Open Access

Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa

  • Federica Santolamazza1, 2,
  • Maria Calzetta1, 2,
  • Josiane Etang3,
  • Elena Barrese1, 2,
  • Ibrahima Dia4,
  • Adalgisa Caccone5,
  • Martin J Donnelly6,
  • Vincenzo Petrarca1, 7,
  • Frederic Simard3,
  • Joao Pinto8 and
  • Alessandra della Torre1, 2Email author
Malaria Journal20087:74

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-74

Received: 23 January 2008

Accepted: 29 April 2008

Published: 29 April 2008

Abstract

Background

Knock-down resistance (kdr) to DDT and pyrethroids in the major Afrotropical vector species, Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, is associated with two alternative point mutations at amino acid position 1014 of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene, resulting in either a leucine-phenylalanine (L1014F), or a leucine-serine (L1014S) substitution. In An. gambiae S-form populations, the former mutation appears to be widespread in west Africa and has been recently reported from Uganda, while the latter, originally recorded in Kenya, has been recently found in Gabon, Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea. In M-form populations surveyed to date, only the L1014F mutation has been found, although less widespread and at lower frequencies than in sympatric S-form populations.

Methods

Anopheles gambiae M- and S-form specimens from 19 sites from 11 west and west-central African countries were identified to molecular form and genotyped at the kdr locus either by Hot Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (HOLA) or allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR).

Results

The kdr genotype was determined for about 1,000 An. gambiae specimens. The L1014F allele was found at frequencies ranging from 6% to 100% in all S-form samples (N = 628), with the exception of two samples from Angola, where it was absent, and coexisted with the L1014S allele in samples from Cameroon, Gabon and north-western Angola. The L1014F allele was present in M-form samples (N = 354) from Benin, Nigeria, and Cameroon, where both M- and S-forms were sympatric.

Conclusion

The results represent the most comprehensive effort to analyse the overall distribution of the L1014F and L1014S mutations in An. gambiae molecular forms, and will serve as baseline data for resistance monitoring. The overall picture shows that the emergence and spread of kdr alleles in An. gambiae is a dynamic process and that there is marked intra- and inter-form heterogeneity in resistance allele frequencies. Further studies are needed to determine: i) the importance of selection pressure exerted by both agricultural and public health use of pyrethroid insecticides, ii) the phenotypic effects, particularly when the two mutations co-occur; and iii) the epidemiological importance of kdr for both pyrethroid- and DDT-based malaria control operations, particularly if/when the two insecticides are to be used in concert.

Background

DDT and pyrethroids share the same mode of action on the insect nervous system, targeting the neuronal voltage-gated sodium ion channels. Molecular characterizations have revealed that various mutations in the S1-S6 transmembrane segments of domain II of the sodium ion channel gene give rise to resistance to these insecticides in a number of insect species [13]. In the major Afrotropical malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (hereafter named simply An. gambiae), two point mutations at amino acid position 1014 of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene have been described, resulting in either a leucine-phenylalanine (L1014F) [2], or a leucine-serine (L1014S) [4] substitution. Both mutations have been shown to be linked with DDT and pyrethroid resistance phenotypes in field An. gambiae populations [2, 49]. A relatively small number of studies have been conducted to determine the epidemiological impact of kdr target site insensitivity on the efficacy of pyrethroid and DDT based vector control [913]. Although a consensus has not been reached yet, some groups suggest that it may be associated with decreased efficacy of ITNs and pyrethroid based IRS [10, 11]. In the latter case, programme staff were able to utilize carbamate insecticides, which have a different mode of action, and thereby overcome the resistance problem. Therefore, studies for determining the epidemiological impact and the extent of distribution of kdr mutations in An. gambiae populations are considered relevant for the design of insecticide-based control programmes and for informing the debate about the re-introduction of DDT into the vector control.

A number of studies, with limited geographical sampling, have detailed the distribution of kdr mutations in An. gambiae: most have either screened for the L1014F allele in west African countries [2, 6, 1422], or the L1014S mutation in east Africa [4]. A few studies have screened for the presence of both resistance alleles in Nigeria [5], Cameroon [23], Equatorial Guinea [24], Gabon [25], Uganda [26], Kenya and Tanzania [27], Malawi and Mozambique [28].

