model 2: p.insem ~B_{0} + B_{1}(z.sperm) + B_{2}(z.wing)
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|

param | estimate | s.e. | Mean fitness (p.insem) | % Δ |

B_{0}
| 0.95 | 0.297 |
exp(B_{0})/(1+exp(B_{0})) = 0.72
| |

B_{1}
| -0.84 | 0.330 |
exp(B_{0} + B_{1})/(1+exp(B_{0} + B_{1})) = 0.53
| -27.0 |

B_{2}
| 0.38 | 0.328 |
exp(B_{0} + B_{2})/(1+exp(B_{0} + B_{2})) = 0.79
| 9.6 |

model 7: p.motile ~B_{0} + B_{1}(z.sperm) + B_{2}(z.wing)
| ||||

param | estimate | s.e. | Mean fitness (p.motile) | % Δ |

B_{0}
| -0.41 | 0.265 |
exp(B_{0})/(1+exp(B_{0})) = 0.40
| |

B_{1}
| -0.69 | 0.325 |
exp(B_{0} + B_{1})/(1+exp(B_{0} + B_{1})) = 0.25
| -37.3 |

B_{2}
| 0.39 | 0.337 |
exp(B_{0} + B_{2})/(1+exp(B_{0} + B_{2})) = 0.49
| 24.0 |

model 12: p.ovip ~B_{0} + B_{1}(z.sperm) + B_{2}(z.wing)
| ||||

param | estimate | s.e. | Mean fitness (p.ovip) | % Δ |

B_{0}
| -0.34 | 0.265 |
exp(B_{0})/(1+exp(B_{0})) = 0.42
| |

B_{1}
| -0.73 | 0.329 |
exp(B_{0} + B_{1})/(1+exp(B_{0} + B_{1})) = 0.25
| -38.8 |

B_{2}
| 0.52 | 0.343 |
exp(B_{0} + B_{2})/(1+exp(B_{0} + B_{2})) = 0.54
| 30.9 |