Volume 8 Supplement 1

Coartem®: reviewing the impact on the malaria landscape

Open Access

The clinical efficacy of artemether/lumefantrine (Coartem®)

Contributed equally
Malaria Journal20098(Suppl 1):S5

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-S1-S5

Published: 12 October 2009

Abstract

Current World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria recommend the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Artemether/lumefantrine is an ACT prequalified by the WHO for efficacy, safety and quality, approved by Swissmedic in December 2008 and recently approved by the USA FDA. Coartem® is a fixed-dose combination of artemether and lumefantrine. Its two components have different modes of action that provide synergistic anti-malarial activity. It is indicated for the treatment of infants, children and adults with acute, uncomplicated infection due to Plasmodium falciparum or mixed infections including P. falciparum. A formulation with improved palatability has been developed especially for children (Coartem® Dispersible), which rapidly disperses in a small amount of water for ease of administration.

The efficacy of the six-dose regimen of artemether/lumefantrine has been confirmed in many different patient populations around the world, consistently achieving 28-day PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-corrected cure rates of >95% in the evaluable population, rapidly clearing parasitaemia and fever, and demonstrating a significant gametocidal effect, even in areas of widespread parasite resistance to other antimalarials.

Background

The rising threat of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to monotherapies prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 guidelines for the treatment of malaria to recommend that combinations of antimalarials be used to treat malaria caused by P. falciparum [1]. Since artemisinin derivatives are the only class of anti-malarial agents to which resistance outside the Thai-Cambodia border region has not been reported in vivo [1], the guidelines specifically recommend the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) [1]. WHO criterion for adequate efficacy of ACT in malaria is the achievement of an average cure rate of ≥ 95% in clinical trials [1].

Artemisinin derivatives have the most potent and rapid onset of anti-parasitic activity of any anti-malarial drug available today and are active against all Plasmodium species that infect humans. Importantly, they allow more parasite clearance than any other anti-malarial drug (parasite numbers can be reduced by a factor of 105 per asexual cycle, compared with 102-103 with other anti-malarial drugs) [2]. When combined with efficacious anti-malarials with slower elimination rates, such as lumefantrine, shorter courses of treatment (three days) become effective [2].

The combination of artemether (an artemisinin derivative) and lumefantrine in a 1:6 ratio was the first fixed-dose ACT to meet the WHO's prequalification criteria for efficacy, safety and quality [3]. Artemether/lumefantrine (AL), as Coartem®, now comprises nearly 75% of the 100 million or so ACT treatments used each year [4]. Coartem® was approved by Swissmedic in 1999 and was recently approved by the USA FDA [5]. Coartem® Dispersible was approved by Swissmedic in December 2008. More than 40 malaria-endemic countries in sub-Saharan Africa have rapidly scaled up malaria prevention and treatment and now recommend the use of ACT as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria [6]. Both artemether and lumefantrine are blood schizonticides with complementary pharmacokinetics and dissimilar modes of action, and hence provide synergistic anti-malarial activity [7]. Artemether is rapidly eliminated from plasma with a half-life of two to three hours, whereas lumefantrine is eliminated more slowly with a half-life of three to six days and provides a high long-term cure rate after a short treatment course [7]. The combination thus provides rapid clearance of parasitemia and most malaria-related symptoms, coupled with prevention of recrudescence.

AL tablets have been included on the WHO model list of Essential Medicines since March 2002 and on the first WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children since October 2007 [8, 9].

The six-dose AL regimen is currently the approved treatment regimen for acute, uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in adults and paediatric patients with a body weight ≥ 5 kg, irrespective of the immune status of the patients to P. falciparum and of the local multidrug resistance situation, in the majority of the 83 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America where the drug is registered.

The objective of this paper is to review the literature investigating the drug's clinical efficacy. In this respect, it is important to note that early clinical studies used a four-dose AL regimen (two doses per day for two days).

However, because this regimen did not provide optimal efficacy in some areas, such as Thailand, where multi-drug resistant P. falciparum malaria is prevalent, it was changed to its current six-dose format (three-day course: dosing at 0, 8, 24, 36, 48 and 60 hours) in 1997. This article will focus on data involving the six-dose regimen only. In addition to the key clinical trials that support the drug's indication for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, over 40 independent trials have produced data supporting the excellent efficacy of this ACT.

Study design considerations

The active comparators used in the controlled studies summarized below were the standard therapies for each country as recommended by the WHO at the time. Placebo-controlled studies are not practical for ethical reasons because untreated P. falciparum malaria may progress rapidly, with a potentially fatal outcome. All comparative studies were randomized, and double-blind designs were used where practical.

Efficacy evaluations

The key criterion used to assess the efficacy of an anti-malarial agent is the elimination of malaria parasites, which in turn leads to resolution of symptoms such as fever. Unless otherwise stated, the primary efficacy endpoint in the studies outlined below was the 28-day parasitological cure rate. This describes the proportion of patients with clearance of asexual parasitaemia within seven days of initiating study treatment without recrudescence at day 28, based on blood smears. In most studies, the 28-day cure rate was also corrected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to differentiate between recurrence of the initial infection and a new infection. This is particularly important in highly endemic regions, as is the case in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa, where reinfection is common.

Several secondary efficacy endpoints were also evaluated. These included: 7-day, 14-day, and/or 42-day parasitological cure rates; fever clearance time (FCT) in patients who had fever at baseline; parasite clearance time (PCT) and gametocyte clearance time (GCT).

The evaluable population included all patients with confirmed P. falciparum malaria who received at least one dose of study drug and had parasite counts performed at the pre-specified time points, including day 28, or who discontinued due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect.

The primary efficacy endpoint was also evaluated in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all patients with confirmed P. falciparum malaria who received at least one dose of study drug. Since patients who did not have a parasite count performed at day 7 or day 28 were classified as a treatment failure in the mITT analysis, the evaluable population analysis gives the most clinically relevant result as it better reflects the true activity of the drug (i.e. it avoids classifying as treatment failure patients who did not have a parasite count performed but who may have been cured).