The picture that emerges from these studies is that the kdr mutations are not homogeneously distributed in the two molecular forms of An. gambiae (termed M and S), which are considered as incipient species [29]. In fact in early studies, the absence of the L1014F allele in the M-form was considered one of the major pieces of evidence for a severe restriction of gene flow between the two forms [30]. To date, the L1014F mutation has been reported in several S-form populations from western and western-central Africa [6, 18, 30, 31] and recently from Uganda [26]. The L1014S mutation, originally recorded in Kenya [4, 27], has recently been found in populations from Uganda [26], Gabon [25], Cameroon [23] and Equatorial Guinea [24]. In most of the few M-form populations surveyed, kdr alleles were seldom found, even in areas where the mutations occur at high frequencies in sympatric S-form populations [5, 16, 20, 22]. Where the L1014F allele was found in M-form individuals it was attributed to introgression between the two molecular forms [17, 21, 31, 32], with the exception of two cases, Bioko Island (Equatorial Guinea) and Douala (Cameroon), where the L1014F mutation may have arisen independently in the M-form [19, 23, 33]. The L1014S allele has not been observed in the M-form although the number of individuals analysed was small [5, 23, 24].

This manuscript details the first effort to analyse the distribution of the L1014F and L1014S mutations in An. gambiae populations from Sub-Saharan Africa west of the Rift Valley. It is envisaged that the data will serve as baseline for both researchers and, more importantly, for control staff who manage the deployment of insecticides, the efficacy of which could be compromised by the presence of kdr alleles.

Methods

Sample collections

Anopheles gambiae samples were collected from 19 sites in 11 west and west-central African countries, between 1998 and 2006. For Kedougou (Senegal), two samples were analysed, collected in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Table 1 shows the sampling sites (listed from west to east and north to south), their geographical coordinates, dates and methods of collection, the ecology of the sampling sites and the total number of M and S molecular forms analysed for kdr genotype.
Table 1

Sampling sites (listed from west to east), geographical coordinates, dates and methods of collection, ecology of the sites and total number of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms genotyped for the kdr locus.

State

Site

Latitude

Longitude

Year of collection

Collection method

Ecology

S-form

M-form

SENEGAL

Kedougou

12°36'N

12°14'W

2001

IR-PSC

Sudan-Guinea savannah

39

0

 

"

"

"

2005

IR-PSC

"

43

0

 

Tambacounda

13°23N

13°44W

2006

IR-PSC

Sudan-Guinea savannah

2

22

THE GAMBIA

Maccarthy Island

13°31'N

14°46'W

2003

IR

Northern Guinea savannah

0

17

BURKINA FASO

Bobo Dioulasso

11°02'N

04°13'W

2001

LC

Sudan-savannah urban

24

31

GHANA

Accra area

05°38'N

00°15'E

2002

LC

Savannah/forest

25

0

IVORY COAST

Bouaké area

07°11' –

07°40'N

04°55' –

05°01'W

1998

IR

Southern Guinea savannah

23

0

BENIN

Dassa area

07°45'N

02°11'E

2002

IR

Southern Guinea savannah

48

5

NIGERIA

Kobape, Olugbo

07°00' –

07°20'N

03°00' –

03°30'E

2001

LC

Southern Guinea savannah, rural

49

41

CAMEROON

Mangoum

05°31' N

10°37'E

2006

LC

Tropical Mountain grassland, intensive agriculture

75

0

 

Kribi

02°56'N

9°54'E

2005

LC

Humid Equatorial, coastal, urban

6

48

 

Dabadi

4°35'N

13°41'E

2006

LC

Equatorial/tropical, urban

64

0

GABON

Benguia

01°37'S

13°26'E

1999

LC

Tropical humid, rural

57

0

ANGOLA

Cabinda

05°32'S

12°11'E

2003

IR-HC

Tropical humid

114

0

 

Kikudo

06°07'S

12°22'E

2002

IR-PSC

Tropical humid

46

0

 

Saurimo

09°39'S

20°23'E

2002

IR-PSC

Tropical humid

15

0

 

