Evaluation of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment zones
© Nyunt et al. 2015
Received: 25 May 2015
Accepted: 11 December 2015
Published: 23 December 2015
Behaviour change communication (BCC) can improve malaria prevention and treatment behaviour. As a one of the activities under Myanmar Artemisinin Resistance Containment (MARC) programme, BCC have been conducting. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the behaviour change communication and community mobilization activities in MARC zones in Myanmar.
A cross sectional descriptive survey was conducted in randomly selected 16 townships in Tier I and II areas of MARC zones by quantitative and qualitative approaches.
In 832 households resided by 4664 people, there were 3797 bed nets. Around 54 % were untreated while 45.6 % were insecticide-treated nets (ITN) and 36.2 % were long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Proportion of households with at least one ITN was 625 (75.12 %), proportion of households with at least one ITN for every two peoples was 487 (58.53 %), and proportion of existing ITNs used in previous night was 1225 (70.65 %) respectively. Nearly 23 % of households had old nets while 52 % had new and unused extra bed nets reflecting the adequacy. Interestingly, 38 % could not mention the benefit of the use of ITN/LLINs. Although 88.2 % knew the disease “malaria”, 11.9 % could not be able to mention the symptoms. More than 80 % provided correct responses that mosquito bite can cause malaria while only 36.9 % could mention the blood test for malaria diagnosis. Only 36.6 % received malaria information within previous year but nearly 15 % could not recognize it. Mostly, 80 % of fever episodes were treated at rural health centers (38.24 %) followed by drug shops (17.65 %) and private clinics (16.18 %) respectively.
Efforts should focus on correcting misconceptions about malaria transmission, prevention and universal use of ITN/LLINs. Although BCC activities have been documented, it is still necessary to intensify community mobilization through all accessible multiple channels in MARC areas.
KeywordsMalaria Behaviour change communication Community mobilization Myanmar
Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recognized as the most effective pharmacological treatments of Plasmodium falciparum infection . However, an reduced susceptibility of P. falciparum to artemisinin was reported at the Thai–Cambodian border in 2007  and in southern Myanmar in 2011 [3, 4]. Therefore, a multifaceted containment programme has been launched, including early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, decreasing drug pressure, optimizing vector control, targeting the mobile population, strengthening management and surveillance systems, and operational research . To guide implementation, malaria endemic countries should consider the following three classifications: Tier I areas for which there is credible evidence of artemisinin resistance; Tier II areas with significant inflows of people from tier I areas, including those immediately bordering tier I; Tier III areas with no evidence of artemisinin resistance and limited contact with tier I areas . In Myanmar, the Myanmar Artemisinin Resistance Containment programme (MARC) has been conducted by the tier approach since 2011 .
The fifth objective of the MARC strategy mentions as “to support containment/elimination of artemisinin tolerant parasites through comprehensive behaviour change communication (BCC), community mobilization and advocacy” . BCC is defined as any intervention with individuals or communities to develop communication strategies to promote positive behaviours appropriate to their settings to provide a supportive environment enabling people to initiate and sustain the desired behaviours, such as sleeping under insecticide-treated bed nets (ITN) . There is evidence that effective BCC programmes can increase a range of positive health behaviours in a target population [7, 8]. BCC has a significant effect on utilization of ITN for prevention of malaria .
Study design and setting
The field based cross sectional descriptive study with analytical components was conducted from September to December, 2013. This study was carried out in selected 16 townships from the Myanmar artemisinin containment zones (Kayin and Mon State; and Bago and Thanintharyi Region). At time of survey, Bago (Shwe Kyin Township), Mon State and Thanintharyi Region was defined as Tier I and Kayin State and Bago (other townships) as Tier II. In 2014, all of the Tier II areas were recognized as Tier I .
