Skip to main content

Table 1 The results of the TreeFitter analysis under various cost settings and under two different evolutionary hypotheses of primate malaria parasites

From: Patterns of co-speciation and host switching in primate malaria parasites

Using parasite phylogeny from Figure 1

Event cost settingsa

Cost

Co-divergence

Duplication

Sorting

Switching

0

0

1

2

13cc

2–3

8–9

1–3

5–6c

0

1

1

1

13c

4–4

1–2

0-0

10–12

-1

0

0

0

-8

8-8

1–9

21–93c

0–8

0

1

7c

0-0

10-10b

0-0

7-7c

0

0

0.5

2

11.5cc

3-3

9-9

3-3

5-5

0

0

1

1

7c

0–3

8–10b

0–1

6–7c

0

0

2

0.5

3.5c

0–2

8–10b

0-0

7-7c

0

0

2

1

7c

0–2

8–10b

0-0

7-7c

100

0

1

2

14c

0-0

10-10b

0-0

7-7c

0

100

1

2

124

4-4

1-1

0-0

12-12

0

0

100

2

14c

0–2

8–10b

0-0

7-7c

0

0

1

100

51

5-5

12-12

51-51

0-0

Using parasite phylogeny from Additional File 1

Event cost settingsa

Cost

Co-divergence

Duplication

Sorting

Switching

0

0

1

2

11ccc

4-4b

8-8

1-1

5-5cc

0

1

1

1

12cc

5-5

1–2

0-0

10–11

-1

0

0

0

-8

8-8c

1–9

20–93c

0–8

0

1

7c

0-0

10-10b

0-0

7-7c

0

0

0.5

2

10.5ccc

4-4

8-8

1-1

5-5

0

0

1

1

6cc

2–4b

8–9

0–1

5–6cc

0

0

2

0.5

3cc

2–3b

8–9

0-0

6-6cc

0

0

2

1

6cc

2–3b

8–9

0-0

6-6cc

100

0

1

2

14c

0-0

10-10b

0-0

7-7c

0

100

1

2

122

5-5

1-1

0-0

11-11

0

0

100

2

12cc

2–3b

8–9

0-0

6-6cc

0

0

1

100

51c

5-5

12-12

51-51c

0-0

  1. The tests were performed between the consensus tree of primate malaria parasites given in Figure 1 and Additional File 1, and the phylogeny of primate host genus in Figure 2. For each model, overall costs and the reconstructed number of events (expressed as ranges that result in equal total costs) are given.
  2. aEvent costs are co-divergence (co-speciation), duplication (within-host speciation), sorting (extinction) and switching (host change via lateral transfer), respectively.
  3. bOverall cost/the number of events significantly exceeds that for randomized trees (bP < 0.05, bbP < 0.01, bbbP < 0.001).
  4. cOverall cost/the number of events is significantly less than that for randomized trees (cP < 0.05, ccP < 0.01, cccP < 0.001).