- Open Access
The combined effect of determinants on coverage of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania
© Gross et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 8 February 2011
Accepted: 21 May 2011
Published: 21 May 2011
Intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) at routine antenatal care (ANC) clinics is an important and efficacious intervention to reduce adverse health outcomes of malaria infections during pregnancy. However, coverage for the recommended two IPTp doses is still far below the 80% target in Tanzania. This paper investigates the combined impact of pregnant women's timing of ANC attendance, health workers' IPTp delivery and different delivery schedules of national IPTp guidelines on IPTp coverage.
Data on pregnant women's ANC attendance and health workers' IPTp delivery were collected from ANC card records during structured exit interviews with ANC attendees and through semi-structured interviews with health workers in south-eastern Tanzania. Women's timing of ANC visits and health worker's timing of IPTp delivery were analyzed in relation to the different national IPTp schedules and the outcome on IPTp coverage was modelled.
Among all women eligible for IPTp, 79% received a first dose of IPTp and 27% were given a second dose. Although pregnant women initiated ANC attendance late, their timing was in line with the national guidelines recommending IPTp delivery between 20-24 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. Only 15% of the women delayed to the extent of being too late to be eligible for a first dose of IPTp. Less than 1% of women started ANC attendance after 32 weeks of gestation. During the second IPTp delivery period health workers delivered IPTp to significantly less women than during the first one (55% vs. 73%) contributing to low second dose coverage. Simplified IPTp guidelines for front-line health workers as recommended by WHO could lead to a 20 percentage point increase in IPTp coverage.
This study suggests that facility and policy factors are greater barriers to IPTp coverage than women's timing of ANC attendance. To maximize the benefit of the IPTp intervention, revision of existing guidelines is needed. Training on simplified IPTp messages should be consolidated as part of the extended antenatal care training to change health workers' delivery practices and increase IPTp coverage. Pregnant women's knowledge about IPTp and the risks of malaria during pregnancy should be enhanced as well as their ability and power to demand IPTp and other ANC services.
Malaria is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Tanzania, especially for small children and pregnant women . About 1.7 million pregnant women contract malaria each year in Tanzania  leading to a high risk of suffering from severe anaemia, spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, congenital infection, still birth and low-birth weight [3, 4]. Malaria during pregnancy is a contributing factor to both maternal death  and infant morbidity and mortality [6, 7]. Infection rates have been found to be especially high in women in their first and second pregnancy [4, 8], but also depend on other factors such as endemicity, immunity, age, trimester and co-morbidities .
Committing themselves to the Abuja targets, Tanzania and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa adopted the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation for malaria prevention and control during pregnancy [10, 11]. In areas of stable malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa, this means the implementation of an intervention package into the antenatal care (ANC) services including the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITN) and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) as well as effective case management of malaria and anaemia . Thus, every Tanzanian pregnant woman attending an ANC clinic is entitled to receive a national voucher for a subsidized ITN, known as Hati Punguzo ("discount card" in Swahili) and IPTp . In 2003, WHO defined IPTp as the delivery of two doses of an anti-malarial to pregnant women at the beginning of the second and third trimester irrespective of the presence of signs for a malaria infection . Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is the drug currently used for IPTp in areas of Africa where malaria is transmitted by Plasmodium falciparum as it has been shown to be a cheap, safe and effective single-dose treatment [12, 15, 16]. There is also evidence that the intervention is well accepted by women in various African settings [17, 18]. Taking health workers' difficulties to assess gestational age into account, WHO modified and simplified the IPTp recommendations in 2004: "beginning of the second trimester" was replaced by "after quickening" (first noted movements of the foetus) and "third trimester" by "at least one month apart". This change in wording also implies that more than two doses can be administered [12, 19]. In the context of the HIV epidemic and increasing SP resistance, discussions have arisen on the optimal number of IPTp doses required to maintain protection for the mother and her child. Based on its relatively low HIV prevalence rate of 6% , Tanzania is the only East-African country to keep a two dose regimen regardless of HIV status  as WHO recommends the introduction of a three dose regimen where HIV prevalence is above 10% .
Tanzania was among the first countries to adopt IPTp as a national strategy in 2000 along with Malawi, Kenya, Uganda and Zambia . ANC attendance is high with 62% of women attending at least four times . Yet coverage is still far from reaching the target of 80% IPTp coverage by 2010 as proposed by the Roll Back Malaria Partnership and set in Tanzania for 2012 [11, 25]. Coverage levels of the second IPTp dose are particularly low. According to the Tanzanian Malaria and HIV Indicator Survey 2007/08 57% of all pregnant women reported receiving one dose of IPTp but only 30% said they were given a second dose during an ANC visit . Disappointing second dose coverage results of below 40% have also been found by other studies from Tanzania and East Africa [26–30].
