Patterns and seasonality of malaria transmission in the forest-savannah transitional zones of Ghana

  • Dominic B Dery1,

    Affiliated with

    • Charles Brown2,

      Affiliated with

      • Kwaku Poku Asante1, 3,

        Affiliated with

        • Mohammed Adams1,

          Affiliated with

          • David Dosoo1,

            Affiliated with

            • Seeba Amenga-Etego1,

              Affiliated with

              • Mike Wilson2,

                Affiliated with

                • Daniel Chandramohan3,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Brian Greenwood3 and

                    Affiliated with

                    • Seth Owusu-Agyei1, 3Email author

                      Affiliated with

                      Malaria Journal20109:314

                      DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-314

                      Received: 8 August 2010

                      Accepted: 7 November 2010

                      Published: 7 November 2010

                      Abstract

                      Background

                      Knowledge of the local pattern of malaria transmission and the effect of season on transmission is essential for the planning and evaluation of malaria interventions. Therefore, entomological surveys were carried out in the forest-savannah transitional belt of Ghana (Kintampo) from November 2003 to November 2005 in preparation for drug and vaccine trials.

                      Results

                      A total of 23,406 mosquitoes were caught from 919 traps over the two-year period (November 2003 to November 2005): 54.3% were Culicines, 36.2% Anopheles funestus, and 9.4% Anopheles gambiae. Infection rates with Plasmodium falciparum were 4.7% and 1.5% for Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus, respectively. Entomological inoculation rates (EIRs) were 269 infective bites per person per year in the first year (November 2003-October 2004) and 231 the following year (November 2004-November 2005). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis detected only Anopheles gambiae s.s. Nineteen mosquitoes were tested by PCR in the wet season; 16 were S-molecular form, 2 M-molecular form and 1 hybrid (S/M). In the dry season, sixteen mosquitoes were tested; 11 S-molecular form, 2 M-molecular form and 3 S/M hybrids. The frequency of knock down resistance (kdr) genotypes F(R) was 0.60.

                      Conclusion

                      The dynamics and seasonal abundance of malaria vectors in the Kintampo area was influenced by micro-ecology, rainfall and temperature patterns. Transmission patterns did not differ significantly between the two years (2004 and 2005) and both Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus were identified as effective vectors. EIR estimates in 2004/2005 were between 231 and 269 infective bites per person per year. The information provided by the study will help in planning intensified malaria control activities as well as evaluating the impact of malaria interventions in the middle belt of Ghana.

                      Background

                      Malaria remains a major public health threat in sub-Saharan Africa as the most efficient vector, Anopheles gambiae s.l, continues to adapt to humans [1] and is a complex of sibling species taxa, thus resulting in a high vectorial capacity. The complex consists of seven species that vary in their ability to transmit malaria [2]. Currently known sibling species within the complex include An. gambiae s.s. Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles melas, Anopheles merus, Anopheles quadrianulantus (A and B) and Anopheles bwambae. Their distribution is associated with particular climatic zones and degrees of aridity [3, 4]. In some areas of sub-Saharan Africa, where mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex are the most important vectors of malaria, individuals may receive up to 800 infective bites per person per year (ib/p/y) [5]. However, in other areas of Africa, An. gambiae is found together with Anopheles funestus and both vectors compete in terms of their importance as malaria vectors [6]

                      The An. funestus group consists of seven to ten morphologically difficult to distinguish sibling species. Among the group, An. funestus s.s is the most anthropophilic and efficient vector. More recently, chromosomal analysis in sympatric populations of this vector has led to provisional names of chromosomal forms such as Folonzo and Kiribina [7]. This vector has been extensively described in Navrongo in northern Ghana and in neighbouring Burkina Faso, where it is an efficient malaria vector [7, 8].

                      The entomological inoculation rate (EIR) estimates the level of exposure of an individual to malaria-infected mosquitoes and it is the most favoured measure of assessing malaria endemicity and transmission intensity [5, 9]. There is a strong correlation between EIR and the prevalence of malaria in a population and, as such, it has become the most accurate measure for estimating transmission. Estimated EIR in the northern part of Ghana (Navrongo), where there is an irrigation programme, is 643 infective bites per person per year (ib/p/y) [8]. In the southern forest (Dodowa) and coastal areas (Prampram) of Ghana, estimated EIRs were 21.9 and 3.65 respectively [4]. There is, however, little information about the intensity of malaria transmission in the middle belt of Ghana required for the design of effective vector control strategies.

