Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequency distributions for variables included in the analysis

From: Comparing two approaches for estimating the causal effect of behaviour-change communication messages promoting insecticide-treated bed nets: an analysis of the 2010 Zambia malaria indicator survey

Variable

Freq (%) (n = 3,263)

Slept under an ITN the previous night

 

    No

731 (22.4)

    Yes

2,532 (77.6)

Exposed to BCC messages through mass media and/or community-based channels

 

    No

2,498 (76.6)

    Yes

765 (23.4)

Age (in years)

 

    15-24

934 (28.6)

    25-34

1,230 (37.7)

    35-49

1,099 (33.7)

Education

 

    None

817 (25.0)

    Primary

1,568 (48.0)

    Secondary or higher

878 (26.9)

Province of residence

 

    Central, Copperbelt

433 (13.3)

    Eastern, Northern, Luapula

1,342 (41.1)

    Lusaka

354 (10.9)

    Western, Southern, North-Western

1,134 (34.8)

Has a child under the age of 6 years

 

    No

1,166 (35.7)

    Yes

2,097 (64.3)

Wealth quintile

 

    Poorer three quintiles

1,597 (48.9)

    Wealthier two quintiles

1,666 (51.1)

Live in a district that received IRS

 

    No

376 (11.5)

    Yes

2,887 (88.5)

Live in an urban area

 

    No

2,630 (80.6)

    Yes

633 (19.4)

Number of nets in household

 

    1

413 (12.7)

    2

1,168 (35.8)

    3+

1,682 (51.55)

Talked to a health worker about malaria

 

    No

1,208 (37.2)

    Yes

2,055 (63.0)