Skip to main content

Table 1 Relative sampling sensitivity of community-based (CB) and quality assurance (QA) surveys of mosquitoes with ITT, compared with QA surveys by human landing catch (HLC), as estimated by generalized linear models (GLM)

From: An affordable, quality-assured community-based system for high-resolution entomological surveillance of vector mosquitoes that reflects human malaria infection risk patterns

Method

Number caught

Trap nights

Locations surveyed

Mean trap nights per location

Mean Catch [95%CI]

Relative rate [95%CI]

P

Anopheles gambiae s.l.

CB-ITT

208

8171

615

13.29

0.026 [0.021,0.033]

0.079 [0.051,0.121]

<0.001

QA-ITT

53

931

293

3.18

0.057 [0.039,0.085]

0.182 [0.101,0.328]

<0.001

QA-HLC

187

335

240

1.39

0.560 [0.385, 0.815]

1.00*

NA

Culex spp

CB-ITT

287,398

8171

615

13.29

20.7 [19.3, 22.0]

0.153 [0.137, 0. 171]

<0.001

QA-ITT

35,642

931

293

3.18

27.1 [23.9, 30.8]

0.215 [0.190, 0. 243]

<0.001

QA-HLC

49,121

335

240

1.39

147.7 [133. 8,163.0]

1.00*

NA

  1. NA: not applicable.
  2. CI: confidence interval.
  3. * Reference category.