                      Anopheles gambiae s.s. has been shown by the extent of chromosomal inversion polymorphism and, more recently, by divergence at the molecular level to consist of two molecular forms M and S [3]. In addition, five chromosomal forms named under a non-linean nomenclature as Forest, Savanna, Mopti, Bamako and Bissau have been identified [10]. This vector has been extensively implicated in malaria transmission in West Africa and Ghana in particular [11]. Climate affects the distribution of both chromosomal and molecular forms [3].

                      Insecticide resistance of the type kdr (knock down resistance), which influences response to pyrethroids and DDT, has been detected in many West African populations of An. gambiae s.s [12]. Mutations in the kdr target site, voltage gated sodium channel, have been observed in West Africa An. gambiae species [13]. In most investigated West Africa countries, the kdr allele was detected in S populations and absent in all sympatric M populations, thus supporting the hypothesis of reduction of gene flow between them [12]. Data on An.gambiae s.s indicate introgression in the S and M molecular forms in Benin and countries to the east [14]. The kdr allele is observed in the M form in Benin [2], but mainly in the S form in most West African countries such as Ivory Coast and Ghana, Nigeria, Mali and Burkina Faso [1, 10, 12, 15, 16]. Though at a lower frequency, kdr resistance has also been reported in the M form in Ghana and Burkina Faso [11, 15].

                      This entomological survey was designed to answer basic entomological questions concerning the transmission of malaria within the forest-savannah transitional zone in Ghana to serve as baseline work for monitoring transmission dynamics and the impact of malaria interventions in this area.

                      Methods

                      Study area, selection of communities and meteorological data

                      Kintampo North and South districts lie within the forest-savannah transitional ecological belt in the Brong Ahafo region of Ghana. They cover an area of approximately 7,162 km2 with a resident population of approximately 140,000 living in approximately 22,000 houses in 156 villages. Communities in Kintampo are predominantly agricultural, engaging in farming of maize and yam and raising some livestock. The area has a mean monthly temperature range of 18°C to 38°C and a rainfall averaging 1,250 mm per annum, which falls mainly between April and October. The Kintampo Health Research Centre implements a health and demographic surveillance system (KHDSS), which tracks the resident population dynamics every six months [17].

                      Sixteen communities or clusters were randomly selected for inclusion in this study following stratification reflecting the mixed micro-ecology (based mainly on the vegetation and water bodies) of the two districts. Communities were geo-located using a simple hand-held GPS receiver (GARMIN series) and integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS) for analysis (ArcGIS 9.2 version). Every house within clusters or communities was given an equal chance of participation. Selection of houses to receive light traps was done without replacement until all houses within a particular community had been considered.

                      One of the meteorological stations linked to the Ghana National Meteorological Department is located in Kintampo town and serves the two districts. Daily collection of data (including rainfall data) was performed for the entire period of the survey.

                      Mosquito collection and identification

                      Mosquito collection was performed over a two-year period (November 2003 to November 2005), the first year alongside a parasitological survey and the second year alone. The Centre for Disease Control (CDC) light traps were used to collect mosquitoes in rooms of randomly selected households. In the first year, mosquito trapping was undertaken the night before a parasitological survey in a particular cluster. Additional traps were then set weekly in rooms of study subjects who met selection criteria in both cohort studies [18] ensuring that at least one trapping took place in each month in each of the 16 selected communities and throughout the whole of the first year of the study. Verbal consent was sought from household heads and occupants of each room in which a trap was set and untreated bed nets provided to be used during the night that the trap was set in the room. Traps were hung approximately 1.5 m above the floor at the foot of the bed/mat of the index person. In the second year of mosquito collection (December 2004 to November 2005), the number of CDC light traps was reduced from four per community per night to two per community per night of trapping due to funding limitation. All other processes were maintained as during the preceding year.