Efficacy of AL studied in children and adults

Six key clinical studies, summarized in Table 1[1015], have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the six-dose AL regimen in a range of patient populations and geographic regions with varying levels of drug resistant P. falciparum and malaria endemicity. In all studies, patients were either non-immune or semi-immune to P. falciparum. Some of the studies included other anti-malarial drugs or combinations as active comparators and some also allowed the inclusion of patients with mixed infections that included P. falciparum at baseline.
Table 1

Clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the six-dose regimen of artemether/lumefantrine

Study number

A025[10]

A026[11]

A028[12]

A2403[13]

B2303[14]

A2401[15]

Design

Randomized double-blind

Randomized open-label

Randomized open-label

Open-label

Randomized investigator blind

Open-label

Comparator

Four-dose regimen

MASa

MASa

-

Dispersible formulation

-

Patients

Adults & children (>2 years)

Adults & children (≥ 2 years)

Adults & adolescents (>12 years)

Infants & children (5 to 25 kg)

Infants & children (5 to <35 kg)

Adult non-immune travellers

N AL/total Geography

120/359b

150/200

164/219

310

452/899

165

 

Thailand

Thailand

Thailand

Kenya

Kenya

EU

    

Tanzania

Tanzania

Colombia

    

Nigeria

Mali

 
     

Benin

 
     

Mozambique

 

28-day PCR-corrected cure rate (evaluable pts)

96.9%

97.7%

95.5%

96.7%

97.8%

96.0%

Median time to fever clearance (h) (mITT popn)

35 (n = 59)

22 (n = 87)

29 (n = 76)

7.8 (n = 309)

7.8 (n = 311)

36.5 (n = 100)

Median time to parasite clearance (h) (mITT popn)

43.6 (n = 118)

48 (n = 149)

29.3 (n = 164)

24.0 (n = 310)

34.9 (n = 452)

41.8 (n = 162)

aStudy was not designed to compare AL with mefloquine + artesunate; bAL over 60 hours; c28-day cure rate was a secondary endpoint. Abbreviations: AL, artemether/lumefantrine; MAS, mefloquine + artesunate.

Study AO25

This randomized, double-blind study enrolled 359 adults and children above two years of age with uncomplicated P. falciparum in two centres in Thailand. It compared the AL four-dose regimen to two different six-dose regimens, one administered over 60 hours and one administered over 96 hours [10].

AL achieved a 28-day PCR-corrected cure rate of 96.9% in the evaluable population (Figure 1) [10]. All patients cleared peripheral parasitaemia rapidly - the median parasite clearance time was 44 hours [10]. Median fever clearance time was 35 hours, and no patient developed gametocytaemia following treatment [10].
Figure 1

28-day PCR-corrected cure rate for artemether/lumefantrine in Studies A025,A026 and A028 [1012].

Since the efficacy was similar between the 96 and 60-hour six-dose regimens, the 60-hour regimen was chosen for further development to facilitate better compliance with a shorter treatment duration.

Studies A026 and A028

These two randomized, open-label studies were both conducted in Thailand and included mefloquine plus artesunate (MAS) as an active control arm [11, 12].

Study 026 enrolled patients ≥ 2 years of age [11], and Study 028 enrolled patients >12 years of age [12]. The open-label design for both studies was chosen because of the excessive number of placebo tablets (24) patients would have had to take if a double-blind/double-dummy design had been used.

In Study 026, 150 patients received AL and 50 patients received mefloquine and artesunate. Patient characteristics were comparable between treatment groups, and treatment comparisons were not affected by a difference in baseline parasite density. The 28-day PCR-corrected cure rates were >95% in the evaluable population for both treatment groups (Figure 1). The median fever and parasite clearance times were identical in the two treatment groups [11].

In Study 028, 164 patients received AL and 55 patients received MAS. Patient characteristics were similar to those seen in Study 026 and were comparable across treatment groups, except for parasite density which was slightly lower than in Study 026 [11, 12].

Once again, the 28-day cure rates were >95% in the evaluable population and were comparable in both treatment groups (Figure 1). The lower boundary of the confidence interval was greater than 85%. Median fever and parasite clearance times were in the range of 20 to 30 hours in both groups [11, 12].

Study A2403

This was an open-label non-comparative study performed in collaboration with the WHO. It was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of AL in 310 infants and young children (5-25 kg body weight) in sub-Saharan Africa (Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania) [13]. In the absence of an ethical comparator agent for paediatric patients with a body weight of 5 to <10 kg at the time of the study, it was a single-arm study. The median age was 24 months, ranging from two months to 10 years. AL tablets were crushed and mixed with sterile water to facilitate administration to those children who were unable to swallow whole tablets [13]. In all cases, treatment was given after feeding.

The overall 28-day cure rate, corrected for reinfection, was 93.9% for the intent-to-treat population [13]. The median time to parasite clearance ranged from 24 to 36 hours, with 98.4% of patients achieving parasite clearance within 48 hours of their first dose [13]. The median time to fever clearance was less than eight hours [13], and none of the children had gametocytes after day 14 [13].

Study B2303

To facilitate administration of AL to children, a sweet-tasting dispersible formulation has been developed. The primary objective of Study B2303, which enrolled 899 African children (5-<35 kg body weight), was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the dispersible tablet to the crushed tablet based on the 28-day PCR-corrected cure rate in the evaluable population. The median age of children enrolled was 36 months, ranging from two months to 12 years, and the median body weight was 13 kg [14].

In the evaluable population, the 28-day PCR-corrected cure rate for the group receiving crushed tablets was 98.5%, compared with 97.8% for the group receiving the dispersible formulation of AL (Coartem® Dispersible) [14]. The PCR-adjusted cure rates for the two groups were also comparable at day 14 and day 42 [14]. Notably, the cure rates were comparable across body weight groups (Figure 2) [14]. In addition, there were no significant differences between those receiving the dispersible formulation and those receiving crushed tablets with regard to median time to parasite clearance (Figure 3A) and median time to fever clearance (Figure 3B) [14].
Figure 2

Efficacy of dispersible AL formulation across body weight groups [14].

Figure 3

Median time to (A) parasite clearance and (B) fever clearance for dispersible artemether/lumefantrine formulation and crushed tablets [14].

