Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlation between QTc and RR, using the various correction formulae

From: Electrocardiographic study in Ghanaian children with uncomplicated malaria, treated with artesunate-amodiaquine or artemether-lumefantrine

Hodges formula

QTC

RR

Pearson’s correlation coefficient

QTC vs RR day 0 (A-L)

391.80 (24.40)

0.54 (0.09)

−0.675

QTC vs RR day 3 (A-L)

376.47 (22.66)

0.72 (0.12)

−0.256

QTC vs RR day 7 (A-L)

374.18 (19.19)

0.69 (0.14)

0.065

QTC vs RR day 0 (A-A)

390.28 (26.59)

0.52 (0.10)

−0.252

QTC vs RR day 3 (A-A)

374.81 (21.77)

0.78 (0.15)

−0.239

QTC vs RR day 7 (A-A)

372.09 (21.94)

0.70 (0.12)

0.458

Bazett’s formula

QTc

RR

Correlation coefficient

QTCb vs RR day 0 (A-L)

406.03 (27.84)

0.54 (0.09)

−0.373

QTCb vs RR day 3 (A-L)

392.71 (27.99)

0.72 (0.12)

−0.366

QTCb vs RR day 7 (A-L)

389.36 (23.56)

0.69 (0.14)

−0.14

QTCb vs RR day 0 (A-A)

399.57 (33.44)

0.52 (0.10)

0.097

QTCb vs RR day 3 (A-A)

388.04 (26.70)

0.78 (0.15)

−0.492

QTCb vs RR day 7 (A-A)

387.67 (27.20)

0.70 (0.12)

−0.283

Fridericia’s formula

QTc

RR

Correlation coefficient

QTCf vs RR day 0 (A-L)

365.16 (23.11)

0.54 (0.09)

0.026

QTCf vs RR day 3 (A-L)

370.54 (24.72)

0.72 (0.12)

0.032

QTCf vs RR day 7 (A-L)

364.90 (22.85)

0.69 (0.14)

0.364

QTCf vs RR day 0 (A-A)

357.42 (33.27)

0.52 (0.10)

0.419

QTCf vs RR day 3 (A-A)

370.77 (22.20)

0.78 (0.15)

−0.023

QTCf vs RR day 7 (A-A)

364.71 (25.04)

0.70 (0.12)

0.116

  1. QTcb =Bazett’s corrected QTc; QTcf =Fridericia’s corrected QTc; QTch = Hodges’ corrected QTc; A-A=artesunate-amodiaquine; A-L=artemether-lumefantrine; RR=RR interval.