                      Anopheline vectors were morphologically identified into species using identification keys [19], stored in 1.5 ml micro-centrifuge tubes enclosed in zip lock plastic bags with silica gel. A maximum of 10 mosquitoes of the same species from the same compound was put in a tube. Non-Anopheles species were discarded after recording numbers caught.

                      Circumsporozoite enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CS-ELISA)

                      Heads and thoraces of the two major vectors of malaria, An. gambiae and An. funestus, were checked for the presence of circumsporozoite (CS) antigen of P. falciparum using the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as described [20]. Presence of CSP in the mosquitoes was read at 405 nm wavelength using a micro plate ELISA reader. A cut-off of 0.2 nm absorbance after subtraction of the average value from seven negative test mosquitoes was considered positive. Heads and thoraces of male Anopheles vectors were used as the negative test controls. All positive mosquitoes were retested to confirm positivity. Results were analysed with the aid of Pool Screen® computer software. EIR was calculated by multiplying the proportion of positive tested vector species by their Man Biting Rate (MBR), which is estimated as the geometric mean of the number of vectors caught in a light trap.

                      Species identification, molecular form and kdr genotyping

                      A total of sixty-four sub-samples were randomly selected to explore the most predominant specie within An. gambiae complex. The samples were selected from the month of February (to represent dry season) and August (to represent wet season) in 2005 catches of Anopheles and tested by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) as per protocol [21]. Enzyme digestion to differentiate the molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s was performed as per protocol [22] on samples that were first PCR successful for sibling species analysis. The presence of kdr alleles conferring knock-down resistance in West Africa was assessed as described [23] on samples that were PCR successful for molecular form differentiation analysis. Results were analyzed proportionally and by Hardy-Weinberg test statistic.

                      Results

                      Mosquito abundance, parasite prevalence and rainfall in Kintampo district

                      In year 1 (November 2003 - November 2004), 664 CDC light traps caught 19,771 mosquitoes; 51.5% of these were Culicines, 1.0% Aedes, 35.0% An. funestus, 10.6% An. gambiae and 1.9% Anopheles rufipes. In year 2 (December 2004-November 2005), 355 CDC traps set captured 3,571 mosquitoes; 44.1% of these were Culicines, 4.8% Aedes, 37.9% An.funestus, 11.6% An.gambiae and 1.6% An. rufipes (Table 1). Monthly abundance of Anopheles vectors caught varied in the two collection periods. Anopheles funestus was caught most frequently in November 2003, September 2004 and October 2005. Anopheles gambiae was also caught frequently in these months but in lower numbers than An. funestus (Figure 1). Abundance of both vectors correlated with monthly rainfall patterns (Figure 2). The annual rainfall in Kintampo for three years consecutively (2003-2005) was steady and ranged between 1,200 mm and 1,400 mm. The highest rainfalls were recorded in the months of April, July and September in the first year and in May, September and October in the second year (Figure 2).
                      Table 1

                      Mosquito densities in Kintampo from CDC light trap catches

                      PERIOD (Nov 2003 - Nov 2004)

                       

                      An. gambiae

                      An. funestus

                      An. rufipes

                      Culex

                      Aedes

                      Mean catch per night

                      3.16

                      10.42

                      0.56

                      15.33

                      0.30

                      Maximum per catch

                      129

                      1,040

                      42

                      1,311

                      36

                      Total (19,771) a

                      2099

                      6922

                      370

                      10178

                      202

                      %

                      10.62

                      35.01

                      1.87

                      51.48

                      1.02

                      PERIOD (Dec 2004 - Nov 2005)

                       

                      An. gambiae

                      An. funestus

                      An. rufipes

                      Culex

                      Aedes

                      Mean catch per night

                      1.16

                      3.81

                      0.16

                      4.44

                      0.49

                      Maximum per catch

                      64

                      360

                      14

                      247

                      102

                      Total (3,571) b

                      413

                      1352

                      57

                      1576

                      173

                      %

                      11.57

                      37.86

                      1.60

                      44.13

                      4.84

                      Superscripts a, b are totals of all species of mosquito collections in (2003-2004) and (2004-2005) respectively

                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-9-314/MediaObjects/12936_2010_Article_1396_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 1

                      Monthly vector abundance and EIRs in Kintampo (2003 - 2005).