Recent studies have stressed the need to investigate the impact of available guidelines on implementation, health worker practices and drug stock-outs at the health facilities in order to understand the reasons for low IPTp coverage [26–28, 30, 31]. However, only a few studies have addressed these factors so far. Instead, studies have associated low IPTp uptake with women's late initiation and irregular attendance of ANC services [29, 32, 33]. Others have investigated the relationship between IPTp uptake and women's knowledge about malaria [28, 32–35]. Yet others have explored the influence of pregnant women's age, marital status, educational level, socio-economic status or parity on IPTp uptake [26, 35, 36]. Overall, studies with a focus on women's individual characteristics were not able to explain low IPTp levels [27–29, 35, 36]. Two recent studies from Tanzania demonstrated that delivery of IPTp was influenced by facility and policy level factors. Marchant et al.  analysed national household and facility survey data from Tanzania and identified insufficient SP stocks at the health facilities and restrictive guidelines as the main reasons for low IPTp delivery. Similarly, Anders et al.  argued that revised guidelines and improved drug stocks would allow for delivery of IPTp at an earlier gestational age and to increase IPTp coverage.
The aim of this paper is to assess the combined impact of women's timing of ANC attendance, health workers' IPTp delivery and different delivery schedules of national IPTp guidelines on IPTp coverage. The study used ANC card records collected during exit interviews with ANC attendees to analyze pregnant women's timing of ANC visits and health workers' delivery and timing of IPTp in relation to the main IPTp guidelines in use in Tanzania and to model the anticipated outcome of a second set of guidelines on IPTp coverage.
This study on IPTp coverage was conducted in the frame of a wider research project that explored determinants of access to ANC and IPTp services in the Kilombero and Ulanga Districts of the Morogoro Region in south-eastern Tanzania between April 2007 and May 2009. The two districts are divided by the floodplain of the Kilombero River which is delimited by the Udzungwa Mountains to the north and by the Mahenge Mountains to the south. Large parts of the valley are regularly flooded during the rainy season from November to May.
The study area coincides with a Demographic Surveillance System (DSS) that encompasses a total of 25 villages of the two districts with an estimated total population of 92'000 in 2008 [37, 38]. In the early 1990s, malaria transmission in this area was amongst highest in Tanzania with a mean entomological inoculation rate (EIR) of over 300 infective bites per person per year . Although malaria transmission in the area has been reduced substantially through the use of untreated and insecticide-treated nets and effective malaria drugs, it remains high and perennial [40, 41]. Malaria is still the most commonly diagnosed cause of illness in health facilities , but there is recent evidence that malaria is over-diagnosed, especially in the urban and peri-urban areas (personal communication V. D'Acremont). The area is predominantly rural and households rely heavily on agriculture of rice, maize, banana and cassava. During the rice planting and harvesting seasons many people move for several months to temporary shelters in distant farming sites .
The Tanzanian public health system consists of a wide network of dispensaries, health centres and hospitals with each facility serving between 3,300 and 7,000 people . At the time of study a total of 13 first and second-level health facilities offered regular out-patient services within the DSS area. Out of these, 12 (ten government and two faith based) facilities provided ANC services for pregnant women on a weekly or daily basis from Monday to Friday. Two district hospitals provide referral care for complicated cases. In the course of the Tanzanian Health Sector Reform the districts have introduced a cost-sharing scheme in public facilities, including an exemption policy for pregnant women and children under five years of age.
DSS records suggest that in 2008, 3,033 women became pregnant in the Kilombero and Ulanga DSS. Women reported an average of 3.1 visits to ANC clinics over the course of a pregnancy (personal communication: M. Alexander). Data collected from the Health Management Information System (HMIS) on the DSS area indicated that IPTp coverage had increased from 24% to 45% between 2006 and 2008 for one IPTp dose and from 7% to 21% for two doses (Gross, unpublished data).
Study design and study population
The study draws on data from two study components of the larger research project: 1) in-depth interviews with health workers at the ANC clinics were conducted in June 2007 and 2) exit interviews with ANC attendees were performed over a five month period between June and October 2008.
In-depth interviews with 18 health workers at 12 ANC clinics were conducted, including all health workers routinely working at the ANC clinic and available on the day of visit. Between one to three health workers were interviewed per health facility.
A total of 440 pregnant women visiting an ANC clinic participated in the exit interviews. Ten facilities (nine government facilities and one faith based facility, five in the Kilombero district and five in the Ulanga district) were selected and visited once per month for one day. Since accessibility of health services in this rural context is constrained through seasonal conditions such as weather, agricultural work or availability of money, the exit interviews were scattered over several months. Two other health facilities in the study area (one government facility and one faith based facility) were not included in the study because very few pregnant women attended ANC services there. On average, 12 randomly selected pregnant women were interviewed per visit (min-max = 1-21) adding up to a total of 43 pregnant women interviewed per health facility (min-max = 28-79).
Data collection instruments
Health worker in-depth interviews
The interviews explored a) health workers' knowledge and attitudes towards the IPTp strategy, and b) their perception on factors influencing IPTp delivery. A semi-structured interview guide was designed in English and piloted outside the study area. The interview guide ensured the coverage of the main topics, but interviewees were encouraged to express their opinions and concerns freely. The interviews were translated and administered in Swahili. All but one of the interviews were tape-recorded after obtaining written informed consent from the health workers.