Sample size determination and sampling procedure
The study design is multi-stage, sampling clusters at the first stage, households within each cluster at the second stage, and then individuals within each household. Based on the population figures and natural proportions by risk category (Strata 1a, 1b, 1c, 2 and 3) in Tier 1 and 2, and overall malaria prevalence of 15 %, a sample size of 800 households provided a precision of ±3 % assuming a design effect of 1.75, non-response rate of 10 %, power of 80 % (beta error), and confidence interval of 95 % (alpha error). As most villages should have at least 25 households, it is likely that each selected cluster would consist of a single village .
All of the townships were listed and four townships were randomly selected in each of the study sites by adding the sampling interval i.e., total number of the townships divided by 4. Similarly, five villages from each townships and 10 households from each villages were also selected.
To find out the effectiveness of the BCC activities in targeted areas, community-based household surveys were conducted using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pre-coded and pre-tested structured questionnaires were used for face-to-face interviews. The questionnaires were designed to collect information on household characteristics, family size, nearest health facilities, bed net ownership and utilization, knowledge about malaria and mosquito nets, source of information and treatment-seeking behaviour. Interviews were conducted by trained interviewers in the local languages using questionnaires adapted and modified from the Malaria Consortium .
Focus group discussions (FGD) were done at two places in each study sites by stratified purposive sampling method. Discussion guidelines were formulated as a series of open-ended questions. Key informal interviews were also conducted from local health authorities, community leader, township health officer and State/Region health officer.
Data collected during the survey were checked and entered by using Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 22. Analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0, IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, New York, USA). Pearson’s Chi squared test was used to determine association with a P value of <0.05 accepted as significant. Logistic regression was calculated using the selected independent variables to estimate the outcome variables. Mann–Whitney test was used to for nonparametric analysis on non-normal distribution. Qualitative data was transcribed and analysed across themes and sub themes for triangulation with quantitative data.
Participation in this project was entirely voluntary. This project was obtained ethical clearance from the ethical committee of the Department of Medical Research (Approval No-56/Ethics, 2013).
Basic demographic characteristics of the respondents
Percent (n = 832)
Can read and write
College or University
Family income per month
Situation of income
Assets for media
Rural Health Centers (RHC) were selected as nearest health care provider by most of them (64.8 %). Although almost villages had the village health/malaria volunteer, only 81 (9.7 %) accepted them as first nearest health care persons while 26 (3.1 %) recognized the quacks, a person who dishonestly claims to have medical knowledge or skills, for their health care.
Among the 832 households resided by 4664 people, there were 3797 bed nets. Almost all families (99.8 %) had a bed net. Most of them had 3–5 bed nets in their family. Among the nets, 1734 (45.6 %) were ITN/LLINs, 1377 (36.2 %) were LLIN and 2063 (54.4 %) were untreated nets. More than 30 % of all bed nets were received within 1 year. For the untreated bed nets, majority of the source of nets were from shop/market while government and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were main source of treated net providers (26 and 10 % of all nets respectively).
Almost all distributed LLINs were family size and only 9.4 % of the all bed net observed in this study were single size. Regardless of the types of the bed nets, 943 (24.8 %) were received re-treatment by insecticide. Most of the re-treatment activities were conducted in the village (785, 83.2 %) and mostly (890, 94.4 %) free of charge by health personals and NGOs. Interestingly, 2346 nets (61.8 %) were being used last night before survey while 1431 (37.7 %) were not being used. Proportion of existing ITNs used the previous night was 70.65 %.