Luanda area

08°50'S

13°14'E

2002–2003

IR-PSC, IR-HC, IR-NET

Tropical dry

0

42

 

Namibe area

15°10'S

12°09'E

2002

IR-PSC, IR-HC, IR-NET

Desert

0

15

SÃO TOME and PRÍNCIPE

Riboque

00°19'N

06°43'E

2004

LC

Tropical humid, urban

0

100

 

Rua Trabalhadores

01°38' N

07°25'E

1998

LC

Tropical humid, urban

0

33

IR-HC = hand-operated aspirators, indoor collection; IR-NET = indoor resting mosquitoes in bed-nets; IR-PSC = pyrethrum spray collection; LC = larval collection

Molecular analyses

DNA was extracted by a variety of standard methods (e.g. phenol/chloroform, DNAzol kit by Molecular Research Center Inc. and Easy-DNA Invitrogen kit) and specimens were identified to molecular form by PCR-RFLP [34]. Samples were genotyped at the kdr locus either using the Hot Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (HOLA) developed by Lynd et al [35] or by the Allele-Specific PCR (AS-PCR) [2, 4].

A sub-sample of the HOLA-analysed sample had been previously genotyped by PCR for the L1014F allele [2] and the results of the two approaches were compared. When the results of the two approaches were not consistent, sequencing of a fragment of the domain II of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene containing the kdr locus was performed using standard primers Agd1 and Agd2 [2]. The PCR products were cleaned using a commercial kit (SureClean PCR Clean Up, BIOLINE) and bi-directionally sequenced.

Statistical analyses

The maximum predicted frequency (y) for an allele to be present in a sample of a given size (x) but undetected in a sample was obtained from the upper 95% confidence limit of a binomial distribution, given by y = 1- 0.051/x, following the example of Post and Millest [36].

Results

Eight-hundred and two An. gambiae were kdr genotyped using the HOLA approach and 193 specimens from Gabon and São Tomé and Príncipe Islands were analysed by AS-PCR. The kdr genotype was successfully determined for more that 98% of the specimens.

Table 2 shows the kdr allele frequencies observed in the S-form samples (N = 628). The L1014F allele was present in all samples analysed, with the exception of samples from Kikudo (N = 46) and Saurimo (N = 15) in Angola. No difference in the L1014F frequency was observed between samples collected in Kedougou (Senegal) in 2001 and 2005 [chi-square = 0.57, degrees-of-freedom (df) = 1, P = 0.32]. The L1014S allele was found in samples from Cameroon, Gabon and north-western Angola (Cabinda). Observed genotypic frequencies were in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg expectations in all samples with N>20.
Table 2

Frequencies of kdr alleles (and 95% confidence intervals, CIs) in S-form samples of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

State

Site

N

1014L [95% CI]

L1014F [95% CI]

L1014S [95% CI]

SENEGAL

Kedougou, 2001

39

85.9 [76.5–91.9]

14.1 [8.1–23.5]

0.0 [0.0–4.7]

 

Kedougou, 2005

43

81.4 [71.9–88.2]

18.6 [11.8–28.1]

0.0 [0.0–4.2]

BURKINA FASO

Bobo Dioulasso

24

2.1 [0.4–10.9]

97.9 [89.1–99.6]

0.0 [0.0–7.4]

GHANA

Accra area

25

22.0 [12.8–35.2]

78.0 [64.8–87.3]

0.0 [0.0–7.1]

IVORY COAST

Toliak

23

0.0 [0.0–7.7]

100.0 [92.3–100.0]

0.0 [0.0–7.7]

BENIN

Dassa area

48

40.6 [31.4–50.6]

59.4 [49.4–68.7]

0.0 [0.0–3.9]

NIGERIA

Kobape, Olugbo

49

83.7 [75.1–89.7]

16.3 [10.3–24.9]

0.0 [0.0–3.8]

CAMEROON

Mangoum

75

0.7 [0.1–3.7]

84.0 [77.3–89.0]

15.3 [10.4–22.0]

 

Kribi

6

25.0 [8.9–53.2]

66.7 [39.1–86.2]

8.3 [1.5–35.4]

 

Dabadi

64

38.3 [30.3–46.9]

47.7 [39.2–56.3]

14.1 [9.1–21.1]