Study A2401

This study was designed to assess the efficacy of AL in non-immune populations (e.g. travellers). To date, it is the largest study investigating a drug for the treatment of malaria in travellers. Because of practical considerations related to the availability of patients, it was an open-label, single-arm study. A total of 165 patients who had been diagnosed with non-endemic malaria were enrolled from Europe and non-malarious areas of Colombia. Non-immune patients were defined as those who had not spent the first five years of their life, nor the five years prior to study entry, in a malaria-endemic area, and had not had acute P. falciparum malaria diagnosed during the past 5 years.

A high 28-day cure rate of 96% (both uncorrected and PCR-corrected) was observed in the evaluable population (Figure 4) [15]. The median time to parasite clearance was 41.5 hours and the median time to fever clearance was 36.8 hours [15].
Figure 4

28-day PCR-corrected cure rate for AL in Study A2401 [15].

A total of 599 adult patients (>16 years) and 877 children (<16 years) were treated with the six-dose AL regimen in the above studies. The 28-day PCR-corrected cure rate in evaluable patients consistently met WHO criteria for efficacy (>95%) in both adults and children. Rapid clearance of parasitaemia and fever was also evident, although noticeably quicker in children.

Comparative results from independent studies

A large number of independent studies have compared the efficacy of AL with other anti-malarial treatments. These studies conclusively show that AL is highly efficacious and at least as effective as other ACTs and combinations of antimalarials over a wide range of geographical areas and in a variety of populations. A summary of these trials is presented in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2

Published studies with the six-dose AL regimen in Africa

Authors

Country

Design and patient population

Comparator(s) No. of patients

Results

Bukirwa et al 2006 [16]

Uganda

Randomized, single-blind, single centre in children (1-10 years)

AL (n = 208)

ASAQ (n = 211)

Primary efficacy outcome was the 28-day risk of recurrent symptomatic malaria (AL = 27%;ASAQ = 42%) and recurrent parasitaemia (AL = 51%;ASAQ = 66%) both unadjusted for re-infection (both p = 0.001). When corrected for re-infection using PCR, the risks for both recurrent symptomatic malaria and parasitaemia were 0% for ASAQ and 1% for AL (equivalent to PCR-adjusted 28-day parasitological cure rates of 100% and 99%, respectively), illustrating the high rate of re-infection in the area studied.

Dorsey et al 2007 [17]

Uganda

Single-blind, randomized, single centre in children (1-10 years)

AL (n = 105)

AQSP (n = 111)

ASAQ (n = 113)

PCR-corrected 28-day cure rates of 99% with AL, 95.4% with ASAQ and 85.9% with AQSP. The differences between AL and AQSP, and between ASAQ and AQSP were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.08, respectively).

Clearance of fever, sexual parasites and gametocytes were similar in the AL and ASAQ groups but slower in the AQSP group.

Gürkov et al 2008 [18]

Ethiopia

One centre, comparative in adults and children >5 years of age

AL (n = 30)

Quinine (n = 5)

Atovaquone/Proguanil (n = 32)

At 28-days, there were no treatment failures in the AL group, but the PCR-confirmed recrudescence rates in the quinine and atovaquone/proguanil groups were 9% and 6%, respectively.

Kabanywanyi et al 2007 [19]

Tanzania

Randomized, open-label, 2-centre in children (6-59 months)

AL (n = 99)

ASAQ (n = 76)

28-day PCR-corrected rates of adequate clinical and parasitological response were 100% for AL and 93.8% for ASAQ. Late parasitological failures, in all cases due to re-infection rather than recrudescence, occurred in 12% and 29% of each group, respectively.

Kamya et al 2007 [20]

Uganda

Single-blind, randomized, single centre in children (6 months to 10 years)

AL (n = 210)

DP (n = 211)

PCR-corrected risk of recurrent parasitaemia at Day 28 was significantly lower with DP than with AL (1.9% vs. 8.9%); this was also the case at Day 42 (6.9% vs. 16%). However, due to the complexity of infection in this area of very high transmission, leading to difficulty in distinguishing between new and recrudescent infections, the risks of recrudescence are probably overstated.

Times to clearance of fever and parasites were similar in the two treatment groups, although DP was associated with better control of gametocytes.

Mårtensson et al 2005 [21]

Zanzibar

Multicenter, randomized, open-label in children (6-59 months)

AL (n = 200)

ASAQ (n = 208)

PCR-corrected 28-day and 42-day parasitological cure rates of 97% and 92%, respectively, for AL and 91% and 88%, respectively, for ASAQ (p = 0.001 at 28 days and p = 0.045 at 42 days).

Parasite and fever clearance were rapid with both treatments, and gametocyte carriage was low in both groups.

Mårtensson et al 2007 [22]

Tanzania

Randomized, single centre, open-label study in children

AL (n = 50)

SP (n = 56)

PCR-corrected 42-day parasitological cure rates were 98% or 94% in the AL group (depending on whether standard or enhanced PCR was used); corresponding figures in the SP group were 70% and 66%, respectively.

Mohamed et al 2006 [23]

Sudan

2-centre, open-label, treatment assigned by centre, in children and adults

AL (n = 72)

ASSP (n = 71)

In this area of low malaria transmission both AL and ASSP were associated with adequate clinical and parasitological response rates of 100% at Day 28.

Mukhtar et al 2007 [24]

Sudan

Randomized, single centre, open-label study in children & adults

AL (n = 80)

ASSP (n = 77)

PCR-corrected rates of adequate clinical and parasitological response of 93.4% for ASSP and 91.3% for AL. The treatment regimen used was not clear.

Mutabingwa et al 2005 [25]

Tanzania

Randomized, single centre, open-label study in children

AL (n = 519)

ASAQ (n = 515)

AQSP (n = 507)

AQ (n = 270)

PCR-corrected 28-day parasitological cure rates were 51.6% for AQ, 65.5% for AQSP, 88.8% for ASAQ, and 97.2% for AL.

Recruitment to the AQ group was stopped early by the trial's data and safety monitoring board due to a high treatment failure rate.

