Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of seropositivity data obtained from either rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) or filter paper (FP) blood-spots

From: Immunophoretic rapid diagnostic tests as a source of immunoglobulins for estimating malaria sero-prevalence and transmission intensity

Site

Age Group

AMA-1

  

Concordant

Discordant

 
  

FP- RDT-

FP+ RDT+

FP- RDT+

FP+ RDT-

Agreement

overall

 

1567

1617

253

269

85.9%

Korogwe

>1

130

39

21

10

84.5%

 

1

104

6

9

4

89.4%

 

2–4

121

46

22

11

83.5%

 

5–9

55

64

19

6

82.6%

 

10–14

24

70

5

8

87.9%

 

15–19

16

69

11

4

85.0%

 

20–24

19

110

6

13

87.2%

 

25–34

26

288

16

20

89.7%

 

35–49

26

224

12

22

88.0%

 

50+

17

169

9

14

89.0%

Same

>1

134

20

10

7

90.1%

 

1

80

0

5

0

94.1%

 

2–4

173

2

2

4

96.7%

 

5–9

121

3

6

4

92.5%

 

10–14

83

15

9

7

86.0%

 

15–19

82

53

9

7

89.4%

 

20–24

69

61

20

14

79.3%

 

25–34

114

116

19

38

80.1%

 

35–49

84

137

23

44

76.7%

 

50+

89

125

20

32

80.5%

  1. Individuals were defined as sero-positive or sero-negative for AMA-1 based on analysis of RDTs (this study) or contemporaneous FP blood-spots (as reported previously;[11]. Percentage agreement was calculated as the number of concordant individuals (FP-RDT- or FP+ RDT+) divided by the total number of individuals. Incomplete data-sets (i.e. only RDT or FP data available) were excluded from the analysis.