Study | Repellent | Control | Risk ratio (95% confidence intervals) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Cases | Population at risk | Cases | Population at risk | |
Chen-Hussey et al.[34] | 35 | 3,947 | 33 | 3,961 | 1.06 (0. 66-1.71) |
Dadzie et al.[31] | 54 | 205 | 47 | 204 | 1.14 (0.81-1.61) |
Deressa et al.1[29] | 23 | 2,399 | 19 | 2,273 | 1.15 (0.63 - 2.10) |
Dutta et al.[32] | - | - | - | Â | Yr 1: 1.16 (0.85-1.58) |
 | Yr 2: 1.20 (0.83-1.72) | ||||
Hill et al.[33] | 1 | 2,041 | 6 | 1,967 | 0.16 (0.02-1.33) |
Kroeger et al.2[37] | 8.5% | Â | 6.7% | Â | 1.273 |
McGready et al.4[36] | 40 | 379 | 30 | 202 | 0.71 (0.46-1.11) |
Sangoro et al.5[30] | 115 | 2,224 | 137 | 2,202 | 0.83 (0.65-1.06) |
Rowland et al.[35] | 23 | 618 | 47 | 530 | 0.42 (0.26-0.68) |