Skip to main content

Table 1 Data sources

From: Effects of pyrethroid resistance on the cost effectiveness of a mass distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets: a modelling study

Population

Start

Lat.

Lon.

AG (%)

Deltamethrin 0.05%

Permethrin 0.75%

Ref.

† (%)

n

† (%)

n

1

Pitoa

Jul-08

9.38

13.53

5

70.0

100

  

[8]

2

Kou

Sep-07

11.4

4.4

100

23.0

100

  

[8]

3

Akron

Oct-08

6.47

2.63

100

1.3d

 

23.0e

80

[9, 29]

4

Malanville

Jul-08

11.87

3.38

95

85.0

100

99

101

[8]

5

Zeneti

Jul-08

−5.22

38.65

100a

100.0

50

  

[10, 30]

6

New Bussa AG

Jul-10

9.88

4.52

100b

79.5

132

75.7

140

[12]

7

New Bussa AA

Jul-10

9.88

4.52

0b

100.0

118

100.0

102

[12]

8

Yaokoffikro

Apr-09

7.18

−5.02

100c

10.6

90

43.9

90

[11, 31]

9

Vand Duc A

Sep-08

9.18

105.3

AE

75

100

  

[13]

  1. Legend:
  2. Lat.: latitude; Lon.: longitude; AG: Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, the complement is Anopheles arabiensis; AA: Anopheles arabiensis; Ref.: Reference; †: mortality; n: (approximate) number of mosquitoes tested for one hour in WHO susceptibility (tube) tests with insecticide on filter papers [14]; AE: Anopheles epiroticus; aBased on Kitau and colleagues [30]; bDuring the study, the An. gambiae s.l. population was composed of 62% An. gambiae s.s. and 38% An. arabiensis; cPresumably, based on Chandre and colleagues [31]; dBased on linear extrapolation of the relationship of logit transformed mortality with deltamethrin and permethrin, using data from ‘New Bussa AG’ and ‘Yakoffikro’; eFor the WHO susceptibility test, mosquitoes were collected December 2006–January 2007.