Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic status of participants with respect to place of assignment

From: Determining the active role of microscopists in community awareness-raising activities for malaria prevention: a cross-sectional study in Palawan, the Philippines

Socio-demographic status

Total (N = 127)

Northern region (n = 67)

Southern region (n = 60)

Chi-square test (p-value)

Age

(Mean = 39.4, SD = 7.4, p = 0.691a)

  Low (≤39.4)

62 (48.8%)

35 (52.2%)

27 (45%)

0.368

  High (>39.4)

64 (50.4%)

31 (46.3%)

33 (55%)

 

Gender

    

  Man

13 (10.2%)

7 (10.4%)

6 (10%)

0.934

  Woman

114 (89.8%)

60 (89.6%)

54 (90%)

 

Marital status

    

  Never married

12 (9.4%)

6 (9%)

6 (10%)

0.518

  Married

105 (82.7%)

56 (83.6%)

49 (81.7%)

 

  Divorced

2 (1.6%)

0 (0%)

2 (3.3%)

 

  Widowed

6 (93%)

3 (4.5%)

3 (5%)

 

Education

    

  No grade completed

3 (2.4%)

2 (3%)

1 (1.7%)

0.404

  Elementary

1 (0.8%)

0 (0%)

1 (1.7%)

 

  High school

61 (48%)

36 (53.7%)

25 (41.7%)

 

  College

58 (45.7%)

28 (41.8%)

30 (50%)

 

  Higher

4 (3.1)

1 (1.5%)

3 (5%)

 

Occupation

    

  Homemakers

93 (73.2%)

49 (73.1%)

44 (73.3%)

0.408

  Farmer: coconut

6 (4.7%)

1 (1.5%)

5 (8.3%)

 

  Farmer: rice

8 (6.3%)

5 (7.5%)

3 (5%)

 

  Fishery

15 (11.8%)

8 (11.9%)

7 (11.7%)

 

  Tourism-related

1 (0.8%)

1 (1.5%)

0 (0%)

 

  Midwife

2 (1.6%)

1 (1.5%)

1 (1.7%)

 

  Other

2 (1.6%)

2 (3%)

0 (0%)

 

Ethnicity

    

  Bicolana

7 (5.5%)

4 (6%)

3 (5%)

p < 0.001 ***

  Bisaya

28 (22%)

11(16.4%)

17 (28.3%)

 

  Ceuano

7 (5.5%)

5 (7.5%)

2 (3.3%)

 

  Cuyunon

33 (26%)

27 (40.3%)

6 (10%)

 

  Ilocano

5 (3.9%)

0 (0%)

5 (8.3%)

 

  Kagayan

3 (2.4%)

1 (1.5%)

2 (3.3%)

 

  Mindanao

2 (1.6%)

0 (0%)

2 (3.3%)

 

  Palawan

4 (3.1%)

0 (0%)

4 (6.7%)

 

  Tagalog

14 (11%)

6 (9%)

8 (13.3%)

 

  Tagbanwa

5 (3.9%)

0 (0%)

5 (8.3%)

 

  Mixed

4 (3.1%)

2 (3%)

2 (3.3%)

 

  Other

4 (3.1%)

1 (1.5%)

3 (5%)

 

Religion

    

  Catholic

86 (67.7%)

52 (77.6%)

34 (56.7%)

0.006**

  Christian except Catholic

35 (27.6%)

15 (22.4%)

20 (33.3%)

 

  Muslim

6 (4.7%)

0 (0%)

6 (10%)

 

Household wealth 1

(Median = 3, SD = 1.62, p = 0.000a***)

  Low (≤3)

59 (46.5%)

19 (31.7%)

40 (59.7%)

0.002**

  High (>3)

68 (53.5%)

41 (68.3%)

27 (40.3%)

 

Duration of work as microscopist (month)

(Median = 104, SD =38.7, p = 0.002b***)

  Low (≤104)

71 (55.9%)

25 (41.7%)

46 (58.7%)

0.002**

  High (>104)

56 (44.1%)

35 (58.3%)

21 (31.3%)

 

Distance from home to nearest health center (min)

(Median = 15, SD = 26.3, p = 0.796c)

  Low (≤15)

73 (57.5%)

32 (53.4%)

41 (61.2%)

0.371

  High (>15)

54 (42.5%)

28 (46.7%)

26 (38.8%)

 

Reason for becoming microscopist

    

  Voluntary

119 (93.7%)

60 (89.6%)

59 (98.3%)

0.042

  Nominee

8 (6.3%)

7 (10.4%)

1 (1.7%)

 
  1. 1This scale scores from 1–8 points as follows, with 1 point each for the following: electricity, radio, television, refrigerator, bicycle, motorcycle, bike-car, and tin or cement wall.
  2. *Significant place of assignment difference (0.01 < p < 0.05), **Significant place of assignment difference (0.001 < p < 0.01), ***Significant place of assignment difference (p < 0.001).
  3. aIndependent t-test, bWelch test, and cMann–Whitney U test were conducted to clarify the place of assignment difference between the northern and the southern regions.