GABON

Benguia

57

86.8 [79.4.-91.9]

6.1 [3.0–12.1]

7.0 [3.6–13.2]

ANGOLA

Cabinda

114

51.3 [44.9–57.7]

18.0 [13.5–23.5]

30.7 [25.1–37.0]

 

Kikudo

46

100.0 [96.0–100.0]

0.0 [0.0–4.0]

0.0 [0.0–4.0]

 

Saurimo

15

100.0 [88.7–100.0]

0.0 [0.0–11.4]

0.0 [0.0–11.4]

1014L = insecticide-sensitivity allele: wild type; L1014F = insecticide-resistance allele: leucine-phenylalanine substitution at position 1014 of the voltage-gated channel gene; L1014S = insecticide-resistance allele: leucine-serine substitution. See text for details

All M-form samples genotyped (N = 354) were characterized by the exclusive presence of the wild-type 1014L allele, with the exception of the samples from Benin (Dassa, N = 5), Nigeria (Kobape, Olugbo, N = 41) and Cameroon (Kribi, N = 48), showing a frequency of 40.0% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 16.8–68.7], 19.5% (CI = 12.4–29.4) and 6.3% (CI = 2.9–13.0) of the L1014F allele, respectively.

In the two sampling sites where M and S forms were sympatric, L1014F frequencies in Nigeria were similar (16.3% in S and 19.5% in M-form) whilst higher frequencies were observed in the S-form in Cameroon (66.7% in S and 6.3% in M-form; Fisher's Exact Probability Test, P << 0.001).

The S-form specimens genotyped by both the HOLA and the PCR assay for the L1014F allele [30] were compared (N = 267). The results of the PCR genotyping were consistent with those of HOLA in 98% (125/127), 79% (27/34) and 89% (43/48) of 1014L/1014L, 1014L/L1014F and L1014F/L1014F genotypes, respectively. When the L1014S allele was present (sample from Cabinda, Angola), the PCR assay interpreted as 1014L/1014L all the 1014L/L1014S (31/31) and L1014S/L1014S (12/12) specimens, while L1014S/L1014F genotypes were interpreted either as L1014F/L1014F (13/15) or as 1014L/L1014F (2/15). Sequencing of the fragment of the domain II of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene containing the kdr codon from 18 of the specimens providing inconsistent results confirmed the interpretation obtained by HOLA, with a single exception (i.e. a 1014L/1014L HOLA-specimen which was 1014L/L1014F by both PCR and sequencing).

Discussion

This study shows that kdr mutations are widespread in An. gambiae S-form in west and west-central regions of sub-Saharan Africa. The L1014F allele was constantly present from the western limits of the S-form geographic range in central Senegal to the sub-equatorial areas of north-western Angola. The L1014S allele was not found in S-form samples collected in western sampling sites (i.e. west of 10°W), while it was found together with the L1014F allele in western-central sites, in agreement with previous preliminary reports from Gabon [25], Cameroon [23], Equatorial Guinea [24], and Uganda [26]. Since no departures from Hardy-Weinberg expectations have been observed in these samples, the significant L1014F/L1014S heterozygote excess reported in Gabon by Pinto et al [25] could likely be a transient and/or localized phenomenon, rather than the result of a possible selective advantage of carriers of both mutations in the heterozygous state. Further surveys will be required to ascertain the epidemiological impact of the co-occurrence of the two kdr mutations, at the level of both the individual and population, in the west-central African region.

Merging the above results with all the data available to date on the simultaneous occurrence of the two kdr mutations in S-form [2328], three main geographic areas can be distinguished based on kdr allele distribution and frequencies (Figure 1a): i) a western area, from Senegal to Nigeria, in which only the L1014F allele is present with frequencies >50% in most sites; ii) a west-central area from Cameroon in the north to Cabinda (Angola) in the south, extending eastward to Uganda, in which both kdr mutations are present at variable frequencies in most sites; iii) an area to the east of the Rift-Valley, where previous reports show L1014S frequencies below 10% in Kenya and where to the south both resistance mutations are likely absent.
Figure 1

Distribution of 1014L, L1014F and L1014S alleles in Anopheles gambiae S-form (1a) and M-form (1b) populations. Smaller pie charts refer to collections with a sample size <20. Red circles refer to literature data reporting the results of the simultaneous genotyping of L1014F and L1014S alleles, per country, indicated by numbers as follows: 1 = Cameroon [23], 2 = Equatorial Guinea [24], 3 = Gabon [25], 4 = Uganda [26], 5 = Kenya [27], 6 = Kenya [43], 7 = Tanzania, Malawi, and Mozambique [28]. Shaded areas indicate zones with different patterns of kdr allele distribution. See text for details.

