|
Variable
|
% (n/N)
|
OR [95%CI]
|
P
|
|---|
|
Habitat category
|
NA
|
NA
|
0.053
|
|
Natural
|
66.4 (146/220)
|
1.00a
|
NA
|
|
Artificial non-agricultural
|
66.1(1766/266)
|
0.60 [0.406,0.909]
|
0.015
|
|
Artificial agricultural
|
57.9 (44/76)
|
1.38 [0.607,3.143]
|
0.441
|
|
CORPs familiarity with plot
|
NA
|
NA
|
< 0.001
|
|
No evidence of unfamiliarity
|
75.8(1788/235)
|
1.00a
|
NA
|
|
Clear evidence of unfamiliarity
|
27.6 (168/608)
|
0.16 [0.130,0.203]
|
< 0.001
|
|
Intervention status
|
NA
|
NA
|
0.978
|
|
Non-larviciding
|
72.4 (775/1070)
|
1.00a
|
NA
|
|
Larviciding
|
62.3(1181/189)
|
0.99 [0.645,1.548]
|
0.997
|
- The probability that a wet habitat was detected by the CORPs was modelled with a binary distribution and logit link function using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE) treating intervention status, CORPs' unfamiliarity with the plots and habitat category as the potential predictors
- a the reference group for the particular variable,
- CI; confidence interval,
- CORPs; community-owned resource persons
- N; the number of wet habitats found during cross-sectional surveys
- n; the number of wet habitats found by the CORPs during their routine habitat survey,
- NA; Not applicable
- OR; Odds ratios,