Yeka et al 2008 [26]

Uganda

Randomized, one centre, single-blinded, in children aged 6 months to 10 years

AL (n = 227)

DP (n = 234)

At 42 days there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of recrudescence (5.8% for AL vs. 2.0% for DP; risk difference = 3.8%, 95% CI 0.2-7.8%), although recurrent parasitaemia (uncorrected for re-infection) was more frequent with AL (33.2% vs. 12.2% for DP).

Mulenga et al 2006 [27]

Zambia

Randomized, open-label, multicentre, in adults

AL (n = 485)

SP (n = 486)

AL was associated with significantly faster clearance of fever, parasitaemia and gametocytes than SP, and a higher Day 45 PCR-corrected cure rate (94.6% vs. 80.7%, p < 0.001).

Toovey 2008 [28]

Mozambique

Non-comparative, open-label, single centre in adults

AL (n = 54)

28-day parasitological cure rate of 100%.

Adjei et al 2008 [29]

Ghana

Randomized, open label

AL (n = 111)

AS+AQ (n = 116)

For the AL group, adequate clinical and parasitological response was reported in 97.1% patients at Day 14 and 94.2% at Day 28; corresponding figures for ASAQ were 98.2% and 95.3%.

Falade et al 2008 [30]

Nigeria

Randomized, open label, single centre in children (6 months to 10 years)

AL (n = 66)

ASAQ (n = 66)

PCR-corrected 28-day parasitological cure rates of 100% for AL and 98.4% for ASAQ.

Faye et al 2007 [31]

Senegal

Randomized, open-label, multicentre in children and adults

ASAQ (n = 360)

AQSP (n = 161)

MAS (n = 145)

AL (6 dose) (n = 149)

AL (four-dose) (n = 140)

PCR-corrected 28-day parasitological cure rates were 100% for all treatments other than AL four-dose (96.4%). Parasite clearance was observed to be more rapid with all ACTs than with AQSP.

Initial reduction of gametocyte carriage also appeared to be more rapid with the ACTs than with AQSP, although all patients were free of gametocytes by day 21.

Koram et al 2005 [32]

Ghana

Multicentre, randomized, open-label in children (6-59 months)

AL (n = 51)

CQ (n = 36)

SP (n = 27)

ASAQ (n = 54)

PCR-corrected 28-day cure rates of 25% for chloroquine, 60% for SP, 100% for ASAQ, and 97.5% for AL.

Meremikwu et al 2006 [33]

Nigeria

Randomized, open-label, single centre, in children (6-59 months)

AL (n = 60)

ASAQ (n = 59)

Both treatments highly effective with similar rates of adequate clinical and parasitological response, early treatment failure, late clinical failure and late parasitological failure at 14 days.

Owusi-Agyei et al 2008 [34]

Ghana

Randomized, open label in children aged 6 months to 10 years

AL (n = 223)

ASAQ (n = 220)

ASCD (n = 178)

Per-protocol analysis showed a lower PCR-corrected parasitological and clinical failure rate at day 28 in the ASAQ group (6.6%) compared with the AL group (13.8%) or ASCD group (13.8%).

Sagara et al 2006 [35]

Mali

Randomized, single centre, open-label study in children (≥ 6 months) and adults

AL (n = 303)

AS plus sulphamethoxypyrazine plus pyrimethamine (n = 303)

28-day PCR-corrected parasitological cure rates were 100% for AS plus sulphamethoxypyrazine plus pyrimethamine, and 99% for AL.

Gametocyte clearance was similar in the two treatment groups.

Sowunmi et al 2007 [36]

Nigeria

Randomized, open-label, single centre, in children (≤ 10 years)

AL (n = 90)

AQ plus sulphalene plus pyrimethamine (n = 91)

PCR-corrected parasitological cure rates at 42 days were 93.3% for AL and 98.9% for AQ plus sulphalene plus pyrimethamine.

Sutherland et al 2005 [37]

Gambia

Randomized, single centre, single-blind, in children (1-10 years)

AL (n = 406)

CQSP (n = 91)

PCR-corrected 28-day cure rates were 96.1% for AL and 91.1% for CQSP.

AL-treated patients were statistically significantly less likely to carry gametocytes at Day 28 than those who received CQSP (8% vs. 49%, p < 0.0001), and carriers in the AL group harboured gametocytes at lower densities, for shorter periods (0.3 d vs. 4.2 d, p < 0.0001) and were less infectious to mosquitoes at day 7 (p < 0.001) than carriers in the CQSP group.

Zongo et al 2007 [38]

Burkina Faso

Multicentre, randomized, open-label in children (6 months to 10 years)

AL (n = 261)

AQSP (n = 260)

The crude (uncorrected for re-infection) risk of recurrent malaria at 28 days was significantly higher with AL than AQSP (10.2% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.0001); PCR correction gave risks of recurrent malaria of 1.2% and 0.4%, with the between-group difference not statistically significant.

Zongo et al 2007 [39]

Burkina Faso

Multicentre, randomized, open-label in children (≥ 6 months)

AL (n = 188)

AQSP (n = 184)

DP (n = 187)

PCR-corrected risks of re-infection at Day 28 were AL, 3.4%; DP, 2.2% and AQSP, 3.9%.

Fanello et al 2007 [40]

Rwanda

Randomized, open-label, 2-centre in children (12-59 months)

AL (n = 251)

AQSP (n = 249)

AL was associated with a statistically significantly higher rate of PCR-adjusted adequate clinical and parasitological response at Day 28 than AQSP (96.8% vs. 79.4%, p < 0.0001).

Gametocyte carriage was significantly lower in the AL group at all post-baseline time points.

Guthman et al 2006 [41]

Angola

Randomized, open-label, single centre in children (6-59 months)

AL (n = 61)

ASAQ (n = 64)

PCR-corrected 28-day parasitological cure rates were 100% for both AL and ASAQ.

Ndayiragije et al 2004 [42]

Burundi

Multicentre, randomized, open-label in children (<5 years)

AL (n = 142)

ASAQ (n = 153)

14-day rates of adequate clinical and parasitological response were similar between treatment groups:AL = 99.3%;ASAQ = 95.3%.