Exit interviews with ANC attendees
Participants were interviewed by two trained local female field workers after obtaining the women's informed consent. The main investigator supervised data collection during the two first rounds and checked the completeness of the data collected.
Information was collected using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed in English, translated to Swahili, back-translated and pre-tested outside the study area. Since the exit interviews were conducted in the frame of a larger research project to investigate pregnant women's access to ANC and IPTp services, questions were related to a) demographic characteristics, b) knowledge about ANC services and motivation to attend the ANC clinics, and c) ANC service utilization, but also inquired d) women's knowledge on malaria prevention, and e) their IPTp use. Additionally, data on the number and timing of ANC visits and IPTp doses received were copied from the ANC cards in order to avoid recall bias.
The in-depth interviews with the health workers were transcribed and translated into English. Analysis was done using the qualitative data management software MaxQDA2 (Lucanus GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Text segments were coded into categories using qualitative content analysis . Key themes emerging around health workers' knowledge on and experiences with the IPTp strategy were cross-tabulated in order to explore differences between and within health facilities.
From the exit interviews mainly ANC card data were analysed for the purpose of this study. Demographic data on marital status, socio-demographic status and level of education will not be investigated in this paper as several previous studies from Tanzania and elsewhere have not demonstrated any association between these characteristics and IPTp uptake [1, 27, 30, 35].
Data were double-entered using Microsoft Access, validated with EpiInfo version 3.3.2 (EpiInfo Association, Denmark) and analysed in Stata 10 (StataCorop, College Station, Texas, USA). Descriptive results are presented using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR = 75th-25th percentile). Differences in proportions were calculated using chi-square-test and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. For all statistical tests a two-sided P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Firstly, women's timing of ANC visits and their eligibility for IPTp according to national guidelines were assessed. Women were assumed to be eligible for IPTp doses if they attended the ANC clinic between 20-24 weeks and/or 28-32 weeks of gestation. Secondly, health workers' IPTp delivery and its timing were evaluated in relation to the national guidelines by using ANC card records on women's gestational age at the time of IPTp receipt. In order to avoid biases resulting from the inclusion of women who according to guidelines were not yet eligible for IPTp due to their low gestational age, IPTp uptake was analysed for two sub-samples: 1) women of at least 20 weeks of gestation and 2) women of at least 28 weeks of gestation. Thirdly, it was estimated how the two different schedules of the national IPTp policies available in the malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines and the FANC guidelines fit with women's timing of ANC attendance and health workers' IPTp delivery and timing. For simplicity, the two IPTp guidelines will be denoted as restrictive IPTp guidelines (recommending IPTp administration between 20-24 and 28-32 weeks of gestation) and simplified IPTp guidelines (recommending two doses of IPTp after quickening and at least one month apart) (Figure 1). For the simplified IPTp guideline, correct IPTp delivery was defined as two doses administered at any time between 20 weeks of gestation, which is the time when most women have already recognized first movements of the foetus , and 40 weeks of gestation as long as they are one month apart. Finally, the combined impact of women's timing of ANC attendance and health worker's delivery and timing of IPTp on the effectiveness of the IPTp strategy was assessed for each of the two national IPTp guidelines. Only women who had made at least two ANC visits were included (N = 189) in the sample. Effectiveness loss was calculated in steps by calculating: 1) the number of women who attended ANC services twice timely according to the guidelines in order to be eligible for IPTp doses; and 2) the number of women who attended timely and received one or two doses of IPTp.
The study was carried out in the frame of the ACCESS Programme which has been cleared by the National Institution for Medical Research of Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8c/Vol. I/66) . The study was also approved by the review boards of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (STPH), formerly known as Swiss Tropical Institute (STI), and the Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), formerly known as Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre (IHRDC). The study was discussed and approved by the district coordinators for Reproductive-and-Child-Health (RCH) and staff in-charge was asked for permission to conduct the study at their facilities. Oral or written consent was obtained from all pregnant women and health-workers participating in the study after explaining the purpose of the study to them and informing them of their right to withdraw at any time. Health workers were asked for the permission to tape-record the interviews.
A total of 18 health workers participated in in-depth interviews. They had between 0.5 and 24 years of working experience at the specific health facility and obtained different professional qualifications: 44% (8/18) were medical attendants (attended a one-year training), 22% (4/18) were MCH (Mother and Child Health) Aides (attended a two-year training), 22% (4/18) were certificated Nurse Midwifes (attended a four-year nursing training or upgrade training) and 6% (1/18) were Nursing Officers (attended a six-year training in nursing).
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents
N = 430
Married or living with partner
Single or separated
Gestational age at day of interview
No. of women attending the first time
No. of women attending the second time
No. of women attending the third or more time
Knowledge about IPTp among health workers
Health workers' awareness about the IPTp strategy was high, but concentrated on the restrictive IPTp schedule. The majority of interviewees (11/18) explained in line with the restrictive IPTp guidelines, that IPTp should be administered between 20-24 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation, or in the fifth and seventh months. However, some health workers were confused as to when and how many doses of IPTp to administer. A third of the health workers (7/18) reported a deviant IPTp schedule: two health workers who were working in the same health facility indicated that they start giving the first SP dose after 16 weeks of gestation; another three health workers coming from two health facilities said they would give a total of three doses of SP, but were confused as to when to deliver them; three other health workers from different facilities reported giving SP up to the 34th and 36th week respectively. All seven health workers who reported deviant IPTp schedules stated that they had been instructed in a seminar to extend the schedule or increase the number of doses.
