Advantages of parasitological diagnosis (according to WHO guidelines, section 6.1, 6.2) | Disadvantages of parasitological diagnosis in high transmission areas |
---|---|
Diagnosis based on clinical features alone has very low specificity and results in over-treatment | Parasitological diagnosis has low specificity |
Improved patient care in parasite-positive patients | In a patient with fever, the presence of parasites neither reliably confirms malaria as the cause of the fever, nor excludes the possibility of other diseases |
Identification of parasite-negative patients in whom another diagnosis must be sought | Other diagnoses should be sought in all patients, irrespective of the presence of malaria parasites |
Prevention of unnecessary use of anti-malarials, reducing frequency of adverse effects especially in those who do not need the medicines, and drug pressure selecting for resistant parasites | Clinicians often prescribe anti-malarials even for patients with a negative test. Prescribing anti-malarials to parasite-negative patients will not increase selection pressure for new drug resistant mutations. |
Improved malaria case detection and reporting | Some "cases" detected in high-transmission areas are incidental carriers of malaria parasites, presenting with another disease |
Confirmation of treatment failures | RDTs cannot confirm treatment failures. It is only possible to do this with microscopy. |