Effects on gametocyte carriage were also similar between treatments.

van den Broek et al 2006 [43]

Republic of Congo

Randomized, single centre, open-label study in children (6-59 months)

AL (n = 106)

ASAQ (n = 101)

ASSP (n = 91)

PCR-corrected 28-day parasitological cure rates were 100% for AL, 98.5% for ASAQ and 90.1% for ASSP. The differences in cure rates between AL and ASSP, and between ASAQ and ASSP, were statistically significant.

Clearance of asexual parasites, gametocytes and fever were rapid in all three treatment groups.

AL:Artemether/lumefantrine; CQ: Chloroquine; SP: Sulphadoxine plus pyrimethamine; CQSP: Chloroquine plus sulphadoxine plus pyrimethamine;AS: Artesunate;AQ:Amodiaquine;ASAQ:Amodiaquine plus artesunate;AQSP:Amodiaquine plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine; DP: dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine; MAS: mefloquine plus artesunate

Table 3

Published studies with the six-dose artemether/lumefantrine regimen in Asia

Authors

Country

Design and patient population

Comparator(s) No. of patients

Results

South-East Asia

    

Krudsood et al 2003 [45]

Thailand

Randomized, open-label, single centre in adults

AL (n = 41)

DNP (n = 89)

The 28-day parasitological cure rates (not PCR corrected) were 99% for DNP and 97% for AL.

Rojanawatsirivej et al 2003 [46]

Thailand

Open-label, multicentre, adults & children (10-74 years), treatment by area (all treatment groups also received primaquine)

AL (n = 33)

MAS (n = 199)

Mefloquine (n = 318)

All 33 (100%) patients treated with AL plus primaquine had adequate clinical response (i.e. parasitological cure at Day 28), compared with 86.3% of the 80 patients who received mefloquine plus primaquine.

Stohrer et al 2004 [47]

Laos

Randomized, open-label, single centre, in adults & children (≥ 10 kg)

AL (n = 53)

MAS (n = 55)

PCR-corrected cure rates at Day 42 were 93.6% for AL and 100% for MAS. The difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Day 28 cure rates were identical to those at Day 42.

Mayxay et al 2004 [48]

Laos

Randomized, open-label, single centre, in adolescents and adults (12-19 years)

AL (n = 110)

MAS (n = 110)

CQSP (n = 110)

42-day PCR-corrected parasitological cure rates were 97% for AL, 100% for MAS and 93% for CQSP. The difference in cure rates between MAS and CQSP was statistically significant.

Ratcliff et al 2007 [49]

Indonesia

Randomized, open-label, 2-centre in children (body weight ≥ 10 kg) and adults with P. falciparum, P. vivax, or mixed infections

AL (n = 387)

DP (n = 387)

For P. falciparum infections, rates of recrudescence at 42 days (PCR-corrected) were 4.7% with AL and 4.1% with DP.

Hutagalung 2005 [50]

Thailand

Randomized, open-label, 2-centre, in children (>10 kg) and adults

AL (n = 245)

MAS (n = 245)

Both treatments were associated with rapid clearance of fever and parasitaemia. 42-day parasitological cure rates were 98.8% for AL and 96.3% for MAS.

South Asia

    

van den Broek et al 2005 [51]

Bangladesh

Randomized, open-label, single centre, in adults & children (≥ 1 year)

AL (n = 121)

MAS (n = 121)

CQSP (n = 122)

Day 42 PCR-corrected cure rates were 62.4% for CQSP, 100% for MAS and 97.1% for AL. The cure rate in the CQSP group was statistically significantly lower than that in the other treatment groups.

Haque et al 2007 [52]

Bangladesh

Open-label, non-comparative, 2-centre in adults (≥ 18 years)

AL (n = 67)

Rapid fever and parasite clearance, and PCR-corrected 28- and 42-day parasitological cure rates of 98.3% and 94.3%, respectively.

Thapa et al 2007 [53]

Nepal

Randomized, open-label, single centre, in adults & children (>5 years)

AL (n = 66)

SP (n = 33)

The 28-day PCR-corrected parasitological cure rate for AL was 100%, compared with 87.9% in the SP group (p = 0.011).

1Includes 2 MAS regimens (mefloquine at 25 mg/kg, n = 153, and 15 mg/kg, n = 46);AL: artemether/lumefantrine; SP: sulphadoxine plus pyrimethamine; CQSP: Chloroquine plus sulphadoxine pyrimethamine; DP: Dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine; DNP: dihydroartemisinin, napthoquine and trimethoprim; MAS: mefloquine plus artesunate

Studies in Africa

In studies reported from Africa, summarized in Table 2[1643], the six-dose AL regimen appeared to be at least as effective as most other forms of ACT included in comparative studies and was generally more effective than other, non-ACT, comparators. In the few studies where comparators were associated with lower risks of treatment failure than AL, the studies were typically conducted in areas with very intense malaria transmission, and the comparators included anti-malarials with a long half-life, which could prevent re-infection late in the study. Indeed, the lower crude failure rates with the comparators in these few studies are the result of lower re-infection rates - recrudescence rates were generally similar for AL and comparators.

Several of the publications report the potent effects of ACT treatment on gametocyte carriage. One study investigated gametocyte carriage in detail and it was found that in AL-treated patients, not only was the rate of carriage of gametocytes significantly reduced as compared with that in patients receiving CQSP, but the carriage time of gametocytes and the infectivity of the gametocytes for mosquitoes were also significantly decreased [37]. These findings potentially have considerable implications for public health, given the possibility of reducing transmission of malaria by extensive use of ACT.

Supervised vs unsupervised AL in acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria

Piola et al [44] conducted a randomized trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of AL when given in a supervised (all doses observed with fatty food intake; n = 313) or unsupervised (first dose supervised followed by outpatient treatment with nutritional advice; n = 644) setting to patients of all ages (weight >10 kg) with acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda. The primary endpoint was 28-day, PCR-adjusted, parasitological cure rate.

