Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of alert threshold development techniques

From: Early detection of malaria foci for targeted interventions in endemic southern Zambia

Technique

Methods to calculate threshold[16, 20]

Advantages

Disadvantages

WHO[17]

Upper third quartile of monthly case numbers from preceding 5 years

• Calculation does not require a computer

• Not skewed by epidemic years

• Requires 5 years of historic data

• Limited utility for local public health response when calculated at the monthly and district-wide level

Cullen[18]

Monthly mean number of cases + 2 standard deviations from 5 years of historic data where "epidemic years" have been excluded

• Simple calculation

• Requires 5 years of historic data

• Limited utility for local public health response when calculated at the monthly and district-wide level

• Exclusion of "epidemic years" is arbitrarily defined

C-sum[19]

Mean number of cases for a given month, the preceding month and the subsequent month from the past 5 years plus 2 standard deviations (note: the same technique has been applied to weekly data for a variety of diseases including malaria [23]).

• Smooths fluctuations due to irregular reporting rather than disease incidence by providing a larger 15 historic months sample size.

• Requires 5 years of historic data

• Limited utility for local public health response when calculated at the monthly and district-wide level

Poisson[20]

Upper 95% confidence interval limit of Poisson distribution based on weekly case numbers from past 2 or more years of historic data at sites grouped by transmission zones and adjusted by population of catchment areas.

• Granular weekly and local thresholds better reflect the seasonal and geographic variations and allow for more agile public health responses

• Does not require as many years of historic data

• A larger historic sample size is obtained by grouping sites with similar observed patterns of transmission

• Greater influence of "epidemic years" on mean and threshold calculations because fewer years of historic data are used

• Questionable applicability of Poisson assumptions

• Zonal thresholds introduce an aggregation bias with inconsistent sensitivities between RHCs within a zone