Skip to main content

Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of microscopy and RDTs versus PCR (reference method) in high- and low-transmission areas in Madagascar, 2008-2010

From: Management of uncomplicated malaria in febrile under five-year-old children by community health workers in Madagascar: reliability of malaria rapid diagnostic tests

Global

Methods

Microscopy

RDT

Sensitivity (95% CI)

72.7 (67.0-77.9)

61.8 (54.0-69.1

Specificity (95% CI)

100.0 (98.5-100.0

95.0 (75.1-99.9)

PPV (95% CI)

100.0 (98.1-100.0)

99.0 (94.9-100.0)

NPV (95% CI)

77.7 (72.8-82.1)

99.0 (94.9-100.0)

High transmission

Methods

 

Microscopy

RDT

Sensitivity (95% CI)

70.1 (63.8-75.9)

60.0 (51.7-67.9)

Specificity (95% CI)

100.0 (97.9-100.0)

100.0 (81.5-100.0

PPV (95% CI)

100.0 (97.8-100.0)

100.0 (96.0-100)

NPV (95% CI)

71.9 (65.9-77.4)

23.1 (14.3-34.0

-Low transmission

Methods

 

Microscopy

RDT

Sensitivity (95% CI)

89.2 (74.6-97.0)

75.0 (50.9-91.3)

Specificity (95% CI)

100.0 (95.4-100.0

50.0 (1.3-98.7)

PPV (95% CI)

100.0 (89.4-100.0)

93.7 (69.8-99.8)

NPV (95% CI)

100.0 (89.4-100.0)

16.7 (0.4-64.1)