Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of average AUCs of daily survival rate, human biting rate and daily abundance in different scenarios

From: A spatial individual-based model predicting a great impact of copious sugar sources and resting sites on survival of Anopheles gambiae and malaria parasite transmission

Scenarios

Male daily survival rate

Female daily survival rate

Human biting rate

Male abundance

Female abundance

Sugar resource density

0

0.0

0.0

0.0

19.6

19.6

5

38.2

42.7

11.9

8708.5

32869.0

25

39.6

44.1

24.4

16355.9

52462.2

50

39.8

44.2

35.0

19148.1

59313.7

75

39.9

44.4

41.1

21326.1

64317.8

100

40.0

44.4

44.3

22379.7

66938.4

SE

0.3

0.3

7.9

2188.5

5489.0

F

3023.89

3281.72

4.83

15.73

21.77

P

<.0001

<.0001

0.0003

<.0001

<.0001

Resting site density

0

31.0

38.2

1.7

2781.8

11814.8

5

38.6

43.0

9.9

9159.1

32628.5

10

39.1

43.3

13.5

11007.2

38490.1

20

39.2

43.6

19.2

13255.8

44537.5

30

39.5

43.9

21.8

14807.7

48612.5

40

39.6

44.0

24.2

15424.6

50068.3

50

39.6

44.1

24.4

16355.9

52462.2

SE

0.6

0.6

3.5

1364.5

3522.6

F

25.84

14.50

5.90

11.99

16.15

P

<0.0001

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

<.0001

Closeness between sugar resources and resting sites

random

39.2096

43.70895

20.83467

13794.52

46042.25

adjacent

39.39681

43.41708

22.36233

12642.16

34496.53

SE

0.327913

0.324676

5.160015

1702.99

3545.201

F

0.16

0.4

0.04

0.23

5.3

P

0.6873

0.5265

0.8346

0.6334

0.0234

Closeness between sugar sources and houses

random

39.6

44.1

24.4

16355.9

52462.2

adjacent

38.6

43.1

12.6

9465.6

34727.9

SE

0.4

0.4

3.7

1435.6

3684.0

F

3.59

2.71

5.07

11.52

11.59

P

0.0611

0.1027

0.0266

0.0010

0.0010