Skip to main content

Table 3 Gender effects on the use of ITNs among individuals who have access to ITNs

From: Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results

Factors

Number of individuals

Number of individuals using ITN (%)

Odd ratios (95% CI)

p value

Total number of individuals

3,056

1622 (53.1)

  

Explanatory variable

    

Gender

    
 

Male

1,494

729 (48.8)

1

 
 

Female

1,562

893 (57.2)

1.46 (1.25-1.70)

<0.001

Covariates

    

Wealth quintiles

    
 

Lowest

521

273 (52.4)

0.80 (0.61-1.05)

0.104

 

Second

610

307 (50.3)

0.82 (0.64-1.06)

0.128

 

Middle

640

359 (56.1)

1.09 (0.86-1.39)

0.479

 

Fourth

653

341 (52.2)

0.89 (0.70-1.13)

0.334

 

Highest

632

342 (54.1)

1

 

Waves

    
 

Wave 1

1,490

735 (49.3)

1

 
 

Wave 2

1,566

887 (56.6)

1.38 (1.18-1.61)

<0.001

Age

     
 

Under 5 years

639

397 (62.1)

1.41 (1.14-1.75)

0.002

 

5-15 years

971

471 (48.5)

0.88 (0.73-1.06)

0.169

 

15-25 years

467

203 (43.5)

0.57 (0.45-0.73)

<0.001

 

25 years and older

979

551 (56.3)

1

 

Place of residence

    
 

Urban

1080

538 (49.8)

1

 
 

Rural

1976

1,084 (54.9)

1.15 (0.98-1.35)

0.098

Education of head of household

   
 

None

1,880

965 (51.3)

1

 
 

Primary

636

374 (58.8)

1.38 (1.13-1.67)

0.001

 

Secondary

382

185 (48.4)

0.87 (0.68-1.12)

0.288

 

Higher

115

75 (65.2)

1.80 (1.16-2.78)

0.009

 

Missing

43

   

Polygamous household

    
 

Yes

1,291

666 (51.6)

1

 
 

No

1,765

956 (54.2)

0.88 (0.76-1.03)

0.114

Ratio 1 ITN/2 persons met

   
 

No

2,268

1,077 (47.5)

1

 
 

Yes

788

545 (69.2)

2.53 (2.11-3.04)

<0.001

  1. Model fit: LR chi2(18)=238.45; p value<0.00001; Pseudo R2=0.057; Log likelihood = −1963.54.