Knowledge, ownership and use of bed net
No. of bed net in their household
Type of bed net
Untreated bed nets
Damage of the net
Nets with holes
Retreated bed net
Retreatment of ITN
Frequency of washing
Every 2–3 months
Twice per year
Once per year
Less than once a year
Never since received
Utilization of the nets last night
Did not use
Presence of unused bed net
Unused old nets
Unused new nets
Knowledge on benefic of ITN/LLIN
Prevents mosquito bites
Kills other insects
Protects against malaria
Protect against other diseases
Do not know
Utilization of the insecticide treatment bed nets
Proportion of households with at least one ITN
Proportion of households with at least one ITN for every two people
Proportion of population with access to an ITN
Proportion of existing ITNs used the previous night
Knowledge assessment and their information channel
Percent (n = 734)
General knowledge on “malaria”
Know the disease, “malaria”
Know the blood test for diagnosis
Know the symptoms of malaria
Cause of malaria
Drink/bath of dirty water
Related to food (e.g., banana)
Visiting to forest
Sleeping/staying in the forest
Prevention of malaria
Bed net can prevent “malaria”
ITN can prevent “malaria”
Drink of boiled water
Do not know
Knowledge on anti-malarial
Know any antimalarial
Source of information
Village health volunteer
Do not remember
Received information last time
Within 1 month
Based on the retrospective analysis of the fever episodes within last 2 weeks, only 16 out of 83 (19.3 %) episodes took the blood test for detection of malaria (RDT). Among them, only 7 (8.4 % of fever episodes) received the blood test within 24 h. Seven out of 16 blood test become positive by RDT and four cases of them are falciparum infection and relieved by ACT.
Higher education level was found to be relationship with better knowledge on malaria [Odd Ratio (OR) = 3.67], on correct knowledge on cause of malaria (OR = 2.25), on benefit of ITN/LLIN (OR 4.25). Similarly, the persons with correct knowledge on causes of malaria were found to be relationship with utilization of the bed net while sleeping (OR = 4.04). The persons who received information on malaria (BCC exposure), within past 1 year showed the correct knowledge on causes of malaria (OR = 8.55), benefit on LLIN (OR = 9.05) and diagnosis (OR = 9.11). Regarding on the treatment-seeking patterns, the correct knowledge on causes of malaria (OR = 12.11), BCC exposure within 1 year (OR = 8.99) seek the local health care centres and volunteer.
Their risk behaviour and community change mobilization change activities were assessed by focus group discussion and key informal interviews.
“BCC activities are believed to be successful. Now most of the people accept to sleep under the bed net and consequently the prevalence of malaria is decreasing”
“Even some health care personnel do not aware the importance of BCC and we have no routine system for monitoring, supervision and evaluation for BCC”
“Malaria prevalence have been decreasing because people become better knowledge and awareness on malaria”
“Either drinking or bathing in the forest water or cold stream water can cause malaria. It can be prevented by drinking of boiling water only”
“There are many challenges in some villages such as language barriers and security reasons. Some are so reluctant to provide family registration data for bed net distribution”
“BCC activities should be done in target groups who have highest risk for malaria, especially in their free time such as at night”
“Because of the low positive rate and no drug for RDT negative fevers cases, many peoples go to drug shops if they have fever. They don’t want to try the blood test”
“As no one channel for BCC activities is enough in our community, multi-channel approaches based on our resources should be encouraged”.
Behaviour change communication (BCC) are widely considered as a vital tool to use of communication to promote positive health outcomes, based on proven theories and model for behaviour change by interactive processes  with communities leading to increase knowledge of malaria instance, stimulating social and communication dialogue, promoting attitude change and demand for information and provided services [13, 14].
In Myanmar, BCC and community mobilization activities have been carrying out as a major component of the MARC programme that include distribution of IEC material such as pamphlets, posters, bill boards, radio talk television short stories series and interpersonal communication including health talks by local health care personals and volunteers . In this study, only 85 (10 %) of the respondents were illiterate and more than half of the household had the media assets, such as television, radio and DVD player, indicating that mass media may be suitable channel for one of the BCC.
RHCs and sub-centres were major nearest health facility for them while a few of them showed the quack and drug sellers as their health care provider. Although every villages had malaria volunteers, they were not nominated as the nearest health care persons.
Ownership as well as utilization of the ITN/LLINs was important in prevention of malaria. Among 832 households, 3797 bed nets were listed and directly observed. Proportion of existing ITNs used in previous night was 70.65 % in this study while proportion of population with access to an ITN was 75.20 %. Nearly 23 % of them had the old nets and 52 % had new unused extra bed nets in their families. It means that in nearly half of the households have the adequate number of the bed nets and free distribution for these families should not be priority.
