Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics on healthcare providers' individual characteristics, working context, and views about and use of research evidence

From: Assessing healthcare providers' knowledge and practices relating to insecticide-treated nets and the prevention of malaria in Ghana, Laos, Senegal and Tanzania

Factor

All

N = 372

Ghana

N = 107

Laos

N = 136

Senegal

N = 51

Tanzania

N = 75

Individual characteristics

Age, yr, mean

42.0

43.0

40.7

38.9

45.5

Sex, male

55.9

59.8

41.2

45.1

84.9

Type of health care provider

     

General practitioner

67.2%

53.8%

86.6%

29.4%

77.8%

Specialist physician

5.8%

10.4%

4.5%

5.9%

1.4%

Nurse

15.7%

31.1%

2.2%

37.3%

2.8%

Health worker

6.6%

2.8%

5.2%

17.6%

6.9%

Other

4.7%

1.9%

1.5%

9.8%

11.1%

Allocation of time, % of time†

Clinical practice

59.0%

71.0%

65.0%

63.6%

28.4%

Research

7.7%

7.6%

6.4%

15.8%

4.8%

Teaching

10.3%

10.2%

9.5%

6.6%

14.4%

Administration

18.2%

9.2%

12.8%

8.5%

47.2%

Master's or doctorate degree

15.1%

15.0%

8.1%

7.8%

32.1%

Training (since completed last degree) in:

     

Acquiring systematic reviews through the Cochrane Library

8.3%

12.1%

4.4%

4.1%

19.4%

Critically appraising systematic reviews

10.8%

16.8%

3.7%

6.3%

33.3%

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI)

34.9%

43.3%

14.0%

39.2%

72.9%

Prevention of malaria

44.6%

39.2%

30.9%

74.5%

65.1%

Easy access to personal computer with CD ROM

24.3%

22.6%

7.5%

31.4%

56.3%

Easy access to Internet

21.7%

21.8%

6.7%

43.1%

35.9%

Able to read and write English well or very well

63.3%

97.2%

19.3%

56.9%

100%

Working context§

     

Operating authority of facility or practice

Government

86.3%

59.8%

100%

92.2%

95.8%

Nongovernmental organization

14.5%

26.2%

4.4%

7.8%

21.1%

For-profit organization

9.6%

23.4%

0.7%

0%

12.7%

Type of facility or practice

Solo or individual practice

13.7%

13.1%

9.6%

15.7%

21.4%

Group practice

33.2%

22.4%

53.7%

0%

34.3%

Hospital

81.6%

79.4%

93.4%

51.0%

84.3%

Community health centre

25.0%

20.6%

0.7%

56.9%

55.7%

Location of facility or practice

Urban

16.0%

4.7%

2.4%

31.4%

44.6%

Rural

55.7%

69.8%

60.3%

52.9%

29.7%

Mixed

40.6%

32.1%

45.2%

23.5%

56.8%

Facility had insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) available

58.5%

64.5%

38.5%

54.9%

89.0%

Views and activities related to improving clinical practice

Research performed in their own country is of above average or excellent quality

47.8%

57.3%

28.2%

39.2%

75.3%

Trust somewhat or completely a systematic review of randomized controlled double-blind trials

55.5%

58.7%

48.1%

47.1%

72.6%

Working with researchers or research groups to improve clinical practice or the quality of working life

43.9%

40.6%

41.0%

27.5%

66.2%

Higher quality of available research is important or very important to improve their work

92.6%

86.0%

99.3%

98.0%

86.3%

Used or read particular sources of evidence

Clinical practice guidelines, protocols or decision-support tools

59.4%

65.7%

47.7%

51.0%

80.0%

Cochrane Library

11.1%

20.4%

6.7%

5.9%

9.5%

Scientific journals from high-income countries

35.9%

55.9%

15.6%

29.4%

50.0%

Scientific journals from own country

55.1%

53.6%

64.9%

17.6%

67.2%

Summaries of articles, reports, and reviews from public and not-for-profit health organizations

56.9%

64.1%

36.4%

78.4%

69.2%

  1. §May not add to 100% because health care providers may practise in more than one setting.
  2. †May not add to 100% because the allocation of time reported by a small number of respondents did not add to 100%