Skip to main content

Table 2 Adjusteda estimates for mean scores on outcome variables for comparison and intervention districts

From: The impact of a hybrid social marketing intervention on inequities in access, ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets

 

(1) Comparison

(2) Intervention

(3) Test statisticc

(4) p

Knowledge of malaria

    

   Mosquito bites cause malaria

58.7%

76.1%

86.15

0.000

Knowledge of nets and treatment

    

   Familiar with mosquito nets

92.0%

95.9%

27.35

0.000

   Ever heard of insecticide treatment

14.4%

51.9%

409.08

0.000

   ITN kills or repels mosquitoes

10.7%

39.4%

302.32

0.000

   Know that ITN needs re-treatment

2.3%

19.3%

245.06

0.000

   No disadvantages to ITN use

7.5%

24.2

150.35

0.000

   Ever heard of PowerNET

10.8%

69.4%

897.58

0.000

   Ever heard of POWERCHEM

1.9%

20.7%

319.71

0.000

Access to mosquito nets

    

   Access to mosquito nets (in minutes)

222.0

131.4

136.20d

0.000

   Access to nets in 15 minutes or less

8.8%

28.1%

171.14

0.000

Beliefs about malaria protection

    

   One can protect oneself from malaria

57.8%

75.7%

94.57

0.000

   One can protect by using a net

18.1%

37.2%

116.24

0.000

   One can protect by using an ITN

1.0%

8.0%

108.59

0.000

Behaviour

    

   Number of mosquito nets in household

0.26

0.41

36.07d

0.000

   Number of ITNs owned by household

0.06

0.25

117.14d

0.000

   Ever had ITN in household

1.3%

14.0%

225.44

0.000

   Ever bought PowerNET

1.4%

14.6%

248.55

0.000

   Ever bought POWERCHEM

0.4%

5.1%

100.51

0.000

   Usually sleeps under a net

5.4%

13.3%

62.52

0.000

  1. aMeans and proportions adjusted for age of respondents, assets, sex, urban/rural residence, education, marital status and number of children. bNot adjusted for marital status. cχ2-test with1 df, unless specified otherwise. dF-test with 1 & 2974 df.