Most of the ITNs were distributed by local health staff and NGOs, that represented 26 and 10 % of all bed nets indicating the big demand for the all net coverage and retreatment of the all of the nets should be considered. Although overall bed net coverage is just adequate, consideration for replenishment was also important for sustainable coverage and utilization of LLINs.
Nearly 25 % of the all bed nets were re-treated with insecticide and 75 % of the re-treatments were done within 12 months. Interestingly, 1734 (24.9 % of the total ITNs) were retreated. This was also satisfactory and people can get the re-treatment free of charge.
However, 38 % of them unable to mention the benefit of the ITN/LLINs indicating that health education on the treated bed nets should be emphasized. In this study, 88.2 % of the respondent knew the disease “Malaria”. But 11.9 % of them could not mention the sign and symptoms. Only 36.9 % can mention the blood test for malaria diagnosis. More than 80 % correctly answered that bite of mosquitoes cause malaria while a few of them still believe it was caused by bathing or drinking of stream water, cold, eating of unsuitable foods such as banana. These unsatisfactory findings indicated that there were still misunderstanding and beliefs on malaria and it highlighted the information needed to be emphasized in BCC activities.
One of the important findings in this study is only 36.6 % of the participants got the information on malaria within last year and among them, nearly 15 % unable to recognize what information they had received. Health staff were found to be main informer in the study site (69.8 %) followed by poster, brochures, TV and radio and health volunteers. Most of them (>40 %) can mention the drugs “artesunate” and “artemether” as anti-malarials. They also noticed that artesunate was no longer available in the market, but they could still buy the “artemether”. It indicates that correction of the misconception and risk behaviour were still needed in this study population.
Delayed seeking for effective treatment would be a main concern for behaviour barrier to control of malaria . From the 70 households, 83 fever episodes within last 2 weeks were reported. Interestingly, more than 80 % of them took treatment from RHC/sub-centre (38.24 %), drug shops (17.65 %) and private clinic (16.18 %) respectively and only 46.98 % of the fever episodes seek the treatment within 24 h. Although malaria volunteers were assigned in all of villages to get the diagnosis of malaria within 24 h after fever, they were not the first health care provider for most of the fever episodes in this study. This unexpected finding suggests a need to explore the reason for this important issue. As mentioned in qualitative findings, there was no case management guideline and support for RDT negative non-malaria fever cases in low endemic areas and it may have effect on treatment-seeking behaviour of the community.
Our findings highlight the improvement of the behaviour change in the MARC areas comparing with the previous findings [11, 16]. The persons who received the information on malaria had correct knowledge on malaria, LLINs, diagnosis and search the health care personals within 24 h after fever episodes. However, there were many misunderstandings and misconceptions on malaria and risk behaviours in the communities were also noted. It is documented that BCC interventions are most effective when a combination of approaches is used, weaving together mass media, interpersonal communication, advocacy meeting, community participation and structural approaches to promote good behaviours [17, 18].
Better knowledge about malaria transmission and benefits of using available effective preventive and control measures by the individual households and the community could contribute much to the overall reduction of the malaria burden. Provision of comprehensive behaviour change communication through media/channel that are accessible and appropriate to vulnerable populations would increase the participation of the population in different socioeconomic strata. As the findings of this study highlighted, such efforts should focus on correcting misconceptions about malaria transmission, prevention and universal ITN/LLINs utilization. It is still necessary to emphasize the behaviour change communication and community mobilization by all of the available multi-channel approaches in MARC areas in Myanmar.
Policy implication and recommendations
Behaviour change commination and community immobilization activities are still needed to be emphasized.
Training on BCC in basic health staff and malaria volunteer should be promoted.
Supervision and monitoring on BCC activities by health staff should be done.
Since only one BCC activity is not adequate at community level, continuous and powerful activities via multi-channels approaches should be encouraged.
