Table 4 Reduced logistic regression models on determinants of preferences and treatment-seeking from CHW
| Â | Preferences for CHW before intervention Coeff. (SE) | Preferences for CHW after intervention Coeff. (SE) | Treatment-seeking for CHW before intervention Coeff. (SE) | Treatment-seeking for CHW after intervention Coeff. (SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Location | .19 (.12)*** | 1.48 (.19)*** | -1.59 (.34)*** | 3.97 (1.35)*** |
Status in household | - - - - - - | - - - - - - | - - - - - - - | 1.05 (.90) |
No of household residents | .10 (.02)*** | - - - - - - | -.09 (.07) | 0.31 (.15)** |
Gender | .29 (.13)** | -.45 (.19)** | - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - |
Age | .005 (.004) | .007 (.006) | -.02 (.01)** | -.06 (.03)* |
Had formal education | -.22 (.12) | .56 (.33)* | .60 (.33)* | 1.55 (.87)* |
Marital status | - - - - - - - | - - - - - - | -.76 (.41) | - - - - - - - |
Had malaria | .33 (.16)*** | - - - - - - | - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - |
Weekly per capita food value | .001 (.0001)*** | - - - - - - | -.002 (.001)*** | .001 (.0008) |
Owns a radio | - - - - - - | .36 (.21)* | -.59 (.35)* | - - - - - - - - |
Owns a bicycle | - - - - - - | - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - | -1.7 (0.75)** |
Owns a Motorcycle | - - - - - - | - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - |
Owns a motorcar | -.25 (.25) | - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - | 1.90 (1.38) |
Constant | -1.15 (.32)*** | -1.39 (.51)*** | 2.02 (.80)** | -5.01 (2.03)** |
LR Chi-square | 54.0*** | 73.7*** | 73.2*** | 56.6*** |
Pseudo R2 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.45 |
Correct predictions | 58.6% | 67.2% | 84.2% | 90.6% |