The data obtained do not allow to determine whether the geographical differences in kdr allele frequencies among S-form populations is a result of non-uniform selective pressures due to variation in insecticide use, as recently hypothesized by Pinto et al [28]. However, it is interesting to note that the data from Angola suggest an impact of human activities on kdr distribution. All samples from Angola were characterized by the wild-type 1014L/1014L genotype, with the only exception of an S-form sample collected in Cabinda, less than 100 km apart from the sampling site of Kikudo [37]. Although it is not possible to completely rule out the presence of kdr alleles in the relatively small Kikudo sample (N = 46), as there is a 95% probability that an allele with a frequency of 3% or below would not be detected in the analysed sample (equivalent to mis-scoring one heterozygote genotype), the difference in the kdr allele frequencies between these sites is significant (chi-square = 67.9, df = 2, P < 0.001). This likely reflects the fact that the Kikudo area was involved in the civil war that ravaged Angola for the last 30 years, whilst Cabinda is located in an Angolan enclave within the Democratic Republic of Congo, which has been only marginally involved in the war, thus allowing for a larger scale use of pyrethroids against agricultural pests and/or malaria vectors [38].

This is the first regional survey of M-form specimens with respect to both resistance mutations. The results show the absence of the L1014S allele in all samples analysed and the presence of the L1014F allele in samples from a relatively restricted geographic region in the central part of Gulf of Guinea (i.e. Benin, Nigeria and Cameroon) (Figure 1b). Interestingly, the first report of the presence of L1014F in M-form was from Benin in 1998 [39], where it was shown to have introgressed from sympatric S-form populations [21] and where it has recently reached frequencies around 80% [15]. Inter alia, it can be hypothesized that the mutation is spreading from this region eastwards (i.e. Nigeria and later in Cameroon, where the L1014F frequency is 19% and 6%, respectively) and westwards in Burkina Faso [7]. Moreover, the hypothesis of a further "possible subdivision within the M molecular form" [40] may further complicate the picture.

Moreover, the different distribution of the two kdr mutations between sympatric M and S populations could also reflect different ecological/behavioural traits between M and S-forms, that might promote different exposure to insecticide selective pressures. For example, the M-form may be more adapted to urbanized, man-influenced ecological settings, whereas the S-form tends to prevail in rural settings [29, 41], where a use of insecticides for agricultural purposes is expected to be greater.

From the technical point of view, the results highlight the high sensitivity and specificity of both the HOLA and AS-PCR approaches, which efficiently and simultaneously detected both kdr alleles, as already suggested on a smaller scale by Lynd et al [35] and Pinto et al [25]. Moreover, the results reinforce the notion that genotyping kdr alleles only with a single primer set (i.e. either the Martinez-Torres et al [2], or the Ranson et al [4] methods), is an incomplete and possibly misleading analysis. For a full description of kdr resistance in a given region, it is essential to screen for both kdr alleles.

Conclusion

Although the results obtained refer to relatively few An. gambiae samples from a very large geographical range, they represent a first effort to analyse the overall distribution of the L1014F and L1014S mutations in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly west of the Rift Valley, where both molecular forms of this species co-occur in most of their range of distribution.

The results on S-form populations, combined with previously published data (Figure 1a), show a non-uniform distribution of kdr mutations throughout the continent: the L1014F is the only allele present west of 10°W latitude, while the two mutations co-exist in a wide geographic area in western-central Africa (ranging approximately from 6°N to 6°S).

The L1014F allele is present also in the M-form in an area comprised approximately between 5°W and 15°E, showing higher frequencies (>75%) in Benin and in the island of Bioko [15, 33], and lower frequencies (<20%) in Burkina Faso, Nigeria and Cameroon. The absence of the L1014S allele in the M-form samples analysed will serve as baseline data for further studies on the possible occurrence and dispersal of this mutation in this form (Figure 1b).

