Table 6 Logistic regressions of ownership at least one ITN for every two de facto persons in household for heterogeneous countries
Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country/Factors | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | Countries/Factors | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) |
Burundi DHS 2010 | Senegal DHS 2011 | ||||
Intermediate/high endemicity | 1.74* (1.15,2.64) | 1.73* (1.11,2.71) | Intermediate/high endemicity | 2.67* (2.14,3.33) | 3.09* (2.40,3.97) |
Target population in household | 1.07 (0.93,1.23) | Target population in household | 0.9 (0.75,1.07) | ||
Rural household | 1.1 (0.76,1.60) | Rural household | 0.79 (0.60,1.05) | ||
Second wealth quintile | 1.50* (1.20,1.88) | Second wealth quintile | 1.1 (0.88,1.38) | ||
Middle wealth quintile | 1.81* (1.45,2.26) | Middle wealth quintile | 1.28 (0.95,1.72) | ||
Fourth wealth quintile | 1.89* (1.49,2.39) | Fourth wealth quintile | 0.9 (0.65,1.25) | ||
Highest wealth quintile | 2.36* (1.75,3.18) | Highest wealth quintile | 0.69 (0.46,1.03) | ||
Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.69* (0.67,0.71) | Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.79* (0.77,0.81) | ||
Kenya DHS 2008-09 | Tanzania AIS 2011-12 | ||||
Intermediate/high endemicity | 1.35* (1.05,1.74) | 2.03* (1.56,2.64) | Intermediate/high endemicity | 1.12 (0.96,1.30) | 1.39* (1.20,1.63) |
Target population in household | 0.88 (0.71,1.08) | Target population in household | 0.62* (0.54,0.71) | ||
Rural household | 1.12 (0.78,1.60) | Rural household | 0.81 (0.64,1.02) | ||
Second wealth quintile | 1.71* (1.33,2.19) | Second wealth quintile | 1.17 (0.97,1.40) | ||
Middle wealth quintile | 2.55* (1.90,3.42) | Middle wealth quintile | 1.72* (1.45,2.05) | ||
Fourth wealth quintile | 2.85* (2.06,3.96) | Fourth wealth quintile | 2.06* (1.70,2.50) | ||
Highest wealth quintile | 3.49* (2.29,5.31) | Highest wealth quintile | 1.79* (1.39,2.30) | ||
Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.79* (0.76,0.82) | Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.74* (0.72,0.76) | ||
Namibia DHS 2006-07 | Zambia DHS 2007 | ||||
Intermediate/high endemicity | 2.61* (1.92,3.55) | 2.92* (1.95,4.38) | Intermediate/high endemicity | 1.13 (0.85,1.51) | 1.77* (1.22,2.55) |
Target population in household | 1.12 (0.78,1.61) | Target population in household | 0.9 (0.75,1.08) | ||
Rural household | 0.61* (0.43,0.86) | Rural household | 0.57* (0.40,0.80) | ||
Second wealth quintile | 1.31 (0.93,1.83) | Second wealth quintile | 1.3 (0.94,1.81) | ||
Middle wealth quintile | 1.46* (1.05,2.02) | Middle wealth quintile | 1.52* (1.09,2.13) | ||
Fourth wealth quintile | 1.88* (1.25,2.84) | Fourth wealth quintile | 2.39* (1.62,3.52) | ||
Highest wealth quintile | 1.2 (0.73,1.98) | Highest wealth quintile | 5.47* (3.40,8.81) | ||
Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.73* (0.69,0.76) | Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.64* (0.61,0.67) | ||
Rwanda DHS 2010 | Zimbabwe DHS 2010-11 | ||||
Intermediate/high endemicity | 1.52* (1.33,1.73) | 1.68* (1.44,1.95) | Intermediate/high endemicity | 4.54* (3.42,6.02) | 6.79* (5.09,9.06) |
Target population in household | 1.29* (1.15,1.43) | Target population in household | 0.96 (0.72,1.27) | ||
Rural household | 1.07 (0.86,1.34) | Rural household | 1.04 (0.75,1.44) | ||
Second wealth quintile | 1.40* (1.23,1.59) | Second wealth quintile | 0.91 (0.70,1.19) | ||
Middle wealth quintile | 1.95* (1.69,2.25) | Middle wealth quintile | 0.98 (0.74,1.30) | ||
Fourth wealth quintile | 2.25* (1.94,2.61) | Fourth wealth quintile | 1.1 (0.79,1.54) | ||
Highest wealth quintile | 3.99* (3.29,4.83) | Highest wealth quintile | 1.78* (1.20,2.63) | ||
Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.64* (0.63,0.66) | Total number of individuals in household (de facto) | 0.70* (0.66,0.73) | ||