                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-9-314/MediaObjects/12936_2010_Article_1396_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 2

                      Monthly vector abundance and rainfall in Kintampo (2003 - 2005).

                      The all-age group prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum ranged between 36% and 57%. The prevalence was highest during the rainy seasons (May-October) but high throughout the year (Figure 3).
                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-9-314/MediaObjects/12936_2010_Article_1396_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 3

                      Bimonthly P. falciparum parasite prevalence in all-age groups in Kintampo.

                      The distances of communities the study was carried out ranged between eight kilometres and 50 kilometres from the meteorological station centrally located in the two districts. The farthest community to the extreme south (Ajina), is 46 km and that to the extreme north (Kawampe), is 50 km (Figure 4).
                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2875-9-314/MediaObjects/12936_2010_Article_1396_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 4

                      Map of surveyed communities with distances in Kintampo (2003 - 2005).

                      Infectivity and seasonal transmission of the main malaria vectors

                      The two main malaria vectors were An. gambiae s.s and An. funestus. In year one, 8,418 Anopheline samples were assayed by CS-ELISA; 6,542 were An.s funestus and 1,876 were An. gambiae. Plasmodium falciparum CS antigen positivity was 1.5% in An. funestus and 4.7% for An. gambiae. The annual EIR, including both vector species, was 269 infective bites per person per year (ib/p/y) with variations in community level EIRs. A total of 1,794 Anopheline samples were tested by CS-ELISA in year two; 1,054 were Anopheles funestus and 740 were An. gambiae. Plasmodium falciparum CS antigen positivity was 3.7% in An. funestus compared to 1.2% for An. gambiae. The annual EIR was 231ib/p/y with An. funestus (141ib/p/y) contributing more infective bites than An. gambiae (90ib/p/y), the opposite pattern from that observed in the previous year. Sporozoite rates (SRs) were generally higher in year 2 than in year 1. Sporozoite rates were highest in communities in the north east and in the southern parts of the districts (Table 2).
                      Table 2

                      Sporozoite rates (SR) in surveyed communities in Kintampo.

                       

                      Year 1

                      Year 2

                      Community

                      Test

                      Pos

                      SR

                      Test

                      Pos

                      SR

                      Kintampo town

                      60

                      0

                      0

                      28

                      3

                      0.107

                      Ajina

                      60

                      2

                      0.033

                      8

                      1

                      0.125

                      Asantekwa

                      472

                      8

                      0.017

                      26

                      3

                      0.115

                      Nyame.2, Brecha

                      70

                      1

                      0.014

                      27

                      0

                      0.000

                      Bredi

                      75

                      0

                      0

                      25

                      7

                      0.280

                      Bawakura

                      181

                      1

                      0.006

                      41

                      2

                      0.049

                      Ntereban

                      2,248

                      71

                      0.032

                      187

                      17

                      0.091

                      Chiranda

                      1,569

                      22

                      0.014

                      926

                      35

                      0.038

                      Kawampe

                      1,377

                      16

                      0.012

                      70

                      4

                      0.057

                      Krutakyi

                      28

                      1

                      0.036

                      23

                      1

                      0.043

                      Sabule

                      274

                      7

                      0.026

                      165

                      22

                      0.133

                      Nyame.No1

                      98

                      1

                      0.010

                      10

                      0

                      0.000

                      Ampoma

                      57

                      1

                      0.018

                      90

                      30

                      0.333

                      Nante-Zongo

                      32

                      0

                      0

                      78

                      7

                      0.090

                      Yara

                      1,455

                      50

                      0.034

                      90

                      4

                      0.044

                      Akora

                      130

                      4

                      0.031

                      0

                      0

                      0.000

                      Total

                      8186

                      185

                      0.023

                      1794

                      136

                      0.076

                      Pos - sporozoite positive by ELISA; SR - Sporozoite Rate; Test - Anopheles tested

                      Species, molecular forms and knock-down resistance (kdr)

                      Fifty-five out of the 64 selected An. gambiae s.l. were successfully tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine their sub-species. All were An. gambiae s.s; no An. arabiensis were detected in either survey period. Sixteen of 22 An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes collected during the wet season (August 2005) were S molecular form, two M molecular forms and one a hybrid (S/M). Three samples failed PCR analysis. A similar pattern was seen during the dry season (February 2005) with 11 of 16 An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes tested being S molecular form, two M molecular form and three (S/M) hybrids (Table 3). Ten An. gambiae s.s mosquitoes, five collected in the rainy season and five collected in the dry season were tested for kdr mutations (Table 3). Six were kdr RR, two kdr R/S and two had the susceptible kdr ss genetotypes.
                      Table 3

                      Species, molecular forms and kdr resistance in Kintampo

                        

                      Species

                      Molecular forms

                      kdr mutation

                      Area

                      season

                      Ag.

