Advertisement
Table 1 Mortality rates (95% confidence interval) and blood-feeding status of Anopheles gambiae s.l from various localities exposed to lambdacyhalothrin 0.05% in WHO resistance tests
| Date of testing | Village | Total tested | Replicate no. | % mortality (95%CI) | % blood-fed Anopheles | Kdr allele frequency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2011 | Kikagate | 35 | 2 | 34% | (19–52) | 100% | 95% |
| Kyamyorwa | 230 | 12 | 40%3 | (33–46) | 70% | 100% | |
| Nov 2011 | Kishuro | 40 | 2 | 13% | (4–27) | 24% | 99% |
| Ngenge | 52 | 3 | 25% | (14–39) | 59% | 99% | |
| Rwigembe | 42 | 2 | 31% | (18–47) | 84% | 100% | |
| Buhuma | 30 | 2 | 17% | (6–35) | 78% | 100% | |
| Kangoma | 105 | 6 | 8%1 | (3–14) | 40% | 96% | |
| Kikagate | 142 | 7 | 8% | (4–14) | 74% | 98% | |
| Kiteme | 104 | 6 | 31%2 | (22–41) | 92% | 99% | |
| Kyamyorwa | 149 | 7 | 26%3 | (19–34) | 75% | 98% | |
| Nyakahama | 13 | 1 | 38% | (14–68) | 77% | 100% | |
| Buhanga | 36 | 2 | 22%3 | (10–39) | 86% | 98% | |
| Kimbuga | 21 | 2 | 0% | (0–16) | 43% | 94% | |
| Kisumu strain | 100 | 4 | 100% | (96–100) | |||
