Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcome of the campaigns with respect to ITN ownership coverage, by delivery and allocation strategy (N = 13,901)

From: Multi-country comparison of delivery strategies for mass campaigns to achieve universal coverage with insecticide-treated nets: what works best?

Location and allocation strategy

% of HH with any net before campaign (95 % CI)

% of HH with any ITN on survey day (95 % CI)

% of HH with one ITN per two people (95 % CI)

% of population with access to an ITN within HH (95 % CI)

Fixed-point delivery, fixed allocation (two ITNs per household)

 Kano State, Nigeria

13.2 (6.0–26.6)

69.3 (58.1–78.6)

30.1 (23.4–37.9)

43.9 (35.8–52.3)

 Niger State, Nigeria

0.7 (0.3–1.7)

51.7 (40.3–62.9)

16.6 (12.4–21.8)

34.2 (25.9–43.7)

 Nasarawa State, Nigeria

13.8 (9.8–19.2)

62.5 (55.1–69.5)

24.8 (20.3–29.9)

41.5 (35.8–47.5)

 Ogun State, Nigeria

4.6 (2.7–7.6)

52.6 (42.0–62.9)

22.6 (15.9–30.7)

37.0 (28.2–46.7)

 Anambra State, Nigeria

7.6 (5.2–10.8)

64.4 (56.9–71.3)

36.6 (31.0–42.6)

50.0 (43.2–56.8)

 Sokoto State, Nigeria

7.2 (4.6–11.3)

64.0 (55.5–71.7)

30.6 (24.7–37.3)

49.0 (42.2–55.8)

 Katsina State, Nigeria

3.5 (2.1–5.6)

73.8 (63.2–82.1)

36.5 (30.0–43.6)

56.2 (48.5–63.7)

 Enugu State, Nigeria

4.1 (2.8–6.1)

72.3 (63.2–75.3)

35.3 (31.9–38.9)

54.6 (51.4–57.7)

 Lagos State, Nigeria

5.9 (3.3–10.4)

46.3 (41.2–51.5)

17.8 (15.2–20.7)

32.2 (32.6–40.1)

Fixed-point delivery, fixed allocation (by household size, maximum three ITNs)

 South Sudan

1.7 (0.8–3.6)

87.7 (76.6–93.9)

44.1 (36.2–52.4)

No dataa

Fixed-point delivery, universal coverage allocation (one ITN per two persons or one ITN per sleeping space)

 Senegal

39.9 (35.0–45.1)

93.9 (90.3–96.2)

42.3 (37.0–47.8)

75.2 (69.7–80.1)

 Uganda

39.8 (33.0–46.9)

91.7 (83.9–95.9)

69.9 (63.2–76.0)

81.3 (74.1–86.9)

House-to-house delivery, universal coverage allocation (one ITN per two persons or one ITN per sleeping space)

 Ghana

12.0 (9.5–15.2)

91.2 (88.3–93.5)

51.2 (47.1–55.3)

74.5 (71.1–77.6)

 Cross River State, Nigeria

11.3 (8.0–15.9)

61.6 (57.2–65.8)

24.2 (20.4–28.4)

45.9 (41.8–50.1)

  1. CI confidence interval, HH household, ITN insecticide-treated net
  2. a No household roster data were collected