The overall picture strongly suggests that the origin and spread of kdr alleles in An. gambiae is an ongoing process. There is evidence that both kdr alleles have originated in the S-form through multiple mutation events [28], whereas the L1014F allele may have arisen in the M-form either through introgression with the S-form or through independent mutation events [19, 21, 42]. Insect control activities, such as the large scale use of pyretroid insecticides for agricultural purposes, and possibly for domestic protection, may contribute largely to this process, as suggested by Pinto et al [28], who hypothesized a possible link between the recent expansion of cotton production in West Africa and an increased selective pressure due to pyrethroid insecticide use. This highlights the need to carefully monitor the evolution and spread of kdr target site insensitivity with a sensitive and precise method for the detection of both alleles and through more specifically designed spatial and temporal transects. Such surveys should be accompanied with the molecular analysis of non-target site resistance mechanisms for An. gambiae. This would facilitate an analysis of the relative contribution of kdr mutations into the resistance phenotype. Given the large geographic area where the two mutations co-occur in the S-form, it is also extremely important to undertake insecticide resistance surveys to correlate kdr genotypes to DDT and pyrethroid resistance phenotypes. This would allow to ascertain the phenotypic effect of both kdr mutations, particularly when co-occurring in the same individual, and to evaluate their possible effect on the efficacy of ITNs and pyrethroid based IRS, thus allowing control programme managers to make informed choices about the chemicals they use for vector control.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all scientists and entomology teams whose contributions to the study of An. gambiae molecular forms made this review wide and comprehensive; we especially thank K. Adasi, M. Akogbeto, T. Baldet, G. Carrara, P.J. Cani, C. Curtis, A. Diabaté, J. Dossou-yovo, N. Elissa, C. Ferreira, F. Fortes, A. Mendjibe, and W. Takken for help with sample collections. JP was funded by a post-doctoral grant from Foundation of Science and Technology-FEDER, Portugal (pocti/esp/44837/2002 and SFRH/BPD/10086/2002). JE was funded by TDR re-entry grant ID number: A41481.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Università "La Sapienza"
(2)
Dipartimento di Scienze di Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Parassitologia, Università "La Sapienza"
(3)
Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale
(4)
Institut Pasteur
(5)
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University
(6)
Vector Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
(7)
Dipartimento di Genetica e Biologia Molecolare, Università "La Sapienza"
(8)
Centro de Malaria e outras Doenças Tropicais, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