Knowledge and attitudes about malaria prevention among pregnant women
Awareness about IPTp was not high among the pregnant women interviewed. 34% (148/430) of the pregnant women mentioned IPTp spontaneously as a service that they should receive at the ANC clinics. Asking the participants specifically about means of malaria prevention that they expect to get at the ANC clinic, SP/Fansidar/antimalarial was stated by 64% (277/430). 17% (75/430) did not know. Most women were aware that they get malaria prevention for their own (13%, 56/430) or for the child's protection (27%, 118/430) or for both mother and child (36%, 155/430). However, almost a quarter of the participants (23%, 99/430) answered the question "why do they provide you with malaria prevention when you go to the ANC clinic" with "I don't know".
Pregnant women's timing of ANC visits
In summary, this analysis shows that women attended in accordance with the restrictive guidelines and ANC attendance initiated later than 24 weeks of gestation was low. Thus, the majority of women attended at the right time to receive IPTp during the two IPTp delivery periods.
Health workers' IPTp delivery and its timing
Use of IPTp-SP
At least one
At least two
Gestational age at 1st IPTp-SP dose
Gestational age at 2nd IPTp-SP dose
Analysis of IPTp delivery by women's gestational age showed that the timing of the IPTp delivery was in accordance with the restrictive IPTp guidelines (Table 2): most women received IPTp during the specific periods of 20-24 and 28-32 weeks of gestation. 73% (218/299) of the women who had received a first dose of IPTp got it between 20-24 weeks; 5% (14/299) received it before and 22% (67/299) after this period. Among the women who had received a second dose of IPTp, 84% (43/51) got it between 28-32 weeks of gestation. Among the total SP doses administered to pregnant women only 11% (38/352) were distributed outside the two delivery periods.
Women's timing of ANC attendance and SP delivery
No. of women attending between 20-24 weeks and/or 28-32 weeks of gestation at any visit
No. of women receiving SP between 20-24 weeks and/or 28-32 weeks of gestation at any visit
% (CI 95%)
% (CI 95%)
20-24 weeks of gestation
28-32 weeks of gestation
20-24 AND 28-32 weeks of gestation
To summarize, analysis of health workers' IPTp delivery showed that they adhered well to the restrictive guidelines as far as timing of IPTp delivery is concerned. However, women attending ANC clinics between 28-32 weeks of gestation were 24% (100%-55.4%/72.9%) less likely to receive a dose of IPTp than women attending between 20-24 weeks of gestation. Consequently, second dose coverage was low.
IPTp guidelines compared
Number of women eligible for IPTp according to the two guidelines
(20-24, 28-32 weeks of gestation)
(20-40 weeks of gestation, one month apart)
% (95% CI)
% (95% CI)
No. of women eligible
for one dose of IPTp
No. of women eligible for at
least two doses of IPTp
First two visits
First three visits
First four visits
Furthermore, according to the simplified guidelines health workers would not only have been able to deliver two IPTp doses at the right time to more women, but could also have administered more than two IPTp doses to 20% (37/189) of the women who attended the ANC clinic at least twice.
In summary, through the implementation of the simplified guidelines recommended by WHO IPTp coverage at their first, second and third ANC visits could have been increased by 12 to 20 percentage points. Moreover, the number of delivered doses of IPTp could be increased.
Lost effectiveness of IPTp strategy
The study illustrated the combined effect of women's timing of ANC attendance, health worker's IPTp delivery and different delivery schedules of national IPTp guidelines on IPTp coverage. This is in line with findings of previous studies from Tanzania showing that low IPTp coverage levels can not be attributed solely to women's late enrolment to ANC [26, 30]. Instead, health worker's IPTp delivery practices and unclear IPTp guidelines led to lost effectiveness of the IPTp strategy. Thus, solutions need to be found at individual, facility and policy level if the government of Tanzania aims at reaching at least 80% of pregnant women with two IPTp doses .