                      Ar.

                      M

                      M/S

                      S

                      kdr RR

                      kdr R/S

                      kdr SS

                      F(R)

                       

                      Wet

                      22

                      0

                      2

                      1

                      16

                      3

                      1

                      1

                       

                      Kintampo

                      Dry

                      33

                      0

                      2

                      3

                      11

                      3

                      1

                      1

                      0.60

                      Hardy-Weinberg expected frequencies not significantly different (P < 0.05; df = 1; χ2 = 0.005)

                      Wet and Dry represent raining/wet season and dry season respectively

                      Discussion

                      This study has demonstrated a high level of malaria transmission in the middle belt of Ghana with each individual in the study area receiving between 231 and 269 infective bites in each year and, during the peak transmission season, one bite every day by a mosquito infected with P. falciparum. There were differences in the densities of vector caught in the various communities. Communities to the north-west (Yara, Ntereban and Sabule) had high densities of Anopheles vectors caught monthly [18]. Variations in transmission between communities reflect the importance of micro-ecological factors in the area studied. Mosquito abundance was greatly influenced by rainfall. Transmission in the Kintampo area (231-269 ib/p/y) is lower than that recorded in the Navrongo area in northern Ghana [8], but significantly higher than that recorded in Dodowa and Prampram near the coast [4]. This is most probably due to the mixed forest-savannah micro-ecology in the middle belt of Ghana.

                      The two main malaria vectors in the Kintampo area are An. gambiae and An. funestus with their abundance depending on the season. Anopheles gambiae was the main vector in 2003/2004, whilst An. funestus became the main one in 2005. This is supported by studies [6, 24] that indicate the obvious importance of these species as the major malaria vectors in Africa. Transmission was sustained throughout the year despite variations in inoculation rates in the dry and wet season. The dramatic increase in numbers of Anopheline vectors observed at the onset of the rains in both years was not translated into an increase in EIRs in these months because sporozoite rates were low, presumably reflecting low infectiousness of the human reservoir [25]. Also at the beginning of the rainy season, there is high abundance of relatively young vector populations which are less likely to be infective and are easily attracted to light traps. Largely, rainfall patterns correlated with high densities of vectors caught per month in the communities though in the first year this was not very obvious for all the months; a demonstration of the impact of environmental factors (weather) on vector abundance, distribution and malaria transmission [26].

                      The results of this study suggest that the most prevalent molecular form within An gambiae s.s in the Kintampo area is the S form although this conclusion is made with lots of caution as very limited numbers of samples were successfully analyzed by PCR. Nonetheless, this observation supports studies [10, 12, 27] that have shown that the M form is most prevalent in drier environments where breeding takes place all year round due to activities such as irrigated projects while the S form is exclusively found in more humid, forested areas. The mixed micro-ecology in the Kintampo area probably accounts for the occurrence of both the S and M forms and, therefore, supports [28] which observed the S form in the middle areas of Ghana and M form in northern savannah and coastal areas of the country. The presence of hybrids in both the dry and wet seasons suggests the overlap of niches of these sub-species and the possibility of interbreeding and perhaps gradual gene flow within the complex. This supports the hypothesis that hybrids are viable in natural populations with no evidence of reduced fitness [15].

                      The frequency of kdr resistant genotypes F(R) in the Kintampo area is lower than that found in neighbouring countries such Benin and Togo [29, 30]. Field resistance susceptibility bioassays are needed to support the picture indicated by these molecular studies. These limited observations cause concern about the impact of kdr resistance, and of other forms of resistance in malaria vectors which have not been studied in this study area but reported in northern Ghana (Navrongo) [31], on the long-term efficacy of pyrethroid based nets and other materials in this part of Ghana.