28-day cure rates were very similar (100% in both groups in an evaluable patient analysis). The only difference between supervised and unsupervised treatment was that blood lumefantrine levels in the unsupervised patients were statistically significantly lower (p < 0.001) at Days 3 and 7.

Studies in Asia

The studies reported from South-East Asia, summarized in Table 3[4553], show that in general AL is associated with similar efficacy to other forms of ACT in the treatment of P. falciparum malaria, with high parasitological cure rates and rapid clearance of parasitaemia and resolution of fever. In one study in which P. vivax infections were included, the comparator ACT (DP) was significantly more effective in terms of reducing the risk of recurrent P. vivax infection, probably due to the long half-life of piperaquine offering protection against re-infection for longer than lumefantrine: in the same study, PCR-corrected P. falciparum parasitological cure rates were almost identical for AL and DP [50].

Studies from South Asia show high parasitological cure rates and rapid clearance of fever and parasitaemia with the six-dose AL regimen, comparable with those for MAS in the one study where this combination was used as a comparator. AL was more effective than non-ACT comparators in these studies.

Meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of 32 published randomized studies performed predominantly in Africa but also in South America and Asia has evaluated the efficacy of a number of different forms of ACT using a Bayesian random effects approach. The analysis showed that AL was one of the most effective ACT with a 28-day PCR-corrected parasitological cure rate of 97.4% (Table 4) [54].
Table 4

Results of a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of several anti-malarial combinations [54]

Treatment combination

28-day PCR-corrected cure rate (%)

Artemether/lumefantrine (AL)

97.4

Mefloquine + artesunate (MAS)

96.9

Amodiaquine + artesunate (ASAQ)

88.5

Amodiaquine + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AQSP)

85.7

Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine + artesunate

82.6

Chloroquine+ sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (CQSP)

72.1

Chloroquine + artesunate

45.3

Safety and tolerability of artemether/lumefantrine

The safety and tolerability of AL has been confirmed in both adults and children in several studies [1015]. These data support the use of a six-dose regimen of AL as a safe and well-tolerated treatment in a wide range of patient populations including children.

Safety and tolerability are covered in detail in a companion article in this supplement [55].

Conclusion

Artemether/lumefantrine has consistently met the WHO criteria for efficacy (>95%) in both adults and children in randomized, controlled trials in malaria-endemic regions [1015]. Efficacy appeared to be maintained across different populations and regions (Tables 2 and 3); it was unaffected by bodyweight in infants and children and was comparable for dispersible and crushed tablets of AL [14].

Effectiveness studies comparing supervised and unsupervised treatment [44] also demonstrated comparable efficacy data. The 28-day uncorrected cure rate in the per protocol population was also >95% in non-immune adult travellers with P. falciparum malaria [15].

A large number of independent studies show the six-dose AL regimen is at least as effective as other artemisinin-based combination therapies and combinations of anti-malarials. A meta-analysis of 32 comparative trials showed AL to be one of the most effective ACTs currently available [54].

The combination of artemether and lumefantrine also has good gametocidal properties, which may help to limit the spread of resistance [10, 12]. To date, no resistance to AL in vivo has been reported in Africa [1].

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank PreScript Communications, who provided editorial assistance with funding from Novartis Pharma AG.

This article is part of Malaria Journal Volume 8 Supplement 1: Coartem®: reviewing the impact on the malaria landscape. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.malariajournal.com/supplements/8/S1. Publication of the supplement has been sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), Francie van Zijl Drive, Parow
(2)
WHO CC for Clinical Management of Malaria, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University

