Skip to main content

Table 1 Exposure to messages on net care and repair; percent distribution of level of exposure to messages at endline

From: Impact of a behaviour change communication programme on net durability in eastern Uganda

 

Comparison

Intervention

P valueπ

N = 445

N = 425

Source of messagesa

 Radio

82.2

81.1

0.780

 Television

3.2

2.1

0.499

 Village health worker

38.2

51.3

0.043

 Health (facility) worker

23.1

36.8

0.051

 Community leader

7.4

34.2

<0.001

 Church or mosque

1.0

42.5

0.001

 Family or friend

7.6

19.8

0.004

 Poster or banner

0.0

14.2

0.022

 Students

0.0

14.3

0.007

 Teacher

0.5

2.9

0.065

 Community event

5.5

20.6

0.001

Messages most remembereda

 Handle net carefully

57.9

62.1

0.538

 Keep net away from fire/flame

8.7

18.6

0.010

 Repair holes early

36.6

75.3

<0.001

 Frequency of washing

24.3

12.9

0.011

 Avoid bleach for washing

29.2

55.5

<0.001

 Dry net in shade

36.0

55.9

0.003

 Take care net prevent malaria

26.5

35.9

0.093

 Inspect net for holes

4.3

17.3

<0.001

 Keep net away from rats

14.8

15.7

0.833

 Take care net to make last longer

15.7

17.5

0.653

 Roll up/tie up when not in use

11.8

39.5

<0.001

 Silent nights, Happy days: care, repair, protect

1.1

25.1

<0.001

 LLIN national campaign (“Protect yourself from malaria, use a net every day”)

16.2

18.9

0.567

 Other

19.3

9.3

0.031

  1. πP values are shown for endline comparisons between district
  2. aOnly among those who heard messages on net care and repair