                      Conclusions

                      Malaria transmission in the Kintampo area of the middle belt of Ghana, studied in 2004 and 2005, is high and occurs all-year round. The intensification of malaria control activities; introduction of artemisinin-based combination treatment (ACT), distribution of ITNs for under five year olds, in the past five years may have altered the situation requiring the repeat of similar studies in order to determine the impact of existing control measures have had on malaria transmission in the middle belt of Ghana and how this contributes to the malaria elimination/eradication discussions currently ongoing.

                      Declarations

                      Acknowledgements

                      The team acknowledges support from selected communities and research participants who willingly agreed for light traps to be set-up in their rooms. This also extends to field data collectors, data entry clerks, data managers and clinical laboratory staff who contributed in various ways. Financial support for this research came from the Gates Malaria Partnership, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Technical support came from the Ghana Health Service, Ministry of Health and Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon.

                      Kintampo Health Research Centre is a member of the INDEPTH Network

                      Authors’ Affiliations

                      (1)
                      Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Ministry of Health
                      (2)
                      Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana
                      (3)
                      Infectious Tropical Diseases Dept, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

                      References

                      1. della Torre A, Fanello C, Akogbeto M, Dossou-yovo J, Favia G, Petrarca V, Coluzzi M: Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa. Insect Mol Biol 2001, 10:9–18.PubMedView Article
                      2. Weill M, Chandre F, Brengues C, Manguin S, Akogbeto M, Pasteur N, Guillet P, Raymond M: The Kdr mutation occurs in the Mopti form of Anopheles gambiae s.s. through introgression. Insect Mol Biol 2000, 9:451–455.PubMedView Article
                      3. Masendu H, Hunt R, Govere J, Brooke B, Awolola T, Coetzee M: The sympatric occurrence of two molecular forms of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto in Kanyemba, in the Zambezi valley, Zimbabwe. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2004, 98:393–396.PubMedView Article
                      4. Appawu MA, Baffoe-Wilmot A, Afari EA, Dunyo S, Koram KA, Nkrumah FK: Malaria vector studies in two ecological zones in southern Ghana. African Entomol 2001, 9:59–65.
                      5. Drakeley C, Schellenberg D, Kihonda J, Sousa CA, Arez AP, Lopes D, Lines J, Mshinda H, Lengeler C, Schellenberg JA, Tanner M, Alonso P: An estimation of the entomological inoculation rate for Ifakara: a semi-urban area in a region of intense malaria transmission in Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 2003, 8:767–774.PubMedView Article
                      6. Hay SI, Guerra CA, Tatem AJ, Atkinson PM, Snow RW: Urbanization, malaria transmission and disease burden in Africa. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005, 3:81–90.PubMedView Article
                      7. Dabire' KR, Baldet T, Diabate' A, Dia I, Costantini C, Cohuet A, Guiguemde TR, Fontenille D: Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Humid Savannah Area of Western Burkina Faso: Bionomics, Insecticide Resistance Status, and Role in Malaria Transmission. J Med Entomol 2007, 44:990–997.View Article
                      8. Appawu MA, Owusu-Agyei S, Dadzie S, Asoala V, Anto F, Koram K, Rogers W, Nkrumah F, Hoffman SL, Fryauff DJ: Malaria transmission dynamics at a site in northern Ghana proposed for testing of malaria vaccines. Trop Med Int Health 2004, 9:164–170.PubMedView Article
                      9. Burkot TR, Graves PM: The value of vector-based estimates of malaria transmission. Annals of Trop Med & Parasitol 1995, 89:125–134.
                      10. Wondji C, Simard F, Fontenille D: Evidence for genetic differentiation between the molecular forms M and S within the Forest chromosomal form of Anopheles gambiae in an area of sympatry. Insect Mol Biol 2002, 11:11–19.PubMedView Article
                      11. Yawson AE, McCall PJ, Wilson MD, Donnelly MJ: Species abundance and insecticide resistance of Anopheles gambiae in areas of Ghana and Burkina Faso. Med Vet Entomol 2004, 18:372–377.PubMedView Article
                      12. Fanello C, Petrarca V, della Torre A, Santolamazza F, Dolo G, Coulibaly M, Alloueche A, Curtis CF, Toure YT, Coluzzi M: The pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali and further indication of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol 2003, 12:241–245.PubMedView Article
