Relevance
|
Rationales for priority setting decisions must rest on reasons (evidence and principles) that 'fair-minded' people can agree are relevant in the context
|
Publicity
|
Priority setting decisions and their rationales must be publicly accessible - justice cannot abide secrets where people's well being is concerned
|
Revisions/appeals
|
There must be a mechanism for challenge, including the opportunity for revising decisions in light of considerations that stakeholders may raise
|
Enforcement
|
There is either voluntary or public regulation of the process to ensure that the first three conditions are met.
|