Skip to main content

Table 1 Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals for model parameters.

From: Comparative performance of the Mbita trap, CDC light trap and the human landing catch in the sampling of Anopheles arabiensis, An. funestus and culicine species in a rice irrigation in western Kenya

  

An. arabiensis

An. funestus

Culicines

Model A

α t : BNT versus HLC

0.17 (0.14, 0.21)

0.73 (0.62, 0.85)

0.20 (0.13, 0.29)

 

α t : CDC versus HLC

0.56 (0.49, 0.66)

1.19 (1.03, 1.37)

4.84 (3.81, 6.21)

 

β c : Person 2 vs person 1

0.38 (0.32, 0.45)

0.89 (0.77, 1.02)

0.54 (0.41, 0.72)

 

β c : Person 3 vs person 1

0.54 (0.47, 0.62)

0.77 (0.66, 0.90)

0.59 (0.42, 0.80)

Model B

α t : BNT versus HLC

0.80 (0.52, 1.12)

0.39 (0.30, 0.50)

0.71 (0.00, 2.02)

 

α t : CDC versus HLC

1.04 (0.79, 1.42)

0.84 (0.66, 1.06)

5.52 (3.08, 7.46)

Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us