                      13. Ranson H, Paton MG, Jensen B, McCarroll L, Vaughan A, Hogan JR, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Genetic mapping of genes conferring permethrin resistance in the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae . Insect Mol Biol 2004, 13:379–386.PubMedView Article
                      14. Black WC IV, Lanzaro GC: Distribution of genetic variation among chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s: introgressive hybridization, adaptive inversions, or recent reproductive isolation? Insect Mol Biol 2001, 10:3–7.PubMedView Article
                      15. Reimer LJ, Tripet F, Slotman M, Spielman A, Fondjo E, Lanzaro GC: An unusual distribution of the kdr gene among populations of Anopheles gambiae on the island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Insect Mol Biol 2005, 14:666–683.View Article
                      16. Diabaté A, Dabiré RK, Millogo N, Lehmann T: evaluating the effect of postmating isolation between molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2007, 44:60–64.PubMedView Article
                      17. Kintampo Health Research Centre: [http://​www.​kintampo-hrc.​org/​annual_​report.​html] Annual reports. Kintampo; 2007.
                      18. Owusu-Agyei S, Asante KP, Adjuik M, Adjei G, Awini E, Adams M, Newton S, Dosoo D, Dery D, Agyeman-Budu A, Gyapong J, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D: Epidemiology of malaria in the forest-savanna transitional zone of Ghana. Malar J 2009, 8:220.PubMedView Article
                      19. Gilles MT, DeMeillon B: The Anophelinae of Africa South of Sahara (Ethiopian Zoogeographical Region). Publication of the South African Institute for Medical Research 1968, 54:127–150.
                      20. Wirtz R: Comparative testing of Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite monoclonal antibodies for ELISA development. Bull World Health Organ 1987, 65:39–45.PubMed
                      21. Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH: Identification of single specimens of Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1993, 49:520–529.PubMed
                      22. Favia G, della Torre A, Bagayoko M, Lanfrancotti A, Sagnon N, Touré YT, Coluzzi M: Molecular identification of sympatric chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae and further evidence of their reproductive isolation. Insect Mol Biol 1997, 6:377–383.PubMedView Article
                      23. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D: Molecular characterisation of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol 1998, 7:179–184.PubMedView Article
                      24. Coetzee M, Fontenille D: Advances in the study of Anopheles funestus , a major vector of malaria in Africa. Insect Mol Biol 2004, 34:599–605.View Article
                      25. Charlwood JD, Mendis C, Thompson R, Begtrup K, Cuamba N: Differential dispersal of young and old females of the malaria vector Anopheles funestus files (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern Mozambique. African Entomol 1998, 6:1–6.
                      26. Kelly-Hope LA, Hemingway J, McKenzie FE: Environmental factors associated with the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus in Kenya. Malar J 2009, 8:268.PubMedView Article
                      27. Bayoh MN, Thomas CJ, Lindsay SW: Mapping distribution of chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae in West Africa using climatic data. Med Vet Entomol 2001, 15:267–274.PubMedView Article
                      28. De Souza D, Kelly-Hope L, Lawson B, Wilson M, Boakye D: Environmental factors associated with the distribution of Anopheles gambiae s.s in Ghana; an important vector of Lymphatic Filariasis and malaria. PLos One 2010, 5:e9927.PubMedView Article
                      29. Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, Martin T, Akogbéto M, Hougard JM, Rowland M: Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop 2007, 101:207–216.PubMedView Article
                      30. Ketoh GK, Morgan K, Akogbeto M, Faye O, Glitho IA: Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles populations in Togo. J Recherche Scientifique Univ Lome (Togo) 2005, 7:13–22.
                      31. Anto F, Asoala V, Anyorigiya T, Oduro A, Adjuik M, Owusu-Agyei S, Dery D, Bimi L, Hodgson A: Insecticide resistance profiles for malaria vectors in the Kassena-Nankana district of Ghana. Malar J 2009, 8:81.PubMedView Article

                      Copyright

                      © Dery et al. 2010

                      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                      Advertisement