Skip to main content

Table 7 Measurements of induced exophily compared between East African, Ifakara and West African experimental huts for three treatment arms: Olyset, Permanet 2.0 long-lasting insecticidal bed nets plus untreated control

From: Comparative performance of three experimental hut designs for measuring malaria vector responses to insecticides in Tanzania

Exophily

OR

95 % CI

p

z

Exophily %

(95 % CI)a

Control

 East African

1

   

7.11 (2.26–11.99)

 Ifakara

0.92

0.02–46.05

0.91

−0.118

6.91 (0.8–13.73)

 West African

14.45

0.0008–2582.05

0.006

2.745

50.00 (31.29–68.71)

Permanet 2.0

 East African

1

   

2.50 (−1.35–6.34)

 Ifakara

3.03

0.009–934.13

0.30

1.033

7.12 (0.36–13.88)

 West African

9.45

0.001–7074.31

0.06

1.846

18.69 (8.43–28.95)

Olyset

 East African

1

   

2.95 (−1.41–7.31)

 Ifakara

0.85

0.01–6306.70

0.72

0.360

4.34 (−1.47–10.15)

 West African

10.39

0.004–548.50

0.05

1.976

25.00 (12.43–13.73)

  1. a95 % CI calculated using 40 df