Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of numbers of female Anopheles gambiae complex and Culex sp. caught between indoors and outdoors by alternative mosquito electrocuting grid (MET) relative to reference human landing catch (HLC), pooling data from each sites and analysed by generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM)

From: An improved mosquito electrocuting trap that safely reproduces epidemiologically relevant metrics of mosquito human-feeding behaviours as determined by human landing catch

Collection methods

Trap nights

Total catch

Mean catch

RR [95 % CI]

P

Anopheles gambiae s.l.

 Indoors

  HLC

308

226

0.73

1a

NA

  MET

308

348

1.13

1.47 [1.23–1.76]

<0.0001

 Outdoors

  HLC

308

237

0.77

1a

 

  MET

308

373

1.12

1.38 [1.14–1.67]

<0.0001

 Indoors and outdoors combined

  HLC

616

463

0.75

1a

 

  MET

616

721

1.17

1.42 [1.24–3.48]

<0.0001

Culex spp.

 Indoors

  HLC

308

13,613

44.19

1a

 

  MET

308

12,576

40.83

0.93 [0.90–0.95]

<0.0001

 Outdoors

  HLC

308

17,273

56.08

1a

NA

  MET

308

16,352

53.09

0.95 [0.93–0.97]

<0.0001

 Indoors and outdoors combined

  HLC

616

30,886

50.14

1a

 

  MET

616

28,928

46.96

0.94 [0.92–0.95]

<0.0001

  1. NA not applicable, RR relative rate, CI confidence interval
  2. aReference group