Compared to the restricted IPTp guidelines, pregnant women initiated ANC attendance late, but still in time to receive a first IPTp dose. Pregnant women in Tanzania are recommended to attend ANC clinics for the first time at 16 weeks of gestation . Most women started ANC attendance in their second trimester around 20 weeks of gestation. This is consistent with the national average among facility users  and with findings from other studies [26, 28, 30, 31, 35]. However, contrary to health workers' perception and assumptions in the literature [29, 33, 49, 50], women's late ANC enrolment did not interfere with the IPTp schedule. This has also been stressed by other studies [26, 30, 31]. Only 15% of the women started ANC attendance after 24 weeks of gestation and were therefore according to the restrictive guidelines no longer eligible for a first dose of IPTp. Overall, women's timing of ANC visits matched well with the restrictive IPTp schedule that was practiced in health facilities. The majority of the participants attended the ANC clinic at least once between 20-24 weeks and between 28-32 weeks of gestation. This shows that women's ANC attendance follows health workers' instructions and was not the main cause for low IPTp levels. IPTp coverage could theoretically have been high. The high proportion of women attending during the specific periods is not surprising as women are given return dates by the health workers. Although women's knowledge about the timing of IPTp was not investigated, it can be presumed that women rely on health workers to correctly administer drugs [18, 49]. Findings of Marchant et al.  support this assumption: over 90% of the women who had not received a dose of IPTp said that health workers had not offered it to them. The participants' knowledge on malaria prevention and its effects was not very high. Almost a quarter of the women did not know why they were supposed to get malaria prevention at the ANC clinic. Pregnant women's knowledge concerning IPTp but also women's power and ability to actively demand IPTp and to protect themselves from erratic timing or missed delivery of IPTp  needs to be improved.
Health workers' IPTp delivery was characterized by its focus on the restrictive IPTp guidelines and by low delivery levels between 28-32 weeks of gestation. Timing of IPTp delivery was in accordance with the restrictive IPTp schedule as most IPTp doses were delivered within the specified periods of 20-24 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. Only 11% of the total IPTp doses were administered outside these periods. Awareness of the IPTp strategy was high among the health workers, however, the concurrent existence of different IPTp guidelines led to some confusion about when and how many IPTp doses to administer.
Consistent with findings from several other studies [26, 27, 29, 31, 48], most women in the study got a first dose of IPTp, but many did not receive a complete course of two IPTp doses. HMIS data collected in the study area in 2008 provided a similar picture: less than half of the women who were given a first IPTp dose, also received a second one. Health workers' low performance provides one possible explanation [50, 51]: Observations of ANC consultations in the context of a study on quality of care showed that return visits were usually of very short duration and reduced to the most basic examinations such as abdominal palpation and the measurement of blood pressure and weight (Gross et al., submitted to BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth). In this context, IPTp as well as the delivery of other drugs and lab examinations might easily be skipped or forgotten. This pattern has also been reported in a study from Malawi . Given the shortages of SP often observed in Tanzania [26, 30, 52] health workers' rationing of SP, especially of the second IPTp dose, might represent another possible explanation. Information on SP stock-outs was not collected at the time of the study as it would only have served to explain the missed delivery of the most recent IPTp doses. Monitoring SP stocks at the health facilities through the collection of end of month drug stock data was not possible due to low quality of record keeping by the facility staff. However, a quality of care study conducted in October 2008 in the same area showed that all the selected health facility except one had SP available in the three preceding months (unpublished data, ACCESS Programme). As this study leaves open questions on why health workers delivered the second IPTp dose significantly less well than the first one, it calls for future studies on health workers IPTp delivery practices.
IPTp delivery practices at ANC clinics in the study area and other regions of Tanzania differ critically from the simplified WHO recommendations to distribute SP to all pregnant women twice after quickening and one month apart [26, 30]. The government's failure to implement the simplified IPTp schedule caused on the one hand confusion among health workers due to the concurrent existence of different and contradictory IPTp policies. On the other hand it represents a missed opportunity for high coverage levels of this important intervention. Calculations based on the simplified guidelines suggest that IPTp coverage could potentially be increased by up to 20 percentage points if IPTp delivery were no longer limited to the narrow gestational range of 20-24 and 28-32 weeks. Better outcomes are also to be expected as health workers' difficulties to assess gestational age is taken into account .
The Ministry of Health should therefore overcome inconsistent IPTp messages and advocate one clear IPTp recommendation. The study showed that implementing the simplified IPTp policy recommended by WHO has the potential to reach more pregnant women with the important intervention of IPTp. The fact that the simplified IPTp guidelines are already integrated in the Focused Antenatal Care guidelines highlights the need for training health workers on the new policy and disseminating the information to the periphery.
Not only coverage but also the number of administered doses could be easily increased through the implementation of the simplified guidelines. WHO currently recommends a three dose regimen for areas in which antenatal HIV prevalence exceeds 10% and where HIV-testing is not available . Trials from Kenya, Malawi and Zambia showed that receiving at least three courses of IPTp was associated with a better protective outcome among HIV-positive pregnant women [15, 54–56]. Tanzania so far continues with a two-dose regimen due to its relatively low HIV prevalence rates. However, if levels of parasite resistance continue to increase, alternative drugs for IPTp need to be urgently found . Any replacement drug to SP will most likely require a more complicated drug regimen. Thus, achieving high coverage levels will become even more challenging.
Collecting data through exit interviews at health facilities imposed two main limitations on the study: Firstly, information on women's ANC attendance behaviour was incomplete. Most women were at the beginning or at the middle of their pregnancy and data were usually available for less than four ANC visits. Moreover, although data collection took place over several months and at different ANC clinics it might not be representative for other places and periods of the year. Secondly, the conduct of exit interviews may have resulted in improved health worker performance. Including ANC card data on services received at earlier visits certainly lessened this type of bias. In reality, having a record of IPTp receipt is neither a guarantee that the drug was given nor taken - despite the fact that IPTp should be provided under direct observation. However, comparing ANC records with women's self-report revealed no major inconsistencies.
