Skip to main content

Table 4 Adequacy criteria for the ACT strategy

From: Rapid assessment of the performance of malaria control strategies implemented by countries in the Amazon subregion using adequacy criteria: case study

 

GRADE: Total criteria: 8

6.5 to 8 criteria satisfied = Programme implementation adequate

4.5 to 6 criteria satisfied = Programme implementation of intermediate adequacy

0 to 4 criteria satisfied = Programme implementation deficient

No.

Criteria

 

Preliminary studies

1

In vivo or in vitro studies on the resistance of P. falciparum [to] medications in previous treatment plans were carried out [11]

2

In vivo or in vitro studies on the sensitivity of P. falciparum to ACT were carried out [11]

 

Coverage

3

At least 80% of P. falciparum cases receive ACT [7]

4

No ACT stockouts occurred in the public network in the last three years [7]

 

Quality

5

Updated protocols and standards exist for ACT in the country's treatment plans [11]

6

A system is in place for monitoring ACT treatment failures [11]

7

According to standards, ACT is only given when a positive result (microscopic or rapid diagnostic test) occurs for P. falciparum

8

A systematic procedure exists to monitor the appropriate application of standards and protocols for ACT [11]