Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence of resistance mutations in 2009 among those typed and estimated prevalence in the population

From: Prevalence of molecular markers of drug resistance in an area of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children in Senegal

 

Study samples

Prevalence in population$

 
 

Control area

SMC area

Control area (%)

SMC area (%)

Prevalence ratio^

p-value

     

SMC/ non SMC (95% CI)

 

Prevalence of parasitaemia among children surveyed

41/3320

9/3326

1.33

0.22

0.16 (0.06, 0.42)

<0.001

Prevalence of mutations among typed

     

dhfr triple (51, 59, 108)

27/34

4/6

0.98

0.18

0.18 (0.059, 0.58)

0.004

dhps-437

25/35

4/6

0.88

0.18

0.21 (0.064, 0.66)

0.008

SP resistant mutant (dhfr triple + dhps 437)

23/34

4/6

0.84

0.18

0.22 (0.068, 0.69)

0.01

crt CVIET mutation

13/35

3/6

0.46

0.14

0.30 (0.10, 0.86)

0.026

mdr 86Y

15/33

4/6

0.56

0.18

0.32 (0.11, 0.92)

0.034

mdr 184F

28/34

5/6

1.02

0.23

0.22 (0.086, 0.58)

0.002

AQ resistant mutant (mdr 86Y + crt CVIET)

9/33

2/6

0.34

0.09

0.27 (0.078, 0.92)

0.036

SP resistant & AQ resistant

8/32

2/6

0.31

0.09

0.29 (0.08, 1.07)

0.064

  1. ^ Prevalence ratios accounting for survey design. $For genotypes, prevalence among population is estimated as the product of 1) the probability of a resistant genotype among the typed samples and 2) the probability positive among samples with a definitive result (positive or negative) for asexual stage parasitaemia. Standard errors estimated by the delta method as described in the methods section.