Skip to main content

Table 1 Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals for model parameters.

From: Comparative performance of the Mbita trap, CDC light trap and the human landing catch in the sampling of Anopheles arabiensis, An. funestus and culicine species in a rice irrigation in western Kenya

   An. arabiensis An. funestus Culicines
Model A α t : BNT versus HLC 0.17 (0.14, 0.21) 0.73 (0.62, 0.85) 0.20 (0.13, 0.29)
  α t : CDC versus HLC 0.56 (0.49, 0.66) 1.19 (1.03, 1.37) 4.84 (3.81, 6.21)
  β c : Person 2 vs person 1 0.38 (0.32, 0.45) 0.89 (0.77, 1.02) 0.54 (0.41, 0.72)
  β c : Person 3 vs person 1 0.54 (0.47, 0.62) 0.77 (0.66, 0.90) 0.59 (0.42, 0.80)
Model B α t : BNT versus HLC 0.80 (0.52, 1.12) 0.39 (0.30, 0.50) 0.71 (0.00, 2.02)
  α t : CDC versus HLC 1.04 (0.79, 1.42) 0.84 (0.66, 1.06) 5.52 (3.08, 7.46)