Table 2 Logistic regression assessing the effect of household socio-economic status on ITNs use among individuals (de facto population) from households which own at least one ITN
Factors | Number of individuals | Number of individual using ITNs (%) | Odd Ratios (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
Totat number of individuals | 3,056 | 1,622 (53.1) | Â |
Wealth quintiles | Â | Â | Â |
   Lowest | 521 | 273 (52.4) | 0.87 (0.67; 1.13) |
   Second | 610 | 307 (50.3) | 0.85 (0.66; 1.10) |
   Third | 640 | 359 (56.1) | 1.1 (0.86; 1.40) |
   Fourth | 653 | 341 (52.2) | 0.91 (0.72; 1.15) |
   Highest | 632 | 342 (54.1) | 1 |
Gender | Â | Â | Â |
   Male | 1,494 | 729 (48.8) | 1 |
   Female | 1,562 | 893 (57.2) | 1.46 (1.26; 1.70) |
Age | Â | Â | Â |
   Under 5 year | 639 | 397 (62.1) | 1 |
   5-15 years | 971 | 471 (48.5) | 0.62 (0.50; 0.77) |
   15-25 years | 467 | 203 (43.5) | 0.42 (0.33; 0.55) |
   25 years and plus | 979 | 551 (56.3) | 0.72 (0.58; 0.89) |
Place of residence | Â | Â | Â |
   Urban | 1,080 | 538 (49.8) | 1 |
   Rural | 1,976 | 1,084 (54.9) | 1.11 (0.94; 1.31) |
Education level of head of household | Â | Â | |
   None | 1,880 | 965 (51.3) | 1 |
   Primary | 636 | 374 (58.8) | 1.39 (1.14; 1.69) |
   Secondary | 382 | 185 (48.4) | 0.97 (0.76; 1.25) |
   Higher | 115 | 75 (65.2) | 1.91 (1.23; 2.96) |
   Missing | 43 |  |  |
Size of the household | Â | Â | Â |
   1 member | 40 | 25 (62.5) | 1 |
   2-4 members | 1,010 | 626 (62.0) | 1.44 (0.74; 2.83) |
   5-7 members | 1,316 | 670 (50.9) | 1.55 (0.76; 3.14) |
   8 and more members | 690 | 301 (43.6) | 1.34 (0.66; 2.75) |
Use of repellent (aerosol, coil, herbs) | Â | Â | |
   None | 185 | 90 (48.6) | 1 |
   At least one | 1,945 | 1086 (55.8) | 1.27 (0.93; 1.75) |
   At least 2 | 926 | 446 (48.2) | 0.94 (0.67; 1.32) |
Ratio 1 net for 2 person met | Â | Â | Â |
   No | 2,268 | 1077 (47.5) | 1 |
   Yes | 788 | 545 (69.2) | 2.64 (2.06; 3.37) |