Skip to main content

Table 2 Review authors ‘judgment on the risk of bias of included trials

From: A systematic review of the efficacy of a single dose artemisinin–naphthoquine in treating uncomplicated malaria

Description of domains

Author, publication year [reference no.]

Hombhanje et al., 2009 [19]

Rujumba et al., 2010 [20]

Kinde-Gazard et al., 2012 [21]

Tjitra et al., 2012 [22]

Udoh et al., 2014 [23]

Random sequence generation

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Allocation concealment

Open label

Unclear

Yes

Open label

Open label

Blinding of outcome assessment

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Incomplete outcome data adequately addressed

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Free of suggestion of selective outcome reportinga

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Addressed other sources of potential bias

Yes

Yes

Yesb

Yes

Yes

Sample size calculation

Yesc

No

No

Yes

Yes

  1. ‘Yes’ indicates ‘low risk of bias; ‘No’ indicates ‘high risk of bias’; ‘Unclear’ indicates ‘uncertain risk of bias’
  2. aIncluded all expected outcomes
  3. bMean parasite counts at baseline are significantly different between the two arms
  4. cDescribed as sufficient sample