Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Direct cost (test and treatment cost) and comprehensive cost (including estimate of life value) of the presumptive versus the test based strategy at "ideal" adherence levels to both strategies (see text): test and treatment cost not subsidized

From: Strict adherence to malaria rapid test results might lead to a neglect of other dangerous diseases: a cost benefit analysis from Burkina Faso

Variables Children, dry season Children, rainy season Adults, dry season Adults, rainy season
Direct cost, presumptive strategy 1032 1033 2005 2047
Direct cost, test-based strategy 1242 1684 1685 1988
Comprehensive cost, presumptive strategy 1747 1372 2728 2604
Comprehensive cost, test-based strategy 1862 2138 1983 2225
Threshold life value* 1151 n.a. (test dominated) n.a. (pres. dominated) n.a. (pres. dominated)
  1. Costs expressed in € (euro) for 1000 patients managed with either strategy, assuming a life value of 525 € (better option in bold)
  2. * Life value at which the two strategies become equivalent at sensitivity analysis