The impact of behaviour change communication on the use of insecticide treated nets: a secondary analysis of ten post-campaign surveys from Nigeria

Table 2 Multi-variable logistic regression of exposure to information and message recall

Explanatory variable^a	Outcome 1: any exposure			Outcome 2: recall two or more messages
Explanatory variable^a	OR	95 % CI	p value	OR	95 % CI	p value
Net ownership
No net	1.00	–	–	1.00	–	–
Net but not from campaign	2.20	1.4, 3.5	0.001	2.12	1.2, 3.8	0.012
Campaign net	18.02	14.5, 22.4	<0.0001	9.62	7.6, 12.1	<0.0001
Time since campaign
0–3 months	1.00	–	–	1.00	–	–
3–6 months	2.54	1.2, 5.4	0.015	4.87	2.0, 11.7	<0.0001
6–9 months	3.82	1.4, 10.7	0.11	6.89	2.3, 20.4	0.001
9–16 months	4.73	1.8, 12.5	0.002	9.05	3.2, 26.0	<0.0001
Wealth quintiles
Poorest	1.00	–	–	1.00	–	–
Second	0.90	0.7, 1.2	0.42	0.87	0.7, 1.1	0.17
Third	0.83	0.6, 1.1	0.23	0.81	0.6, 1.0	0.10
Fourth	1.21	0.9, 1.6	0.20	1.12	0.9, 1.4	0.37
Wealthiest	1.13	0.8, 1.5	0.04	1.10	0.8, 1.4	0.47
Education of head
Non-literate	1.00	–	–	1.00	–	–
Primary	1.02	0.8, 1.3	0.88	1.00	0.8, 1.2	0.98
Secondary	1.23	0.9, 1.6	0.10	1.34	0.9, 1.4	0.27
Tertiary and higher	1.18	0.9, 1.6	0.27	1.11	0.8, 1.5	0.48
Age of head in years
19–29	1.00	–	–	1.00	–	–
30–59	1.15	0.8, 1.5	0.30	1.19	0.9, 1.6	0.23
60+	1.29	0.9, 1.8	0.12	1.29	0.9, 1.7	0.092
HH with 3 or less people and no children	0.69	0.6, 0.8	<0.0001	0.69	0.6, 0.8	<0.0001
HH head is female	1.20	0.9, 1.5	0.075	1.14	0.9, 1.4	0.18
HH has radio	1.37	1.0, 1.8	0.022	1.14	0.9, 1.4	0.18
Urban versus rural	0.98	0.7, 1.3	0.85	0.93	0.7, 1.1	0.44
North versus south	0.76	0.5, 1.2	0.20	1.34	0.9, 2.0	0.14

^aThe variables year and season of survey were included in models to adjust for timing

ISSN: 1475-2875