Finally, between the interviews with the health workers and the exit interviews with ANC attendees was a time gap of one year, since the exit interview survey was conducted in order to verify and validate certain results from the health worker interviews. Although health workers did not receive any training on IPTp delivery in the meantime, the time order of the studies did not allow to investigate health workers' reasons for the lower level of second dose IPTp delivery.
This study showed that effective IPTp delivery to pregnant women is hampered by the combined effect of women's timing of ANC attendance, health worker's IPTp delivery and different delivery schedules of national IPTp guidelines. In particular, the implementation of simplified IPTp guidelines will be critical for reaching the 80% target. Training on simplified IPTp messages should be reinforced as part of the extended FANC training of health workers to change IPTp delivery practices and increase coverage levels. Additionally, campaigns that provide educational messages on the risk of malaria during pregnancy and the usefulness of IPTp and that help to raise patients' awareness for their rights are required to increase pregnant women's power to demand IPTp and other ANC services and decrease their dependence on health workers. Lessons need to be learned on how to implement guidelines changes effectively and determinedly in order to be prepared for the implementation of a new drug for IPTp when drug resistance against SP has reached levels where IPTp with SP is no longer efficacious.
We thank all district authorities, health workers and pregnant women for their willingness to participate in this study. The study was funded by the Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships in Developing Countries (KFPE), the Novartis Foundation for Sustainable Development and the Rudolf-Geigy Foundation of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. None of the funders had a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We acknowledge the institutional support of the Ifakara Health Institute. Special thanks go to all members of the ACCESS Programme, especially Judith John, Irene Ngoja and Hilda Mwakabusi, and to Phemy Muhaku, Prudenciana Kassim, Lucy Ngwatali and Salum Mbunda for their help with data entry, transcription and translation. Moreover, we thank Tanya Marchant, Christian Lengeler and the anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful comments and inputs.
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] & ORC Macro: Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2004-05. 2005, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: National Bureau of Statistics and ORC MacroGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M, Salgado R, Kachur SP, Wirtz R, Renshaw M, Greene R, Llewellyn C: President's Malaria Initiative. Malaria Country Action Plan (CAP). FY 2006. Tanzania. 2006Google Scholar
- Desai M, ter Kuile FO, Nosten F, McGready R, Asamoa K, Brabin B, Newman RD: Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 93-104. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70021-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steketee RW, Nahlen BL, Parise ME, Menendez C: The burden of malaria in pregnancy in malaria-endemic areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 28-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olsen BE, Hinderaker SG, Bergsjo P, Lie RT, Olsen OH, Gasheka P, Kvale G: Causes and characteristics of maternal deaths in rural northern Tanzania. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002, 81: 1101-1109. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811202.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hinderaker SG: Perinatal mortality and anaemia in pregnancy in rural northern Tanzania. Doctoral thesis. 2003, University of Bergen, Centre for International HealthGoogle Scholar
- Menendez C, Ordi J, Ismail MR, Ventura PJ, Aponte JJ, Kahigwa E, Font F, Alonso PL: The impact of placental malaria on gestational age and birth weight. J Infect Dis. 2000, 181: 1740-1745. 10.1086/315449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garner P, Gulmezoglu AM: Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, CD000169-Google Scholar
- Lagerberg RE: Malaria in pregnancy: a literature review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008, 53: 209-215. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.02.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill J, Kazembe P: Reaching the Abuja target for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in African women: a review of progress and operational challenges. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 409-418. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01585.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- RBM, WHO: The Abuja Declaration and the Plan of Action. An Extract from the African Summit on Roll Back Malaria, Abuja, 25 April 2000 (WHO/CDS/RBM/2000.17). 2003, Geneva: Roll Back Malaria Partnership Secretariat, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- WHO: A Strategic Framework for Malaria Prevention and Control During Pregnancy in the African Region. 2004, Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for AfricaGoogle Scholar
- Hanson K, Nathan R, Marchant T, Mponda H, Jones C, Bruce J, Stephen G, Mulligan J, Mshinda H, Schellenberg JA: Vouchers for scaling up insecticide-treated nets in Tanzania: methods for monitoring and evaluation of a national health system intervention. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 205-10.1186/1471-2458-8-205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care. A guide for essential practice. 2003, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Parise ME, Ayisi JG, Nahlen BL, Schultz LJ, Roberts JM, Misore A, Muga R, Oloo AJ, Steketee RW: Efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for prevention of placental malaria in an area of Kenya with a high prevalence of malaria and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 59: 813-822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shulman CE, Dorman EK, Cutts F, Kawuondo K, Bulmer JN, Peshu N, Marsh K: Intermittent sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine to prevent severe anaemia secondary to malaria in pregnancy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 1999, 353: 632-636. