Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison of malaria RDTs against Giemsa microscopy for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum

From: Field evaluation of diagnostic performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in western Kenya

Malaria RDTs

Sensitivity %, 95 % CI

Specificity %, 95 % CI

Predictive value

Likelihood ratio

Methods agreement %

κ value

Positive test %, 95 % CI

Negative test %, 95 % CI

Positive test %, 95 % CI

Negative test %, 95 % CI

BinaxNOW 665-025

91.6

79.3

68.8

94.9

4.4

0.1

83.4

0.7

86.3–95.3

74.6–83.6

62.2–74.8

91.7–97.2

3.6–5.5

0.1–0.2

0.6–0.7

SD Bioline 05FK60

93.4

74.6

64.6

95.8

3.7

0.1

80.8

0.6

88.5–96.6

69.5–79.1

58.2–70.6

92.6–97.9

3.0–4.4

0.1–0.2

0.5–0.6

SD Bioline 05FK50

94.8

73.3

62.2

96.8

3.5

0.1

80.1

0.6

89.9–97.7

68.1–77.9

55.7–68.5

93.8–98.6

2.9–4.3

0.0–0.1

0.5–0.6

First Response I16FRC

90.3

79.0

68.2

94.3

4.3

0.1

82.8

0.6

84.8–94.4

74.3–83.3

61.6–74.3

90.9–96.7

3.5–5.3

0.1–0.2

0.5–0.6

First Response I13FRC

92.8

76.9

66.7

95.5

4.0

0.1

82.2

0.6

87.7–96.2

72.1–81.4

60.2–72.2

92.3–97.7

3.3–4.9

0.1–0.2

0.5–0.6

CareStart G0131

93.4

76.9

66.81

95.9

4.0

0.1

82.4

0.6

88.5–96.6

72.1–81.4

60.4–72.8

92.8–97.9

3.3–4.9

0.1–0.2

0.5–0.6

CareStart G0181

92.2

76.9

66.5

95.2

4

0.1

82.0

0.6

86.9–95.8

72.1–81.4

60.0–72.6

91.9–97.4

3.3–4.9

0.1–0.2

0.5–0.6

CareStart G0141

93.4

75.8

65.7

95.8

3.9

0.1

81.6

0.6

88.5–96.6

70.8–80.3

59.2–71.7

92.7–97.9

3.2–4.7

0.1–0.2

0.5–0.6

  1. CI confidence interval, RDTs Rapid diagnostic test