References

  1. WHO guidelines for the treatment of malaria 2006. [http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/TreatmentGuidelines2006.pdf]
  2. White NJ, van Vugt M, Ezzet F: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of artemether/lumefantrine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999, 37: 105-125. 10.2165/00003088-199937020-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: The WHO prequalification project. [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs278/en/index.html]
  4. Olliaro P, Wells TNC: The global portfolio of new antimalarial medicines under development. Clin Pharmacol & Therapeutics. 2009, 85: 584-595. 10.1038/clpt.2009.51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cousin M, Kummerer S, Lefèvre G, Marrast AC, Stein D, Weaver M, Advisory Committee Briefing Book. Coartem® (artemether/lumefantrine): Tablets for the treatment of malaria in patients with acute, uncomplicated infections due to Plasmodium falciparum or mixed infections including P. falciparum. NDA 22-268. 2008, [http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/briefing/2008-4388b1-02-Novartis.pdf]Google Scholar
  6. WHO World Malaria Report 2008: Chapter 4 - Interventions to control malaria. [http://www.who.int/malaria/wmr2008/MAL2008-Chap4-EN.pdf]
  7. Novartis Drug Regulatory Affairs: Coartem®/Riamet® Basic Prescribing Information. 2007Google Scholar
  8. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. [http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/08_ENGLISH_indexFINAL_EML15.pdf]
  9. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children. [http://www.who.int/childmedicines/publications/EMLc%20(2).pdf]
  10. van Vugt M, Wilairatana P, Gemperli B, Gathmann I, Phaipun L, Brockman A, Luxemburger C, White NJ, Nosten F, Looareesuwan S: Efficacy of six doses of artemether/lumefantrine (benflumetol) in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 60: 936-942.Google Scholar
  11. van Vugt M, Looareesuwan S, Wilairatana P, McGready R, Villegas L, Gathmann I, Mull R, Brockman A, White NJ, Nosten F: Artemether/lumefantrine for the treatment of multi-drug resistant falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94: 545-548. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90082-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lefèvre G, Looareesuwan S, Treeprasertsuk S, Krudsood S, Silachamroon U, Gathmann I, Mull R, Bakshi R: A clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of six doses of artemether/lumefantrine for multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 247-256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Falade C, Makanga M, Premji Z, Ortmann CE, Stockmeyer M, de Palacios PI: Efficacy and safety of artemether/lumefantrine (Coartem®) tablets (six-dose regimen) in African infants and children with acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 99: 459-467. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.09.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abdulla S, Sagara I, Borrmann S, D'Alessandro U, González R, Hamel M, Ogutu B, Mårtensson A, Lyimo J, Maiga H, Sasi P, Nahum A, Bassat Q, Juma E, Otieno L, Björkman A, Beck HP, Andriano K, Cousin M, Lefèvre G, Ubben D, Premji Z: Efficacy and safety of artemether/lumefantrine dispersible tablets compared with crushed commercial tablets in African infants and children with uncomplicated malaria: a randomised, single-blind, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2008, 372: 1819-1827. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61492-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatz C, Soto J, Nothdurft HD, Zoller T, Weitzel T, Loutan L, Bricaire F, Gay F, Burchard GD, Andriano K, Lefèvre G, De Palacios PI, Genton B: Treatment of acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria with artemether/lumefantrine in non-immune populations: a safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 78: 241-247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bukirwa H, Yeka A, Kamya MR, Talisuna A, Banek K, Bakyaita N, Rwakimari JB, Rosenthal PJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Dorsey G, Staedke SG: Artemisinin combination therapies for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. PLoS Clin Trials. 2006, 1: e7-10.1371/journal.pctr.0010007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorsey G, Staedke S, Clark TD, Njama-Meya D, Nzarubara B, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Dokomajilar C, Kamya MR, Rosenthal PJ: Combination therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ugandan children. JAMA. 2007, 297: 2210-2219. 10.1001/jama.297.20.2210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gürkov R, Eshetu T, Miranda IB, Berens-Riha N, Mamo Y, Girma T, Krause E, Schmidt M, Hempel JM, Löscher T: Ototoxicity of artemether/lumefantrine in the treatment of falciparum malaria: a randomized trial. Malar J. 2008, 7: 179-10.1186/1475-2875-7-179.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kabanywanyi AM, Mwita A, Sumari D, Mandike R, Mugittu K, Abdulla S: Efficacy and safety of artemisinin-based antimalarial in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children in southern Tanzania. Malar J. 2007, 6: 146-10.1186/1475-2875-6-146.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamya MR, Yeka A, Bukirwa H, Lugemwa M, Rwakimari JB, Staedke SG, Talisuna AO, Greenhouse B, Nosten F, Rosenthal PJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Dorsey G: Artemether/lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial. PLoS Clin Trials. 2007, 2: e20-10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mårtensson A, Strömberg J, Sisowath C, Msellem MI, Gil JP, Montgomery SM, Olliaro P, Ali AS, Björkman A: Efficacy of artesunate plus amodiaquine versus that of artemether/lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated childhood Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 41: 1079-1087. 10.1086/444460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mårtensson A, Ngasala B, Ursing J, Isabel Veiga M, Wiklund L, Membi C, Montgomery SM, Premji Z, Farnert A, Bjorkman A: Influence of consecutive-day blood sampling on polymerase chain reaction-adjusted parasitological cure rates in an antimalarial-drug trial conducted in Tanzania. J Infect Dis. 2007, 195: 597-601. 10.1086/510910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohamed AO, Eltaib EH, Ahmed OA, Elamin SB, Malik EM: The efficacies of artesunate-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and artemether/lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria, in an area of low transmission in central Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006, 100: 5-10. 10.1179/136485906X86239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mukhtar EA, Gadalla NB, El-zaki S-EG, Mukhtar I, Mansour FA, Babiker A, El-Sayed BB: A comparative study on the efficacy of artesunate plus sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine versus artemether/lumefantrine in eastern Sudan. Malar J. 2007, 6: 92-10.1186/1475-2875-6-92.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mutabingwa TK, Anthony D, Heller A, Hallett R, Ahmed J, Drakeley C, Greenwood BM, Whitty CJ: Amodiaquine alone, amodiaquine + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine + artesunate, and artemether/lumefantrine for outpatient treatment of malaria in Tanzanian children: a four-arm randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2005, 365: 1474-1480. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66417-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yeka A, Dorsey G, Kamya MR, Talisuna A, Lugemwa M, Rwakimari JB, Staedke SG, Rosenthal PJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Bukirwa H: Artemether/lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treating uncomplicated malaria: a randomized trial to guide policy in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e2390-10.1371/journal.pone.0002390.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mulenga M, Van geertruyden J-P, Mwananyanda L, Chalwe V, Moerman F, Chilengi R, Van Overmeir C, Dujardin JC, D'Alessandro U: Safety and efficacy of lumefantrine-artemether (Coartem®) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zambian adults. Malar J. 2006, 5: 73-10.1186/1475-2875-5-73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Toovey S: Effectiveness of co-artemether in an unsupervised outpatient setting for the treatment of falciparum malaria. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2008, 6: 29-31. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2007.08.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Adjei GO, Kurtzhals JA, Rodrigues OP, Alifrangis M, Hoegberg LC, Kitcher ED, Badoe EV, Lamptey R, Goka BQ: Amodiaquine-artesunate vs artemether/lumefantrine for uncomplicated malaria in Ghanaian children: a randomized efficacy and safety trial with one year follow-up. Malar J. 2008, 7: 127-10.1186/1475-2875-7-127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Falade CO, Ogundele AO, Yusuf BO, Ademowo OG, Ladipo SM: High efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations (artemether/lumefantrine and artesunate plus amodiaquine) for acute uncomplicated malaria in Ibadan, Nigeria. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13: 635-643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Faye B, Ndiaye JL, Ndiaye D, Dieng Y, Faye O, Gaye O: Efficacy and tolerability of four antimalarial combinations in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Senegal. Malar J. 2007, 6: 80-10.1186/1475-2875-6-80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koram KA, Abuaku B, Duah N, Quashie N: Comparative efficacy of antimalarial drugs including ACTs in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria among children under 5 years in Ghana. Acta Trop. 2005, 95: 194-203. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Meremikwu M, Alaribe A, Ejemot R, OyoIta A, Ekenjoku J, Nwachukwu C, Ordu D, Ezedinachi E: Artemether/lumefantrine versus artesunate plus amodiaquine for treating uncomplicated childhood malaria in Nigeria: randomized controlled trial. Malar J. 2006, 5: 43-10.1186/1475-2875-5-43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Owusu-Agyei S, Asante KP, Owusu R, Adjuik M, Amenga-Etego S, Dosoo DK, Gyapong J, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D: An open label, randomised trial of artesunate+amodiaquine, artesunate+chlorproguanil-dapsone and artemether/lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e2530-10.1371/journal.pone.0002530.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sagara I, Dicko A, Djimde A, Guindo O, Kone M, Tolo Y, Thera MA, Sogoba M, Fofana M, Ouattara A, Sissoko M, Jansen HF, Doumbo OK: A randomized trial of artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine versus artemether/lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mali. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 630-636.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sowunmi A, Gbotosho GO, Happi CT, Adedeji AA, Fehintola FA, Folarin OA, Tambo E, Fateye BA: Therapeutic efficacy and effects of artemether/lumefantrine and amodiaquine-sulfalene-pyrimethamine on gametocyte carriage in children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in southwestern Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 235-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutherland CJ, Ord R, Dunyo S, Jawara M, Drakeley CJ, Alexander N, Coleman R, Pinder M, Walraven G, Targett GA: Reduction of malaria transmission to Anopheles mosquitoes with a six-dose regimen of co-artemether. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e92-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020092.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zongo I, Dorsey G, Rouamba N, Tinto H, Dokomajilar C, Guiguemde RT, Rosenthal PJ, Ouedraogo JB: Artemether/lumefantrine versus amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2007, 369: 491-498. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60236-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zongo I, Dorsey G, Rouamba N, Dokomajilar C, Séré Y, Rosenthal PJ, Ouédraogo JB: Randomized comparison of amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, artemether/lumefantrine, and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45: 1453-1461. 10.1086/522985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fanello CI, Karema C, van Doren W, Van Overmeir C, Ngamije D, D'Alessandro U: A randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of artemether/lumefantrine (Coartem®) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwanda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 101: 344-350. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Guthmann J-P, Cohuet S, Rigutto C, Fortes F, Saraiva N, Kiguli J, Kyomuhendo J, Francis M, Noël F, Mulemba M, Balkan S: High efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations (artesunate + amodiaquine and artemether + lumefantrine) in Caala, Central Angola. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 143-145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ndayiragije A, Niyungeko D, Karenzo J, Niyungeko E, Barutwanayo M, Ciza A, Bosman A, Moyou-Somo R, Nahimana A, Nyarushatsi JP, Barihuta T, Mizero L, Ndaruhutse J, Delacollette C, Ringwald P, Kamana J: Efficacité de combinaisons thérapeutiques avec des dérivés de l'artémisinine dans le traitement de l'accès palustre non-complique au Burundi. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 673-679. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01255.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Broek van den I, Kitz C, Al Attas S, Libama F, Balasegaram M, Guthmann JP: Efficacy of three artemisinin combination therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Republic of Congo. Malar J. 2006, 5: 113-10.1186/1475-2875-5-113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Piola P, Fogg C, Bajunirwe F, Biraro S, Grandesso F, Ruzagira E, Babigumira J, Kigozi I, Kiguli J, Kyomuhendo J, Ferradini L, Taylor W, Checchi F, Guthmann JP: Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether/lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005, 365: 1467-1473. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66416-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Krudsood S, Chalermrut K, Pengruksa C, Srivilairit S, Silachamroon U, Treeprasertsuk S, Kano S, Brittenham GM, Looareesuwan S: Comparative clinical trial of two-fixed combinations dihydroartemisinin-napthoquine-trimethoprim (DNP®) and artemether/lumefantrine (Coartem®/Riamet®) in the treatment of acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003, 34: 316-321.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rojanawatsirivej C, Vijaykadga S, Amklad I, Wilairatna P, Looareesuwan S: Monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of antimalarials against uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003, 34: 536-541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stohrer JM, Dittrich S, Thongpaseuth V, Vanisaveth V, Phetsouvanh R, Phompida S, Monti F, Christophel EM, Lindegardh N, Annerberg A, Jelinek T: Therapeutic efficacy of artemether/lumefantrine and artesunate-mefloquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Luang Namtha Province, Lao People's Democratic Republic. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 1175-1183. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01320.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayxay M, Khanthavong M, Lindegårdh N, Keola S, Barends M, Pongvongsa T, Yapom R, Annerberg A, Phompida S, Phetsouvanh R, White NJ, Newton PN: Randomized comparison of chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine versus artesunate plus mefloquine versus artemether/lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39: 1139-1147. 10.1086/424512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ratcliff A, Siswantoro H, Kenangalem E, Maristela R, Wuwung RM, Laihad F, Ebsworth EP, Anstey NM, Tjitra E, Price RN: Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet. 2007, 369: 757-765. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60160-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hutagalung R, Paiphun L, Ashley EA, McGready R, Brockman A, Thwai KL, Singhasivanon P, Jelinek T, White NJ, Nosten FH: A randomized trial of artemether/lumefantrine versus mefloquine-artesunate for the treatment of uncomplicated multi-drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum on the western border of Thailand. Malar J. 2005, 4: 46-10.1186/1475-2875-4-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Broek van den IV, Maung UA, Peters A, Liem L, Kamal M, Rahman M, Rahman MR, Bangali AM, Das S, Barends M, Faiz AM: Efficacy of chloroquine + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, mefloquine + artesunate and artemether + lumefantrine combination therapies to treat Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 99: 727-735. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Haque R, Thriemer K, Wang Z, Sato K, Wagatsuma Y, Salam MA, Akther S, Akter J, Fukuda M, Miller RS, Noedl H: Therapeutic efficacy of artemether/lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 39-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Thapa S, Hollander J, Linehan M, Cox-Singh J, Bista MB, Thakur GD, Davis WA, Davis TM: Comparison of artemether/lumefantrine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Eastern Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 423-430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Jansen FH, Lesaffre E, Penali LK, Zattera MJ, Die-Kakou H, Bissagnene E: Assessment of the relative advantage of various artesunate-based combination therapies by a multi-treatment Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 1005-1009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Falade C, Manyando C: Safety profile of Coartem® - the evidence base. Malar J. 2009, 8 (Suppl 1): S8-10.1186/1475-2875-8-S1-S6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Makanga and Krudsood; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.