Skip to main content

Table 4 Impact of probabilistic sensitivity analyses on gross and net cost-effectiveness ratios for the three malaria incidence scenarios

From: Cost-effectiveness of larviciding for urban malaria control in Tanzania

Scenarios

Gross CER* [95% UI†]

CER* Provider perspective [95% UI†]

CER* Societal perspective [95% UI†]

Scenario #1 - Incidence rate of 902 per 1,000

 

 Infection averted

[$3-12]

[$2-11]

[$1-10]

 Death prevented

[$2,593-11,110]

[$1,879-10,399]

[$793-9,346]

 DALY averted

[$50-215]

[$36-201]

[$15-181]

Scenario #2 - Incidence rate of 227 per 1,000

 

 Infection averted

[$11-47]

[$10-11]

[$9-46]

 Death prevented

[$10,321-44,217]

[$9,612-43,503]

[$8,543-42,438]

 DALY averted

[$200-856]

[$186-842]

[$165-822]

Scenario #3 - Incidence rate of 122 per 1,000

 

 Infection averted

[$21-88]

[$20-87]

[$19-86]

 Death prevented

[$19,195-82,232]

[$18,491-81,503]

[$17,419-80,444]

 DALY averted

[$372-1,592]

[$358-1,578]

[$337-1,558]

  1. Note: All prices are in 2012 US dollars.
  2. *CER: Cost-Effectiveness Ratio.
  3. †95% UI: 95% Uncertainty Interval.