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07318-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mubyazi GM, Bloch P, Magnussen P, Olsen OE, Byskov J, Hansen KS, Bygbjerg IC: Women's experiences and views about costs of seeking malaria chemoprevention and other antenatal services: a qualitative study from two districts in rural Tanzania. Malar J. 2010, 9: 54-10.1186/1475-2875-9-54.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith LA, Jones C, Adjei RO, Antwi GD, Afrah NA, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D, Tagbor H, Webster J: Intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: user acceptability. Malar J. 2010, 9: 18-10.1186/1475-2875-9-18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gies S, Coulibaly SO, Ouattara FT, Ky C, Brabin BJ, D'Alessandro U: A community effectiveness trial of strategies promoting intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in pregnant women in rural Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2008, 7: 180-10.1186/1475-2875-7-180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS): Tanzania HIV/AIDS and Malaria Indicator Survey 2007-08. 2008, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: National Bureau of StatisticsGoogle Scholar
- MIPESA: Assessment of MIPESA Country Experiences in the Adoption and Implementation of Malaria in Pregnancy Policies. Including Best Practices and Lessons Learned. 2006, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Tanzania: National Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria. 2006, Dar es Salaam: Ministry for Health and Social WelfareGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Health Tanzania (RCHS/NMCP) & JHPIEGO: Focused Antenatal Care. Malaria and Syphilis during Pregnancy. Orientation Package for Service Providers. 2004, Dar es Salaam: Ministry of HealthGoogle Scholar
- Crawley J, Hill J, Yartey J, Robalo M, Serufilira A, Ba-Nguz A, Roman E, Palmer A, Asamoa K, Steketee R: From evidence to action? Challenges to policy change and programme delivery for malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 145-155. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70026-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Malaria Control Programme: Mid Term Strategic Plan 2008-2012. Draft version. 2007Google Scholar
- Anders K, Marchant T, Chambo P, Mapunda P, Reyburn H: Timing of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy and the implications of current policy on early uptake in north-east Tanzania. Malar J. 2008, 7: 79-10.1186/1475-2875-7-79.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gikandi PW, Noor AM, Gitonga CW, Ajanga AA, Snow RW: Access and barriers to measures targeted to prevent malaria in pregnancy in rural Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13: 208-217. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01992.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holtz TH, Kachur SP, Roberts JM, Marum LH, Mkandala C, Chizani N, Macheso A, Parise ME: Use of antenatal care services and intermittent preventive treatment for malaria among pregnant women in Blantyre District, Malawi. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 77-82. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01170.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiwuwa MS, Mufubenga P: Use of antenatal care, maternity services, intermittent presumptive treatment and insecticide treated bed nets by pregnant women in Luwero district, Uganda. Malar J. 2008, 7: 44-10.1186/1475-2875-7-44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchant T, Nathan R, Jones C, Mponda H, Bruce J, Sedekia Y, Schellenberg J, Mshinda H, Hanson K: Individual, facility and policy level influences on national coverage estimates for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in Tanzania. Malar J. 2008, 7: 260-10.1186/1475-2875-7-260.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ouma PO, Van Eijk AM, Hamel MJ, Sikuku E, Odhiambo F, Munguti K, Ayisi JG, Kager PA, Slutsker L: The effect of health care worker training on the use of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in rural western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 953-961. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01876.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akinleye SO, Falade CO, Ajayi IO: Knowledge and utilization of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in primary health care centers in rural southwest, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009, 9: 28-10.1186/1471-2393-9-28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Launiala A, Honkasalo ML: Ethnographic study of factors influencing compliance to intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy among Yao women in rural Malawi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 101: 980-989. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mubyazi G, Bloch P, Kamugisha M, Kitua A, Ijumba J: Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy: a qualitative study of knowledge, attitudes and practices of district health managers, antenatal care staff and pregnant women in Korogwe District, North-Eastern Tanzania. Malar J. 2005, 4: 31-10.1186/1475-2875-4-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nganda RY, Drakeley C, Reyburn H, Marchant T: Knowledge of malaria influences the use of insecticide treated nets but not intermittent presumptive treatment by pregnant women in Tanzania. Malar J. 2004, 3: 42-10.1186/1475-2875-3-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Eijk AM, Blokland IE, Slutsker L, Odhiambo F, Ayisi JG, Bles HM, Rosen DH, Adazu K, Lindblade KA: Use of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in a rural area of western Kenya with high coverage of insecticide-treated bed nets. Trop Med Int Health. 2005, 10: 1134-1140. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01497.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alba S, Hetzel MW, Goodman C, Dillip A, Liana J, Mshinda H, Lengeler C: Improvements in access to malaria treatment in Tanzania after switch to artemisinin combination therapy and the introduction of accredited drug dispensing outlets - a provider perspective. Malar J. 2010, 9: 164-10.1186/1475-2875-9-164.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong Schellenberg J, Mukasa O, Abdulla S, Marchant T, Lengeler C, Kikumbih N, Mshinda H, Nathan R: Chapter 11. Ifakara DSS, Tanzania. Population and Health in Developing Countries Population, Health, and Survival at INDEPTH Sites. Edited by: INDEPTH Network. 2002, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1:Google Scholar