References

  1. Knipple DC, Doyle KE, Marsella-Herrick PA, Soderlund DM: Tight genetic linkage between the kdr insecticide resistance trait and a voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene in the house fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91 (7): 2483-2487. 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2483.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D: Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998, 7 (2): 179-184. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Williamson MS, Martinez-Torres D, Hick CA, Devonshire AL: Identification of mutations in the housefly para-type sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Mol Gen Genet. 1996, 252: 51-60. 10.1007/BF02173204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000, 9 (5): 491-497. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Awolola TS, Oduola AO, Oyewole IO, Obansa JB, Amajoh CN, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M: Dynamics of knockdown pyrethroid insecticide resistance alleles in a field population of Anopheles gambiae s.s. in south-western Nigeria. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007, 44 (3): 181-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandre F, Manguin S, Brengues C, Dossou Yovo J, Darriet F, Diabate A, Carnevale P, Guillet P: Current distribution of a pyrethroid resistance gene (kdr) in Anopheles gambiae complex from west Africa and further evidence for reproductive isolation of the Mopti form. Parassitologia. 1999, 41: 319-322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Guiguemde RT, Brengues C, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Hougard JM: First report of the kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae M form from Burkina Faso, west Africa. Parassitologia. 2002, 44: 157-158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Etang J, Manga L, Chandre F, Guillet P, Fondjo E, Mimpfoundi R, Toto JC, Fontenille D: Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Republic of Cameroon. J Med Entomol. 2003, 40 (4): 491-497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kolaczinski JH, Fanello C, Herve JP, Conway DJ, Carnevale P, Curtis CF: Experimental and molecular genetic analysis of the impact of pyrethroid and non-pyrethroid insecticide impregnated bednets for mosquito control in an area of pyrethroid resistance. Bull Entomol Res. 2000, 90 (2): 125-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleinschmidt I, Torrez M, Schwabe C, Benavente L, Seocharan I, Jituboh D, Nseng G, Sharp B: Factors influencing the effectiveness of malaria control in Bioko Island, equatorial Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76 (6): 1027-1032.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. N'Guessan R, Corbel V, Akogbeto M, Rowland M: Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13 (2): 199-206.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hougard JM, Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Darriet F, Chandre F, Akogbéto M, Baldet T, Guillet P, Carnevale P, Traoré-Lamizana M: Efficacy of mosquito nets treated with insecticide mixtures or mosaics against insecticide resistant Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Côte d'Ivoire. Bull Entomol Res. 2003, 93 (6): 491-498. 10.1079/BER2003261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Henry MC, Assi SB, Rogier C, Dossou-yovo J, Chandre F, Guillet P, Carnevale P: Protective efficacy of lambda-cyhalothrin treated nets in Anopheles gambiae pyrethroid resistance areas of Côte d'Ivoire. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 73 (5): 859-864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Awolola TS, Oyewole IO, Amajoh CN, Idowu ET, Ajayi MB, Oduola AO, Manafa OU, Ibrahim K, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M: Distribution of the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae and pyrethroid knock down resistance gene in Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2005, 95 (3): 204-209. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, Martin T, Akogbeto M, Hougard JM, Rowland M: Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007, 101 (3): 207-216. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cuamba N, Choi KS, Townson H: Malaria vectors in Angola: distribution of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex, their pyrethroid insecticide knockdown resistance (kdr) status and Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite rates. Malar J. 2006, 5 (2):Google Scholar
  17. Diabate A, Brengues C, Baldet T, Dabire KR, Hougard JM, Akogbeto M, Kengne P, Simard F, Guillet P, Hemingway J: The spread of the Leu-Phe kdr mutation through Anopheles gambiae complex in Burkina Faso: genetic introgression and de novo phenomena. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9 (12): 1267-1273. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01336.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fanello C, Petrarca V, della Torre A, Santolamazza F, Dolo G, Coulibaly M, Alloueche A, Curtis CF, Toure YT, Coluzzi M: The pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali and further indication of incipient speciation within An. gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2003, 12 (3): 241-245. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00407.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Reimer LJ, Tripet F, Slotman MA, Spielman A, Fondjo E, Lanzaro GC: An unusual distribution of the kdr gene among populations of Anopheles gambiae on the island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Insect Mol Biol. 2005, 14 (6): 683-688. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2005.00599.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tripet F, Wright J, Cornel A, Fofana A, McAbee R, Meneses C, Reimer L, Slotman MA, Thiemann T, Dolo G: Longitudinal survey of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid (kdr) in Mali, West Africa, and evidence of its emergence in the Bamako form of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76 (1): 81-87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Weill M, Chandre F, Brengues C, Manguin S, Akogbeto M, Pasteur N, Guillet P, Raymond M: The kdr mutation occurs in the Mopti form of Anopheles gambiae s.s. through introgression. Insect Mol Biol. 2000, 9 (5): 451-455. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00206.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Coetzee M, van Wyk P, Booman M, Koekemoer LL, Hunt RH: Insecticide resistance in malaria vector mosquitoes in a gold mining town in Ghana and implications for malaria control. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2006, 99 (5): 400-403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Etang J, Fondjo E, Chandre F, Morlais I, Brengues C, Nwane P, Chouaibou M, Ndjemai H, Simard F: First report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74 (5): 795-797.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moreno M, Vicente JL, Cano J, Berzosa PJ, de Lucio A, Nzambo S, Bobuakasi L, Buatiche JN, Ondo M, Micha F: Knockdown resistance mutations (kdr) and insecticide susceptibility to DDT and pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae from Equatorial Guinea. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13 (3): 430-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinto J, Lynd A, Elissa N, Donnelly MJ, Costa C, Gentile G, Caccone A, do Rosario VE: Co-occurrence of East and West African kdr mutations suggests high levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles gambiae from Libreville, Gabon. Med Vet Entomol. 2006, 20 (1): 27-32. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00611.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Backeljau T, Coosemans M: Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/Melt Curve analysis. Malar J. 2006, 5: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-5-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stump AD, Atieli FK, Vulule JM, Besansky NJ: Dynamics of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele in western Kenyan populations of Anopheles gambiae in response to insecticide-treated bed net trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70 (6): 591-596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinto J, Lynd A, Vicente JL, Santolamazza F, Randle NP, Gentile G, Moreno M, Simard F, Charlwood JD, do Rosario VE: Multiple origins of knockdown resistance mutations in the afrotropical mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2 (11): e1243-10.1371/journal.pone.0001243.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. della Torre A, Tu Z, Petrarca V: On the distribution and genetic differentiation of Anopheles gambiae s.s. molecular forms. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 35 (7): 755-769. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. della Torre A, Fanello C, Akogbeto M, Dossou-yovo J, Favia G, Petrarca V, Coluzzi M: Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa. Insect Mol Biol. 2001, 10 (1): 9-18. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yawson AE, McCall PJ, Wilson MD, Donnelly MJ: Species abundance and insecticide resistance of Anopheles gambiae in selected areas of Ghana and Burkina Faso. Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18 (4): 372-377. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00519.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gentile G, Santolamazza F, Fanello C, Petrarca V, Caccone A, della Torre A: Variation in an intron sequence of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene correlates with genetic differentiation between Anopheles gambiae s.s. molecular forms. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13 (4): 371-377. 10.1111/j.0962-1075.2004.00494.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharp BL, Ridl FC, Govender D, Kuklinski J, Kleinschmidt I: Malaria vector control by indoor residual insecticide spraying on the tropical island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Malar J. 2007, 6: 52-10.1186/1475-2875-6-52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fanello C, Santolamazza F, della Torre A: Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP. Med Vet Entomol. 2002, 16 (4): 461-464. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00393.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lynd A, Ranson H, McCall PJ, Randle NP, Black WC, Walker ED, Donnelly MJ: A simplified high-throughput method for pyrethroid knock-down resistance (kdr) detection in Anopheles gambiae. Malar J. 2005, 4: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-4-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Post RJ, Millest AL: Sample size in parasitological and vector surveys. Parasitol Today. 1991, 7 (6): 141-10.1016/0169-4758(91)90279-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Calzetta M, Santolamazza F, Carrara GC, Cani PJ, Fortes F, Di Deco MA, della Torre A, Petrarca V: Distribution and chromosomal characterization of Anopheles gambiae complex in Angola. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 78 (1): 169-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. The work of the African Network on Vector Resistance to insecticides 2004–2005. [http://www.afro.who.int/des/phe/publications/anvr_tech_report.pdf]
  39. Akogbeto M, Yakoubou S: [Resistance of malaria vectors to pyrethrins used for impregnating mosquito nets in Benin, West Africa]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999, 92 (2): 123-130. [Article in French]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Slotman MA, Tripet F, Cornel AJ, Meneses CR, Lee Y, Reimer LJ, Thiemann TC, Fondjo E, Fofana A, Traore SF: Evidence for subdivision within the M molecular form of Anopheles gambiae. Mol Ecol. 2007, 16 (3): 639-649. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03172.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wondji C, Simard F, Petrarca V, Etang J, Santolamazza F, della Torre A, Fontenille D: Species and populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Cameroon with special emphasis on chromosomal and molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s. J Med Entomol. 2005, 42: 998-1005. 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0998:SAPOTA]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre C, Dabire KR, Kengne P, Guiguemde TR, Simard F, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Hougard JM: KDR mutation, a genetic marker to assess events of introgression between the molecular M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in the tropical savannah area of West Africa. J Med Entomol. 2003, 40 (2): 195-198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Chen H, Githeko AK, Githure JI, Mutunga J, Zhou G, Yan G: Monooxygenase levels and knockdown resistance (kdr) allele frequencies in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis in Kenya. J Med Entomol. 2008, 45 (2): 242-250. 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[242:MLAKRK]2.0.CO;2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Santolamazza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement