Skip to main content

Table 1 Effects of malaria diagnostic methods on appropriately treated patients in two regions of Afghanistan, 2009

From: Cost-effectiveness of malaria diagnosis using rapid diagnostic tests compared to microscopy or clinical symptoms alone in Afghanistan

 

Moderate transmission region

Low transmission region

   

Area with microscopes

Area without microscopes

Effects

Microscopy arm

RDT arm

Microscopy arm

RDT arm

Clinical arm

RDT arm

Fever patients suspected of malaria (N)

1,983

2,028

515

523

321

325

Of which suffering from (%)#:

      

 vivax malaria

21.9

19.5

1.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

 falciparum malaria

3.8

3.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

 Mixed vivax-falciparum infections

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

 Non-malarial febrile illness

74.3

77.0

99.0

99.6

100.0

100.0

Effect:

      

 Patients appropriately treated (N)

1,512

1,696

393

420

40

212

 Patients appropriately treated (%)

76.2

83.6

76.3

80.3

12.5

65.2

  Adjusted& odds ratio

1

1.70**

1

1.73*

1

92.7**

  (95% CI)

(1.30; 2.23)

(1.08; 2.78)

 

(12.4; 694.1)

  1. # According to the malaria reference diagnosis.
  2. & Adjusted odds ratio using three level model, adjusted for fixed effect of patient’s age and clinic type (in moderate transmission region) and random effects of clinician (within clinics) and clinic (between clinics).
  3. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.
  4. Source: [3].