- Smith T, Charlwood JD, Kihonda J, Mwankusye S, Billingsley P, Meuwissen J, Lyimo E, Takken W, Teuscher T, Tanner M: Absence of seasonal variation in malaria parasitaemia in an area of intense seasonal transmission. Acta Trop. 1993, 54: 55-72. 10.1016/0001-706X(93)90068-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Killeen GF, Tami A, Kihonda J, Okumu FO, Kotas ME, Grundmann H, Kasigudi N, Ngonyani H, Mayagaya V, Nathan R, Abdulla S, Charlwood JD, Smith TA, Lengeler C: Cost-sharing strategies combining targeted public subsidies with private-sector delivery achieve high bednet coverage and reduced malaria transmission in Kilombero Valley, southern Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 121-10.1186/1471-2334-7-121.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russell TL, Lwetoijera DW, Maliti D, Chipwaza B, Kihonda J, Charlwood JD, Smith TA, Lengeler C, Mwanyangala MA, Nathan R, Knols BG, Takken W, Killeen GF: Impact of promoting longer-lasting insecticide treatment of bed nets upon malaria transmission in a rural Tanzanian setting with pre-existing high coverage of untreated nets. Malar J. 2010, 9: 187-10.1186/1475-2875-9-187.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hetzel MW, Iteba N, Makemba A, Mshana C, Lengeler C, Obrist B, Schulze A, Nathan R, Dillip A, Alba S, Mayumana I, Khatib RA, Njau JD, Mshinda H: Understanding and improving access to prompt and effective malaria treatment and care in rural Tanzania: the ACCESS Programme. Malar J. 2007, 6: 83-10.1186/1475-2875-6-83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schellenberg JR, Abdulla S, Minja H, Nathan R, Mukasa O, Marchant T, Mponda H, Kikumbih N, Lyimo E, Manchester T, Tanner M, Lengeler C: KINET: a social marketing programme of treated nets and net treatment for malaria control in Tanzania, with evaluation of child health and long-term survival. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93: 225-231. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90001-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong Schellenberg JR, Adam T, Mshinda H, Masanja H, Kabadi G, Mukasa O, John T, Charles S, Nathan R, Wilczynska K, Mgalula L, Mbuya C, Mswia R, Manzi F, de Savigny D, Schellenberg D, Victora C: Effectiveness and cost of facility-based Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) in Tanzania. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1583-1594. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17311-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayring P: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. 2007, Weinheim: Beltz VerlagGoogle Scholar
- O'Dowd MJ, O'Dowd TM: Quickening--a re-evaluation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985, 92: 1037-1039. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb02999.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Programme ACCESS: Annual Report 2007/2008. 2008, Ifakara Ifakara Health InstituteGoogle Scholar
- Marchant T, Bruce J, Nathan R, Mponda H, Sedekia Y, Hanson K: Monitoring and evaluation of the Tanzanian National Voucher Scheme: Report on 2007 TNVS Household, Facility services and Facility users surveys (a comparison across three survey years). 2008, Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineGoogle Scholar
- Brabin L, Stokes E, Dumbaya I, Owens S: Rural Gambian women's reliance on health workers to deliver sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as recommended intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy. Malar J. 2009, 8: 25-10.1186/1475-2875-8-25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Eijk AM, Ayisi JG, ter Kuile FO, Slutsker L, Otieno JA, Misore AO, Odondi JO, Rosen DH, Kager PA, Steketee RW, Nahlen BL: Implementation of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for control of malaria in pregnancy in Kisumu, western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 630-637. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01242.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ndyomugyenyi R, Katamanywa J: Intermittent prevetive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp): do frequent antenatal care visits ensure access and compliance to IPtp in Ugandan rural communities?. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 104 (8): 536-40. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guyatt HL, Noor AM, Ochola SA, Snow RW: Use of intermittent presumptive treatment and insecticide treated bed nets by pregnant women in four Kenyan districts. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 255-261. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01193.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ter Kuile FO, Steketee RW: Intermittent preventive therapy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during pregnancy: seeking information on optimal dosing frequency. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196: 1574-1576. 10.1086/522233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Filler SJ, Kazembe P, Thigpen M, Macheso A, Parise ME, Newman RD, Steketee RW, Hamel M: Randomized trial of 2-dose versus monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in HIV-positive and HIV-negative pregnant women in Malawi. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 286-293. 10.1086/505080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gill CJ, Macleod WB, Mwanakasale V, Chalwe V, Mwananyanda L, Champo D, Mukwamataba D, Chilengi R, Thea DM, Hamer DH: Inferiority of single-dose sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy among HIV-positive Zambian women. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196: 1577-1584. 10.1086/522137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamer DH, Mwanakasale V, Macleod WB, Chalwe V, Mukwamataba D, Champo D, Mwananyanda L, Chilengi R, Mubikayi L, Mulele CK, Mulenga M, Thea DM, Gill CJ: Two-dose versus monthly intermittent preventive treatment of malaria with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in HIV-seropositive pregnant Zambian women. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196: 1585-1594. 10.1086/522142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallely A, Vallely L, Changalucha J, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D: Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Africa: what's new, what's needed?. Malar J. 2007, 6: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-6-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.