Table 3 Density-dependence of relative sampling efficiency of alternative traps for An. gambiae s.l. by generalized estimating equations (GEE)
From: A new tent trap for sampling exophagic and endophagic members of the Anopheles gambiae complex
Alternative collection method | Parameter | Estimate [95%CI] | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Versus CDC-light trap reference method | ||||
Furvela | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 1 | Intercept | 1.07 [0.70, 1.44] | < 0.001 |
Ifakara A | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 1 | Intercept | 2.12 [1.42, 2.82] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Log10(CDC-LT) | -0.90 [-1.22, -0.57] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Experiment 2 | Intercept | 1.05 [0.59, 1.51] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Log10(CDC-LT) | -0.39 [-0.57, -0.21] | < 0.001 |
Ifakara B | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 1 | Intercept | 3.31 [1.17, 5.45] | 0.002 |
| Â | Â | Log10(CDC-LT) | -1.27 [-2.35, -0.19] | 0.021 |
| Â | Experiment 2 | Intercept | 2.10 [1.22, 2.99] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Log10(CDC-LT) | -0.74 [-1.09, -0.39] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Experiment 3 | NA | NA | NA |
Light trap | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 2 | NA | NA | NA |
Versus human landing catch reference method | ||||
Furvela | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 1 | NA | NA | NA |
Ifakara A | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 1 | NA | NA | NA |
| Â | Â | NA | NA | NA |
| Â | Experiment 2 | Intercept | 1.69 [0.86, 2.52] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Log10(HLC) | -0.71 [-1.09, 0.33] | < 0.001 |
Ifakara B | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 1 | NA | NA | NA |
| Â | Â | NA | NA | NA |
| Â | Experiment 2 | intercept | 0.64 [0.46, 0.81] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Experiment 3 | Intercept | 1.06 [0.78, 1.33] | < 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Log10(HLC) | -0.75 [-0.99, 0.50] | < 0.001 |
Light trap | Â | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Experiment 2 | Intercept | 4.65 [1.58, 7.71] | 0.003 |
| Â | Â | Log10(HLC) | -1.71 [-3.243, -0.178] | 0.029 |