likely reflects the incompatibility of most neurological conditions with military service.
This study employed medical surveillance databases to identify an arbitrary set of ICD-9CM diagnosis codes defining a medical contraindication to mefloquine use. The diagnosis codes were selected based on the clinical judgment of the study authors. This methodology reflects the clinical uncertainty faced by individual healthcare providers in interpreting the mefloquine package insert. Of the listed contraindications to mefloquine use, the terms "major psychiatric disorders" and "history of convulsions" leave significant room for interpretation. In this study, a liberal interpretation of neurological disorder, and a relatively conservative interpretation of psychiatric disorder were employed. This had the effect of including and excluding, respectively, many diagnoses which individual providers might or might not consider a contraindication.
The use of pharmacosurveillance databases to infer the presence of a contraindicating medical condition is reasonable. Previous studies  have shown significant correlation between psychiatric diagnosis and psychoactive drug prescription, and the dispensing of a drug in this class in the absence of a diagnostic encounter likely represents continued therapy without documentation of follow-up treatment.
These findings underscore that caution must be exercized by healthcare providers in prescribing mefloquine to deploying U.S. military personnel, and lend strong support to policies prohibiting the practice of mass-prescribing mefloquine without an individualized review of medical records. Given the significant prevalence of its contraindications, a careful review and screening of available medical records (including available pharmacy records) and thorough counseling prior to prescribing and dispensing mefloquine to U.S. military personnel is strongly indicated. The use of existing medical and pharmacosurveillance databases to populate automated decision-support systems to assist clinicians in identifying personnel with possible contraindications may improve the sensitivity of such review and screening. The development of such systems would require that the ICD-9CM codes and medications deemed consistent with a contraindication to mefloquine use be formally defined.
This study also highlights the importance of investing in the further development and testing of alternative anti-malaria drugs which retain the advantages in compliance and convenience of the weekly dosing schedule of mefloquine. For U.S. service members in whom mefloquine in contraindicated, tafenoquine may be a promising alternative , both for its schizonticidal activity and its potential use as terminal prophylaxis against Plasmodium vivax infection .
Although not sharing the particular contraindications of mefloquine, tafenoquine carries a significant risk of haemolysis among those with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency syndrome. A recent study suggests that the prevalence of this contraindication among deploying U.S. military populations is lower than that of contraindications to mefloquine found in the present study, with 2.5% of males and 1.6% of females deficient for G6PD .
In light of this study's findings, upon U.S. Food and Drug Administration licensure and upon the completion of studies confirming its safety and suitability for long-term administration, tafenoquine may prove to be a viable option to replace mefloquine for routine use in the U.S. military. Universal screening for G6PD deficiency upon entry to U.S. military service may be a prudent means of ensuring the safe administration of this drug and aiding in the pre-selection of individuals most suited for long-term deployment to malarious areas.
The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policies or positions of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Defense Medical Surveillance System
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification
Pharmacy Data Transaction System
We thank Colonels (Retired) Mark V. Rubertone and John F. Brundage, Major Paul Ciminera, Lieutenant Colonel Steven Tobler, and the staff at the Army Medical Surveillance Activity; and the staff at the Department of Defense Pharmacoeconomics Center for their assistance with database access. Dr. Nevin had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The authors are employees of the U.S. Department of Defense and wrote this paper as part of their daily activities.
- Ciminera P, Brundage J: Malaria in US military forces: a description of deployment exposures from 2003 through 2006. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 275-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kotwal RS, Wenzel RB, Sterling RA, Porter WD, Jordan NN, Petrucelli BP: An outbreak of malaria in US Army Rangers returning from Afghanistan. JAMA. 2007, 293 (2): 212-216. 10.1001/jama.293.2.212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen LH, Wilson ME, Schlagenhauf P: Prevention of malaria in long-term travelers. JAMA. 2007, 296 (18): 2234-2244. 10.1001/jama.296.18.2234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen LH, Wilson ME, Schlagenhauf P: Controversies and misconceptions in malaria chemoprophylaxis for travelers. JAMA. 2007, 297: 2251-2263. 10.1001/jama.297.20.2251.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wells TS, Smith TC, Smith B, Wang LZ, Hansen CJ, Reed RJ, Goldfinger WE, Corbeil TE, Spooner CN, Ryan MAK: Mefloquine use and hospitalizations among US service members, 2002–2004. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 744-749.Google Scholar
- Roche Laboratories Inc: Lariam® (mefloquine hydrochloride) Complete Product Information. 2004, Nutley, NJGoogle Scholar
- Rubertone MV, Brundage JF: The Defense Medical Surveillance System and the Department of Defense serum repository: glimpses of the future of public health surveillance. Am J Public Health. 2002, 92: 1900-1904.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavlin JA, Murdock P, Elbert E, Milliken C, Hakre S, Mansfield J, Hoge C: Conducting population behavioral health surveillance by using automated diagnostic and pharmacy data systems. MMWR. 2004, 166-172. Suppl 53
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision Clinical Modification. 1980, US Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute: SAS/STAT® 9.1 Users Guide. 2004, SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
- Haley RW: Point: bias from the "healthy-warrior effect" and unequal follow-up in three government studies of health effects of the Gulf War. Am J Epidemiol. 1998, 148: 315-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seal KH, Bertenthal D, Miner CR, Sen S, Marmar C: Bringing the war back home: mental health disorders among 103,788 US veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan seen at Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167: 476-82. 10.1001/archinte.167.5.476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, Milliken CS: Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. JAMA. 2006, 295: 1023-32. 10.1001/jama.295.9.1023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill DR: Pre-travel health, immunization status, and demographics of travel to the developing world for individuals visiting a travel medicine service. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 45: 263-270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crockett M, Kain KC: Tafenoquine: a promising new antimalarial agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007, 16: 705-15. 10.1517/13543722.214.171.1245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitchener S, Nasveld P, Edstein MD: Tafenoquine for the treatment of recurrent Plasmodium vivax malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 494-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chinevere TD, Murray CK, Grant E, Johnson GA, Duelm F, Hospenthal DR: Prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in U.S. Army personnel. Mil Med. 2006, 171: 905-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.