BCC activities should be emphasized especially on the target groups at convenience time for the audience.
Operational research on effect of BCC activities should be carried out by using uniform study design in different Tier in MARC before and after the activities.
MHN, KMA, MPK, KTW and TO conceived and designed the study; MHN, KMA, AT, HWO, HPP, SSH, TT and KKS collected the data and data management; MHN, MPK, KTW and TO analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors would like to express their gratitude towards authorities from Department of Medical Research and Department of Health for allowing us to conduct this study. The authors also like to thanks participants in this study and staff from the Parasitology Research Division, Department of Medical Research for sample collection in the field.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was supported by the 3MDGF (The Three Millennium Development Goal Fund), WHO-Myanmar (3MDG-C2P1-13-66972).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- WHO. Guideline for treatment of Malaria, 2nd edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2010.
- Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith B, Socheat D, Fukuda M. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kyaw MP, Nyunt MH, Chit K, Aye MM, Aye KH, Lindegardh N, et al. Reduced susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate in Southern Myanmar. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57689.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- WHO. Emergency response to artemisinin resistance in the Greater Mekong subregion. Regional framework for action 2013–2015. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2013.
- WHO. Strategic framework for artemisinin resistance containment in Myanmar (MARC) 2011–2015. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2011.
- Mendis K. External evaluation of the National Malaria Control Programme, Myanmar. World Health Organization. 2012.
- Vaughan P, Rogers E. A staged model of communication effects: evidence from an entertainment-education radio soap opera in Tanzania. J Health Commun. 2000;5:203–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Westoff C, Koffman D, Moreau C. Calverton, Maryland: the impact of television and radio on reproductive behaviour and on HIV/Aids knowledge and behaviour. Calverton, Maryland: ICF International. 2011 [DHS Analytical Studies 24].
- Boulay M, Lynch M, Koenker H. Comparing two approaches for estimating the causal effect of behaviour-change communication messages promoting insecticide-treated bed nets: an analysis of the 2010 Zambia malaria indicator survey. Malar J. 2014;13:342.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malaria Consortium. Consultancy report: assessment of malaria surveillance in Myanmar: Malaria Consortium. 2014. pp. 1–56.
- Celine Zegers de Beyl MPK, Ohnmar, Thae Maung Maung, Sylvia Meek, Krongthong Thimasarn, Aye Yu Soe, et al: Myanmar artemisinin resistance containment (MARC) survey: malaria diagnosis and treatment. Malaria consortium. 2013.
- Head KJ, Noar S. Facilitating progress in health behaviour theory development and modification: the reasoned action approach as a case study. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8:34–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mugisa M, Muzoora A. Behavioural change communication strategy vital in malaria prevention interventions in rural communities: Nakasongola district, Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13(Suppl 1):2.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mushi A, Schellenberg J, Mrisho M, Manzi F, Mbuya C, Mponda H, et al. Development of behaviour change communication strategy for a vaccination-linked malaria control tool in southern Tanzania. Malar J. 2008;7:191.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Littrell M, Gatakaa H, Evance I, Poyer S, Njogu J, Solomon T, et al. Monitoring fever treatment behaviour and equitable access to effective medicines in the context of initiatives to improve ACT access: baseline results and implications for programming in six African countries. Malar J. 2011;10:327.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nyunt M, Aye K, Kyaw M, Kyaw T, Hlaing T, Oo K, et al. Challenges in universal coverage and utilization of insecticide-treated bed nets in migrant plantation workers in Myanmar. Malar J. 2014;13:211.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW, Kiwanuka-Tondo J, Fleming-Milici F, Proctor D. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behaviour change in the United States. J Health Commun. 2004;9(Suppl 1):71–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koenker H, Keating J, Alilio M, Acosta A, Lynch M, Nafo-Traore F. Strategic roles for behaviour change communication in a changing malaria landscape. Malar J. 2014;13:1.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar