Multi-country comparison of delivery strategies for mass campaigns to achieve universal coverage with insecticide-treated nets: what works best?

Table 4 Predicting factors of a household with enough ITNs (one net per two people) on survey day among those that received at least one net from a universal coverage campaign

Factors of association^a	All (n = 3458)			Uganda (n = 491)
Factors of association^a	Adjusted OR	95 % CI	P value	Adjusted OR	95 % CI	P value
UC allocation by sleeping place (vs by people)	1.63	1.07–2.48	0.025	1.60	1.02–2.52	0.042
Wealth quintile
Lowest	1.00		<0.001	1.00		0.172
Second	1.09	0.78–1.53		1.21	0.59–2.46
Middle	1.39	1.01–1.91		1.40	0.72–2.71
Fourth	1.66	1.19–2.31		1.48	0.76–2.91
Highest	1.91	1.37–2.64		2.79	1.20–6.53
Household of four people or more (vs three or less)	0.25	0.18–0.35	<0.001	0.42	0.24–0.76	0.005
Household with any child under five (vs no child under five)	0.37	0.30–0.47	<0.001	0.20	0.10–0.38	<0.001

CI confidence interval, ITN insecticide-treated net, OR odds ratio, UC universal coverage
^aAll models included the survey to reflect the structure of the data (results not shown)